A 15–16-page literature review, Turabian Author Date format, with link to sources. Based upon your dependent variable/research question regarding the
“The impact of Veterans using cannabis compared to state legal authorization. The dependent variable is the state’s legal authority for the use of cannabis compared to how many veterans self-report using cannabis.”
The lit review must be grounded in prominent peer-reviewed work on your particular dependent variable/research question. The paper must illustrate why your research question is meaningful and theoretically significant. To do this, you must provide reader with a strong sense of the state of the established literature in their chosen sub-field and must identify areas where they can make a substantial contribution to existing theory and scholarly discourse.
Please note this teacher is very alert of grammer, avoid passive voice,
Start by briefly introducing your topic, providing your research question, and specifying your dependent variable. This should all be accomplished on page one of your lit reviews. Hypotheses: Is the use of medical cannabis different for Veterans as compared to non-Veterans depended on states that have legalized cannabis? In other words is there a connection of veterans taking cannibis due to states legalizing the drug and if there is an increase of veterans taking cannabis due to states legalizing the drug is it more recerational or to support a medical need such as to help with PTSD? PTSD is not the only medical condition… this is just an example.
Then, identify the peer-reviewed sources which represent the most prominent work done to date on your particular question. Describe key information from your reviewed sources in a manner that clearly connects to your specific research problem and helps you conceptualize how you will eventually study/tackle your problem. I have attached a few articles to give an idea, please be sure they are peer reviewed articles! Please provide the source/paper!! I have attached a paper from past classes to help with additional insights as well as how to do the Author/Date format for the Bibliography. Don’t worry about the stuff after the bibliogrpahy. Again this was focusing on other things about cannabis but might be useful.
Steer away from describing this relevancy in general terms.
Instead, describe the specific contribution the author(s) makes to ongoing scholarly conversations.
Speaking of conversations, a good literature review will put scholars into discussion with one another.
Use these conversations to illuminate how the key findings, research designs/methods and strengths/weaknesses of arguments and research approaches.
Finally, a good literature review will move seamlessly from this in-depth discussion of specific contributions/gaps up to the macro level, where the reader is provided with a sense of key advancements/setbacks and themes running throughout an entire body of literature. It takes practice and skill to effortlessly move your reader from specific contributions to a broad assessment of the state of an entire body of literature. But that is your goal.
REQUIREMENTS:
The literature review should consist of 14-16 pages, not counting any title page, tables or graphs, or references/works cited.
∙ The literature review should be in current Turabian format.
∙ The literature review must include citations from at least 25 sources. ∙ Acceptable sources include peer-reviewed journal articles, books from academic presses, and/or policy research papers published by reputable think tanks.
Last Completed Projects
| topic title | academic level | Writer | delivered |
|---|