Look at the case of NFIB v. Sebelius (567 US 519 (2012)). The main argument raised at the Supreme Court of the United States was that the individual mandate of the ACA (requiring Americans to have health insurance) was unconstitutional.

Look at the case of NFIB v. Sebelius (567 US 519 (2012)). The main argument raised at the Supreme Court of the United States was that the individual mandate of the ACA (requiring Americans to have health insurance) was unconstitutional.
In three paragraphs, explain the outcome of this case, and why Chief Justice Roberts was criticized for his opinion. Your explanation should be couched in terms that non-lawyers should understand. ****Add to this analysis any commentary on the Texas v. US oral arguments and how the Texas case might impact the holding in NFIB v. Sebelius.

Last Completed Projects