RUA: Analyzing Published Research, IF YOU HAVE NEVER DONE A RUA DO NOT ACCEPT JOB PLEASE!
TOPIC: The analysis of postpartum depression treatments
CLASS: EVIDENCE BASED PRACTICE OF NURSING
Please include this book and these two references as listed below as referenced citations
SCHOLARLY SOURCES FROM THE LAST 5 YEARS.
Houser, J. (2018). Nursing research: Reading, using, and creating evidence (4th ed.). Jones & Bartlett.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3939973/
Abdollahi, F., Lye, M. S., Md Zain, A., Shariff Ghazali, S., & Zarghami, M. (2011). Postnatal depression and its associated factors in women from different cultures. Iranian journal of psychiatry and behavioral sciences, 5(2), 5–11.
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35122433/
Safi-Keykaleh M, Aliakbari F, Safarpour H, Safari M, Tahernejad A, Sheikhbardsiri H, Sahebi A. Prevalence of postpartum depression in women amid the COVID-19 pandemic: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2022 May;157(2):240-247. doi: 10.1002/ijgo.14129. Epub 2022 Feb 28. PMID: 35122433; PMCID: PMC9087783.
———————————————————————————————————————–
Paper should be 3 content pages in length.
Title and reference pages are required but are excluded from 3-4
page length.
Clinical Question
1. Describe the problem: What is the focus of your group’s work?
2. Significance of problem: What health outcomes result from your
problem? Or what statistics document this is a problem? You may
find support on websites for government or professional
organizations.
3. Purpose of the paper: What will your paper do or describe?
Evidence Matrix Table: Data Summary (Appendix A)
Categorize items in the Matrix Table, including proper intext citations and
reference list entries for each article.
1. References (recent publication within the last 5 years)
2. Purpose/Hypothesis/Study Question(s)
3. Variables: Independent (I) and Dependent (D)
4. Study Design
5. Sample Size and Selection
6. Data Collection Methods
7. Major Findings (Evidence)
Description of Findings
Describe the data in the Matrix Table, including proper intext citations
and reference list entries for each article.
1. Compare and contrast variables within each study.
2. What are the study design and procedures used in each study;
qualitative, quantitative, or mixed method study, levels of confidence
in each study, etc.?
3. Participant demographics and information. 4. Instruments used, including reliability and validity.
5. How do the research findings provide evidence to support your
clinical problem, or what further evidence is needed to answer your
question?
6. Next steps: Identify two questions that can help guide the group’s
work.
Conclusion
Review major findings in a summary paragraph.
1. Evidence to address your clinical problem.
2. Make a connection back to all the included sections.
3. Wrap up the assignment and give the reader something to think
about.
Format
1. Correct grammar and spelling
2. Include a title and reference page
3. Use of headings for each section:
o Problem
o Synthesis of the Literature
▪ Variables
▪ Methods
▪ Participants
▪ Instruments
▪ Implications for Future Work
4. Conclusion
5. Adheres to current APA formatting and guidelines
6. Includes at least two (2) scholarly, current (within 5 years) primary
sources other than the textbook
7. 3-4 pages in length excluding appendices, title and reference pages.
Evidence Matrix Table
Article
References
Purpose
Hypothesis
Study Question(s)
Variables
Independent(I)
Dependent(D)
Study Design
Sample
Size &
Selection
Data Collection
Methods
Major Finding(s)
1
(SAMPLE ARTICLE)
Smith, Lewis (2013),
What should I eat? A focus for those living with diabetes. Journal of Nursing Education, 1 (4) 111-112.
How do educational support groups effect dietary modifications in patients with diabetes?
D-Dietary modifications
I-Education
Quantitative
N- 18
Convenience sample-selected from local support group in Pittsburgh, PA
Focus Groups
Support and education improved compliance with dietary modifications.
1
2
3
4
5
Purpose
NR449 Evidence-Based Practice
RUA: Analyzing Published Research Guidelines
The purpose of this paper is to interpret the two articles identified as most important to the group topic. Course outcomes: This assignment enables the student to meet the following course outcomes.
CO 2: Apply research principles to the interpretation of the content of published research studies. (POs 4 and 8)
CO 4: Evaluate published nursing research for credibility and clinical significance related to evidence-based practice.
Due date: Your faculty member will inform you when this assignment is due. The Late Assignment Policy applies to
this assignment.
Total points possible: 200 points
Preparing the assignment
Follow these guidelines when completing this assignment. Speak with your faculty member if you have questions.
Please make sure you do not duplicate articles within your group.
The paper will include the following:
Clinical Question (30 points/15%)
Describe the problem: What is the focus of your group’s work?
Significance of problem: What health outcomes result from your problem? Or what statistics document this
is a problem? You may find support on websites for government or professional organizations.
Purpose of the paper: What will your paper do or describe?
***Please note that although most of these questions are the same as you addressed in paper 1, the purpose of this paper is different. You can use your paper 1 for items 1 & 2 above, including any faculty suggestions for improvement provided as feedback.
Evidence Matrix Table: Data Summary (Appendix A) – (60 points/30%)
Categorize items in the Matrix Table, including proper intext citations and reference list entries for each article.
References (recent publication within the last 5 years)
Purpose/Hypothesis/Study Question(s)
Variables: Independent (I) and Dependent (D)
Study Design
Sample Size and Selection
Data Collection Methods
Major Findings (Evidence)
Description of Findings (60 points/30%)
Describe the data in the Matrix Table, including proper intext citations and reference list entries for each article.
Compare and contrast variables within each study.
What are the study design and procedures used in each study; qualitative, quantitative, or mixed method
study, levels of confidence in each study, etc.?
Participant demographics and information.
Instruments used, including reliability and validity.
How do the research findings provide evidence to support your clinical problem, or what further evidence
is needed to answer your question?
Next steps: Identify two questions that can help guide the group’s work.
Conclusion (20 points/10%)
Review major findings in a summary paragraph.
Evidence to address your clinical problem.
Make a connection back to all the included sections.
4. Wrap up the assignment and give the reader something to think about.
Format (30 points/15%)
1. Correct grammar and spelling
2. Include a title and reference page
3. Use of headings for each section:
o Problem
o Synthesis of the Literature
· − Variables
· − Methods
· − Participants
· − Instruments
· − Implications for Future Work
4. Conclusion
5. Adheres to current APA formatting and guidelines
6. Include at least two (2) scholarly, current (within 5 years) primary sources other than the textbook
7. 3-4 pages in length, excluding appendices, title and reference pages
Last Completed Projects
| topic title | academic level | Writer | delivered |
|---|