What key terms, concepts, and theories from our Lessons and readings are relevant to the issue(s) in this case?

Executive Summary: Usually written last, this section (no more than 10% of your total paper length) seizes your reader’s interest and tells your reader what s/he is going to learn from reading your analysis. The Executive Summary should be on its own separate page and is the first page the reader will see after the cover page.
Background: What are the critical facts in the case? Who are the key “players” and what perspectives do they bring to the situation? What is/are the central issue(s)? What is at stake?
Analysis: What key terms, concepts, and theories from our Lessons and readings are relevant to the issue(s) in this case? How? What do the “facts” of this case look like from the perspective of each of the key “players”? What is the source or basis for any understanding or misunderstanding that is evident in this case? What light can research, using credible source material, shed on the central issue(s) in this case? (Your analysis should include current-day information obtained through Metrostate’s online library.) What needs to be resolved in this case?
Recommended Action Plan: Based on your analysis, what alternatives do key “players” in this case have? What are the probable implications associated with each alternative? What action(s) do you recommend? Why? On what key concepts, “best practice,” or idea supported by credible source(s) do you base your recommendation(s)?

Last Completed Projects