Peer responses should
be a minimum of 150 (so this can be 200 words) substantial words and
scholarly in nature.
Some points to keep in
mind for your postings:
Suggest why you might see things differently.
Ask a probing or clarifying question.
Share an insight from having read the colleague’s
posting.
Offer and support an opinion.
Validate an idea with your own experience.
Make a suggestion.
Expand on the colleague’s posting.
Ask for evidence that supports the posting.
Always be respectful and collegial.
Required
Readings/Resources:
1.
Read from
Jeukendrup, A. & Gleeson, M. (2019). Sport Nutrition. (3 ed.) a. Chapter
11: Nutritional Supplements
2.
Review Lesson
Presentation: Nutritional Supplements
3.
Kerksick, C.M.,
et al. (2018). International Society of Sports Nutrition exercise & sports
nutrition review update: Research & recommendations. Journal of the
International Society of Sports Nutrition, 15(38)
Recommended
Readings/Activities
1.
Burke, L. M.
(2017). Practical issues in evidence-based use of performance supplements:
Supplement interactions, repeated use and individual responses. Sports
Medicine, 47(S1), S79– S100.
2.
Kreider, R. B.,
et al., (2017). International Society of Sports Nutrition position stand:
Safety and efficacy of creatine supplementation in exercise, sport, and
medicine. Journal of the International Society of Sports Nutrition, 14(1),
1-18.
3.
Maughan, R. J.,
et al., (2018). IOC Consensus Statement: Dietary supplements and the
highperformance athlete. International Journal of Sport Nutrition and Exercise
Metabolism, 28(2), 104-125.
Last Completed Projects
| topic title | academic level | Writer | delivered |
|---|