Discuss how the notion of college originality have changed since the 1960s and 1970s.

Part 2 – Your response to two students: Choose two students to respond to. You may agree or disagree. Use critical thinking skills to justify your position. Your first response is due at midnight Thursday. Your two posts or responses are due by midnight on Sunday and need to be a minimum of 200 words each. Remember to use references from your text or from another source (website, book or journal article) to support or negate your position on this topic.
THIS THE STUDENTS PAPER I NEED DA RESPONSE TO BELOW
Discussion on Plagiarism
Q. 1 Main approaches to student plagiarism
On college campuses, the two main approaches of preventing student plagiarism are treating the act as a crime or presuming it to be morally wrong (Ribble & Bailey, 2004). The tutors and lecturers can refer to the student honor codes, which require students to do the right thing at all times. During admission into the preferred colleges, the students are usually requested to consent to the code of conduct that they will uphold the moral standards expected of them in the academic fraternity. Consequently, on the approach of plagiarism as a crime or breaking rules, the school faculties and their administrators are responsible for ensuring the school regulation are followed.
Q.2 Blums viewpoint on why traditional methods preventing plagiarism fail
Blum states that; the reason for the failure of this method is that most students lack knowledge on the true meaning of academic integrity (Scanlon & Neumann, 2002). She denotes that academic integrity is usually not taken seriously by most students as they lack information on the seriousness of this offense. Consequently, most students are usually engrossed in achievement and success, which makes them do anything towards getting better grades.
Q.3 How the notion of college originality have changed since the 1960s and 1970s
During the 1960s and 1970s, there was no internet where the student could quickly get materials that can be plagiarized (Selwyn, 2008). The only source of learning was via books which made it hard to plagiarize the original work. However, in the modern day, the easy access to study materials on the internet has contributed to the increased cases of student plagiarism.
Q.4 Solutions offered by Blum towards handling student plagiarism
Blum offers the solution of incorporating the citation skill more in colleges which will help the student learn the correct citation methods. Blum emphasizes academic integrity in which she suggests that tutors should have a uniform citation to avoid the existing bias among students as they try to identify meet their tutor’s expectations (Scanlon & Neumann, 2002). According to Blum, it is okay to refer to other people’s work, but all ideas borrowed from these other sources should be cited appropriately to give credit to the authors.
WC: 369
References
Ribble, M., & Bailey, G. (2004). Monitoring technology misuse & abuse. The Journal, 32(1), 22-25. https://doi=10.1.1.491.8560&rep=rep1&type=pdf
Scanlon, P. M., & Neumann, D. R. (2002). Internet plagiarism among college students. Journal of College Student Development, 43(3), 374-385. http://doi=10.1.1.465.268&rep=rep1&type=pdf
Selwyn, N. (2008). A safe haven for misbehaving? An investigation of online misbehavior among university students. Social Science Computer Review, 26(4), 446-465. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F0894439307313515

Last Completed Projects

topic title academic level Writer delivered