A 6000 word literature review focusing on the use of extended reality (ie. Virtual reality and augmented reality) in Higher Education.
The review should explore journal articles and books about the topic and it’s benefits to learning, as well as any barriers the technology still faces.
The review should include a methodology as well as a discussion of the findings
Hello,
I don’t want any sources in my essay. The basic idea for the piece is for you to get more comfortable writing about yourself. It’s non fiction, though — fiction is made-up stories, and this is creative non-fiction, so an actual story about your life but in a less formal way– being able to add sensory details and use metaphor to really put the reader in your shoes. We looked at memoir, which is a story from your life (maybe a person or moment that changes your perspective) literary personal essay (examining some outside phenomenon through the lens of your own experience) the open letter (ranting about something that bothers you) and familiar essay (using your own experience but zooming way out too — like the Fadiman piece). Any of these approaches are acceptable.
Select a famous person who has been diagnosed with a disorder listed in the DSM-5-TR. In a 5-6 page analysis, discuss how well the criteria in the DSM-5-TR fit the person. Analyze the person’s quality of life and how the disorder impeded or enhanced their success. Analyze possible treatments for the diagnosis.
Complete stage #3 of my annotated bibliography
(I have uploaded the file I want you to work on)
For each of the five scholarly peer-reviewed journal articles that are listed under stage #2 you will complete the Note-taking
grid worksheet that is under stage #3 addressing the following information:
1. Full APA 7th Edition References
2. Aim of the study
3. Future research suggestions
4. Methodology
5. Design
6. Instrument of Measurement
7. Participants
8. Overall finding/ significance
(Each step is already in the Note-taking grid, just fill it out)
The link to each article is imbedded in the title (it should be blue). In order to access the articles, you may need to login.
My login is: 10970135@cc.peralta.edu and my password is: Folashade1234$
You will need to read each article in order to complete this.
Topic: Eating Disorders
Population: Adolescent Female
Issues/Problems: Social media platforms’ impact of eating disorders among adolescent females body imagery
Working Research Question: How have social media platforms impacted the eating disorders of adolescent females’ perception of body imagery?
Psychology Approach: Behavioral Approach
FOR ARTICLE 3 ONLY USE AGES 15-18 when mentioning the sample/particpants because my population has to be adolescent females and the sample they used involves age 15 up to 35 which we don’t want.
Write a two-page, doubled-spaced proposal that identifies what your topic will be; your invested interest in the course; the research questions that you hope to answer; the debate around the topic; as well as the tentative argument that you hope to make in relationship to this debate.
Attached –
1. Information for Intel as the needed.
2. A copy of the presentation draft that is already put together and that I am working from.
3. An example of what the informtion should resemble (this one is Costco however)
4. Directions – In the Team Consulting 3 – instruction the focus is on the portion of opportunites
Total of 3 slides – As per the word document attached, the slides should follow in the order of the attached presentation when viewing Slides 27 and 28 these should lead as example of what the recommedation slides should be for Intel as corporation. It is a requirement to be visually pleasing. The company focus is Intel and this information is also provided.
.
Research Essay Description
Students will use their oral presentation and annotated bibliography to compose a thoroughly supported research paper that describes the finding of their research.
Describe current impacts of artificial intelligence applications in the area of your major or field of study or field of career-for example, if you are studying biology and intend to become a veterinarian-how is AI affecting veterinarian businesses right now and what will be the impacts in the future. Or if you are a music major, what are the impacts of AI in the music industry right now and what will be the impact in the future on you as a possible employee/employer/audience/society.
So these will be the major perspectives you need to take after you’ve described what’s happening in your field or career (dream job?):
What happens to employees/employers/audience-or consumers/and finally the overall society-will it be good? or will it be awful!? Why!?
Minimum 8 sources must be used, including peer-reviewed research articles. The student must take a position that applies belief and reasoning systems to concepts of ethics and knowledge (DBR 200.1) and applies said systems of knowledge and ethics to issues in society, history, faith, spirituality, and one’s own life from a global perspective (DBR 200.2).
Persuasive Web Article:
For my web article, I plan for the title to be “What does being the 26th constitutional carry state mean for Florida’s vulnerable inhabitants.”
I will be directing my writing towards Floridians who, now that permitless carry is in order, will be more vulnerable. This includes but is not limited to children, students, parents, and law enforcement.
Assignment:
Discuss your purpose and audience:
What do you hope to accomplish with your web article? Are you trying to persuade your audience to change their behavior? Take action? Argue in favor of a particular solution. And who is this argument is directed to? Be as specific as you’re able to with your audience — since you’re writing persuasively you should think about who you’re hoping to persuade, to take action based on your argument. Take some time to explain why you have decided on this purpose and what you really want to say.
State your thesis:
State the working thesis that you will assert in your web article, and explain why this will be the stance you’ve decided to take. Here, it is a good idea to also reference some of the research you’ve done, showing how you plan on incorporating different sources in support of this stance.
Step 3: Draft
Provide me with a short draft of your report – at least 600 words
Applied Research Case Analysis II
This assignment focuses on case analysis and direct application of course concepts to the persons and situations presented in each case vignette. All discussions must take into account the legal and ethical considerations, as well as issues of culture and diversity that may pertain to the situations presented below. Cultural can be found in the DSM-5. Outside research in culture is encouraged.
Use the reading assignments thoroughly in an integrative discussion that illustrates your ability to apply research in clinical case analysis. You are also required to use evidence-based research taken from current on-line or hard copy journals to enhance the course text material. A minimum of 4 evidence-based research articles are required. Remember to cite and reference all work in 7th ed. APA format.
Please keep your responses focused on what is presented in the case vignette. Do not add information but use your creativity to support what you see in the vignette as written. Avoid elaborations and assumptions. This assignment MUST be typed, double-spaced, in 7th ed. APA style, and must be written at graduate level English.
Your discussion should be approx. approx 4 pages per case vignette.
Entire assignment should be approx 8 pages plus a title and reference page
Case:
Jakki is a 29-year-old Iranian woman who was referred by a former client. Jakki moved to the United States from the Middle East when she was 10 years old. Jakki is happily married and the couple has an 18-month-old daughter. Jakki tells you that she feels like she is going crazy. She has this terrifying sensation that someone is in her room at night standing over her bed, staring at her. Even though, intellectually, she knows that nobody is there, she says she gets frozen and cannot move. She also tells you, “I bolt awake from a deep sleep from having horrific nightmares of being chased and smothered. I’m covered in sweat, gasping for breath for 10 minutes until I realize I am safe in my own bed with my dear husband.” During your assessment, you learn that Jakki saw her youngest brother killed as they were escaping out of the country. Tearfully, she tells you that she wishes she could trade places with him so that he could have survived. “He was such a sweet boy. I often see him from the corner of my eye when I take my daughter to the park, but when I turn around to call out to him, he is gone.” Jakki does not remember her early childhood, but she does get “creepy, eerie feelings around men with beards. I hold my daughter close worried that something will happen to her.” You notice that Jakki is easily startled and keeps looking about the room with what appears like nervous anticipation.
Using the text information from Chapters 8 through 11:
In consideration of the diagnosis and treatment of trauma and trauma related disorders, how might you assess Jakki?
What would you target in treatment?
What form(s) from the text might you utilize in your work with Jakki as a therapeutic intervention?
How might her responses be used to initiate change?
Case:
Ken is a 31-year-old African American man who is sent for therapy through his EAP program at work. Ken tested positive for amphetamines on a random drug test. He denies using drugs and tells you, “it must be those herbal pills that did it. A buddy of mine gave them to me to help me stay awake. I’m a truck driver and sometimes it’s hard to stay focused on the road. My buddy said it was all natural stuff and would also help me shed a few pounds. Sitting in a truck all day has really started to put the weight on, if you know what I mean.” Ken admits to having “a bit of a meth problem in my early 20’s. But that was because my best buddy was a drug dealer. So he got me started on the stuff. I was real skinny back then though!” During your interview, Ken reveals that his parents were obese and that, “I hated it when I was a kid. I was embarrassed and ashamed to have friends around and I don’t want to do that to my own kids.” You notice that Ken becomes quite emotional at this time, then quickly changes the subject by asking you, “so what do I have to do to get my boss to believe I’m not a drug addict?” You notice Ken is quite thin and that his face is broken out. His pupils are dilated and he can’t seem to sit still.
Using the text information from Chapters 8 through 11:
In consideration of the diagnosis and treatment of substance use disorders and eating disorders, how might you assess Ken?
What would you target in treatment?
What form(s) from the text might you utilize in your work with Ken as a therapeutic intervention?
How might his responses be used to initiate change?
Argumentation FRQ—Option 1
The House Committee on House Administration has jurisdiction over federal elections. It considers proposals to amend federal election law and to monitor congressional elections across the United States. It is conducting investigative hearings into redistricting practices and their impact on federal elections.
Prepare an essay in the form of an argument that favors or opposes gerrymandering as a method for helping ensure fairness in representation. This argument should include as support at least one provision of the U.S. Constitution (including amendments) or legislation, and one additional piece of relevant evidence from case of Shaw v. Reno (1993).
In your response, be sure to:
Articulate a defensible claim or thesis that responds to the question.
Support your claim or thesis with at least two pieces of accurate and relevant evidence:
One piece of relevant evidence from the U.S. Constitution (including amendments)
One additional piece of relevant evidence from case of Shaw v. Reno (1993).
Use reasoning to organize and analyze your evidence.
Respond to an opposing or alternate perspective using refutation, concession, or rebuttal.
Argumentation FRQ—Option 1
The House Committee on House Administration has jurisdiction over federal elections. It considers proposals to amend federal election law and to monitor congressional elections across the United States. It is conducting investigative hearings into redistricting practices and their impact on federal elections.
Prepare an essay in the form of an argument that favors or opposes gerrymandering as a method for helping ensure fairness in representation. This argument should include as support at least one provision of the U.S. Constitution (including amendments) or legislation, and one additional piece of relevant evidence from case of Shaw v. Reno (1993).
In your response, be sure to:
Articulate a defensible claim or thesis that responds to the question.
Support your claim or thesis with at least two pieces of accurate and relevant evidence:
One piece of relevant evidence from the U.S. Constitution (including amendments)
One additional piece of relevant evidence from case of Shaw v. Reno (1993).
Use reasoning to organize and analyze your evidence.
Respond to an opposing or alternate perspective using refutation, concession, or rebuttal.
Argumentation FRQ—Option 1
The House Committee on House Administration has jurisdiction over federal elections. It considers proposals to amend federal election law and to monitor congressional elections across the United States. It is conducting investigative hearings into redistricting practices and their impact on federal elections.
Prepare an essay in the form of an argument that favors or opposes gerrymandering as a method for helping ensure fairness in representation. This argument should include as support at least one provision of the U.S. Constitution (including amendments) or legislation, and one additional piece of relevant evidence from case of Shaw v. Reno (1993).
In your response, be sure to:
Articulate a defensible claim or thesis that responds to the question.
Support your claim or thesis with at least two pieces of accurate and relevant evidence:
One piece of relevant evidence from the U.S. Constitution (including amendments)
One additional piece of relevant evidence from case of Shaw v. Reno (1993).
Use reasoning to organize and analyze your evidence.
Respond to an opposing or alternate perspective using refutation, concession, or rebuttal.
Argumentation FRQ—Option 1
The House Committee on House Administration has jurisdiction over federal elections. It considers proposals to amend federal election law and to monitor congressional elections across the United States. It is conducting investigative hearings into redistricting practices and their impact on federal elections.
Prepare an essay in the form of an argument that favors or opposes gerrymandering as a method for helping ensure fairness in representation. This argument should include as support at least one provision of the U.S. Constitution (including amendments) or legislation, and one additional piece of relevant evidence from case of Shaw v. Reno (1993).
In your response, be sure to:
Articulate a defensible claim or thesis that responds to the question.
Support your claim or thesis with at least two pieces of accurate and relevant evidence:
One piece of relevant evidence from the U.S. Constitution (including amendments)
One additional piece of relevant evidence from case of Shaw v. Reno (1993).
Use reasoning to organize and analyze your evidence.
Respond to an opposing or alternate perspective using refutation, concession, or rebuttal.
Argumentation FRQ—Option 1
The House Committee on House Administration has jurisdiction over federal elections. It considers proposals to amend federal election law and to monitor congressional elections across the United States. It is conducting investigative hearings into redistricting practices and their impact on federal elections.
Prepare an essay in the form of an argument that favors or opposes gerrymandering as a method for helping ensure fairness in representation. This argument should include as support at least one provision of the U.S. Constitution (including amendments) or legislation, and one additional piece of relevant evidence from case of Shaw v. Reno (1993).
In your response, be sure to:
Articulate a defensible claim or thesis that responds to the question.
Support your claim or thesis with at least two pieces of accurate and relevant evidence:
One piece of relevant evidence from the U.S. Constitution (including amendments)
One additional piece of relevant evidence from case of Shaw v. Reno (1993).
Use reasoning to organize and analyze your evidence.
Respond to an opposing or alternate perspective using refutation, concession, or rebuttal.
Argumentation FRQ—Option 1
The House Committee on House Administration has jurisdiction over federal elections. It considers proposals to amend federal election law and to monitor congressional elections across the United States. It is conducting investigative hearings into redistricting practices and their impact on federal elections.
Prepare an essay in the form of an argument that favors or opposes gerrymandering as a method for helping ensure fairness in representation. This argument should include as support at least one provision of the U.S. Constitution (including amendments) or legislation, and one additional piece of relevant evidence from case of Shaw v. Reno (1993).
In your response, be sure to:
Articulate a defensible claim or thesis that responds to the question.
Support your claim or thesis with at least two pieces of accurate and relevant evidence:
One piece of relevant evidence from the U.S. Constitution (including amendments)
One additional piece of relevant evidence from case of Shaw v. Reno (1993).
Use reasoning to organize and analyze your evidence.
Respond to an opposing or alternate perspective using refutation, concession, or rebuttal.
Argumentation FRQ—Option 1
The House Committee on House Administration has jurisdiction over federal elections. It considers proposals to amend federal election law and to monitor congressional elections across the United States. It is conducting investigative hearings into redistricting practices and their impact on federal elections.
Prepare an essay in the form of an argument that favors or opposes gerrymandering as a method for helping ensure fairness in representation. This argument should include as support at least one provision of the U.S. Constitution (including amendments) or legislation, and one additional piece of relevant evidence from case of Shaw v. Reno (1993).
In your response, be sure to:
Articulate a defensible claim or thesis that responds to the question.
Support your claim or thesis with at least two pieces of accurate and relevant evidence:
One piece of relevant evidence from the U.S. Constitution (including amendments)
One additional piece of relevant evidence from case of Shaw v. Reno (1993).
Use reasoning to organize and analyze your evidence.
Respond to an opposing or alternate perspective using refutation, concession, or rebuttal.
Argumentation FRQ—Option 1
The House Committee on House Administration has jurisdiction over federal elections. It considers proposals to amend federal election law and to monitor congressional elections across the United States. It is conducting investigative hearings into redistricting practices and their impact on federal elections.
Prepare an essay in the form of an argument that favors or opposes gerrymandering as a method for helping ensure fairness in representation. This argument should include as support at least one provision of the U.S. Constitution (including amendments) or legislation, and one additional piece of relevant evidence from case of Shaw v. Reno (1993).
In your response, be sure to:
Articulate a defensible claim or thesis that responds to the question.
Support your claim or thesis with at least two pieces of accurate and relevant evidence:
One piece of relevant evidence from the U.S. Constitution (including amendments)
One additional piece of relevant evidence from case of Shaw v. Reno (1993).
Use reasoning to organize and analyze your evidence.
Respond to an opposing or alternate perspective using refutation, concession, or rebuttal.
Argumentation FRQ—Option 1
The House Committee on House Administration has jurisdiction over federal elections. It considers proposals to amend federal election law and to monitor congressional elections across the United States. It is conducting investigative hearings into redistricting practices and their impact on federal elections.
Prepare an essay in the form of an argument that favors or opposes gerrymandering as a method for helping ensure fairness in representation. This argument should include as support at least one provision of the U.S. Constitution (including amendments) or legislation, and one additional piece of relevant evidence from case of Shaw v. Reno (1993).
In your response, be sure to:
Articulate a defensible claim or thesis that responds to the question.
Support your claim or thesis with at least two pieces of accurate and relevant evidence:
One piece of relevant evidence from the U.S. Constitution (including amendments)
One additional piece of relevant evidence from case of Shaw v. Reno (1993).
Use reasoning to organize and analyze your evidence.
Respond to an opposing or alternate perspective using refutation, concession, or rebuttal.
Argumentation FRQ—Option 1
The House Committee on House Administration has jurisdiction over federal elections. It considers proposals to amend federal election law and to monitor congressional elections across the United States. It is conducting investigative hearings into redistricting practices and their impact on federal elections.
Prepare an essay in the form of an argument that favors or opposes gerrymandering as a method for helping ensure fairness in representation. This argument should include as support at least one provision of the U.S. Constitution (including amendments) or legislation, and one additional piece of relevant evidence from case of Shaw v. Reno (1993).
In your response, be sure to:
Articulate a defensible claim or thesis that responds to the question.
Support your claim or thesis with at least two pieces of accurate and relevant evidence:
One piece of relevant evidence from the U.S. Constitution (including amendments)
One additional piece of relevant evidence from case of Shaw v. Reno (1993).
Use reasoning to organize and analyze your evidence.
Respond to an opposing or alternate perspective using refutation, concession, or rebuttal.
Argumentation FRQ—Option 1
The House Committee on House Administration has jurisdiction over federal elections. It considers proposals to amend federal election law and to monitor congressional elections across the United States. It is conducting investigative hearings into redistricting practices and their impact on federal elections.
Prepare an essay in the form of an argument that favors or opposes gerrymandering as a method for helping ensure fairness in representation. This argument should include as support at least one provision of the U.S. Constitution (including amendments) or legislation, and one additional piece of relevant evidence from case of Shaw v. Reno (1993).
In your response, be sure to:
Articulate a defensible claim or thesis that responds to the question.
Support your claim or thesis with at least two pieces of accurate and relevant evidence:
One piece of relevant evidence from the U.S. Constitution (including amendments)
One additional piece of relevant evidence from case of Shaw v. Reno (1993).
Use reasoning to organize and analyze your evidence.
Respond to an opposing or alternate perspective using refutation, concession, or rebuttal.
Argumentation FRQ—Option 1
The House Committee on House Administration has jurisdiction over federal elections. It considers proposals to amend federal election law and to monitor congressional elections across the United States. It is conducting investigative hearings into redistricting practices and their impact on federal elections.
Prepare an essay in the form of an argument that favors or opposes gerrymandering as a method for helping ensure fairness in representation. This argument should include as support at least one provision of the U.S. Constitution (including amendments) or legislation, and one additional piece of relevant evidence from case of Shaw v. Reno (1993).
In your response, be sure to:
Articulate a defensible claim or thesis that responds to the question.
Support your claim or thesis with at least two pieces of accurate and relevant evidence:
One piece of relevant evidence from the U.S. Constitution (including amendments)
One additional piece of relevant evidence from case of Shaw v. Reno (1993).
Use reasoning to organize and analyze your evidence.
Respond to an opposing or alternate perspective using refutation, concession, or rebuttal.
Argumentation FRQ—Option 1
The House Committee on House Administration has jurisdiction over federal elections. It considers proposals to amend federal election law and to monitor congressional elections across the United States. It is conducting investigative hearings into redistricting practices and their impact on federal elections.
Prepare an essay in the form of an argument that favors or opposes gerrymandering as a method for helping ensure fairness in representation. This argument should include as support at least one provision of the U.S. Constitution (including amendments) or legislation, and one additional piece of relevant evidence from case of Shaw v. Reno (1993).
In your response, be sure to:
Articulate a defensible claim or thesis that responds to the question.
Support your claim or thesis with at least two pieces of accurate and relevant evidence:
One piece of relevant evidence from the U.S. Constitution (including amendments)
One additional piece of relevant evidence from case of Shaw v. Reno (1993).
Use reasoning to organize and analyze your evidence.
Respond to an opposing or alternate perspective using refutation, concession, or rebuttal.
Argumentation FRQ—Option 1
The House Committee on House Administration has jurisdiction over federal elections. It considers proposals to amend federal election law and to monitor congressional elections across the United States. It is conducting investigative hearings into redistricting practices and their impact on federal elections.
Prepare an essay in the form of an argument that favors or opposes gerrymandering as a method for helping ensure fairness in representation. This argument should include as support at least one provision of the U.S. Constitution (including amendments) or legislation, and one additional piece of relevant evidence from case of Shaw v. Reno (1993).
In your response, be sure to:
Articulate a defensible claim or thesis that responds to the question.
Support your claim or thesis with at least two pieces of accurate and relevant evidence:
One piece of relevant evidence from the U.S. Constitution (including amendments)
One additional piece of relevant evidence from case of Shaw v. Reno (1993).
Use reasoning to organize and analyze your evidence.
Respond to an opposing or alternate perspective using refutation, concession, or rebuttal.
Argumentation FRQ—Option 1
The House Committee on House Administration has jurisdiction over federal elections. It considers proposals to amend federal election law and to monitor congressional elections across the United States. It is conducting investigative hearings into redistricting practices and their impact on federal elections.
Prepare an essay in the form of an argument that favors or opposes gerrymandering as a method for helping ensure fairness in representation. This argument should include as support at least one provision of the U.S. Constitution (including amendments) or legislation, and one additional piece of relevant evidence from case of Shaw v. Reno (1993).
In your response, be sure to:
Articulate a defensible claim or thesis that responds to the question.
Support your claim or thesis with at least two pieces of accurate and relevant evidence:
One piece of relevant evidence from the U.S. Constitution (including amendments)
One additional piece of relevant evidence from case of Shaw v. Reno (1993).
Use reasoning to organize and analyze your evidence.
Respond to an opposing or alternate perspective using refutation, concession, or rebuttal.
Argumentation FRQ—Option 1
The House Committee on House Administration has jurisdiction over federal elections. It considers proposals to amend federal election law and to monitor congressional elections across the United States. It is conducting investigative hearings into redistricting practices and their impact on federal elections.
Prepare an essay in the form of an argument that favors or opposes gerrymandering as a method for helping ensure fairness in representation. This argument should include as support at least one provision of the U.S. Constitution (including amendments) or legislation, and one additional piece of relevant evidence from case of Shaw v. Reno (1993).
In your response, be sure to:
Articulate a defensible claim or thesis that responds to the question.
Support your claim or thesis with at least two pieces of accurate and relevant evidence:
One piece of relevant evidence from the U.S. Constitution (including amendments)
One additional piece of relevant evidence from case of Shaw v. Reno (1993).
Use reasoning to organize and analyze your evidence.
Respond to an opposing or alternate perspective using refutation, concession, or rebuttal.
Argumentation FRQ—Option 1
The House Committee on House Administration has jurisdiction over federal elections. It considers proposals to amend federal election law and to monitor congressional elections across the United States. It is conducting investigative hearings into redistricting practices and their impact on federal elections.
Prepare an essay in the form of an argument that favors or opposes gerrymandering as a method for helping ensure fairness in representation. This argument should include as support at least one provision of the U.S. Constitution (including amendments) or legislation, and one additional piece of relevant evidence from case of Shaw v. Reno (1993).
In your response, be sure to:
Articulate a defensible claim or thesis that responds to the question.
Support your claim or thesis with at least two pieces of accurate and relevant evidence:
One piece of relevant evidence from the U.S. Constitution (including amendments)
One additional piece of relevant evidence from case of Shaw v. Reno (1993).
Use reasoning to organize and analyze your evidence.
Respond to an opposing or alternate perspective using refutation, concession, or rebuttal.
Argumentation FRQ—Option 1
The House Committee on House Administration has jurisdiction over federal elections. It considers proposals to amend federal election law and to monitor congressional elections across the United States. It is conducting investigative hearings into redistricting practices and their impact on federal elections.
Prepare an essay in the form of an argument that favors or opposes gerrymandering as a method for helping ensure fairness in representation. This argument should include as support at least one provision of the U.S. Constitution (including amendments) or legislation, and one additional piece of relevant evidence from case of Shaw v. Reno (1993).
In your response, be sure to:
Articulate a defensible claim or thesis that responds to the question.
Support your claim or thesis with at least two pieces of accurate and relevant evidence:
One piece of relevant evidence from the U.S. Constitution (including amendments)
One additional piece of relevant evidence from case of Shaw v. Reno (1993).
Use reasoning to organize and analyze your evidence.
Respond to an opposing or alternate perspective using refutation, concession, or rebuttal.
Argumentation FRQ—Option 1
The House Committee on House Administration has jurisdiction over federal elections. It considers proposals to amend federal election law and to monitor congressional elections across the United States. It is conducting investigative hearings into redistricting practices and their impact on federal elections.
Prepare an essay in the form of an argument that favors or opposes gerrymandering as a method for helping ensure fairness in representation. This argument should include as support at least one provision of the U.S. Constitution (including amendments) or legislation, and one additional piece of relevant evidence from case of Shaw v. Reno (1993).
In your response, be sure to:
Articulate a defensible claim or thesis that responds to the question.
Support your claim or thesis with at least two pieces of accurate and relevant evidence:
One piece of relevant evidence from the U.S. Constitution (including amendments)
One additional piece of relevant evidence from case of Shaw v. Reno (1993).
Use reasoning to organize and analyze your evidence.
Respond to an opposing or alternate perspective using refutation, concession, or rebuttal.
Argumentation FRQ—Option 1
The House Committee on House Administration has jurisdiction over federal elections. It considers proposals to amend federal election law and to monitor congressional elections across the United States. It is conducting investigative hearings into redistricting practices and their impact on federal elections.
Prepare an essay in the form of an argument that favors or opposes gerrymandering as a method for helping ensure fairness in representation. This argument should include as support at least one provision of the U.S. Constitution (including amendments) or legislation, and one additional piece of relevant evidence from case of Shaw v. Reno (1993).
In your response, be sure to:
Articulate a defensible claim or thesis that responds to the question.
Support your claim or thesis with at least two pieces of accurate and relevant evidence:
One piece of relevant evidence from the U.S. Constitution (including amendments)
One additional piece of relevant evidence from case of Shaw v. Reno (1993).
Use reasoning to organize and analyze your evidence.
Respond to an opposing or alternate perspective using refutation, concession, or rebuttal.
Argumentation FRQ—Option 1
The House Committee on House Administration has jurisdiction over federal elections. It considers proposals to amend federal election law and to monitor congressional elections across the United States. It is conducting investigative hearings into redistricting practices and their impact on federal elections.
Prepare an essay in the form of an argument that favors or opposes gerrymandering as a method for helping ensure fairness in representation. This argument should include as support at least one provision of the U.S. Constitution (including amendments) or legislation, and one additional piece of relevant evidence from case of Shaw v. Reno (1993).
In your response, be sure to:
Articulate a defensible claim or thesis that responds to the question.
Support your claim or thesis with at least two pieces of accurate and relevant evidence:
One piece of relevant evidence from the U.S. Constitution (including amendments)
One additional piece of relevant evidence from case of Shaw v. Reno (1993).
Use reasoning to organize and analyze your evidence.
Respond to an opposing or alternate perspective using refutation, concession, or rebuttal.
Argumentation FRQ—Option 1
The House Committee on House Administration has jurisdiction over federal elections. It considers proposals to amend federal election law and to monitor congressional elections across the United States. It is conducting investigative hearings into redistricting practices and their impact on federal elections.
Prepare an essay in the form of an argument that favors or opposes gerrymandering as a method for helping ensure fairness in representation. This argument should include as support at least one provision of the U.S. Constitution (including amendments) or legislation, and one additional piece of relevant evidence from case of Shaw v. Reno (1993).
In your response, be sure to:
Articulate a defensible claim or thesis that responds to the question.
Support your claim or thesis with at least two pieces of accurate and relevant evidence:
One piece of relevant evidence from the U.S. Constitution (including amendments)
One additional piece of relevant evidence from case of Shaw v. Reno (1993).
Use reasoning to organize and analyze your evidence.
Respond to an opposing or alternate perspective using refutation, concession, or rebuttal.
Argumentation FRQ—Option 1
The House Committee on House Administration has jurisdiction over federal elections. It considers proposals to amend federal election law and to monitor congressional elections across the United States. It is conducting investigative hearings into redistricting practices and their impact on federal elections.
Prepare an essay in the form of an argument that favors or opposes gerrymandering as a method for helping ensure fairness in representation. This argument should include as support at least one provision of the U.S. Constitution (including amendments) or legislation, and one additional piece of relevant evidence from case of Shaw v. Reno (1993).
In your response, be sure to:
Articulate a defensible claim or thesis that responds to the question.
Support your claim or thesis with at least two pieces of accurate and relevant evidence:
One piece of relevant evidence from the U.S. Constitution (including amendments)
One additional piece of relevant evidence from case of Shaw v. Reno (1993).
Use reasoning to organize and analyze your evidence.
Respond to an opposing or alternate perspective using refutation, concession, or rebuttal.