Rewrite: note from professor: You provided a lot of contextualizing information in your response, but I’m not sure you completely answered the question as asked by comparing/contrasting the two articles in terms of their different operational definitions (construct validity) of their stimuli and the differences in internal and external validity between the two types of experiments (laboratory vs field study). …..Just straightforward answer the questions IN YOUR OWN WORDS, NO CHANGING UP WORDS OR ANYTHING. No background or summary of articles. Attach you will find the paper I had paid for that needs rewriting.
Question:
Week 2 introduced four articles regarding different factors and biases that may affect eyewitness encoding. Erickson et al. (2014) presented the effects on eyewitness memory in the presence of a weapon. Morgan et al., (2004) presented high intense stress and its effect on eyewitness memory. By comparing/contrasting the two articles, discuss which study you believe presented their stimuli (threat or stress) more effectively/appropriately. How does the way a stimulus is presented impact the results of a study (think internal and external validity)? Please use evidence from the articles to present your case.
Last Completed Projects
| topic title | academic level | Writer | delivered |
|---|