Do you think the right to a jury trial for complex and time consuming cases should be abolished? If yes, what should be the alternative?

THERE ARE TWO PARTS FOR THIS ASSIGNMENT

PLEASE SEPARATE THE ANSWERS FOR EACH PART

Ex) PART 1) —— PART 2) ——

PART 1.

Do you think the right to a jury trial for complex and time consuming cases should be abolished? If yes, what should be the alternative?
If no, how do we address those jurors who find it difficult to understand complex facts?

ALSO PLEASE REPLY TO TWO OTHER STUDENTS.

PART 2.

Assignment Objectives This assignment shall test your understanding of subject
matter jurisdiction
Instructions: Please read and answer the following fact pattern.
Mark, a citizen of Georgia, was crossing a street in Atlanta when he was struck by a car driven by David, a citizen of New York visiting
Atlanta. The car was owned by David’s employer, a Delaware corporation that has its principal place of business in Atlanta, Georgia.
Mark sues both David and the corporation in federal district court in Atlanta alleging damages in the amount of $500,00. Does the
court have subject matter jurisdiction? Why or why not?

BUS 1 Discussion (1)
Criteria Ratings Pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome
Initial Response
15 to >13.5 pts
Excellent
Thorough response to discussion prompt that effectively demonstrates and integrates knowledge (not necessarily mastery) of course materials (lectures, videos, and text). May also integrate personal experience if applicable.
13.5 to >8.25 pts
Acceptable
Initial response is acceptable, but not thorough. Response may be missing a part, or some parts may demonstrate only minimal knowledge of course materials (lectures, videos, text).
8.25 to >0 pts
Unsatisfactory
Initial response is off-topic, missing multiple parts, and/or does not demonstrate knowledge of course materials (lectures, videos, text). **Initial Posts not submitted by Friday receive 1/2 credit (i.e., .5 points)**
15 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome
Reply 1
2.5 pts
Excellent
Replies is substantive and reflects knowledge of course materials and/or personal experience. Reply moves the conversation forward by attempting to elicit responses and reflections from other learners, building upon the ideas of other learners, or answering a question asked in response to their own posting.
2 pts
Acceptable
Reply reflects knowledge of course materials, but does not attempt to move the conversation forward (engage with other members) or answer a question posed.
1 pts
Unsatisfactory
Reply lacks substance and does not reflect knowledge of course materials (lectures, videos, or text). Reply does not move the conversation forward or answer a question posed.
2.5 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome
Reply 2
2.5 pts
Excellent
Reply is substantive and reflects knowledge of course materials and/or personal experience. Reply moves the conversation forward by attempting to elicit responses and reflections from other learners, building upon the ideas of other learners, or answering a question asked in response to their own posting.
2 pts
Acceptable
Reply reflects knowledge of course materials, but does not attempt to move the conversation forward or answer a question posed.
1 pts
Unsatisfactory
Reply lacks substance and does not reflect knowledge of course materials (lectures, videos, or text). Reply does not move the conversation forward or answer a question posed.
2.5 pts
Total Points: 20

Last Completed Projects