DQ1: Stare Decisis
Under the doctrine of stare decisis, courts are obligated to follow the precedents established in their jurisdiction unless there is a compelling reason not to do so. Should U.S. courts continue to adhere to this common law principle, given that our government now regulates so many areas by statute?
DQ2: Online Filing Systems
Class, concerning Cyberlaw, many jurisdictions have implemented online filing systems, and some have set up cyber courts in which part, or all, of a case is presented online. What issues are likely to occur in these circumstances? To what extent those who send e-mail over the Internet should be liable for the content of their messages in states other than their own (or nations other than the United States). Is the existence of a website a sufficient basis to exercise jurisdiction?
DQ3: Strategic Managements
In negotiating a business deal, is strategic misrepresentation permissible? Do you have to disclose everything?
DQ 4: Slander and Libel
Is online defamation slander or libel? Defend your response! Also, take a look at this California case: a. Varian Medical Systems, Inc. v. Delfino, 113 Cal.App.4th 273, 6 Cal.Rptr.3d 325 (6th Dist. 2003).
Last Completed Projects
| topic title | academic level | Writer | delivered |
|---|