When looking for information about a particular issue, how often do you try to resist biases toward your own point of view?
This assignment asks you to engage in this aspect of critical thinking.
Write a 3–4 page paper in which you:
State your position on the topic you selected in the Week 3 assignment, Conflicting Viewpoints Essay: Part 1.
Identify three premises (reasons) from Pros & Cons of Controversial Issues that support your position, and explain why you selected these specific reasons.
Explain your answers to the “believing” questions about the three premises opposing your position from Pros & Cons of Controversial Issues.
Examine at least two types of biases that you likely experienced as you evaluated the premises for and against your position.
Discuss the effects of your own enculturation or group identification that may have influenced your biases.
Discuss whether your thinking about the topic has changed after playing the “Believing Game,” even if your position on the issue has stayed the same.
The paper should follow guidelines for clear and organized writing:
Include an introductory paragraph and concluding paragraph.
Address the main ideas in body paragraphs with a topic sentence and supporting sentences.
Adhere to standard rules of English grammar, punctuation, mechanics, and spelling.
THIS IS THE TOPIC THAT WAS PICKED FOR THE PREV ASSIGNMENT THAT WAS MENTIONED ABOVE WITH THE TOPIC…..
Pros and Cons of Hosting the Olympics
Hosting
the Olympics, a global sports competition across different cities globally can
offer tremendous benefits to the host country. The sporting event boosts
tourism, international trade, and national pride. However, the Olympics can
also cause financial leakage, non-reusable infrastructural developments, and
human displacement. These three arguments offer exciting insights into
understanding the requirements for and effects of hosting the Olympics and form
the basis of this short essay.
They
were grasping the financial drain that the Olympic Games may cause budgeting
committees for such events to plan effectively and account for possible cost
overruns. Believing this viewpoint would help determine the circumstances under
which hosting the event is a loss-making endeavor, such as the current coronavirus
pandemic. During the war and economic uncertainty, postponing or preceding the
event is rational. For instance, the 2004 Athens Games destabilized an already
struggling Greek economy (ProCon.org, 2021).
The
result of finished constructions that targeted the Olympics only is disuse and
disrepair afterward. Considering this standpoint may help planners incorporate
long-term plans for such establishments, encouraging them to maintain their
conditions. Believing this perspective would help one observe the enormous
financial investments rendered useless by the Games’ conclusion. This idea may
be sensible when examining examples like Greece, China, and Brazil, whose
former Olympic infrastructures are not in use, despite costing millions of
dollars to maintain annually (ProCon.org, 2021).
Issues
of displacement introduce discussions on the human cost of financial strategies
with short-term benefits. For instance, 1.5 million people were displaced to
create room for the construction of stadia and accommodation facilities for
visitors (ProCon.org, 2021). People lost homes in which they had lived their
entire lives, an aspect that one would notice if they supported this viewpoint.
This idea is rational to countries hosting an event of such magnitude for the
first time in their history. Structures meant to host sportspeople, and their
staff need new construction but become useless later.
In
conclusion, hosting the Olympics can be a source of national pride, trade, and
tourism. However, the negative consequences are also worth examining. These
opposing viewpoints are necessary to appreciate both sides of the debate and
introduce perspectives and critical details that boost an overall understanding
of the issue. Therefore, countries eager to host the Olympics advised examining
their circumstances and long-term plans before claiming the opportunity.
References
ProCon.org. (2021, July 8). Hosting
the Olympic Games – Top 3 Pros and Cons – ProCon.org.
Retrieved July 24, 2021, from https://www.procon.org/headlines/hosting-the-olympic-games-top-3-pros-and-cons/
Last Completed Projects
| topic title | academic level | Writer | delivered |
|---|