Analyse the implementation of organisational change in a case study of your choice using either “conversational” or a “contextual” conceptual framework. Then, critically reflect on (a) the strengths and weaknesses of your analysis, (b) your own experience/s of organisational change, (c) and how your learning on the module will inform your future practice.
Analyse the implementation of organisational change in a case study of your choice using either a “conversational” or a “contextual” conceptual framework. To do this, you must critically evaluate both the organisational change and the academic ideas (e.g. theories, models, and frameworks) used in your analysis.
“conversational” conceptual framework – engaging with ongoing organisational interactions – recognising how managing organisational change might need a sense of direction – academic ideas around resistance, communication, and leadership
“contextual” conceptual framework – acknowledging an organisation’s unique situation – recognising how managing organisational change might need a firm grasp of the detail – academic ideas around culture, substance, and politics
relevant to both frameworks: sensemaking, and emotional responses to organisational change (2000 words)
Reflect on the implications of your analysis by responding to three questions.
What are the strengths and weakness of your analysis (including how a different conceptual framework might have given a different understanding)?
How has your analysis enabled you to reflect on your own experiences of organisational change?
How has your learning about organisational change given you new ways to think about your future practice?
Key to successful reflection:
demonstrate personal learning (e.g. by reflecting on analysis, experience/s, and future practice)
build on academic ideas (e.g. theories, models, and frameworks) and use relevant literature (1000 words)
Last Completed Projects
| topic title | academic level | Writer | delivered |
|---|