diagrams project

Project Phase II – Content Requirement
Your individual project is developed based on the case descriptions. All the diagrams should be created using a diagramming tool (draw.io) and copied and pasted to a MS Word document, which then should be submitted to
The following details the required content for project
phase II.
Note: the following structure is expected to be followed and each diagram well formatted and presented.
Required Content
• Title Page
Table of Contents
• Assumptions (Optional)
• Revised content of project phase I including domain class diagram, use case diagrams, use case scenarios, and activity diagrams.
• System sequence diagram – Develop a system sequence diagram based on each fully detailed use case description
• Design class diagram – Develop a design class diagram for the system. Include all classes of the system in the diagram. However, for the classes that are not involved in the use cases you’ve chosen, you can keep their methods blank.
Detailed system sequence diagram- Develop a first-cut sequence diagram for each use case description you’ve chosen for the project
The table below summarizes the number of diagrams needed for project phase II
Diagrams
No. of diagram that needs to be produced
Domain class diagram
1
Use case diagram
Use case scenario
2
Activity diagram
2
System sequence diagrams
Design class diagram
1
Sequence diagram
2Project Phase II – Content Requirement
Your individual project is developed based on the case descriptions. All the diagrams should be created using a diagramming tool (draw.io) and copied and pasted to a MS Word document, which then should be submitted to
The following details the required content for project
phase II.
Note: the following structure is expected to be followed and each diagram well formatted and presented.
Required Content
• Title Page
Table of Contents
• Assumptions (Optional)
• Revised content of project phase I including domain class diagram, use case diagrams, use case scenarios, and activity diagrams.
• System sequence diagram – Develop a system sequence diagram based on each fully detailed use case description
• Design class diagram – Develop a design class diagram for the system. Include all classes of the system in the diagram. However, for the classes that are not involved in the use cases you’ve chosen, you can keep their methods blank.
Detailed system sequence diagram- Develop a first-cut sequence diagram for each use case description you’ve chosen for the project
The table below summarizes the number of diagrams needed for project phase II
Diagrams
No. of diagram that needs to be produced
Domain class diagram
1
Use case diagram
Use case scenario
2
Activity diagram
2
System sequence diagrams
Design class diagram
1
Sequence diagram
2

Recreation and Leisure Report

Instructions:
• Answer five (5) of the six (6) questions listed below. Each question is worth 10 marks
(total 50 marks). Only answer five questions. If you answer all six, only the first five
will be graded.
• Your answer to each question is limited to one page (12 pt. font, double-spaced). One
page with double-spaced lines is about 250 to 350 words. Anything beyond one page per
question will not be graded.
• Put the question number at the top of each page of your answer.

Questions:

1. We have spent a term exploring how leisure is defined, delivered, and practiced. Using
this new understanding, create your own definition of leisure (2 marks). In your
definition, be sure to address what leisure is/means (2 marks); how it differs from other
concepts, like work and play (3 marks); and how you conceptualize leisure satisfaction (3
marks).

2. Provide three examples (3 marks) of what pop culture is beyond media (i.e., not
television, movies, magazines, etc.). Differentiate (2 marks) between “high culture” and
“low culture,” providing an example (1 mark) of each. Identify (4 marks) why this
high-low distinction can be problematic and explain how it is beginning to shift.

3. Write a brief job description for a recreation therapist, including the clients, contexts, and
key modalities in which they will work (4 marks). Explain what is meant by “person-first
language” (1 mark) and explain when it would not be appropriate to use it (1 mark).
Provide an example (2 marks) of a leisure program where persons with disabilities are
segregated and provide an example (2 marks) of a program that is inclusive.

4. Explain (3 marks) three ways that sport can help strengthen communities. Explain (3
marks) three ways that sport can be challenging or controversial in terms of diverse
populations. Define (1 mark) eSports and discuss (3 marks) whether or not you believe
that competitive gamers are athletes.

5. Define tourism in your own words (2 marks). Explain what push factors and pull factors
are (2 marks) and provide an example for each (2 marks). Discuss two positive impacts
of tourism and two negative impacts of tourism (4 marks).

6. In the final module of the term, we explored some of the factors that are likely to impact
our leisure lives in the distant and not-so-distant future. Identify (0.5 marks) whether you
are a Prophet-of-Doom, Utopian, or somewhere in the middle. Define (0.5 marks) the
term you choose and explain (3 marks) why you chose it. Discuss how the COVID-19
pandemic is likely to impact how we understand and engage in leisure (6 marks).

Resources:
• You must write the report in your own words.
• You may refer to the modules and/or course readings when developing your responses.
o DO NOT copy/paste module content – this will be flagged for plagiarism.
• You may not refer to any external sources (e.g., google).

**Feel free to contact me if you need access to course readings and materials. Email: Kiran5000@hotmail.com

Corporate governance about a company

Learning outcomes
The assignment covers all module learning outcomes.
Knowledge
1. Discuss and critically evaluate key corporate governance and ethics concepts.
2. Evaluate different theoretical perspectives on corporate governance, understand their assumptions about key actors, motives, and control mechanisms.
3. Explore an international comparative perspective of corporate governance, focusing upon the system found in the UK and contrasting this with a range of different corporate governance systems in countries around the world.
Skills
4. Construct critical thinking about a range of approaches and options for corporate accountability and ethics requiring the organisation of thoughts, analysis, synthesis, and critical appraisal.
Assessment guideline:
• Weighting – 100% of the marks for this module
• This is an individual assignment of 3,000 words. (+ 10%) excluding appendices, reference list, and bibliography.
• The Assignment hand-in date: To be confirmed this week.
• The assignment must be submitted ONLINE through TURNITIN© by the due date. Only assessments submitted through TURNITIN© will be marked. Any other submission including submission to the library in hard copy will be treated as a non-submission.
Students should approach this assignment as an academic essay, weighing the arguments for and against each issue, making comment on the literature and drawing logical conclusions. Academic referencing using the Harvard referencing approach is a key requirement of the assignment to demonstrate wider reading and to underpin the discussions, ensuring they have relevant depth. Students are encouraged to be inquisitive and innovative in their approach as to what should be included in this report.
The University policy on cheating collusion and plagiarism will be applied to this piece of work.
Assessment Brief:
Each student selects his/her own company to study.
The requirement is that you analyse in depth one company based in any country. It is not a requirement that the company is located in the UK. The scope of this analysis is to draw from the material discussed within the module.
Analysis contents:
• A short section setting out Basic Factual Information about the company, such as nature of the business (business sector), country of incorporation, size, segmental breakdown, brief history, stock market listings etc.
(approx. 250 words- 10 Marks)
• Corporate Governance: the examination of relationship within the organisation, those involved in the management of the organisation and external stakeholders: The section should include such things as:
1. Internal Corporate Governance Mechanisms: structure, substance, and purpose (e.g., board effectiveness, the role of non-executive directors, and remuneration structures)
2. External mechanisms, especially the role of institutional investors.
3. Shareholder and stakeholder perspectives in an ethical context
4. Employees and Ethics
(approx. 500 words- 15 Marks)
• Evaluate the corporate governance failures and weaknesses that have led to problems of the chosen company and the consequences of weak corporate governance experienced.
(approx. 750 words 25 Marks)
• Critically evaluate the different responses to corporate governance and the role of government regulations in responding to issues raised by an examination of the ethical issues impacting upon the business organisations that have encouraged corporate governance reform worldwide: The section should include such things as:
1. Comparative Corporate Governance systems – Europe, USA, Asia
2. Globalisation issues including International corporate governance and comparative analysis
3. Leadership, Values & Managing Ethical Behaviour
4. Ethics & CSR in a Global Context (approx. 1500 words – 50 Marks)
KEY POINTS
The assignment aims to understand the key areas of Corporate Governance and Ethics using extracts, examples, and approaches to Corporate Governance issues. This will include investigating topics from throughout the course linked to the ethics and accountability issues. Some of the principles, concepts and models will be more relevant to their chosen approach than others and so it is likely that different students will formulate different approaches to the problems.
Student assignment should aim to provide readers with comprehensive knowledge and critical reviews of these areas covering, for example:
• Knowledge of a variety of topic related to corporate governance within the concept of CSR, ethics, and accountability.
• Knowledge of comparing a range of definitions of corporate governance within the practitioner community and several theoretical frameworks that are applied to the corporate governance discipline.
• Individual understandings of, comments on, arguments and contributions to the topic, such as key qualitative characteristics, true and fair view/fair presentation, creative accounting.
Therefore, the assessment encourages students to explore how corporate governance and accountability may be enhanced and how a more ethical business environment may be nurtured. This engages the student in the academic literature that they then need to apply in their assessment.
THE FRONT COVER OF YOUR ASSIGNMENT MUST SHOW:
1. Your name;
2. Your student registration number;
3. Your Programme of Study (e.g., BA (Hons) Business and Financial Management, BA (Hons) Accounting and Finance)
4. The word count (excluding the reference list, bibliography and any appendices).
5. The name of your UGB364 module leader and tutor.
FORMAT GUIDE:
• All text should be in a clear font such as Arial or Times New Roman;
• All text should be 12-point except for headings.
• The text should be in a single column and left-aligned;
• One and a half spacing between lines, including appendices and bibliography, but excluding quotations, footnotes, or captions, which may be single-spaced.
• References: Harvard

debate topic : should Shemima begum be allowed back in the uk? in comparison to unity mitford?

I need you to write a debate style news article deciding whether shemima begum should be allowed to regain her uk citenzenship, and if not why should Unity Mitford, two girls who joined Russian to fight against Ukrainian, be allowed to regain their citizenship.
Themes should include topics like race and culture. Including both shemima begum and unity mitfords circumstances

Reflection Journal: Vulnerable Populations

We often consider how community health nurses can support vulnerable populations. For this self-reflection, complete the following:

Identify a vulnerable population in your community and internationally.
What resources are available to service these populations’ specific needs?
What gaps or areas could be better addressed?
What policies may affect these vulnerable populations?
Then, explore what unique assets or perspectives vulnerable populations can provide to nurses. Reflect on how you, as a professional nurse, hope to improve individual and social factors that contribute to vulnerability in populations.

Poverty and Economic Inequality

This is a research paper, meaning you will need to find multiple sources pertaining to your discussion in the paper, and cite them both within the paper and in the References page.

Based on your research, you will make a thesis (a main claim or argument) in your introductory paragraph, and then support your thesis using evidence (from outside sources) and logic in the body of the paper. Your conclusion will wrap up your main points expressed in the body of the essay and show the reader why your thesis is clearly supported and correct. You are encouraged to choose a novel or interesting thesis, as this tends to create a more engaging paper.
Topic
Introduction/Thesis (Argument)

Main Point 1:
a) evidence
b) evidence
discuss
etc.
[Repeat for Main Points 2, 3 and so forth]
Conclusion
————–
Paper Formatting Requirements:
Typed
Three page minimum, no maximum (3-5 pages recommended)
Double spaced
Font: Times New Roman
Size: 12 font

Other Requirements:
Minimum of five (5) high-quality sources (see #3 in “Resources” above)
You must reference the sources that you use within the body of the paper in APA format. Generally, include the author(s) and year of publication at the end of the sentence.
Example: A downward sloping demand curve reflects the Law of Demand (Taylor & Greenblatt, 2020). A “References” Page (in APA format). The writing tutors can help with citing correctly, or use these web resources:
An introductory paragraph, with a thesis and the general arguments that you will be making in the body of the paper (in the body of the paper, you will delve into these arguments in more details and support them with evidence).
A concluding paragraph, which wraps up the arguments (discussed in the body) into an overall main point that supports your thesis.
Must include a cover page in APA format (including a Running head)
Must include an abstract (after the cover page)

Here are some citations I have found:
Carvalho, L. S., Meier, S., & Wang, S. W. (2016). Poverty and Economic Decision-Making: Evidence from Changes in Financial Resources at Payday. The American Economic Review, 106(2), 260–284. http://www.jstor.org/stable/43821452
Economic Inequality and Morality :
Diverse Ethical Perspectives
Bishop, J. A., & Rodríguez, J. G. (Eds.). (2014). Economic well-being and inequality : Papers from the fifth ecineq meeting. Emerald Publishing Limited.
Meyer, B. D., & Sullivan, J. X. (2012). Identifying the Disadvantaged: Official Poverty, Consumption Poverty, and the New Supplemental Poverty Measure. The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 26(3), 111–135. http://www.jstor.org/stable/41581134

Explain the background information and theories related to SNS.

Explain the background information and theories related to SNS. What drives SNS use? How can SNS be rewarding? (5pts)

What is the hypothesis of this study? (2pts)
What kind of study was done? Explain the procedures. (5pts)

What were the independent and dependent variables? How did the researchers measure their variables? (3pts)

What were the main findings of this study?

What were the results? (5pts)

What have you learned while completing this assignment? Was there anything surprising to you, or did something confirm what you already knew? Explain in detail. (5pts)

What is the threshold level of emissions where damages begin to occur?

What is the threshold level of emissions where damages begin to occur? b) (2 points) How much carbon would be emitted without any regulation in place? c) (3 points) What is the socially efficient level of emissions? d) (3 points) What is the optimal tax per ton of carbon? e) (8 points) If the optimal tax on carbon is in place, what are the total social costs (total abatement cost (TAC) + total damages (TD))? How much tax revenue would be raised? f) (8 points) If the carbon tax is set at $400 per ton, what are the total social costs (TAC + TD)? How much tax revenue would be raised? g) (8 points) If the carbon tax is set at $100 per ton, what are the total social costs (TAC + TD)? How much tax revenue would be raised?