Discuss the developments outlined in the article that were not present or not fully fleshed out in the earlier piece. In this article, the attention is on the specific roles and responsibilities of various actors to discourage crime, and various means by which they might do so.
Discuss these dimensions. Do you think that this is a sensible manner for the theory to have progressed according to? Does it continue to make sense, or has it started making more sense? How do you feel about what you’ve come to understand about environmental criminology in general?
Also, which of the roles discussed in the article do you have most or least confidence in? Why? As always, these are merely examples to get you started. Let’s hear what you think.
Please use citation from the article. No in conclusion paragraph needed/summary of what you wrote is not needed.
Last Completed Projects
| topic title | academic level | Writer | delivered |
|---|