Mid-Point Formative Assessment

Description of Assessment Task and Submission Instructions:
To support your learning and maximise your performance in the final assessment, you have the opportunity to submit two of your 500-word reflective journal entries for formative feedback. You may modify your original reflection(s) for your final submission based on the formative feedback you receive.

Please follow these formatting guidelines:
– Font / Size: Arial / 12
– Spacing / Sides: 1.5 / Single Sided
– Page numbers required? Yes
– Margins: At least 2.54 to left and right and text ‘justified’
– Referencing: Full compliance with Harvard protocols

Information for Completion of Assessment:
Your reflections will be personal to you, can i4nclude your feelings and reactions, and so you should use first person pronouns (e.g. ‘I’ and ‘we’).
Your reflections should:
critically analyse relevant concepts and theories of leadership and consider the implications for your leadership practice (LO1, LO2, LO3)
where appropriate, discuss the results of self-assessment questionnaires (LO3)
identify your areas of strength and weakness as a leader (LO3)
identify goals to develop your own leadership practice in this area. Ensure that your goals are SMART
(Links to an external site.)
(specific, measurable, achievable, realistic, time-related) and clearly outline the specific steps you will take to achieve your goals, how you will measure your success, the resources and support you will need, and your target date for their achievement (LO4).
Ensure all sources referenced in your assessment are correctly listed according to the Harvard System of referencing
.
Include only sources that you have cited in the work. If you consult any sources which you have not cited, they should be listed in a Bibliography.
It is very important to use appropriate academic books/e-books and journals/e-journals as the basis for your research.
Whilst you may use the internet, take great care to ensure that the sites are valid and appropriate for academic purposes – sites such as Wikipedia, Businessballs.com, MindTools.com etc. are inappropriate for academic research.

Last Completed Projects