Part I – Complete all of the learning activities about nurses Anne Mitchell, Nina Pham and Alex Wubbels. Select one of the three nurses to further study.
Part II – Prepare a PowerPoint presentation (slides only, no audio/video) briefly addressing the following six questions with regard to the nurse you selected (Anne Mitchell, Nina Pham or Alex Wubbels):
1) Do you agree with the nurse’s actions? Why or why not?
2) Would you have done anything differently? Why or why not?
3) Was the nurse acting as a patient advocate? Why or why not?
4) Did the nurse promote patient safety? If so, how?
5) Could the nurse have initiated any type of peer review? If so, which type?
Your presentation should have 7-10 slides including: one slide with your name and a creative presentation title; at least 5 slides addressing the questions above; and at least one slide with your Reference List in APA format with at least one reference.
You only need to submit PowerPoint slides (no voiceover required). No literature search is required.
4349 Module D Grading Rubric (1).pdf
download
VoiceThread Presentation
Criteria Ratings Pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome
CONTENT
Information in the
postings is accurate,
relevant to the
assigned questions, and demonstrates student learning related to module content. Utilize at least one reference.
60 pts
Expert
Information is accurate, relevant, addresses all of the assigned questions in-depth, and demonstrates student learning related to module content.
50 pts
Proficient
Information is accurate, addresses all of the assigned questions, and demonstrates student learning related to module content.
40 pts
Competent
Information is mostly accurate but minimal discussion of each assigned question, and/or does not fully demonstrate student learning related to module content.
20 pts
Substantive Area for Improvement
Information does not fully address each assigned question, and does not demonstrate student learning related to module content.
0 pts
Unsatisfactory Work
Minimal information provided, does not address each assigned question and does not integrate module content. AND/OR Utilized no sources.
60 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome
VISUAL
Presentation is professional, creative and includes 7-10 slides.
10 pts
Expert
Presentation is professional, creative and includes 7-10 slides.
8 pts
Proficient
Presentation is professional and includes 7-10 slides.
5 pts
Competent
Presentation includes more than 10 slides.
3 pts
Substantive Area for Improvement
Presentation includes only 6 slides.
0 pts
Unsatisfactory Work
Presentation includes less than 6 slides.
10 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome
SCHOLARLY PRESENTATION
Clear communication of thoughts through
logical presentation
demonstrating effective preparation and critical thinking. Writing style
demonstrates correct
spelling, grammar, sentence structure
and punctuation.
15 pts
Expert
Thoughts are organized, succinct and demonstrate critical thinking without any errors in spelling, grammar, sentence structure or punctuation.
12 pts
Proficient
Thoughts are organized, demonstrate critical thinking with only one error in spelling, grammar, sentence structure or punctuation.
10 pts
Competent
Thoughts are organized, demonstrate critical thinking with only two errors in spelling, grammar, sentence structure or punctuation.
5 pts
Substantive Area for Improvement
Thoughts show minimal organization and lack of critical thinking, OR three errors in spelling, grammar, sentence structure or punctuation.
0 pts
Unsatisfactory Work
Thoughts show no logical organization or critical thinking, OR four or more errors in spelling, grammar, sentence structure or punctuation.
15 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome
REFERENCE(S)
Presentation is
supported by proper use of citations and reference(s) in APA format.
15 pts
Expert
APA format used for citations and reference list without any errors.
12 pts
Proficient
One APA error with citations or reference list.
10 pts
Competent
Two APA errors with citations and/or reference list.
5 pts
Substantive Area for Improvement
Three APA errors with citations and/or reference list.
0 pts
Unsatisfactory Work
Four or more APA errors with citations and/or reference list.
15 pts
Total Points: 100
for Alex Wubbels case
Utah officer fired for forcibly handcuffing nurse who defied him | CNN
Last Completed Projects
| topic title | academic level | Writer | delivered |
|---|