Premium Writing

Critical analyze and present your perspective on:
Recently, Silicon Valley Bank got into trouble, and so did other banks. Did it hurt the US Dollar or helped in its strength?
Investigate such scenarios around the globe and answer the issues and challenges that face companies who are buying from or selling to countries with currencies in a flux.
Your original post must be detailed and analytical of what you have understood from the chapter
Answer the following questions:
What are the current challenges of shipping products and how companies are paying higher prices for shipping goods to customers in such countries?
Base your answers on practical aspects, and not in an ideal world
It is important to share real information and experiences when answering the discussion posts
Do not copy from the textbook. Use your own personal language to show understanding of concepts
Ensure that your submission is supported by data, research, examples, and several news resources

Sanders, N. R. (2018). Supply Chain Analytics: Understanding the Business Context. Prospect Press. https://online.vitalsource.com/books/9781943153602

Select only one (1) of the following essay topics to complete: Question #1 or Question #2. Your essay should not be less than 500 words. However, there is no maximum word count. However, your essay must be at least 500 words for full points. Please give word count at the end of the essay. Be sure to include at least 3 citations and a Works Cited page. Follow example #29 “One Selection From an Anthology or a Collection” on page 184 of A Writer’s Reference.

Note: Your essay and works cited page entries must only come from the following articles from chapter 9 of Writing and Reading Across the Curriculum.
Question #1: “The Milgram Experiment” by McLeod
Question #2: “The Power of Situations” by Ross and Nisbett
There are no outside sources for this essay. Using outside sources will result in loss of points. Remember, this essay is over explanatory synthesis of the required materials.
Stay away from using first person pronouns (I, my). Stay away from second person pronouns (you) too. Instead, you will want to express your essay without saying phrases like:

“In my opinion”
“I think”
“I feel”
“When thinking about this topic, I”
Question #1:

Use information from “The Milgram Experiment” (252-258) in an explanatory synthesis.

The Milgram experiment has been conducted many times, and researchers have come to certain conclusions about why “ordinary people, simply doing their jobs, and without any particular hostility on their part, can become agents in a terrible destructive process.” Using this statement as a principle, discuss what came from these studies and suggest examples in our world today, close at home or far away, that suggest these conclusions are valid.

1.) Use explanatory synthesis to fully explain the Milgram Experiment. Remember, don’t bring in your own opinion, yet.

2.) After explaining the Milgram Experiment, discuss where this type of behavior may be found in our real world. This is an opportunity to compare the Milgram Experiment to something outside of the text. You may use any example as long as it is relevant to the same ideas presented in the Milgram Experiment.

Use at least 3 citations and include a Works Cited page that you should format following the model in your handbook on page 184, #29, “one selection from an anthology or collection”. You will have only one Works Cited entry. Essay should be at least 500 words.

Question #2:

Ross and Nisbett suggest that the “situational variable” may be the key predictor in how the person will behave in a given scenario. In a well-developed argument that draws on “The Power of Situations,” agree or disagree with Ross and Nisbett as you make the case that the key predictor of people’s behavior is either individual conscience, peer pressure, or situation.

Head your paper appropriately. You will need at least 3 citations and a Works Cited page. You will have only one Works Cited entry. Follow #29 on page 184 in A Writer’s Reference. Length should be approximately 500 words.Select only one (1) of the following essay topics to complete: Question #1 or Question #2. Your essay should not be less than 500 words. However, there is no maximum word count. However, your essay must be at least 500 words for full points. Please give word count at the end of the essay. Be sure to include at least 3 citations and a Works Cited page. Follow example #29 “One Selection From an Anthology or a Collection” on page 184 of A Writer’s Reference.

Note: Your essay and works cited page entries must only come from the following articles from chapter 9 of Writing and Reading Across the Curriculum.
Question #1: “The Milgram Experiment” by McLeod
Question #2: “The Power of Situations” by Ross and Nisbett
There are no outside sources for this essay. Using outside sources will result in loss of points. Remember, this essay is over explanatory synthesis of the required materials.
Stay away from using first person pronouns (I, my). Stay away from second person pronouns (you) too. Instead, you will want to express your essay without saying phrases like:

“In my opinion”
“I think”
“I feel”
“When thinking about this topic, I”
Question #1:

Use information from “The Milgram Experiment” (252-258) in an explanatory synthesis.

The Milgram experiment has been conducted many times, and researchers have come to certain conclusions about why “ordinary people, simply doing their jobs, and without any particular hostility on their part, can become agents in a terrible destructive process.” Using this statement as a principle, discuss what came from these studies and suggest examples in our world today, close at home or far away, that suggest these conclusions are valid.

1.) Use explanatory synthesis to fully explain the Milgram Experiment. Remember, don’t bring in your own opinion, yet.

2.) After explaining the Milgram Experiment, discuss where this type of behavior may be found in our real world. This is an opportunity to compare the Milgram Experiment to something outside of the text. You may use any example as long as it is relevant to the same ideas presented in the Milgram Experiment.

Use at least 3 citations and include a Works Cited page that you should format following the model in your handbook on page 184, #29, “one selection from an anthology or collection”. You will have only one Works Cited entry. Essay should be at least 500 words.

Question #2:

Ross and Nisbett suggest that the “situational variable” may be the key predictor in how the person will behave in a given scenario. In a well-developed argument that draws on “The Power of Situations,” agree or disagree with Ross and Nisbett as you make the case that the key predictor of people’s behavior is either individual conscience, peer pressure, or situation.

Head your paper appropriately. You will need at least 3 citations and a Works Cited page. You will have only one Works Cited entry. Follow #29 on page 184 in A Writer’s Reference. Length should be approximately 500 words.

Attached is the paper that need to be rewritten because I was only supposed to pick one topic.

The purpose of this assignment is to apply knowledge of reliable and valid information sources to
patient education in clinical nursing practice and to evaluate patient educational materials posted on the internet.

The assignment for this week consists of 3-5 page paper evaluating consumer/patient health information on the web. You will be required to find a website that is designed to provide health
information to the consumer/patient and analyze it according to the criteria described below.
You are required to report your analysis in a formal course paper.

Choose a health topic/issue in which you want to educate your patient/consumer/family about (diabetes, heart failure, teenage pregnancy, depression, etc…) and briefly describe in your paper :
An explanation of your health topic/issue and why you selected it (Significance of the topic/issue selected).

Find an internet source that is designed to provide information/education about your selected health topic/issue and analyze the following:

describe the website (main title, information)

describe the overall impression about the design of the website (organization, easiness of finding information, easiness to read, table of content/index, colors, font, does it look professional).

Who is sponsoring the website?

How often is the site updated? When was the site created? Was it updated recently?

Does it state that the content is not medical advice?

Who is the intended audience? Does the site have a clear target audience?
Is the information presented appropriate to the target population?

How credible are the information presented:

Is there any evidence that the author of the web information has some authority in the field about
which she or he is providing information? Who is responsible for the information? What are the
author’s credentials? Is a mechanism in place for you to contact the author?

Are there clues that the author/s are biased? For example, is he/she selling or promoting a product?
Is the author taking a personal stand on a social/political issue or is the author being objective ?
Bias is not necessarily “bad,” but the connections should be clear.

Does the information have a complete list of works cited, which reference credible, authoritative
sources? Is the information valid and supported by evidence? Are omissions noted? Is the author’s point of view objective and unbiased?

Is the information accurate? Any inconsistencies, inaccuracies, errors, false information, etc…
Are there links that point to additional, valuable resources with minimum effort?

Adequacy:
Overall, does the site provide consumer/patient education? is the education adequate or does the
consumer have to go somewhere else to find answers about the topic?

Sophistication of the information:
Is this source too elementary, too technical, too advanced, or just right?
Is the purpose of the site clearly stated? Does the site match its purpose? Is the site intended to educate or sell?

Submit a 3-5 page analysis paper following APA format (include a title page, introduction, headings, Summary paragraph, reference page, and in-text citation). You need to include at least 5 reliable and current (within the last 5 years) references of which at least 3 journal articles.

What is land titling and why is it so important to the Millennium Challenge Corporation?

Criteria for Success:
The length should be 200-250 words.
Respond to all parts of the prompt, rather than answering only part of it.
Be sure to identify and use the appropriate concept(s), and pay attention to the nuances of the concepts as we have been developing them in this class.
Use specific examples from the reading. Cite the book using just the page number in parentheses (17). Do not use long quotations — try to paraphrase it just enough, clearly and concisely, to communicate he information.
Be sure to edit and proofread: is your answer well-organized? Does it flow, logically? Is it free of grammar and spelling errors?

Assessment Description
The purpose of this assignment is to become familiar with various data sources used by health care organizations to obtain quality data. The Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) creates an annual report, the National Healthcare Quality and Disparities Report, which assesses the performance of the U.S. health care system. This report identifies strengths and weaknesses of the health care system in addition to disparities for access to health care and quality of health care. The report is based on more than 250 measures of quality and disparities, and it covers a broad range of health care services and settings.
Access the most current report using the “National Healthcare Quality and Disparities Reports” AHRQ website, provided in the topic Resources.

Select five data sources from this report and fill in the required components on the “Quality Data Sources Organizer.”Assessment Description

Need a written speech presentation about Free speech on Social Media
The presentation will be 10 slides so make sure to link each idea to a future slide
Introduction
Attention Grabber: (Wets the appetite – limit 45 sec)
Thesis:
Relate (Pathos): Ask 2-3 questions requires the audience to think about how this topic pertains to their life.
State (Logos): Thesis statement (modified purpose statement) combined with credibility statement (as appropriate)
Support (Ethos): Provide a quote from a famous person supporting this topic matters.
Preview: Provide a preview of just the main points of your speech. In this case just two points: 1. What is (describe structure)…. II. How can we use (functionality)….

This criterion is linked to a learning outcomeBody: Credible Sources
Must have five credible sources. Each source must be cited:
1. Orally
2. In text and on Reference Page APA
3. On Slides.

Body Connections (4 P’s)
Engage the audience!!! Make it come alive. Must have each of these in the BODY of the speech:
1. Personal Story (Names, dates, stakes, conclusion, connect to content)
2. Probing Questions: Ask audience to connect with and to the content.
3. Physical Activity: At least two butts out of seats…MOVE…Stand Up/Sit Down…Role Play
4. Prop: 3 D — may not be a movie or on a slide — use an object or create learning aids to help audience connect with content from speech.

ADD EXTRA – Incorporate use of chat, backgrounds and props to secure audience connection.

This criterion is linked to a learning outcomeConclusion
Review: Final review of Main Points Thesis: Review Support (Ethos): Restate the famous quote supporting this topic. Return to Thesis Statement: Modified purpose statement. Return to Relate (Pathos): Remind audience of response to 2-3 questions/see how their new ideas
Return to Attention Grabber: Maybe don’t do the entire Attention Grabber bur remind audience and circle back to that concept.
Strong close, look at the audience, smile. Maybe ask for questions or thank them for attention.

Use the attached template and information to create a individual case analysis & scatter plot.

Do an individual analysis and create a scatter plot; Using the provided data (tab 2 – Data for Dr. Stanley), create a scatter plot that could be used to understand what is going on. Hint #1: You will need to use two variables to make a scatter plot. For example, you can use # of falls and acuity. Hint #2: Use excel to create your scatter plot and copy and paste it at the bottom of the individual analysis template.

Womanism/feminism
Prompt 2: Analyze the Parable of the Sower and “Bloodchild” from a feminist lens.
Essay: final draft should be approximately 5-8 pages, at least 1500 words, not including works cited. Your essay should include
an introduction, 3 or more body paragraphs, a conclusion, and a works cited page
reference to the 2 unit readings (Parable of the Sower and “Bloodchild”)
at least 2 literary critiques to back up analysis.

Format your paper in MLA (12 point font, consistent web-friendly font throughout, a works cited page, no extra space between paragraphs or at top or bottom of page, etc). Here’s a link to a sample MLA formatted essay (https://owl.purdue.edu/owl/research_and_citation/mla_style/mla_formatting_and_style_guide/mla_sample_paper.html) available on the Purdue owl website
Include a Works Cited pageLinks to an external site.
PDF .doc .docx and GoogleDoc files are accepted. No other file formats. You won’t receive credit for submitting a written essay until you resubmit your paper using one of the first three file formats.

Please see below for comments on paper as well as the paper itself attached with a “CRAAP” Tool.

From the start of your paper:
please review your APA 7th ed. title page format for placement on page and missing items
https://apastyle.apa.org/style-grammar-guidelines/paper-format/title-page

**Background – section identified by heading….. ? Introduction
”Labor induction is primarily considered when” – labor of what population?
“This puts pregnant women above 18 years who utilize induction methods for labor at an increased risk” – is this biased?

perhaps your approach should be to identify the population and then explain the two strategies being reviewed

**PICOT question – no section identified by heading, please correct for final SR
what is your PICOT question?

**Purpose section – section identified by heading
“This paper will compare different evidence-based literature research to establish the
prevalence of infections” – this reads very biased…. you should be objective in your initial research, summarization, and analysis, then you can have an opinion

**Lit Search strategy- no section identified by heading… please correct for final SR
please review prior feedback r/t personal pronouns in APA
I found a paragraph that would benefit from numbers……” ” around the search terms

**Eval of lit – section identified by heading
subheading for intervention strategy is used, subheading for comparison strategy is used
feedback offered in Lit Search/CRAAP assignment, not addressed “Please do not use ”the article”, you are not reviewing articles from the Golf magazine, rather you are reviewing scholarly studies/original research.
please use the authors of this study, this study, consider also the research, or the researchers found, or in a study by researchers names (date).”
cite by author (date), this is how your reference page is set up and how one would look for your source
what is an adequate sample? state this number
add specifics – location, age………..assessment method your summaries are vague
statements like academic standing, The study method is appropriate could be placed in your analysis paragraphs, not summary

**Analysis of studies-
“Each study focuses” – CITE your studies by author, for example “All three”-cite by author (date) or (Smith, 2022; Rug, 2021)…
okay capture of similarities, differences, consider adding data versus words, for example, what is a therapeutic response in numbers?

Conclusion – identified by a heading
”Despite this, there is no significant increase in infections in women that
choose labor induction methods.” – show the numbers here, add data

References – identified by a heading
missing bold title

General comments:
Your draft included the following sections, with headings:
Background
PICOT Question
Purpose of the paper
Literature Search Strategy
Evaluation of Literature with subheadings for Intervention Strategy and Comparison Strategy
Conclusion of Findings
References

Your final SR will add the following with headings:
Implementing Change in Healthcare
Barriers to Change
Summary

Company: Magnolia Bakery
I have attached a word Doc with all 20 sources to be used + eText.
Also screenshots of eText were added as pdf files.
Please be sure to use page numbers when referencing eText and include in text citation.

(Be sure there are many secondary sources (articles) of information on the chosen company
and industry.)
Find articles on the company and its competitors and industry that relate to its business
strategies and marketing activities. You should be able to find a minimum of 20 references
from a wide variety of sources (Go beyond the Internet!)
Based upon the information contained in the articles or from other resources, choose, develop,
or analyze a key marketing decision the company will have to confront within the next one to
two years. This focal strategic marketing decision (e.g., introduce a product line, enter a
market, use a new distribution strategy, target a new segment of the market, etc.) will then
become the basis of your marketing analysis.
From class and external material, prepare a paper (minimum of 20 pages excluding references
and appendices) that discusses in-depth how the company being investigated should confront
the selected issue.
FORMAT FOR THE STRATEGIC MARKETING CAPSTONE TERM PAPER
I Executive Summary (The executive summary should include a concise statement of the
problem, a short summary of the major points arising from your analysis, and the major
recommendations from your analysis.) (OR: What I know, What I sought, What I found, and
What I learned)
II Table of Contents
III Situation Analysis
— The Internal Environment
— The Customer Environment
— The External Environment
IV SWOT Analysis
— Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities, Threats
V The Focal Strategic Marketing Decision You Wish to Confront (The Marketing Decision)
VI Decision Criteria
— Objectives associated with the decision
— Relevant factors influencing the decision
VII Development and Evaluation of the Marketing Strategy
— Include the selection of what you will do and the proposed implementation
VIII Expected/Anticipated Competitive Reactions
IX Conclusion
Appendices and References