What is interesting is that it was ordinary people who were protesting against this blatant discrimination, and fighting for the civil rights movement.

Question 1
Jim Crow laws of the 1960s. What is interesting is that it was ordinary people who were protesting against this blatant discrimination, and fighting for the civil rights movement. Even if the government has the ultimate say, it is pressure from the people that spurs them to change in many cases. For example, the civil rights movements and the changes in the Jim Crow laws were the results of ordinary people, such as Rosa Parks, student movements, etc., taking a stand. Why do you think it came to this in order to achieve equality. Why do you all think it took ordinary people to bring this issue to light, rather than our elected government. They were just as aware of the inequalities.

Question 2

Having a diverse workforce makes a company more innovative. If people are exposed to more diversity at work, they can expect to learn more from their co-workers. In turn, this will help the company to attract even better applicants from all over the world. If a company has a reputation for embracing and appreciating diversity, they have more of a chance of attracting people who may not normally apply for a position at the company. Having a diverse workforce can only increase the good reputation of a company because it will be seen as practicing global and social acceptance, and having fair employment practices. What do you all think?

Last Completed Projects