Did the articles seem to agree with one another or was there much disagreement?

IN THE DOCUMENT-All parts labeled ADRIANNA need to be completed and blend in that report all together. For the methodolgy- use the sources already used to speak on how the research itself was.
The Problem:
Your group is the strategic planning committee for a large HMO. The backgrounds of the committee members consists of diverse clinical and non-clinical fields such as medicine, health education, nursing, physical therapy, and administration. The CEO has asked you to provide input to the organization’s strategic plan by identifying a single issue that may impact clinical or public health (now or in the future). You must then review the current literature with respect to that issue and recommend a position to be taken by the HMO in a 10 to 12 page report. If the CEO likes your paper (he will) you will be asked to make a formal multimedia presentation to the board of directors.
Research Question NEED THREE QUESTIONS – State your research question(s) used to develop your literature search. This section just needs to contain the research questions you need to be able to answer in order to offer a solution to the problem. Keep in mind that more than one question will be necessary, and that the questions must follow the guidelines discussed in class for good research questions (e.g. grammatically correct, written down, in the form of a question, and very specific). Also, the questions must be ones that can be answered through a review of the research literature. For example, a question such as “what should our HMO do about medical errors?” is not one that can be answered by the research. On the other hand, “What are the most common medical errors encountered in Health Maintenance Organizations in the U.S.?” is one that would be much more appropriate. – 10 points
Methodology – A discussion of each research tool used and what your experience was with it (2 pages) Make sure to discuss whether you found articles meeting your criteria or not. If not, make sure to discuss what you found instead of what you wanted. This section should address each of the research tools you used and should include some significant discussion as to the approach that you took with it, your experiences with the tool, and how it contributed to the overall project. Note that ¼ of the total points are assigned to this section, so it should be as long as necessary to adequately discuss the tools you used.- 25 points (at least 2 pages)
Findings CAMOMILE TEA – Discuss your findings. This section deals with what you learned from your research and should address the answers to your research questions. In order to get an idea of what this section should look like, take a look at some of the articles you found and review the findings sections in those articles. The idea here is to integrate the results of the various studies so that it naturally leads to the conclusion(s) you will offer in the “Conclusions” section.
What articles did you find?
Did the articles seem to agree with one another or was there much disagreement?
Did your articles deal with research studies or clinical trials — if so what did they find?
Any information found from a non-peer reviewed source must include a short discussion of the credibility of that information using the CCO method (at least 4 pages). – 30 points

Last Completed Projects

topic title academic level Writer delivered