Premium Writing

The idea behind this exercise is to get you to apply anthropological topics and terminology to a specific context of social behavior & cultural categories. The more anthropological terms you are able to correctly apply, the more credit you receive. The specific case to which you’ll be applying class material will a fictional world i.e. movie or tv show. This can involve multiple episodes of one show or multiple movies from one franchise. The film/show can also be in a language other than English – but in this case, please ensure there’s an English language summary of I that I can find online (provide a link).

Promotes further discussion on the subject matter through thought-provoking peer responses; demonstrates depth of analysis of topic and peer’s post; source support in proper APA format, grammar,
punctuation, spelling, mechanics and usage with no errorsPromotes further discussion on the subject matter through thought-provoking peer responses; demonstrates depth of analysis of topic and peer’s
post; source support in proper APA format, grammar, punctuation, spelling, mechanics and usage with
no errors.

Textbook:
Kail, R. V., & Cavanaugh, J. C. (2023). Human Development (9th ed.). Cengage LearningKail, R. V., & Cavanaugh, J. C. (2023). Human Development (9th ed.). Cengage Learning

-Both References have to be an outside source

WEEK 3: Essay 1: Success Zones (10 points) – 700-1,000 words

Consider your department or organization’s mission, and the problems you face in the workplace. Identify 2-3 problems you would like to work toward solving. Using the steps outlined on pp. 149-151 in Puccio, Mance, & Murdock, analyze the degree of importance and probability of success for each problem, as well as the “success zone” within which each falls. Based on this evaluation, identify one problem you’d recommend working on resolving, and provide a rationale as to why you chose the problem.

Crime Scene Research Paper
Step 1: Report
Select a criminal case with a computer forensics component that has not been covered in class materials
Suggested Cases:
Casey Anthony
Dennis Rader (BTK)
Jodi Arias
Lori Vallow/Chad Daybell
Aaron Hernandez
Research a criminal case and write a research report about how the crime scene and digital evidence was processed in that case
Summary:
Approximately 3-5 pages single spaced, Arial or Calibri font, 12 point, 1 inch margins
Summarize the case
Provide a brief overview of the case (Note: this should be brief, the purpose of the paper is analyzing the CRIME SCENE processing and should focus on the DIGITAL EVIDENCE component.)
Review the evidence & any available information
Describe the process investigators used to process the crime scene in this case
Include information about any mistakes that were made in the case
What was the outcome of the case?
Analysis:
Approximately 1-2 pages single spaces, Arial or Calibri font, 12 point, 1 inch margins
What would you do differently or the same?
Were there any issues in processing the crime scene/case that had an impact on the outcome/prosecution of the case?
Appendix:
Include visuals to support your report. This may include items from the actual case, such as: evidence logs, photos, search warrants, transcripts, other documents presented in court
Works Cited:
Cite any sources you use in APA – both in-text and a works cited page
Use at least 3 reputable sources to support your report.
Step 2: Conduct a “Background Check” on Yourself
Imagine you are one of the investigators in this case and will be presenting evidence in court. You need to ensure that there is nothing you have posted online or in your background that could be challenged by the opposing side that could put your case in jeopardy.
Remember the article: http://arstechnica.com/web/news/2009/03/officers-online-comments-used-against-him-in-court.ars
Research online to make sure there is nothing that could discredit your character as a witness.
Look for anything you can find online (i.e. Facebook, Instagram, Twitter, etc.) that would question your values or credibility.
Write a brief summary of the process you took to conduct the background check and whether or not you found anything that could be questioned. You do not need to provide details or information about what you found, just the process and if you did or did not find anything. (Just a paragraph or two is needed. This does not need to be extensive.)
Include your background check summary after the works cited page in your report.

Grading:
Summary: (30 Points)
Analysis: (30 Points)
Appendix: (20 Points)
Works Cited: (10 Points)
Background Check: (10 Points)

0-10
Background check notes
0-30
Summary 3-5 pages
· Review the evidence & any available information
· Describe the process investigators used to process the crime scene in this case
· Include information about any mistakes that were made in the case
· What was the outcome of the case?
0-30
Analysis 1-2 pages
· What would you do differently or the same?
· Were there any issues in processing the case that had an impact on the outcome of the case?
0-20
Appendix
· Evidence logs, photos, etc.
0-10
Works cited page
TOTAL
Notes:

Write about ghosts and argue that it is real, put in real life situations and examples of ghost being real. The paper should make the person reading it believe that ghosts are real. ( Thesis:
The existence of ghosts is supported by a variety of sources, including personal experiences, religious and cultural beliefs, and scientific evidence.) Use this thesis to write the paper and make sure the sources are legit and accessible. After each 1 paper is completed please send it to me so I can see how it is.

Discuss how a current political issue has, or will, move through the entire political system. Be sure to include those who have a stake in the issue (interest groups, organizations, businesses, etc.), what current laws or Supreme Court decisions affect the issue , what agencies (executive) and congressional committees (legislative) have jurisdiction, how the public views the issue, how it is represented by the political parties, how the issue has evolved over time, and what roles and responsibilities individuals (or citizens) including yourself have within the system as it relates to the issue.

Submit an attachment and be sure to document all of your sources.
I am looking for quite a bit of research and factual detail. Be sure to answer all of the questions and give me your impression of where the policy area is going.
Choose one the following (or get pre-clearance from me on something else):
Environmental policy
Foreign policy
Health Care
Civil Rights
Gun policy
Immigration

Please watch 1.5 minute youtube video

Do you believe in a transcendental self (whether you call itself, spirit, soul…whatever)? What does this make you feel about your physical body? As for all of nature can you really believe it is just an illusion?

This assignment is to analyse the “Gender Mainstreaming Strategy of Umeå University” (file attached), by using Carol Bacchi’s ‘What’s the problem represented to be?’ WPR approach to policy analysis, based on the following questions:

· Question 1: What is the problem represented to be in the specific policy (file attached)?
· Question 2: What presuppositions or assumptions underlie this representation of the ‘problem’?
· Question 3: How has this representation of the ‘problem’ come about?
· Question 4: What is left unproblematic in this problem representation? Where are the silences? Can the ‘problem’ be thought differently?
Structure the paper in the following manner:

1. Briefly situate the policy in its socio-political and historical context with references to the course literature (max. 1-2 paragraphs),
2. Briefly situate the theoretical context of the WPR-approach (max. 1-2 paragraphs),
3. The WPR-analysis based on explicit examples from the policy (main body of the paper),
4. Concluding discussion (1-2 paragraphs).
5. References.
This paper requires editing – please include headlines and a more focused structure, as it is now it is far too long and repetitive.
TO BE EDITED/RE-WRITTEN: The theoretical context of Carol Bacchi’s WPR-approach is quite specific and cannot be summarized with the very general fields “feminist scholarship and political science” (which are not theoretical positions). This part is also quite general and does not show understanding of the theoretical setting of this specific methodology (e.g., writing “It also draws from post-structuralist and discourse analysis theories, which examine the role of language and representation in shaping power relations and constructing social reality” is not quite the same as explaining how language and power relate to each other).
TO BE EDITED/RE-WRITTEN: What is the problem represented to be in the University’s Policy on Gender Equality (file attached)? It is missing from this paper. It is a key question that needs to be answered.
This is a methodological exercise, and it is Carol Bacchi’s WPR methodology and theoretical understanding of power and gender that must guide the analysis.

What if you are counselor and you have fallen in love with your client and the client has also fallen in love with you. Since, it is unethical to pursue the relationship; you will quit your job. Your job is also importantto you. Now, what will be your decision?

read article https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5461250/pdf/fpsyg-08-00920.pdf

course leadership in health

Explain it in your own words.
Review the results of the study in the Discussion section of the article and summarize.
Provide a real-world example (either has happened to you or a hypothetical scenario) based on the hypothesis
Discuss the application of findings to how you can learn from the readings, lecture, discussion in this course and integrate into your own professional career – what can you do better in regards to delegation?