What constitutional issues are involved in the scenario that dictates what you can and cannot do related to the evidence of other criminal activity outside the scope of the original wiretap order?

What constitutional issues are involved in the scenario that dictates what you can and cannot do related to the evidence of other criminal activity outside the scope of the original wiretap order? Explain.
Example 1: You want to act on the information about the murder plot but your warrant does not cover that. The Fourth Amendment requires that you have a warrant to listen but only for the evidence written on that warrant.
Example 2: The Fifth Amendment gives us the right to not testify against ourselves. This is the law against self-incrimination. If you act on the information about the murder plot, you are denying the offender his Fifth Amendment rights because his words incriminated him.
If you arrest the other individuals for the crimes not associated with the reasons for the wiretap, what happens to any future evidence that might be obtained from the wiretap? Why

Last Completed Projects