Write a 2-page reflection paper addressing the following questions:
What you would do to improve sexual violence laws? No right or wrong here.
What would you change and what would need to be done to implement those changes?
More requirements on files
Thinking Traps Short Paper: In a 6-7 page APA paper, reflect on recent decisions made by either your state or the federal government during the pandemic that had significant impact on citizens.
Identify any thinking traps you observe were made in the process. **you do not have to utlize them all **
There are 7 thinking traps fro reference:
1.Anchoring.
2.The status quo trap
3. Sunk cost trap
4.Confirming evidence trap
5.Framing trap
6.The estimating and forecasting traps
7.The recallability trap
Justify your opinions and observations with your textbook readings and research in peer-reviewed academic journal articles (minimum 5 references).
***For a paper this short do not include an abstract****
Page count does not include required APA title page, reference page(s).
**Only use proquest database for scholorlaty journals from year 2015 on.**
class book: Hammond, J. S., Keeney, R. L., & Raiffa, H. (2015). Smart Choices: A Practical Guide to Making Better Decisions. Harvard Business School Press. isbn: 978 1 63369 104 9 (mainly in chapter 10)
For this assignment, you will attempt to debunk, dispute, or disprove a hoax, conspiracy theory, or incorrectly held common belief. There are many ways for you to interpret this concept. You can interpret this concept literally–as in literal conspiracies or hoaxes (9/11 truthers, Bigfoot, JFK assassination conspiracies, etc.), or you may interpret it metaphorically, academically, scientifically, socially, medically, etc., as in semi-widely held beliefs that are nonetheless wrong (examples: you can flush “toxins” out of your body using special cleanses or foot baths; the earth is only 6000 years old; you can cure diseases with essential oils; the symptoms of a heart attack are the same for men and women, etc.). You should consider how to categorize your questions and topic using critical thinking/question categories and strategies of argument discussed in your handouts, notes, and readings.
Assignment Process and For this assignment, you will focus on strategies for counterargument, counterclaims, and contradiction. You will also integrate visual media into your essay in the form of photos, charts, maps, graphs, trees, or graphics. You will compose an essay with a strong thesis statement and evidence, coherent body paragraphs, and a strong conclusion. You are required to use five sources for this assignment. The sources can be anything you want (photo, audio, map, article, website, video, interview, survey, census, data, graphs, trees, art, literature, book, etc.) as long as they meet the following two parameters: A) You must have sources from at least two different modes (ie-print and digital, textual and visual, etc.) and B) One of your sources must be accessed through our library (catalog, database). As long as they meet those 2 criteria, your source selection is entirely up to you. You should choose the sources that have the most credibility, accuracy, and relevance to your topic. You should choose the best sources to answer your research question.
*Your audience for this assignment is an interdisciplinary audience of college students, scholars, and inquisitive adults (the kind who watch PBS). The genre for this assignment is a researched argument.*
In order to complete this assignment, you should go through the following steps:
Invention and Critical Thinking: Come up with a topic, conduct background research, and develop a research question.
Research your question. Carefully choose five sources. Read and make notes as you go.
Develop a working thesis statement based on your research.
Draft body paragraphs and outline the conclusion of your essay.
Draft your introduction and conclusion. As part of the introduction section, revise your working thesis statement into a more polished thesis based on your essay draft.
Get feedback on your essay from a peer, friend, tutor, the Writing Center, or professor.
Revise your essay based on the feedback you received. Solicit a second round of feedback if necessary and revise.
Edit and proofread your paper for submission. Check your formatting.
Evaluation Criteria (Rubric)
An essay that achieves excellence on this assignment will be distinguished in the following criteria:
The writer has a clearly defined purpose and argument demonstrated with a strong thesis statement.
The writer illustrates the significance or importance of his or her topic.
The writer uses five sources, including sources from at least two different modes and at least one from the library.
The writer engages responsibly and appropriately with research that he or she uses as specific evidence and examples.
The writer’s evidence supports his or her argument directly and is the best evidence for the research question the writer chose.
The writer effectively employs strategies for counterargument, counterclaims, and/or contradiction.
The writer effectively incorporates a visual into the body of his or her essay, such as a chart, graph, photo, graphic, map, tree, or image.
The writer cites his or her sources effectively using summary, paraphrase, and/or direct quotation.
The writer’s paper is succinct and tightly composed, with coherent body paragraphs.
The writer’s essay is appropriate for a general academic audience.
The writer meets the standards of clarity, accuracy, logic, significance, fairness, precision, and relevance.
The writer uses appropriate spelling, grammar, and mechanics.
The essay is in MLA format, including for the Works Cited page and overall document design.
The essay is approximately 1100-1200 words (about 5-6 pages double-spaced).
Congratulations!
You have been selected to test a new math game that will be used to help students learn calculus. The game consists of several challenges meant to test a student’s understanding of big ideas and their problem-solving process. In order to support the game designers, you are requested to provide explanations for how you solved these problems, focusing on the ideas within calculus that led you to your results. This will help the game designers better understand student thinking so they can improve the questions and overall design. The game designers have given the following guidance:
The quality of your mathematical explanations will be evaluated using the rubric in Brightspace.
If you have questions about the level of detail that the game designers are looking for, you can ask your instructor.
You can navigate between questions and leave the Project as needed (be sure to click the “Quit & Save” button).
Do not click Submit Assignment until you are satisfied with all responses as this will submit the assignment for grading. This action cannot be undone.
questions are in the pdf file. Explain, in your own words and with your own work, how you arrived at this result. Be sure to explain using calculus concepts to best support the work of the game design team.
paper has to have
prompt: -craft an essay in which you analyze the persuasive strengths of the reading “what we eat” by eric Schlosser
-persuade ypur audience how the author of your article delivered an effective argument
thesis: -describe the argument of your paper in one or two sentences(place ag the end of your introduction) body paragraphs: – The Point
• Each of the three body paragraphs must build a point about the article you choose by focusing on one of the three rhetorical appeals, otherwise known as a mode of persuasions.
Body Paragraphs – The Analysis
• Each rhetorical appeal (also known as a mode of persuasion) must be supported by direct quotes from the reading and analysis in your own words.
• Each rhetorical appeal (also known as a mode of persuasion) may be supported by one or more of the rhetorical strategies (also known as argument types claim, assumption, support, language, position, persuasion, trust, opposition, voice)
A PICOT statement includes a brief description of the problem and population impacted, intervention, comparison, outcome, and anticipated timeframe in order to better understand the issue. This step provides clarity and direction as the critique of evidence from scholarly literature is initiated.
MSN-prepared nurses are uniquely positioned with knowledge and skills to identify problems, and to plan, implement, and evaluate evidence-based interventions to improve practice-related outcomes. Toward that end, the assignments in this course are designed to cultivate skills in the development of a PICOT statement (week 2 assignment), and in the critique of evidence from scholarly literature sources (week 5 assignment). As a culminating activity that, a proposal for an evidence-based practice intervention will be developed in week 7 that builds upon the learning accomplished through the assignments in weeks 2 and 5.
The purpose of this assignment is to explore the development of a PICOT statement that can serve as a springboard for the critique of scholarly evidence surrounding the identified practice problem and intervention to improve outcomes
Review the elements included in a PICOT statement to guide evidence-based nursing practice.
Consider various problems that impact nursing practice, health, or organizational outcomes. You are welcome to consider a specific issue that is interesting to you professionally or an issue that impacts your future MSN role.
Once you have identified one practice issue, you will complete the PICOT Worksheet by addressing the items below. Using a minimum of two scholarly nursing sources, current within five years:
Identify and describe the selected practice issue. Explain why the issue is important to the profession of nursing and its impact on health-related outcomes.
Define each element of your PICOT statement in one or two sentences, being sure to address all of the following:
P – Population and problem – What is the nursing practice concern or problem, and whom does it affect?
I – Intervention – What evidence-based solution for the problem would you like to apply?
C – Comparison – What is another solution to the problem? (Note that this is typically the current practice, no intervention at all, or alternative solutions.)
O – Outcome – Very specifically, how will you know that the intervention worked? What will be the indicator of success, and how will that outcome be measured?
T – Timeframe – Target date for outcome achievement.
Construct your PICOT statement in the standard narrative format and define each letter separately.
Complete the Week 2 PICOT Worksheet Links to an external site. using complete sentences.
Include a minimum of 2 scholarly nursing sources, current within 5 years, to support your work.
Credit sources with citations and a reference list using current APA format guidelines.
Use correct spelling, word usage, grammar, punctuation, and sentence structure, congruent with graduate-level writing.
No direct quotes may be used in this assignment.
**EXAMPLE IS ATTACHED**
**BLANK WORK SHEET IS ATTACHED**
future of genetics. if specific genes are identified as being associated with particular characteristics or traits such as obesity, what possible outcomes would you predict in terms of increase or decrease in the amount of genetic testing? what, if any, ethical issues do you think this may present? provide thoughts in a cohesive manner
For my order to be completed, I require a 15-page term paper that answers the following research question: “To what extent does the legitimacy of ASEAN depend on the political regimes, and how does this compare to the legitimacy of the SCO?”. The method to be used here is the comprehensive case study method. However, I am open to other methods that will answer the question. Here are some of the references, I have used:
Ba, Alice D. (2013): The Association of Southeast Asian Nations: Between Internal and External Legitimacy. In: Dominik Zaum (Hg.): Legitimating International Organizations: Oxford University Press, S. 132–161.
Barber, Rebecca; Teitt, Sarah (2021): Legitimacy and centrality under threat: The case for an ASEAN response to human rights violations against the Rohingya. In: Asian Politics & Policy 13 (4), S. 471–492. DOI: 10.1111/aspp.12602
.
Bexell, Magdalena; Jönsson, Kristina; Uhlin, Anders (Hg.) (2022): Legitimation and Delegitimation in Global Governance. Practices, Justifications, and Audiences: Oxford University PressOxford.
Davies, Michael; Woodward, Richard (2014): International organizations. A companion. Cheltenham: Elgar.
Dellmuth, Lisa; Scholte, Jan Aart; Tallberg, Jonas; Verhaegen, Soetkin (2022): Citizens, Elites, and the Legitimacy of Global Governance: Oxford University Press.
Nesadurai, Helen E. S. (2008): The Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN). In: New Political Economy 13 (2), S. 225–239. DOI: 10.1080/13563460802018588
.
Nguitragool, Paruedee; Rüland, Jürgen (2015): ASEAN as an actor in international fora. Reality, potential and constraints. Cambridge, United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press (Integration through law : the role of law and the rule of law in ASEAN integration).
Panke, Diana; Stapel, Sören; Starkmann, Anna (2020): Comparing regional organizations. Global dynamics and regional particularities. Bristol: Bristol University Press.
Welsh, Jennifer (2013): Legitimation and the UN Security Council. In: Dominik Zaum (Hg.): Legitimating International Organizations: Oxford University Press, S. 65–87.
Answer both questions listed below in an organized and coherent fashion, providing as much detail and critical analysis of the issue as possible. You
may also use independent sources as well as notes from class lectures; however, your textbook is the main foundation and roadmap to your answers.
.
Requirements:
• Double-spaced
• Each response should be 800-1,000 words
• Number your responses 1-2
• Spelling, grammar, and fluidity are a must
• Font size is 12
• Font style is Times New Roman
1. Discuss the phenomena of the strain paradigm from the lens of Albert K. Cohen and Richard Rosenfeld & Steven F. Messner. In doing so, be sure to explicate the main propositions of each individual author’s viewpoint. Describe how the authors’ suppositions are different and/or similar to one another. Is there any article you favor more than the other? Either way, give your opinion based on the readings and offer support for your arguments.
2. In an alternate universe, Elijah Anderson and Edwin Sutherland were stranded together in an airport one evening. They gathered in the coffee shop around a table and the conversation turned quickly to a discussion of the particularly high violent crime rate in Chicago. Each individual shared how their theory explains this phenomenon. As the coffee flowed, the discussion became ever more animated. Fortunately, you were also stranded in the airport and were seated at the adjacent table, able to overhear the entire discussion. Laptop ever at the ready, you captured the conversation. Please describe it here, to the best of your recollection.
Question 1
What is their stance on strain theory?
What are the difference or similarities and differences?
What is my opinion offer support (sources) and make the connection clear
Use examples! (personal,outside sources/ current events )
Question 2
Can give 3-4 sentences on the prior history of Chicago and how it is relevant today
Agree or disagree on the violent crime rate in Chicago
Can create 2 different paragraphs for Anderson and Sutherland
DO NOT GO OVER WORD 800-1000 WORD LIMIT FOR EACH QUESTION !
Have you heard that teachers and preschool teachers are paid very little? Or perhaps you heard a teacher complain about their current pay, living paycheck to paycheck?