1
HSYP8105 Systems Science in Healthcare
Assessment Task 3: Health Intervention Evaluation Presentation
Due: 12 noon Monday 31st October 2022
Weighting: 40% (30% content and notes; 10% visual design and presentation)
Length: 10 PowerPoint slides, no more than 15 minutes of presentation time
Details
Prepare an evaluation plan of the public health program, BreasrSCreen NSW, using the six-step method
covered in weeks 8 and 9 (Evaluation Methods).
BreastScreen NSW aims to detect breast cancer early by encouraging women aged 50-74 years to have a free
mammogram every 2 years. Early detection results in early treatment and treatment is most successful when
the cancer is still small and has not spread to other parts of the body. https://www.breastscreen.nsw.gov.au/
Imagine you want to explain to a mixed audience of health professionals and managers how you would
evaluate BreastScreen NSW, by using a 15-minute PowerPoint presentation. Devise your own evaluation
question – you may use examples covered in week 10.
The assignment must include:
10 PowerPoint slides with each slide including accompanying text in the notes section of each slide.
• The accompanying text, in the notes section of each slide, should be comprehensive and explain indepth the information contained on each slide. Full explanations, particularly in relation to the
evaluation six (6) steps, are required to elucidate the material on the slide.
• There should be at least one slide for each of the six (6) evaluation steps listed below.
• You need to include an introductory slide where you describe the intervention (in more detail than is
listed above), how it works and who it is designed to help.
• One slide will be used to list your references.
• You may include an additional title slide (not counted in the 10).
Six Evaluation Steps:
Step 1 Identify the change/outcome desired for the intervention and formulate evaluation questions
Step 2 Identify the boundaries and dimensions of your evaluation
Step 3 Select comparison groups
Step 4 Select techniques for measuring the change/outcome desired
Step 5 Plan the organization and conduct of your evaluation
Step 6 Report the results of your evaluation
Referencing: Please refer to the Unit Guide on iLearn particularly in relation to academic integrity and
assignment guide. It is essential that any resources, journal articles, reports, books, web pages etc. referred to
in your assignment are appropriately referenced using the Vancouver citation style. Software is used to check
all assignments for plagiarism.
You must submit ONE PowerPoint file that contains:
1. The PowerPoint presentation (10 slides maximum plus 1 title slide) with an embedded audio/video recording (max 15
minutes in length)
2. The PowerPoint slides and notes pages accompanying each slide
Instructions on how to record yourself in your PowerPoint presentation are included below
Guide for assessment/marking of assignment 3
There are two (2) marking rubrics for this assignment (page 3).
One guide is for the content of the slides and the notes pages (30%) and one guide is for the visual design of the Power
Point slides and the video presentation (10%).
2
Guidelines/tips for PowerPoint slides and notes
Keep it Simple
• Use only one message per slide. If you have more than one message, add a slide.
• Limit the amount of text on each slide – no one wants to read a JAMA article during your presentation.
• Use only elements that add to the content of the message. Use graphics that clearly support your message. Good
graphics can significantly add to learning, bad graphics can confuse and distract your audience.
• Maintain a consistent design with regard to colours, font styles, and graphics.
• Notes pages should provide sufficient detail to describe and explain the information on the accompanying slide.
Slide Design
• Each slide should endeavour to address a single concept
• Slides should follow a logical progression, each building on the other
• Preferably use no more than six lines of text on any one slide
• Use upper and lower-case text, NOT all caps
• Choose a colour appropriate to the mood you want to convey
• Avoid using too many colours (maximum of 5)
• Use photographs/images to help the audience relate slide information to real world situations
(keep in mind that if you use an outside source it is under copyright and permission to use it
must be granted)
Source: Dartmouth College Library ‘Power Point: Guides tips and help’ (Updated 16/6/17) [Internet] [Cited and modified
October 2018] Available from: ttps://www.dartmouth.edu/~library/biomed/guides/powerpoint.html
Useful resource on adding notes to PowerPoint (please note that for this assignment these notes need to include detailed
information supporting the slides) https://www.duarte.com/presentation-skills-resources/everything-need-know-usingspeaker-notes-inpowerpoint/
To record your PowerPoint presentation voiceover, go to “Slide Show” and click the “Record Slide Show” button under.
Ensure that you have your speakers and microphone on. Simply go through your slide as if you are presenting to an
audience. Make sure your microphone is on. Save your file when you are happy with the presentation and submit it for
marking through the AT3 DropBox in iLearn. Alternatively, submit a shared link to your file. See instructions in the briefing
presentation (week 10)
Windows
Mac
3
Assessment Task 3 marking rubric – Content of PowerPoint Slides (30%)
Outstanding
HD
Advanced
D
Proficient
C
Functional
P
Limited
F
≥ 85% ≥ 75% ≥ 65% ≥ 50% < 50%
Criterion 1
Evaluation
Steps
1 & 2
8%
The
change outcome(s)
desired for the
intervention was
very clearly
outlined. The
evaluation
questions were very
clearly related to
the
goals of the
program. The
boundaries and
dimensions of
the evaluation were
very clearly
presented
The change
outcome(s)
desired for the
intervention was
clearly outlined.
The evaluation
questions were
clearly related to
the goals of the
program. The
boundaries and
dimensions of
the evaluation
were clearly
presented
The change
outcome(s)
desired for the
intervention was
mostly clearly
outlined. The
evaluation
questions were
mostly clearly
related to the
goals of the
program.
The boundaries
and dimensions
of the evaluation
were mostly
clearly presented
The change
outcome(s) for the
intervention
was not always
presented clearly
The evaluation
questions were
not always clearly
related to the
goals of the
program
The boundaries
and dimensions of
the evaluation
were not always
clearly presented
The change
outcome(s)
for the
intervention was
not clearly
outlined
The evaluation
questions were not
clearly related to
the goals of the
program
The boundaries
and dimensions
of the evaluation
were not clearly
presented
Criterion 2
Eval Steps
3 & 4
8%
The descriptions of
groups and reasons
for selection were
presented in a very
coherent manner
The quantitative
and
qualitative
measures, how you
would collect these
data and challenges
in collection were
very clearly
presented
The descriptions
of the comparison
groups and
reasons
for selection were
presented in a
very coherent
manner
The quantitative
and qualitative
measures, how
you would collect
these data and
challenges
in collection were
clearly presented
The descriptions
of the
comparison
groups and
reasons
for selection
were mostly
presented in a
very coherent
manner
The quantitative
and qualitative
measures, were
mostly clearly
presented.
The descriptions
of the comparison
groups and
reasons
for selection were
not always
presented in a
coherent manner
The quantitative
and
qualitative
measures were
not always clearly
presented
The descriptions of
the comparison of
the comparison
groups and reasons
for selection were
not presented
The quantitative
and qualitative
measures were not
clearly presented.
Criterion 3
Eval Steps
5 & 6
8%
The issues which
needed to be
considered when
planning your
evaluation (e.g.
budget, timelines,
stakeholders) and
reporting your
findings were
presented very
clearly
The issues which
needed to be
considered when
planning your
evaluation (e.g.
budget, timelines,
stakeholders) and
reporting your
findings were
presented clearly
The issues which
needed to be
considered when
planning your
evaluation (e.g.
budget,
timelines,
stakeholders)
and reporting
your findings
were mostly
presented clearly
The issues which
needed to be
considered when
planning your
evaluation (e.g.
budget, timelines,
stakeholders) and
reporting your
findings were not
always presented
clearly
The issues which
needed to be
considered when
planning your
evaluation (e.g.
budget, timelines,
stakeholders) and
reporting your
findings were not
presented clearly
Criterion 4
Referencing
6%
Referencing and
citation style is
correct (Vancouver
style) and
consistent between
the reference list
and the text in the
slides and notes
pages; the
reference list is
complete and
without errors
Referencing and
citation style is
consistent
(Vancouver style)
between the text
in the slides and
notes pages and
the reference list
has only a few
minor mistakes
Some references
were
inconsistent
between the text
in the slides and
notes pages and
the reference list
has some
mistakes
Many references
were inconsistent
between the text
in the slides and
notes pages and
the reference list;
there are many
mistakes in the
reference list
Most references
were inconsistent
between the text
in the slides and
notes pages and
the reference list;
there are many
mistakes in the
reference list
You have failed
to acknowledge
some reference
sources
4
Assessment Task 2 marking rubric – Slide design and presentation (10%)
Outstanding
HD
Advanced
D
Proficient
C
Functional
P
Limited
F
≥ 85% ≥ 75% ≥ 65% ≥ 50% < 50%
Criterion 1
Slide design and
use of graphics
5%
Outstanding slide
design in terms of
text and visual
layout, amount of
text per slide,
font size and
logical sequence
of slides
Outstanding use
of graphics and
colour
Advanced slide
design in terms of
text and visual
layout, amount of
text per slide,
font size and
logical sequence
of slides
Advanced use of
graphics and
colour
Proficient slide
design in terms of
text and visual
layout, amount of
text per slide,
font size and
logical sequence
of slides
Proficient use of
graphics and
colour
Functional, slide
design in terms
of text and
visual layout,
amount of text
per slide, font
size and logical
sequence of
slides
Functional, basic
use of graphics
and colour
Limited slide
design in terms of
text and visual
layout, amount of
text per slide, font
size and logical
sequence of slides
Limited use of
graphics and
colour
Criterion 2
Oral Presentation
5%
Outstanding, clear
and logical
presentation that
further explains
the ideas on the
slides;
Advanced, clear
and logical
presentation that
further explains
the ideas on the
slides;
Proficient
presentation that
further explains
the ideas on the
slides;
Functional,
presentation
that provides a
limited
explanation of
the ideas on the
slides;
Limited
presentation that
did not adequately
explain the ideas
on the slides
Last Completed Projects
| topic title | academic level | Writer | delivered |
|---|