Identify the key insights/major arguments of the book and offer a summary of the purpose, aims, and arguments. The review should reflect upon and/or critique the readings; consider how one or more of the major arguments/findings relate to concepts from previous weeks, discuss whether and how the book achieves its aim (i.e., evaluate the evidence presented to support arguments), generate compelling discussion points and questions for consideration, and/or compare and contrast the material in the book with major concepts in the wrongful convictions literature. These points should provide a thoughtful and considered evaluation and/or critique of issues raised in the readings. Be very clear in providing topics and/or specific questions to stimulate discussion about the book. Each scholarly book review should be approximately 5-6 pages in length (double-spaced, times new roman font).
Last Completed Projects
| topic title | academic level | Writer | delivered |
|---|