Assignment Question

Compare and Contrast the two works of art shown above. One is a Persian manuscript painting “Timur Granting an Audience on the Occasion of his Succession” by the artist Kamal al-din Behzad, a manuscript painter working during the late Timurid and early Safavid Persian periods. The other is an Italian Renaissance fresco painting “School of Athens” by Raphael. Use the Feldmans Art criticism method synthesizing art elements with design principles in the portion of this essay that describes form.

Note that Kamal al-din Behzad and Raphael lived and worked contemporaneously but in different regions of the world. Kamal al-din Behzad worked in Herat in modern day Afghanistan for the Safavid and Tabriz Princes. He directed the royal manuscript workshop and the royal library, was both a teacher and artist, and instrumental to the development of Tabrīz as a centre of art. Raphael lived and worked in Florence and Rome Italy during a period of great artistic patronage.

Raphael’s works were commissioned by powerful princes, rulers and by Pope Julius II. Like many popes of this time, Julius II was both the head of the church and a secular ruler. The fresco painting “School of Athens” was painted on the walls of Julius II papal apartment. Raphael was an innovative and important artist who contributed to the development of the Renaissance style.

Answer

Introduction

The realm of art encompasses diverse styles and techniques that have evolved across different regions and time periods. In this essay, we will delve into a comparative analysis of two distinct works of art, each representing its unique cultural and artistic context. The first piece is a Persian manuscript painting titled “Timur Granting an Audience on the Occasion of his Succession,” created by the renowned artist Kamal al-din Behzad during the late Timurid and early Safavid Persian periods. The second work is the Italian Renaissance fresco painting “School of Athens,” masterfully crafted by Raphael. Although Kamal al-din Behzad and Raphael lived contemporaneously, their works emerged from vastly different regions of the world, reflecting the cultural and historical influences of their respective times.

Kamal al-Din Behzad’s “Timur Granting an Audience”

Kamal al-Din Behzad’s “Timur Granting an Audience” exemplifies the intricate beauty of Persian manuscript painting. This work is characterized by meticulous attention to detail, vibrant colors, and a narrative quality that is typical of Persian miniature art (Bloom & Blair, 2019). The composition is organized around a central axis, with Timur seated on a magnificent throne, surrounded by his courtiers and dignitaries. Behzad skillfully uses proportion and scale to emphasize Timur’s authority and stature within the scene. The use of gold leaf and intricate patterns in the manuscript’s border and clothing highlights the opulence and grandeur of Timur’s court, while the meticulous rendering of facial expressions and gestures brings life to the characters (Soudavar, 2018). Behzad’s attention to the natural world is evident in the landscape elements, such as the lush vegetation and distant mountains. The form of this Persian manuscript painting reflects the artistic conventions of the time, emphasizing harmony, balance, and storytelling through visual elements.

 Raphael’s “School of Athens”

Raphael’s “School of Athens” represents a pinnacle of Italian Renaissance art. This fresco, located in the papal apartments of Julius II in the Vatican, is a testament to Raphael’s mastery of perspective, composition, and classical influences (Paoletti & Radke, 2020). The painting features a grand architectural space with a central group of philosophers, including Plato and Aristotle, engaging in discourse. The use of linear perspective creates a sense of depth and three-dimensionality, as the architecture converges towards a distant vanishing point. Raphael seamlessly combines classical motifs with contemporary portraiture, as some of the figures in the painting are believed to be depictions of prominent Renaissance intellectuals and artists (Paoletti & Radke, 2020). The composition, with its careful placement of figures and meticulous attention to anatomy, conveys a sense of order and intellectual pursuit.

Comparison of Form

Raphael’s “School of Athens” is a masterpiece of Italian Renaissance art, created between 1509 and 1511 during the High Renaissance period. This iconic fresco is situated in the Vatican’s Apostolic Palace and is considered one of the most celebrated works in the history of Western art (Paoletti & Radke, 2020). The composition of “School of Athens” is striking and visually captivating. It depicts a grand architectural space resembling a classical Roman basilica, filled with classical philosophers and thinkers engaged in intellectual discourse. At the center of the composition stand Plato and Aristotle, symbolizing the dualism of philosophy and science, with Plato pointing to the heavens and Aristotle gesturing towards the earth. Their positions not only represent their respective philosophical ideas but also allude to the interplay between idealism and empiricism.

Raphael’s use of linear perspective in “School of Athens” is masterful. The converging lines of the architecture create a sense of depth, drawing the viewer’s eye towards a distant vanishing point. This technique adds a three-dimensional quality to the painting, making the space feel expansive and immersive. One remarkable aspect of “School of Athens” is Raphael’s inclusion of contemporary figures. Some of the individuals depicted in the fresco are believed to be portraits of notable Renaissance scholars, artists, and thinkers, including Leonardo da Vinci, Michelangelo, and Raphael himself. This blending of classical and contemporary figures reflects the Renaissance’s fascination with the revival of classical ideals and the belief in the continuity of knowledge across time.

The fresco’s overall composition is harmonious and balanced, with groups of philosophers arranged in symmetrical fashion on both sides of the central axis. The use of vibrant colors and meticulous attention to detail in the drapery and facial expressions of the figures adds a sense of realism and vitality to the scene. “School of Athens” not only showcases Raphael’s exceptional technical skills but also embodies the humanistic spirit of the Renaissance. It celebrates the pursuit of knowledge, the exchange of ideas, and the belief in the power of reason. Raphael’s ability to capture these profound concepts within a single work of art continues to make “School of Athens” a timeless and revered masterpiece in the world of art.

Conclusion

In conclusion, the comparative analysis of Kamal al-Din Behzad’s “Timur Granting an Audience” and Raphael’s “School of Athens” reveals the profound impact of cultural and regional influences on art. While both artists excelled in their respective forms, they diverged in their stylistic choices, mediums, and cultural contexts. Behzad’s Persian manuscript painting is characterized by its intricate details, vibrant colors, and storytelling within a Persian miniature tradition. In contrast, Raphael’s “School of Athens” embodies the principles of Italian Renaissance art, with its mastery of perspective, classical influences, and intellectual depth. These two works serve as remarkable examples of the artistic diversity that emerged during their respective periods and regions. By appreciating their distinct forms and the design principles inherent in each, we gain a deeper understanding of the rich tapestry of art history. Kamal al-Din Behzad and Raphael may have lived and worked in different parts of the world, but their contributions to the world of art continue to be celebrated and studied to this day.

References

Bloom, J. M., & Blair, S. S. (2019). The Art and Architecture of Islam, 1250–1800. Yale University Press.

Paoletti, J. T., & Radke, G. M. (2020). Art in Renaissance Italy. Pearson.

Soudavar, A. (2018). Art of the Persian Courts: Selections from the Art and History Trust Collection. Yale University Press.

Frequently Ask Questions ( FQA)

Q1: What are the two works of art compared in the essay?

A1: The two works of art compared in the essay are Kamal al-Din Behzad’s “Timur Granting an Audience on the Occasion of his Succession” and Raphael’s “School of Athens.”

Q2: Who was Kamal al-Din Behzad, and in which time period did he work?

A2: Kamal al-Din Behzad was a Persian manuscript painter who worked during the late Timurid and early Safavid Persian periods.

Q3: Where did Kamal al-Din Behzad work, and what role did he play in the art world?

A3: Kamal al-Din Behzad worked in Herat, modern-day Afghanistan, for the Safavid and Tabriz Princes. He directed the royal manuscript workshop and the royal library, served as both a teacher and artist, and was instrumental in the development of Tabriz as a center of art.

Q4: Who was Raphael, and during which period did he work?

A4: Raphael was an Italian Renaissance artist who lived and worked in Florence and Rome, Italy, during a period of great artistic patronage in the 16th century.

Q5: Where is Raphael’s “School of Athens” located, and for whom was it commissioned?

A5: Raphael’s “School of Athens” is located in the papal apartments of Julius II in the Vatican. It was commissioned by Pope Julius II, who served as both the head of the church and a secular ruler.

Last Completed Projects