The evidence documenting social inequalities in health Define the social gradient in morbidity and mortality, including examples The relationship between socioeconomic status and inequalities in health

Please read the following target articles:
Marmot Social Differentials in Health Daedalus 1994.pdf Marmot Social Differentials in Health Daedalus 1994.pdf – Alternative Formats
Marmot MG, Bell R: Action on Health Disparities JAMA 2009.pdf Marmot MG, Bell R: Action on Health Disparities JAMA 2009.pdf – Alternative Formats
Marmot MG, Allen JJ: Social Determinants of Health Equity Am J Public Health 2014.pdf Marmot MG, Allen JJ: Social Determinants of Health Equity Am J Public Health 2014.pdf – Alternative Formats
Phelan JC, et al: Social Conditions as Fundamental Causes of Health Inequalities pdf Phelan JC, et al: Social Conditions as Fundamental Causes of Health Inequalities pdf – Alternative Formats

Create a Keynote/PowerPoint presentation on all of the following topics —
The evidence documenting social inequalities in health
Define the social gradient in morbidity and mortality, including examples
The relationship between socioeconomic status and inequalities in health
Methods of utilizing the social determinants of health to improve population health
Implications for healthcare policy and specific action plans to reduce health inequalities
Be sure, as part of your slide content for each topic, to cite material from the target article readings.
Use the APA format as a guideline. Grammar and spelling count.
Create a PowerPoint/Keynote presentation with
At least 20 slides (at least 4 slides per topic), not including the title slide and the reference list/bibliography
For each topic, add notes at the bottom of 2 slides to enhance the content
NOTE —
Week Three Assignments containing less than 20 content slides (at least 4 slides per topic) will receive a 10-point deduction from the maximum earned score.
Week Three Assignments containing less than the required 2 slide notes for each topic will receive a 10-point deduction from the maximum earned score.
The Week Three Assignment is worth a maximum of 20 points. Grading will be based on the following rubric:
Week Three Assignment Grading Rubric
Rationale and Significance
Outstanding Achievement: 5 points
Expresses the rationale, significance, and context of the issues being discussed.
Commendable Achievement: 4 points
Expresses the rationale and significance of the issues being discussed without offering contextual statements.
Acceptable Achievement: 3 points
Expresses the rationale of the issues being discussed without statements of significance and context.
Unsatisfactory Achievement: 2 points
Introduces the issues being discussed without rationale, significance, or context.
Failing: 0 points
Missing,
Discussion
Outstanding Achievement: 5 points
Includes a complete review of the concepts and viewpoints. Includes position statements for and against the viewpoint. Provides depth into the topic.
Commendable Achievement: 4 points
Discussion provides depth and describes concepts and viewpoints, but has omitted some relevant viewpoints.
Acceptable Achievement: 3 points
Discussion describes concepts and viewpoints, but has omitted some relevant sources and lacks depth.
Unsatisfactory Achievement: 2 points
Discussion is not supported by citations from the literature.
Failing: 0 points
Missing.
Meaningful Development of Ideas
Outstanding Achievement: 5 points
Depth and complexity of thought supported by rich, pertinent details. Supporting evidence leads to high-level idea development.
Commendable Achievement: 4 points
Depth of thought supported by relevant evidence and provides clear vision of the ideas. Contains details.
Acceptable Achievement: 3 points
Unelaboratedideas that are not fully explained or supported. Repetitive details.
Unsatisfactory Achievement: 2 points
Ideas are unclear and/or not well-developed.
Failing: 0 points
Missing.
Grammar and Vocabulary
Outstanding Achievement: 5 points
Nearly error-free, reflecting clear understanding and thorough proofreading. Rich and precise language.
Commendable Achievement: 4 points
Few grammatical and/or stylistic errors. Effective language.
Acceptable Achievement: 3 points
Some errors in grammar and/or format that do not interfere with clarity. Acceptable use of language.
Unsatisfactory Achievement: 2 points
Multiple grammatical and stylistic errors. Many errors of usage.
Failing: 0 points
Grammatical errors throughout the assignment. Incorrect usage of language.
Your work must be original. Please review the section on plagiarism in the Course Outline. Students found plagiarizing are subject to the penalties outlined in the Policies and Procedures section of the University Catalog, which may include a failing grade for the work in question or for the entire course. Plagiarism, the use of ideas or words of another without proper, full acknowledgment, may result in a failing grade on the paper.
The slide presentation must adhere to the guidelines established by the American Psychological Association (APA) in its most current edition. Students unfamiliar with the APA style requirements should immediately contact the National University Writing Center for direction and assistance.
Click on the “Week Three Assignment” link above to submit your assignment, as well as to get more information regarding the due date and grading rubric.

Last Completed Projects