earthquakes in California

the paper should include a TITLE. The title of the paper is very important. It should be a clear and concise description of the
content of the paper. ABSTRACT. The abstract should summarizes the essentials of the paper. It briefly describes the purpose, any unusual methodology, and key results of the project. INTRODUCTION. This is accomplished by briefly reviewing some of the
relevant literature and explaining how the current project is related to the existing body of work. Interpretations made earlier and
now known to be incorrect are disqualified here as well. This is also the time to describe the goals and objectives of the study, e.g.,
to test certain hypotheses or answer a set of questions.METHODOLOGY.The description should be complete enough so that the
reader can evaluate the appropriateness of the methods to answer the questions or test the hypotheses as presented in the
Introduction. If you employed some methods that others have used, you should cite the publications in which those methods are
described. In many cases, it is appropriate for geologists to include a subsection (or even a separate section) in which you describe your study site. If some statistical analyses were performed on the data, they should be described completely and accurately in the Methodology section. RESULTS. In the Results section, one should report, but not discuss, the primary results. In other words,
“Just the facts, please”. An author needs to summarize the key findings verbally first and then refer the reader to relevant tables and figures for more a more detailed, or graphic, representation of the results. Figures and tables should each be numbered consecutively so that the reader may refer to them when intended, e.g., „The results show a strong correlation between rate of uplift and rate of erosion (Fig. 3)’. All tables should have a descriptive title, and a caption for each figure should be provided. The caption should
include the subject or title of the figure and all other information that will help the reader understand or interpret what is being
illustrated.DISCUSSION. The discussion is the section of the paper in which the author describes what the results mean. Were the original hypotheses supported, or questions answered? How are unexpected results explained? Do findings support or contradict findings from similar studies? These are some of the sorts of questions you might address. If most of the discussion is confined to the specific results of your study, the section may be better titled “Interpretations” or “Analysis of Results”.CONCLUSIONS. It is often important to extract the main conclusions from the text and summarize them as the “take home” ideas of the paper. This is frequently done with a numbered list of the points made.

Last Completed Projects