Premium Writing

Discuss “Health is Membership” in light of what we learned in theology, spirituality, religion.

Topics you can choose from (choose one)
What does Berry mean by the phrase “health is wholeness”
How does Berry understand the relationship between “body” and “spirit”
What is the idea that “Health is Membership” is all about
How might Berrys argument lead us to think differently about what it means to be a healer

150-200 word discussion. Please no plagiarism, he does check and I will check before submitting.
No citing needed unless you quote something Berry said.

Explain why our restrurant use Facebook and Instagram for online advertising.
Restrurant information:
Type of Operation: Fine Dining
Restaurant Concept: Spanish Tapas
Target Marketing Area: Las Vegas Town Square
Customer Base: Millennials
Primary Age Range: 30-39 years old

fter watching my videos and reading chapter 19-23 you should be familiar with argumentation and research methods. For this essay you will write a 1500 word (not including your title and heading) Argumentative essay over your approved topic. Review discussion post and Argumentative response essay for additional information.
Remember emotion has no room in this essay. Stick to the facts to support your argument. You must include aspects of personal responsibility and decision making in the choices of your argumentative topic. In your essay you will evaluate choices and actions, and relate consequences to your decision on the stance of your topic. Feel free to include similar comments about personal responsibility regarding the opposing side of your topic.
You will have to use at least three outside sources (No Wikipedia or social media sources:Twitter, Facebook etc.). You must correctly cite all sources in MLA style both within your essay and on your Works Cited page.
Your 1500 word essay will contain a supporting a thesis statement which argues one side of a two-sided issue. Your choice of topics is very important. There should be an opposing view to your point of view. Most of the words in the paper should be your own. The introduction should provide interesting lead-in information and/or background about the topic. The points of argument (at least three) that you have chosen to address should be clarified here. The thesis statement should clearly state your position. A forecasting statement (essay map) can be included mapping the main reasons for your opinion on the subject which you will then support in well-developed body paragraphs. You may use examples, analogies and quotes from authorities to clarify and add credibility to your argument.
Topic selection is a key to success. The most important feature of the topic is that it must be a two sided issue, that is, reasonable people could make a case for both sides. There should be an opposing view to your point of view. Most of the words in the paper should be your own. The introduction should provide interesting lead-in information and/or background about the topic. The points of argument (at least three) that you have chosen to address should be clarified here. The thesis statement should clearly state your position. A forecasting statement (essay map) can be included mapping the main reasons for your opinion on the subject which you will then support in well-developed body paragraphs. You may use examples, analogies and quotes from authorities to clarify and add credibility to your argument.
Peer Revision
After the discussion deadline, I will open a discussion board where you can post your essays to share for peer revision. This assignment is optional for a summer course.
Email me with any questions.
* Your essay must be no less than 1500 words and MLA style. Please look at the sample MLA essay at this link and use it a model for all of your essays in this class: https://owl.english.purdue.edu/owl/resource/747/13/
(Links to an external site.)
Make your essays look just like the MLA sample as far as formatting: heading, spacing, pagination, etc.
See Rubric:
download
Click here for grade breakdown.
download
2015-16 Core Rubric (1)
Criteria Ratings Pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome
CS1-1 Organization
Exceeds expectations: Demonstrates organization from beginning to end; has a clear focus; is unified and cohesive throughout. Achieves expectations: Has a clear focus most of the time; demonstrates organization, but may have minor lapses; uses transitions most of the time. Does not meet expectations: Makes serious errors in organization and thought patterns; is difficult to follow and understand; uses no transitions or poor transitions; demonstrates inconsistencies in unity and/or coherence.
threshold: 2.0 pts
3 pts
Exceeds Expectations
2 pts
Meets Expectations
1 pts
Does Not Meet Expectations
0 pts
Did Not Complete
3 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome
CS1-2 Development and Support
CS1-2 Development and Support Exceeds expectations: Establishes a clear and thoughtful purpose; shows a keen awareness of audience/task; includes accurate and relevant detail, as well as correct use/citation of sources (if applicable). Achieves expectations: Establishes a purpose; develops ideas, but may miss opportunities for further development; shows awareness of audience / task, but with minor lapses; uses/cites sources (if applicable), but with minor errors. Does not meet expectations: Has no clear purpose; lacks clarity of ideas; shows minimal awareness of audience/task; fails to use/cite sources correctly (if applicable).
threshold: 2.0 pts
3 pts
Exceeds Expectations
2 pts
Meets Expectations
1 pts
Does Not Meet Expectations
0 pts
Did Not Complete
3 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome
CS1-3 Language Skills
Exceeds expectations: Makes few, if any, errors. Achieves expectations: Makes minor errors, but the language is sufficiently clear and understandable. Does not meet expectations: Makes frequent and severe errors; patterns of errors are evident.
threshold: 2.0 pts
3 pts
Exceeds Expectations
2 pts
Meets Expectations
1 pts
Does Not Meet Expectations
0 pts
Did Not Complete
3 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome
CS1-4 Format
Exceeds expectations: Adheres precisely to the assigned style. Achieves expectations: Shows some evidence of adherence to the assigned style, but with minor lapses. Does not meet expectations: Shows little or no evidence of adherence to the assigned style, or shows minimal adherence with major lapses.
threshold: 2.0 pts
3 pts
Exceeds Expectations
2 pts
Meets Expectations
1 pts
Does Not Meet Expectations
0 pts
Did Not Complete
3 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome
CT1-1 Position
Exceeds expectations: A specific position is expressed and defended based on the evidence. Alternate positions are considered and a rationale for rejecting them is methodically and logically presented. Achieves expectations: A specific position is expressed and defended based on the evidence. Does not meet expectations: No clear position is expressed, or the position is unsupported by evidence, or is not logically based on the evidence presented.
threshold: 2.0 pts
3 pts
Exceeds Expectations
2 pts
Meets Expectations
1 pts
Does Not Meet Expectations
0 pts
Did Not Complete
3 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome
CT1-2 Explanation
Exceeds expectations: Explanation of the issue clearly states all relevant points; the explanation considers and rejects irrelevant information. Achieves expectations: Explanation of the issue clearly states all relevant aspects. Does not meet expectations: Explanation of the issue is scanty, incomplete, or unclear.
threshold: 2.0 pts
3 pts
Exceeds Expectations
2 pts
Meets Expectations
1 pts
Does Not Meet Expectations
0 pts
Did Not Complete
3 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome
CT1-3 Evidence
Exceeds expectations: Information from reliable sources is integrated into a coherent narrative, and misinformation and irrelevant information is considered and dismissed. Underlying assumptions are acknowledged and addressed, and the process of discovering hidden assumptions is explained. Achieves expectations: Information from reliable sources is integrated into a coherent narrative. Underlying assumptions are acknowledged and addressed. Does not meet expectations: Evidence is lacking, incomplete, contradictory, irrelevant, or unclear. Assumptions are not examined or addressed.
threshold: 2.0 pts
3 pts
Exceeds Expectations
2 pts
Meets Expectations
1 pts
Does Not Meet Expectations
0 pts
Did Not Complete
3 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome
CT1-4 Conclusion
Exceeds expectations: Conclusions and/or outcomes are clearly explained and justified. Priorities in judgment are evaluated. Achieves expectations: Conclusions and/or outcomes are clearly explained and justified. Does not meet expectations: No clear conclusion is stated, or the conclusion is not related to supporting information, or not justified.
threshold: 2.0 pts
3 pts
Exceeds Expectations
2 pts
Meets Expectations
1 pts
Does Not Meet Expectations
0 pts
Did Not Complete
3 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome
PR1-1 Identification
PR1-1 Identification Exceeds expectations: Identifies and fully describes personal dilemmas in scenarios from life situations and/or from theoretical scenarios. Achieves expectations: Identifies and describes simple personal dilemmas in scenarios from life situations and/or from theoretical scenarios. Does not meet expectations: Has difficulty either identifying or describing simple personal dilemmas in scenarios from life situations and/or from theoretical scenarios.
threshold: 2.0 pts
3 pts
Exceeds Expectations
2 pts
Meets Expectations
1 pts
Does Not Meet Expectations
0 pts
Did Not Complete
3 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome
PR1-2 Connection
Exceeds expectations: Uses insights and other sources to connect actions and choices to consequences of a decision made in relation to the dilemma. Achieves expectations: Uses insights to connect actions and choices to consequences of a decision made in relation to the dilemma. Does not meet expectations: Does not use insights to connect actions and choices to consequences of a decision made in relation to the dilemma.
threshold: 2.0 pts
3 pts
Exceeds Expectations
2 pts
Meets Expectations
1 pts
Does Not Meet Expectations
0 pts
Did Not Complete
3 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome
PR1-3 Response
Exceeds expectations: Thoroughly articulates an understanding of the personal values which influenced the decision. Achieves expectations: Adequately articulates an understanding of the personal values which influenced the decision. Does not meet expectations: Fails to articulate an understanding of the personal values which influenced the decision.
threshold: 2.0 pts
3 pts
Exceeds Expectations
2 pts
Meets Expectations
1 pts
Does Not Meet Expectations
0 pts
Did Not Complete
3 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome
TW1-2-1 Contributions to Team Interaction
Exceeds expectations: Provides leadership in helping the team accomplish the objective efficiently. Achieves expectations: Interacts with team members to accomplish the objective. Does not meet expectations: Interacts poorly, inconsistently, or not at all.
threshold: 2.0 pts
3 pts
Exceeds Expectations
2 pts
Meets Expectations
1 pts
Does Not Meet Expectations
0 pts
Did Not Complete
3 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome
TW1-2-2 Individual Contributions
Exceeds expectations: Is prepared not only for the individual contribution but has prepared more than was assigned. Achieves expectations: Is adequately prepared for working with the team. Does not meet expectations: Is unprepared for teamwork.
threshold: 2.0 pts
3 pts
Exceeds Expectations
2 pts
Meets Expectations
1 pts
Does Not Meet Expectations
0 pts
Did Not Complete
3 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome
TW1-2-3 Completed Team Purpose/Goal
Exceeds expectations: Completed team project or product shows superior efforts of individuals working as a team. Achieves expectations: Completed project or product exemplifies efforts of individuals working as a team. Does not meet expectations: Final project or product shows clear lack of team members working together.
threshold: 2.0 pts
3 pts
Exceeds Expectations
2 pts
Meets Expectations
1 pts
Does Not Meet Expectations
0 pts
Did Not Complete
3 pts
Total Points: 42

1.
What
is the relationship between an investor’s required rate of return and the risk
associated with a particular investment? Explain and give examples.
2.
Explain
the Capital Asset Pricing Model (CAPM) and give an example of how it is used.
3.
What
is the financial manager’s goal in selecting investment projects for the firm?
Define the capital budgeting process and explain how it helps managers achieve
their goal.
4.
Why
is it important to evaluate capital budgeting projects on the basis of
incremental cash flows? Explain and give examples.

1. Why did antislavery turn into abolitionism?
Contrast the differences between early American antislavery and the later abolitionist movement and explain why the fight against slavery shifted in the way that it did.
2. How did enslaved Americans endure bondage?
Slavery was a brutal, dehumanizing institution. Yet the enslaved managed to survive. Describe the survival strategies of enslaved Americans.
3. Was the early United States an empire?
Explain how the United States expanded its territory and related to the rest of the world. While doing so, make an argument as to whether these activities constitute the behavior of an empire.

Answer the three questions in essay form. Submit the three essays in a single document but give each essay its own title that reflects an argument. graded based on your argument, evidence, and clarity. You should have a clear and specific argument in your introduction that answers the question. discuss all relevant evidence from the textbook The American Yawp http://www.americanyawp.com/index.html.
No plagiarism
Each question should have its own introduction and body paragraphs with an argument. Focus more on the supporting evidence.

After studying Module 2: Lecture Materials & Resources, discuss the following:
Describe and discuss the nurse’s role in health promotion and
disease prevention in older adults. Share an example from your personal
experience as a RN.
Name and elaborate on at least three screening/preventive procedure that must be done in older adults.
Define and discuss three common End-of-life documents that you as
nurse must be familiar with to be able to educate older adults.

Submission Instructions:
Your initial post should be at least 500 words, formatted and cited in current APA style with support from at least 2 academic sources. Your initial post is worth 8 points.
You should respond to at least two of your peers by extending,
refuting/correcting, or adding additional nuance to their posts. Your
reply posts are worth 2 points (1 point per response.)
All replies must be constructive and use literature where possible.
Please post your initial response by 11:59 PM ET Thursday, and comment on the posts of two classmates by 11:59 PM ET Sunday.
You can expect feedback from the instructor within 48 to 72 hours from the Sunday due date.
Grading Rubric
Your assignment will be graded according to the grading rubric.
Discussion Rubric
Criteria
Ratings
Points
Identification of Main Issues, Problems, and Concepts
Distinguished – 5 points
Identify and demonstrate a sophisticated understanding of the issues, problems, and concepts.
Excellent – 4 points
Identifies and demonstrate an accomplished understanding of most of issues, problems, and concepts.
Fair – 2 points
Identifies and demonstrate an acceptable understanding of most of issues, problems, and concepts.
Poor – 1 point
Identifies and demonstrate an unacceptable understanding of most of issues, problems, and concepts.
5 points
Use of Citations, Writing Mechanics and APA Formatting Guidelines
Distinguished – 3 points
Effectively
uses the literature and other resources to inform their work.
Exceptional use of citations and extended referencing. High level of APA
precision and free of grammar and spelling errors.
Excellent – 2 points
Effectively
uses the literature and other resources to inform their work. Moderate
use of citations and extended referencing. Moderate level of APA
precision and free of grammar and spelling errors.
Fair – 1 point
Ineffectively
uses the literature and other resources to inform their work. Moderate
use of citations and extended referencing. APA style and writing
mechanics need more precision and attention to detail.
Poor – 0 points
Ineffectively
uses the literature and other resources to inform their work. An
unacceptable use of citations and extended referencing. APA style and
writing mechanics need serious attention.
3 points
Response to Posts of Peers
Distinguished – 2 points
Student constructively responded to two other posts and either extended, expanded or provided a rebuttal to each.
Fair – 1 point
Student constructively responded to one other post and either extended, expanded or provided a rebuttal.
Poor – 0 points
Student provided no response to a peer’s post.

2 points
Total Points
10

Discuss the concept of socialization. What do you understand socialization to be? What is resocialization? Compare and contrast two of the five major socialization theories proposed by Freud, Mead, Erikson, Piaget and/or Kohlberg.

You’ll also need access to the textbook that’s on vitalsource. I’ll post the login information below
Gmail: sdiaz7108astronomy@gmail.com
Password: 1107astroL*
Please let me know if you need help with the login information.

PLease use peer-reviewed sources that are 3-5 years old and 4 sources. Explain an organizational or patient issue of CLABSI prevention which a collaborative interdisciplinary team approach would help achieve a specific improvement goal.
Summarize an evidence-based interdisciplinary plan to address an organizational or patient issue.
Use of CHG wipes and use of sterile techniques including pre-op and post-op site care
Explain how the interdisciplinary plan could be implemented and how the human and financial resources would be managed.
Propose evidence-based criteria that could be used to evaluate the degree to which the project was successful in achieving the improvement goal.
Communicate the PowerPoint presentation of the interdisciplinary improvement plan to stakeholders in a professional manner, with writing that is clear, logically organized, and respectful with correct grammar and spelling using current APA style.
There are various ways to structure your presentation; following is one example:
Part 1: Organizational or Patient Issue.
What is the issue that you are trying to solve or improve?
Why should the audience care about solving it?
Part 2: Relevance of an Interdisciplinary Team Approach.
Why is using an interdisciplinary team relevant, or the best approach, to addressing the issue?
How will it help to achieve improved outcomes or reach a goal?
Part 3: Interdisciplinary Plan Summary.
What is the objective?
How likely is it to work?
What will the interdisciplinary team do?
Part 4: Implementation and Resource Management.
How could the plan be implemented to ensure effective use of resources?
How could the plan be managed to ensure that resources were not wasted?
How does the plan justify the resource expenditure?
Part 5: Evaluation.
What would a successful outcome of the project look like?
What are the criteria that could be used to measure that success?
How could this be used to show the degree of success?
Please tailor the message to the professional stakeholders at level 1 trauma center (hospital). Remember to include thorough speaker’s notes that flesh out the bullet points on each slide.

The Surgical Care Improvement Project (SCIP) is a national quality
partnership of organizations interested in improving surgical care by
significantly reducing surgical complications. Partners in SCIP believe that a
meaningful reduction in surgical complications depends on surgeons,
anesthesiologists, perioperative nurses, pharmacists, infection control
professionals, and hospital executives working together to intensify their
commitment to making surgical care improvement a priority. If you were the
administrator in charge of reducing errors related to surgery, what strategies
would you implement that enable the different professionals (i.e., surgeons,
anesthesiologists, preoperative nurses, pharmacists, infection control
professionals, and hospital executives) to receive training? What kind of
training and development activities would you implement to change the culture
of the hospital in regard to reducing patient care errors? What other HRM
activities could be impacted by the training and collaboration

You
must support your assertions with at least 5 scholarly citations in APA format.
Any sources cited must have been published within the last five years. In
addition, you must integrate a minimum
of 2 citations of scriptural support as well as the course
textbook.

Course textbook must
be included :McConnell, C.R. (2021). Human resources management in
Healthcare Management: Jones & Bartlett. ISBN: 9781284155136

Skip to main contentSkip to toolbar
Menu
About WordPress
Writing Champion
1 Theme Update
Howdy, cynthia
Log Out
Scrapped Post
Filter scrapped postNew (603) | Approved (6) | Posted (154232) | Trash (133357)
Title Content
Africa and China relation whether it’s beneficial for Africa I have a 5 page paper due at 10pm central time This is a geography class there isn’t much on the syllabus explaining what I should be doing. My to
Quick Edit |
Edit |
Discuss about Africa and China relation whether it’s beneficial for Africa.
my topic is Africa and China relation whether it’s beneficial for Africa

Five sources could be used

I can send an example for written one from one of the students