You are a victimologist assigned to a multijurisdictional fusion center. The Department of Homeland Security would like an evaluation on the community response to a recent raid by Homeland Security agents on a druid religious compound just outside of a major urban area.
Druids are easily recognizable because they wear long robes with hoods. The raid was conducted in response to a sect of the druid religion that planned to destroy a major furniture-producing factory that was clearing a nearby forest to produce their furniture. The radical druids were concerned over the damage to the forest and the spirits that they believed resided in the trees.
The agents who conducted the raid discovered the following in the druid compound:
Several drums of homemade napalm
The floor plans of the furniture factory
A time table for the planned attack
Your are tasked with evaluating the community’s response to the raid on the druid compound.
Focus your evaluation on the following:
Explain how you would help the community understand that it was a small radical group in the druid community that planned the attack.
Assess the impact that the community would have felt if the radical druid sect successfully destroyed the furniture factory. Determine how this might have impacted the economic base of the local community.
Identify who the potential victims are in the community, not just for loss of income or injury but also for the relationships between the druid and non-druid members of the community.
Explain to your fusion center leadership how the community has been impacted by the potential attack and what the community feels about the remaining druids in the community who are not directly tied to the radical element that planned the attack.
Is there an impending possibility of racial profiling by authorities when observing members of the druid community?
Discussion Board Reminders
Main post: Must be posted before midnight CT (Central time) on Friday of each week
Two replies to peers: Must be posted on separate days, between Saturday and Tuesday, before midnight CT
Connect to content: At least 1 of your posts must refer to course learning materials; see the academic resource on Discussion Boards for help with connecting to the content
Engaging in class discussions: For more information on making the most of your class dialog, review the academic resource on Discussion Boards
Technical Support: For help on using the Discussion Board tool, use the academic resource on Discussion Boards
Assignment Criteria Proficient Descriptor Points
Quality of Main Post
24 Points
Total
Student’s main post meets or exceeds the following requirements:
• Responds completely to all of parts of discussion question (6 points)
• Communicates content information accurately and/or logically (6 points)
• Delivers a thoughtful response, demonstrating insights and reflections (6 points)
• Connects to both key content concepts and personal experiences (6 points)
/24 pts.
Response to Peers
24 Points
Total
• Responds to a minimum of two peers (12 points per response)
o Substantive response (6 points)
o Furthers the conversation with peers. Examples could include (6 points):
Provides additional resources
Connects to key concepts
Shares personal or professional experiences
Contributes new information or perspective
Presents a competing viewpoint
/24 pts.
Support from Learning Resources
6 Points
Total
At least one post refers to course learning resources. /6 pts.
Professional Writing
6 points Total
Response is well-organized, clear, and free of grammatical and mechanical errors.
Posts demonstrate courtesy and respect for others.
/6 pts.
Total 60 points possible /60 pts.
Last Completed Projects
| topic title | academic level | Writer | delivered |
|---|