Healthcare related subject

In this week’s assignment, you will be describing a famous psychologist, of your choosing, who has well known theories of development. You will provide clues as to who you have chosen, but you will not give away the name until the end of your essay. Follow the directions below, and be sure to include ALL of the information in the prompt.

Prompt: Week Nine ‘Who Am I’ Essay
Provide an introduction to lifespan development.
Without giving away the individual you chose, provide details of the individual, such as birth place, life growing up, and what made this individual pursue psychology and lifespan development.
Write in either first or third person (NOT BOTH). Use phrases such as: “This individual…” (third person) or “I was born…” (first person)
Share theories and concepts that helped make this individual well known, whether in their time or currently.
Provide a conclusion on the individual’s life, and share (at the end) who you chose to write about, thus answering the question “who am I?”
Your essay should:
Answer the essay questions thoroughly in no fewer than 400 words.
Use factual information from reputable sources.
Be written in standard essay format:
Introduction; includes an overview of your main points.
Body; complete paragraphs, each discussing one main point with support and details.
Conclusion; recaps main points, without presenting new information .
In-text and full citations are required in APA format.

GE Written Assignment Rubric_PSY201
Criteria Ratings Pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome
APA (5%)
All outside information must be from credible sources, such as the course text. Learner must include full citations within written work with matching references at the bottom of their work. All citations and references must be in current APA format. Complete works cited/reference list provided. Preference should be given to original work with support from paraphrased and direct quotes. Direct quotes should be used sparingly.
2.5 to >2.0 pts
Exemplary
Meets all guidelines with no errors.
2 to >1.5 pts
Accomplished
Meets all guidelines; contains minor errors.
1.5 to >1.0 pts
Acceptable
Meets some of the guidelines; contains major errors.
1 to >0.0 pts
Inadequate
Does not meet the guidelines
0 pts
No Submission
2.5 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome
Essay Body (85%)
Work demonstrates critical thinking and addresses each topic point thoroughly. Work showcases original thoughts and demonstrates understanding of the topic by presenting specific examples. Arguments for and/or against information presented clearly and logically.
42.5 to >32.5 pts
Exemplary
Meets all guidelines with no errors.
32.5 to >25.5 pts
Accomplished
Meets all guidelines; contains minor errors.
25.5 to >15.5 pts
Acceptable
Meets some of the guidelines; contains major errors.
15.5 to >0.0 pts
Inadequate
Does not meet the guidelines
0 pts
No Submission
42.5 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome
Format and Mechanics (10%)
Spelling, punctuation, and grammar are correct. Both sentence and paragraph structures conform to current conventions. Essay meets minimum length as assigned. Learner utilizes each topic point as a new paragraph. Work shows logical flow from one topic to the next.

Introduction, essay body, and conclusion are included with a clear distinction between sections. Essay adheres to APA formatting.
5 to >4.0 pts
Exemplary
Meets all guidelines with no errors.
4 to >3.0 pts
Accomplished
Meets all guidelines; contains minor errors.
3 to >2.0 pts
Acceptable
Meets some of the guidelines; contains major errors.
2 to >0.0 pts
Inadequate
Does not meet the guidelines
0 pts
No Submission
5 pts

Last Completed Projects