In the landmark case, Shelby County V. Holder (2013), the US Supreme Court struck down major provisions of the 1965 Voting Rights Act relating to the procedure of “pre-clearance.” Describe the provisions (parts) of the Voting Rights Actthat discuss the issue of “pre-clearance”. Compare and contrast the views of those who think the federal government should have the power of “pre-clearance” and those who do not. Include at least three points of comparison.
Using evidence from any election in 2014 or later, argue whether or not you believe the federal government should have the power of “pre-clearance” relating to election laws. Include at least three reasons and/or examples to make your point.
List at least two things you could do in order to engage in the political process in pursuit of your position. Cite at least three (3) reliable, quality references within the body of the paper using the Chicago Manual of Style’s , parenthetical citation style.
Format:
1.) 2-3 pages (not counting Works Cited Page), 12-point font, double-spaced. Times News Roman.
2.) A title is required, but a separate title page is not necessary.
3.) Use of the Chicago Manual of Style’s, parenthetical citation format.
4.) Use of footnotes or endnotes is prohibited.
Last Completed Projects
| topic title | academic level | Writer | delivered |
|---|