What’s your response to the article’s argument — do you find it persuasive, unpersuasive, interesting, uninteresting? Explain your response. Refer to details from the article in your response.

You can pick any “internet” or non-academic sources, meaning web
pages, blog posts, or other non-academic source.

After that just answer the question about the sources there is a example listed below
1. Who is the article’s intended audience? That is, specialists, the general
public, scholars with certain interests, something else entirely?
2. What’s your response to the article’s argument — do you find it
persuasive, unpersuasive, interesting, uninteresting? Explain your
response. Refer to details from the article in your response.
3. What do you notice about the article’s methodology — the kinds of
evidence the writer draws on and the critical approach the writer takes in
framing a question or problem to analyze?
4. How does the scholar situate his or her argument in relationship to other
critics? That is, does the scholar write to undercut x’s argument, or to
build on y’s argument, or in agreement with z’s argument? How does the
argument signal its participation in a larger critical conversation?
5. What questions come to mind as you read the article? You do not need to
answer these questions.

Last Completed Projects