What attitude does the author have about this issue? How does he express his opinion about this topic?

Paper #2 Due April 2 at 11:59PM

Your second paper asks that you demonstrate your ability to understand an argument as well as understand how an argument works. You will select to speak about any one of the following essays outlined below. Your task in this essay is to tell me what the essay does and how the essay does it. For example, if we look at the essay of Lee and Grant, we might argue that the essay establishes America as a country of divided opinions as well as one of decency and respect. We might go on to argue that the essay illustrates this idea through the presentation of two drastically different and celebrated heroes of the Civil War. The remainder of my essay might continue to explain how the author drives his point home by using the final meeting of Lee and Grant to show that decency is the hallmark of a great country.

Please notice that although I am speaking about the text of Lee and Grant, I am not simply giving a summary of what the author said. I am explaining the agenda of this piece, and then I am explaining how the author went about presenting that agenda. Please also note that this essay should not be a summary of the text, although you will be required to summarize or quote a point or place in the text or in order to put your reader in context.

Your task for this paper is to select one of the essays below and to write a 2- page paper explaining what the piece does and how it does it. I do not want a research paper. Points will be deducted for research used, nor do I want a plagiarized paper from the Internet. I want your own words and your own thoughts about the what the text does and how it does it. I would like you to maintain a singular focus in your argument and connect your sentences so that they logically build from one another. I would like a mature and thoughtful discussion about what lies beneath the surface of the text.

Your essay must be an argument — not a list of facts — about the text. The point of this essay is to show that you are capable of developing a logical and reasonable argument based on facts and reason. You have been given discussions and examples that focus on how to examine a text. You will ask yourself what argument just the text make, and how the text makes that argument. You will explain the value of the text beyond the words on the page.

Questions to ask yourself:

1. What topic does this text explore?

2. What attitude does the author have about this issue? How does he express his opinion about this topic?

3. What evidence from the text can I use to support my argument?

4. How can I elaborate on this argument? In other words, what do I have to say that it’s important to relevant to this argument, without becoming too self-indulgent and making the text about me? What do I have to add to the topic expressed — not the plot.

* Please remember that I do not want a summary of the text. You might, however, use a summary for your introduction, so you can provide your reader with context before you move to your thesis and your analysis. I want you to explain to me the message that the text communicates and how he communicates that message.

You will select from one of the following essays for your paper:

Straw in metamorphosis

A few words about breasts

Shooting in elephant

Once more to the lake

A man without a country

Basics of the Paper (If you miss any of these basic requirements, you cannot receive an A. Please read carefully. )

Two full pages (You may stop anywhere on Page 3. You cannot stop on page 2, and you cannot start halfway down on Page 1. Page 1 includes your title in the center, your name and date on left hand, and the beginning of your discussion. I do not want a cover page.)
double space
12 font
indent paragraphs
underline thesis — this must be a claim about what the text does and how it does it
title in the center of your page (your title cannot be the title of the piece)
name and date on the left hand side of the page
Please do not use secondary sources. I want only your thinking
Please also know that if you plagiarize, you will fail the class. Plagiarism also includes using papers that have been submitted to other instructors.
Please also know that I do not want any research. I just want your ideas substantiated by the text.
Please do not use second person and do not use first person. You will lose one letter grade for doing so.

Grading Criteria

Did you follow directions? (If you have not followed all of the basic directions, you will not receive an A)
Do you have a clear thesis that explains what the piece does? A thesis is not a summary of the piece.
Are your paragraphs focused to one specific issue?
Have you used the text appropriately in your writing to help make your argument?
Are your sentences clear and grammatically appropriate?
Do your paragraph carry ideas over in order to develop them?
Have you done more than simply summarized the text? (Please note that a simple summary will result in a failure. We are beyond the skill of simply summarizing.)
Have you explained the agenda of the text and how the author carried out this argument.Paper #2 Due April 2 at 11:59PM

Your second paper asks that you demonstrate your ability to understand an argument as well as understand how an argument works. You will select to speak about any one of the following essays outlined below. Your task in this essay is to tell me what the essay does and how the essay does it. For example, if we look at the essay of Lee and Grant, we might argue that the essay establishes America as a country of divided opinions as well as one of decency and respect. We might go on to argue that the essay illustrates this idea through the presentation of two drastically different and celebrated heroes of the Civil War. The remainder of my essay might continue to explain how the author drives his point home by using the final meeting of Lee and Grant to show that decency is the hallmark of a great country.

Please notice that although I am speaking about the text of Lee and Grant, I am not simply giving a summary of what the author said. I am explaining the agenda of this piece, and then I am explaining how the author went about presenting that agenda. Please also note that this essay should not be a summary of the text, although you will be required to summarize or quote a point or place in the text or in order to put your reader in context.

Your task for this paper is to select one of the essays below and to write a 2- page paper explaining what the piece does and how it does it. I do not want a research paper. Points will be deducted for research used, nor do I want a plagiarized paper from the Internet. I want your own words and your own thoughts about the what the text does and how it does it. I would like you to maintain a singular focus in your argument and connect your sentences so that they logically build from one another. I would like a mature and thoughtful discussion about what lies beneath the surface of the text.

Your essay must be an argument — not a list of facts — about the text. The point of this essay is to show that you are capable of developing a logical and reasonable argument based on facts and reason. You have been given discussions and examples that focus on how to examine a text. You will ask yourself what argument just the text make, and how the text makes that argument. You will explain the value of the text beyond the words on the page.

Questions to ask yourself:

1. What topic does this text explore?

2. What attitude does the author have about this issue? How does he express his opinion about this topic?

3. What evidence from the text can I use to support my argument?

4. How can I elaborate on this argument? In other words, what do I have to say that it’s important to relevant to this argument, without becoming too self-indulgent and making the text about me? What do I have to add to the topic expressed — not the plot.

* Please remember that I do not want a summary of the text. You might, however, use a summary for your introduction, so you can provide your reader with context before you move to your thesis and your analysis. I want you to explain to me the message that the text communicates and how he communicates that message.

You will select from one of the following essays for your paper:

Straw in metamorphosis

A few words about breasts

Shooting in elephant

Once more to the lake

A man without a country

Basics of the Paper (If you miss any of these basic requirements, you cannot receive an A. Please read carefully. )

Two full pages (You may stop anywhere on Page 3. You cannot stop on page 2, and you cannot start halfway down on Page 1. Page 1 includes your title in the center, your name and date on left hand, and the beginning of your discussion. I do not want a cover page.)
double space
12 font
indent paragraphs
underline thesis — this must be a claim about what the text does and how it does it
title in the center of your page (your title cannot be the title of the piece)
name and date on the left hand side of the page
Please do not use secondary sources. I want only your thinking
Please also know that if you plagiarize, you will fail the class. Plagiarism also includes using papers that have been submitted to other instructors.
Please also know that I do not want any research. I just want your ideas substantiated by the text.
Please do not use second person and do not use first person. You will lose one letter grade for doing so.

Grading Criteria

Did you follow directions? (If you have not followed all of the basic directions, you will not receive an A)
Do you have a clear thesis that explains what the piece does? A thesis is not a summary of the piece.
Are your paragraphs focused to one specific issue?
Have you used the text appropriately in your writing to help make your argument?
Are your sentences clear and grammatically appropriate?
Do your paragraph carry ideas over in order to develop them?
Have you done more than simply summarized the text? (Please note that a simple summary will result in a failure. We are beyond the skill of simply summarizing.)
Have you explained the agenda of the text and how the author carried out this argument.Paper #2 Due April 2 at 11:59PM

Your second paper asks that you demonstrate your ability to understand an argument as well as understand how an argument works. You will select to speak about any one of the following essays outlined below. Your task in this essay is to tell me what the essay does and how the essay does it. For example, if we look at the essay of Lee and Grant, we might argue that the essay establishes America as a country of divided opinions as well as one of decency and respect. We might go on to argue that the essay illustrates this idea through the presentation of two drastically different and celebrated heroes of the Civil War. The remainder of my essay might continue to explain how the author drives his point home by using the final meeting of Lee and Grant to show that decency is the hallmark of a great country.

Please notice that although I am speaking about the text of Lee and Grant, I am not simply giving a summary of what the author said. I am explaining the agenda of this piece, and then I am explaining how the author went about presenting that agenda. Please also note that this essay should not be a summary of the text, although you will be required to summarize or quote a point or place in the text or in order to put your reader in context.

Your task for this paper is to select one of the essays below and to write a 2- page paper explaining what the piece does and how it does it. I do not want a research paper. Points will be deducted for research used, nor do I want a plagiarized paper from the Internet. I want your own words and your own thoughts about the what the text does and how it does it. I would like you to maintain a singular focus in your argument and connect your sentences so that they logically build from one another. I would like a mature and thoughtful discussion about what lies beneath the surface of the text.

Your essay must be an argument — not a list of facts — about the text. The point of this essay is to show that you are capable of developing a logical and reasonable argument based on facts and reason. You have been given discussions and examples that focus on how to examine a text. You will ask yourself what argument just the text make, and how the text makes that argument. You will explain the value of the text beyond the words on the page.

Questions to ask yourself:

1. What topic does this text explore?

2. What attitude does the author have about this issue? How does he express his opinion about this topic?

3. What evidence from the text can I use to support my argument?

4. How can I elaborate on this argument? In other words, what do I have to say that it’s important to relevant to this argument, without becoming too self-indulgent and making the text about me? What do I have to add to the topic expressed — not the plot.

* Please remember that I do not want a summary of the text. You might, however, use a summary for your introduction, so you can provide your reader with context before you move to your thesis and your analysis. I want you to explain to me the message that the text communicates and how he communicates that message.

You will select from one of the following essays for your paper:

Straw in metamorphosis

A few words about breasts

Shooting in elephant

Once more to the lake

A man without a country

Basics of the Paper (If you miss any of these basic requirements, you cannot receive an A. Please read carefully. )

Two full pages (You may stop anywhere on Page 3. You cannot stop on page 2, and you cannot start halfway down on Page 1. Page 1 includes your title in the center, your name and date on left hand, and the beginning of your discussion. I do not want a cover page.)
double space
12 font
indent paragraphs
underline thesis — this must be a claim about what the text does and how it does it
title in the center of your page (your title cannot be the title of the piece)
name and date on the left hand side of the page
Please do not use secondary sources. I want only your thinking
Please also know that if you plagiarize, you will fail the class. Plagiarism also includes using papers that have been submitted to other instructors.
Please also know that I do not want any research. I just want your ideas substantiated by the text.
Please do not use second person and do not use first person. You will lose one letter grade for doing so.

Grading Criteria

Did you follow directions? (If you have not followed all of the basic directions, you will not receive an A)
Do you have a clear thesis that explains what the piece does? A thesis is not a summary of the piece.
Are your paragraphs focused to one specific issue?
Have you used the text appropriately in your writing to help make your argument?
Are your sentences clear and grammatically appropriate?
Do your paragraph carry ideas over in order to develop them?
Have you done more than simply summarized the text? (Please note that a simple summary will result in a failure. We are beyond the skill of simply summarizing.)
Have you explained the agenda of the text and how the author carried out this argument.Paper #2 Due April 2 at 11:59PM

Your second paper asks that you demonstrate your ability to understand an argument as well as understand how an argument works. You will select to speak about any one of the following essays outlined below. Your task in this essay is to tell me what the essay does and how the essay does it. For example, if we look at the essay of Lee and Grant, we might argue that the essay establishes America as a country of divided opinions as well as one of decency and respect. We might go on to argue that the essay illustrates this idea through the presentation of two drastically different and celebrated heroes of the Civil War. The remainder of my essay might continue to explain how the author drives his point home by using the final meeting of Lee and Grant to show that decency is the hallmark of a great country.

Please notice that although I am speaking about the text of Lee and Grant, I am not simply giving a summary of what the author said. I am explaining the agenda of this piece, and then I am explaining how the author went about presenting that agenda. Please also note that this essay should not be a summary of the text, although you will be required to summarize or quote a point or place in the text or in order to put your reader in context.

Your task for this paper is to select one of the essays below and to write a 2- page paper explaining what the piece does and how it does it. I do not want a research paper. Points will be deducted for research used, nor do I want a plagiarized paper from the Internet. I want your own words and your own thoughts about the what the text does and how it does it. I would like you to maintain a singular focus in your argument and connect your sentences so that they logically build from one another. I would like a mature and thoughtful discussion about what lies beneath the surface of the text.

Your essay must be an argument — not a list of facts — about the text. The point of this essay is to show that you are capable of developing a logical and reasonable argument based on facts and reason. You have been given discussions and examples that focus on how to examine a text. You will ask yourself what argument just the text make, and how the text makes that argument. You will explain the value of the text beyond the words on the page.

Questions to ask yourself:

1. What topic does this text explore?

2. What attitude does the author have about this issue? How does he express his opinion about this topic?

3. What evidence from the text can I use to support my argument?

4. How can I elaborate on this argument? In other words, what do I have to say that it’s important to relevant to this argument, without becoming too self-indulgent and making the text about me? What do I have to add to the topic expressed — not the plot.

* Please remember that I do not want a summary of the text. You might, however, use a summary for your introduction, so you can provide your reader with context before you move to your thesis and your analysis. I want you to explain to me the message that the text communicates and how he communicates that message.

You will select from one of the following essays for your paper:

Straw in metamorphosis

A few words about breasts

Shooting in elephant

Once more to the lake

A man without a country

Basics of the Paper (If you miss any of these basic requirements, you cannot receive an A. Please read carefully. )

Two full pages (You may stop anywhere on Page 3. You cannot stop on page 2, and you cannot start halfway down on Page 1. Page 1 includes your title in the center, your name and date on left hand, and the beginning of your discussion. I do not want a cover page.)
double space
12 font
indent paragraphs
underline thesis — this must be a claim about what the text does and how it does it
title in the center of your page (your title cannot be the title of the piece)
name and date on the left hand side of the page
Please do not use secondary sources. I want only your thinking
Please also know that if you plagiarize, you will fail the class. Plagiarism also includes using papers that have been submitted to other instructors.
Please also know that I do not want any research. I just want your ideas substantiated by the text.
Please do not use second person and do not use first person. You will lose one letter grade for doing so.

Grading Criteria

Did you follow directions? (If you have not followed all of the basic directions, you will not receive an A)
Do you have a clear thesis that explains what the piece does? A thesis is not a summary of the piece.
Are your paragraphs focused to one specific issue?
Have you used the text appropriately in your writing to help make your argument?
Are your sentences clear and grammatically appropriate?
Do your paragraph carry ideas over in order to develop them?
Have you done more than simply summarized the text? (Please note that a simple summary will result in a failure. We are beyond the skill of simply summarizing.)
Have you explained the agenda of the text and how the author carried out this argument.

As forensic psychologists, should we treat offenders or should we just lock them up and throw away the key?

Topic: 1) As forensic psychologists, should we treat offenders or should we just lock them up and throw away the key? (Also, consider what challenges a forensic psychologist might face when working with offenders?)

Written paper:
The written paper is worth 25% of your final grade.
you shall have a cover page, an abstract page, table of contents, and a references page. The body of the paper itself should be four to five pages in length, double-spaced, not counting the title page, abstract, table of contents, and references. The body of the paper needs an introduction section and a conclusion section. The student should use topic headings throughout the body of the paper, except for the introduction and conclusions sections. You should have at least twelve reference sources with no more than three scholarly sources from Internet sites. The font type will be comparable to 12 Arial or 12 Times New Roman and double-spaced. The term paper must be written and submitted in a Microsoft Word document. If the document is not a Microsoft Word document, then the student will receive a zero (0) score for the paper.
The rules for the preparation and presentation of the manuscript shall conform to the APA Manual (7th Edition). Under no circumstances shall you quote any portion of a text from a source. Instead, you shall use his own words in conveying the meaning of source material. There are point deductions for quotes. you shall use grammar that conforms to standard and acceptable prose-writing style that is found in journal articles, scholarly books, and guides. The student should write in the first or third person and should avoid the use of “etc.” There are point deductions for writing in the second person or using “etc.” The cover page shall include the following information, typed in about the centre of the page: title, your name, PSY Special Topics: Introduction to Forensic Psychology, and your academic affiliation. The student shall use the running head feature and page numbers, in accordance with the APA Manual. The page numbers shall be displayed in the top right portion of the pages of the document. In Microsoft Word, locate the Insert tab, Page Number, Top of Page, and Plain Number 3. Select Plain Number 3. At this point, you may type in your header, according to the APA Manual.

Course Evaluation Template

Develop a standardized template for evaluating courses in a selected program. Include a 2 page executive summary containing the rationale and justification for the methods selected.

Theories of Aging Paper

Identify the different theories and their implications on the aging process.

Define aging from biologic, sociologic, and psychological theories.
Develop nursing interventions based on the psychosocial issues and biologic changes associated with older adulthood.
Discuss several nursing implications for each of the major biologic, sociologic, and psychological theories of aging.
Based on your experience what health promotion strategies would you recommend to facilitate successful aging?

Submission Instructions:

The paper is to be clear and concise and students will lose points for improper grammar, punctuation and misspelling.
The paper is to be formatted per current APA, be clear, concise and students will lose points for improper grammar, punctuation and misspelling.
The paper is to be 3-4 pages in length, excluding the title, and references page.
Incorporate a minimum of 3 current (published within last five years) scholarly journal articles or primary legal sources (statutes, court opinions) within your work.
Journal articles and books should be referenced according to current APA style.

Why has Walmart been successful? What is the single most important factor that has contributed to Wal-Mart’s phenomenal success?Why has Walmart been successful? What is the single most important factor that has contributed to Wal-Mart’s phenomenal success?

Question 1
Why has Walmart been successful? What is the single most important factor that has contributed to Wal-Mart’s phenomenal success?Why has Walmart been successful? What is the single most important factor that has contributed to Wal-Mart’s phenomenal success?
question 2
Why do you think Wal-Mart has had difficultly succeeding in foreign markets, especially in emerging markets like Brazil and South Korea?Why do you think Wal-Mart has had difficultly succeeding in foreign markets, especially in emerging markets like Brazil and South Korea?

Discussion #4 Discussion is based on a chapter 10 review

Discussion #4
Chapter 10. Contraception
Students, the Discussion is based on a chapter 10 review in order for the student to earn all the points, it requires to follow the instructions below:
1. explaining your understanding the chapter of your choice.
2. You may include examples, experiences, and theories.
Note: that each paragraph is a writing structure that requires a minimum of five sentences.
These five or more sentences should represent a valid knowledge of the topic.
Class Book
Title: Our Sexuality
Authors: R. Crooks, K. Baur, and L. Widman
Edition: 14th Edition – Year 2021
Publisher: Cengage
ISBN #: 13-978035730750
Summary
Historical and Social Perspectives
• From the beginning of recorded history, humankind has been concerned about birth control.
• Margaret Sanger opened the first birth control clinics in the United States at a time when it was illegal to provide birth control information and devices.
• Objections to contraception stem from Roman Catholic doctrine and far-right anti-contraception beliefs. However, most church members in the United States approve of and use some kind of artificial contraception.
Sharing Responsibility and Choosing a Birth Control Method
• A man can share contraceptive responsibility with his female partner by getting informed, asking a new partner about birth control, accompanying his partner to her exam, using condoms and/or coital abstinence if the couple chooses, and sharing the expense of the exam and contraceptive method.
• Comparison of convenience, safety, cost, and effectiveness may influence the choice of contraception.
• People who feel guilty, have negative attitudes about sexuality, and do not talk with their partners about contraception are less likely to use contraception effectively than are people who have positive attitudes about sexuality.
Hormone-Based Contraceptives
• Four types of oral contraceptives are available. The constant-dose combination pill contains steady doses of estrogen and progestin. The triphasic pill provides fluctuations of estrogen and progestin levels throughout the menstrual cycle. The extended-cycle pill reduces menstrual cycles to four per year. The progestin-only pill consists of low-dose progestin.
• Advantages of oral contraceptives include high effectiveness and lack of interference with sexual activity. Birth control pills are also associated with lower incidences of uterine, ovarian, and colon cancer. An additional advantage is reduction of menstrual flow and cramps. The advantage of the progestin-only pill is the reduced chance of side effects from estrogen. The vaginal ring (NuvaRing), the transdermal patch (Ortho Evra), and the injectable Depo-Provera are hormone-based contraceptives that do not require remembering to take a pill each day.
• Disadvantages of hormone-based contraceptives include possible side effects such as a slight increase in the likelihood of blood clots, an increase in migraine headaches, nausea, fluid retention, irregular bleeding, and reduced sexual interest. Disadvantages of the progestin-only pill include irregular bleeding and the possibility of additional side effects. In general, the health risks of oral contraceptives are far lower than those from pregnancy and birth.
• Depo-Provera is an injectable contraceptive that lasts for 3 months.
Barrier and Spermicide Methods
• Condoms are available in a variety of styles. Advantages include protection from sexually transmitted infections and availability as a backup method. Disadvantages include interruption of sexual activity if the couple do not incorporate its use into their sex play. A female condom has also been developed.
• Vaginal spermicides (including contraceptive foam, the sponge, vaginal suppositories, creams and jellies, and contraceptive film) are available without a prescription. Advantages of vaginal spermicides include lack of serious side effects and added lubrication. Disadvantages include low level of effectiveness unless used with a condom, possible irritation of genital tissues, and interruption of sexual activity.
• Advantages of cervical barrier methods include lack of side effects, high effectiveness with knowledgeable and consistent use, and possible promotion of vaginal health. Disadvantages include interruption of sexual activity, potential irritation from the spermicidal cream or jelly, and possible misplacement during insertion or intercourse.
Intrauterine Devices
• There is one non-hormonal IUD—ParaGard—and four hormonal IUDs—Mirena, Skyla, Kyleena, and Liletta—currently available in the United States. Advantages of the IUD include uninterrupted sexual interaction and simplicity of use. Disadvantages include the possibilities of increased cramping and spontaneous expulsion. Uterine perforation is rare. The IUD increases risk of pelvic inflammatory disease for women with multiple partners.
Emergency Contraception
• Plan B, oral contraceptives, and the ParaGard IUD can be used for emergency contraception when a woman has had unprotected intercourse.
Fertility Awareness Methods
• Contraceptive methods based on the menstrual cycle—including the calendar, standard days, mucus, basal body temperature, and symptothermal methods—help in planning intercourse to avoid a woman’s fertile period.
Sterilization
• At this time sterilization should be considered permanent. A decision to be sterilized should be carefully evaluated.
• Tubal implant is the sterilization procedure most commonly performed for women. It does not alter a woman’s hormone levels or menstrual cycle or the timing of menopause. There are recent concerns about side-effects that women should carefully consider.
• Vasectomy, the sterilization procedure for men, is not effective for birth control immediately after surgery because sperm remain in the vas deferens above the incision.
Less Reliable Methods
• The withdrawal method and douching are not reliable methods of contraception.
• The lactational amenorrhea method can be used by a woman in the first six months after childbirth if she is breastfeeding and has not restarted menstruation. Backup methods should also be considered.
New Directions in Contraception
• Possible contraceptive methods for males in the future include the use of hormones and nonhormonal methods to reduce the production and motility of sperm.
• Possible future contraceptive methods for females include nonhormonal contraception, variations of the IUD, and new methods for delivering hormones.
Discussion #4
Chapter 10. Contraception
Students, the Discussion is based on a chapter 10 review in order for the student to earn all the points, it requires to follow the instructions below:
1. explaining your understanding the chapter of your choice.
2. You may include examples, experiences, and theories.
Note: that each paragraph is a writing structure that requires a minimum of five sentences.
These five or more sentences should represent a valid knowledge of the topic.
Class Book
Title: Our Sexuality
Authors: R. Crooks, K. Baur, and L. Widman
Edition: 14th Edition – Year 2021
Publisher: Cengage
ISBN #: 13-978035730750
Summary
Historical and Social Perspectives
• From the beginning of recorded history, humankind has been concerned about birth control.
• Margaret Sanger opened the first birth control clinics in the United States at a time when it was illegal to provide birth control information and devices.
• Objections to contraception stem from Roman Catholic doctrine and far-right anti-contraception beliefs. However, most church members in the United States approve of and use some kind of artificial contraception.
Sharing Responsibility and Choosing a Birth Control Method
• A man can share contraceptive responsibility with his female partner by getting informed, asking a new partner about birth control, accompanying his partner to her exam, using condoms and/or coital abstinence if the couple chooses, and sharing the expense of the exam and contraceptive method.
• Comparison of convenience, safety, cost, and effectiveness may influence the choice of contraception.
• People who feel guilty, have negative attitudes about sexuality, and do not talk with their partners about contraception are less likely to use contraception effectively than are people who have positive attitudes about sexuality.
Hormone-Based Contraceptives
• Four types of oral contraceptives are available. The constant-dose combination pill contains steady doses of estrogen and progestin. The triphasic pill provides fluctuations of estrogen and progestin levels throughout the menstrual cycle. The extended-cycle pill reduces menstrual cycles to four per year. The progestin-only pill consists of low-dose progestin.
• Advantages of oral contraceptives include high effectiveness and lack of interference with sexual activity. Birth control pills are also associated with lower incidences of uterine, ovarian, and colon cancer. An additional advantage is reduction of menstrual flow and cramps. The advantage of the progestin-only pill is the reduced chance of side effects from estrogen. The vaginal ring (NuvaRing), the transdermal patch (Ortho Evra), and the injectable Depo-Provera are hormone-based contraceptives that do not require remembering to take a pill each day.
• Disadvantages of hormone-based contraceptives include possible side effects such as a slight increase in the likelihood of blood clots, an increase in migraine headaches, nausea, fluid retention, irregular bleeding, and reduced sexual interest. Disadvantages of the progestin-only pill include irregular bleeding and the possibility of additional side effects. In general, the health risks of oral contraceptives are far lower than those from pregnancy and birth.
• Depo-Provera is an injectable contraceptive that lasts for 3 months.
Barrier and Spermicide Methods
• Condoms are available in a variety of styles. Advantages include protection from sexually transmitted infections and availability as a backup method. Disadvantages include interruption of sexual activity if the couple do not incorporate its use into their sex play. A female condom has also been developed.
• Vaginal spermicides (including contraceptive foam, the sponge, vaginal suppositories, creams and jellies, and contraceptive film) are available without a prescription. Advantages of vaginal spermicides include lack of serious side effects and added lubrication. Disadvantages include low level of effectiveness unless used with a condom, possible irritation of genital tissues, and interruption of sexual activity.
• Advantages of cervical barrier methods include lack of side effects, high effectiveness with knowledgeable and consistent use, and possible promotion of vaginal health. Disadvantages include interruption of sexual activity, potential irritation from the spermicidal cream or jelly, and possible misplacement during insertion or intercourse.
Intrauterine Devices
• There is one non-hormonal IUD—ParaGard—and four hormonal IUDs—Mirena, Skyla, Kyleena, and Liletta—currently available in the United States. Advantages of the IUD include uninterrupted sexual interaction and simplicity of use. Disadvantages include the possibilities of increased cramping and spontaneous expulsion. Uterine perforation is rare. The IUD increases risk of pelvic inflammatory disease for women with multiple partners.
Emergency Contraception
• Plan B, oral contraceptives, and the ParaGard IUD can be used for emergency contraception when a woman has had unprotected intercourse.
Fertility Awareness Methods
• Contraceptive methods based on the menstrual cycle—including the calendar, standard days, mucus, basal body temperature, and symptothermal methods—help in planning intercourse to avoid a woman’s fertile period.
Sterilization
• At this time sterilization should be considered permanent. A decision to be sterilized should be carefully evaluated.
• Tubal implant is the sterilization procedure most commonly performed for women. It does not alter a woman’s hormone levels or menstrual cycle or the timing of menopause. There are recent concerns about side-effects that women should carefully consider.
• Vasectomy, the sterilization procedure for men, is not effective for birth control immediately after surgery because sperm remain in the vas deferens above the incision.
Less Reliable Methods
• The withdrawal method and douching are not reliable methods of contraception.
• The lactational amenorrhea method can be used by a woman in the first six months after childbirth if she is breastfeeding and has not restarted menstruation. Backup methods should also be considered.
New Directions in Contraception
• Possible contraceptive methods for males in the future include the use of hormones and nonhormonal methods to reduce the production and motility of sperm.
• Possible future contraceptive methods for females include nonhormonal contraception, variations of the IUD, and new methods for delivering hormones.

Report of movie adaptation of one of the following plays

Requirements – Watch one of the movie adaptations of the plays (or read it) and write a one-page report on one of them. Don’t write a summary, rather comment on how you liked the play, what you felt, how you related to the characters, whether you could identify any social/philosophical problems and what the play made you think about (what questions it poses).

John Osborne – Look Back in Anger
August Wilson – Fences
Caryl Churchill – Top Girls
Tom Stoppard’s Rosencrantz and Guildenstern Are Dead (1990 film adaptation of a 1966 play)

Program Effectiveness Presentation

Create a PowerPoint presentation with 10 slides that proposes a systematic process for determining the effectiveness of the nursing program for a sample course.

Make sure your presentation contains the following slide headings and sections, which reflect critical elements that align with the grading criteria:

Title.
Purpose. Include the reasons for the presentation (2 slides).
Philosophical Approaches. Explain some of the major philosophical approaches to evaluation (2 slides).
Program Evaluation Process. Show the steps of the program evaluation process (2 slides).
Evaluation Design. Select and articulate an evaluation design, framework, or model for program evaluation (2 slides).
Program Improvement. Examine how data analysis can be used to foster ongoing program improvement (2 slides).
References. Include a minimum of eight sources, cited using current APA style and formatting.
Additional Requirements
Your presentation should meet the following requirements:

Bullets: Aim for 6 bullets per slide and 4–6 words per bullet.
Images: Use graphics liberally throughout the presentation but ensure they are appropriate for the content provided.
Speaker notes: Use the Notes section within PowerPoint to provide all the information relevant to each slide, which you would otherwise present verbally.
APA citations: Include proper APA style in-text citations in the speaker notes and on slides (if relevant).