The comparative element is not clear. You list similarities, then briefly difference, but do not explain why they are different.
In explaining your works, make sure you do not limit yourself to summarizing, but add your analysis to this summary.
Do not just list similarities, followed by difference. This is not what is required. The main idea is two works that are similar in one aspect, but approach that aspect differently. So there is no need to specifying a full paragraph or two on how the two works are similar, then how they are different. Rather, you argue that both works do (whatever is similar, maybe in a sentence or two. However, though they agree on (whatever it is), they approach this differently as A while B
As you present or analyze one work, try to add a phrase that helps us see you are using it to connect to the other. For example, when analyzing a theme in work A, you can add something like this is not the case with B, as the paper explains later, or In B, this idea is dealt with differently, as I will elaborate later. Similarly, when you talk about work B, remind the reader of the link (this connects to the previous argument made about B, for example)
Can you think of a general significance of such comparative studies to add to your conclusion at the end? (What do we benefit from such comparisons? What do we learn in general from these comparisons? Do they teach us anything about how different people act in different circumstance, for example? What other things you can think of that people can benefit from when they read your study)
Last Completed Projects
| topic title | academic level | Writer | delivered |
|---|