Discussion Question (Ch. 15) Judicial Philosophies
The philosophy of judicial restraint says that judges should interpret the Constitution according to the plain meaning of the words in the document. The philosophy of judicial activism says that judges should go beyond the plain meaning of constitutional language when interpreting the document. Which of these views do you agree with, and why?
Use the textbook as often as possible in answering the question and when responding to your classmates. In your answers make sure to 1. use in-text citation (Ginsberg et al., 2019, p. # …) each time you paraphrase what the authors said in the textbook; and 2. use quotation marks (”…”) each time you use the authors’ exact words.
Last Completed Projects
| topic title | academic level | Writer | delivered |
|---|