Write a reflection paper describing how you interpret and understand the material in the course.
In the writing of the reflection paper, incorporate theories, constructs, and research findings from the course content. Include any thoughts about how you perceive you can use the information learned from the course. You must include a minimum of two (2) references from peer-reviewed journal articles (i.e., in-text citations). The Reflection Paper will be graded on the following areas:
a. Content (including required minimum page length)
b. Organization
c. Writing mechanics and style (APA standards will be applied)
*All materials must be in your own words! Excessive use of direct quotes may a point penalty for each occurrence and will not be accepted as content towards the page count of the reflection paper.)
References Page
This will be the last page of your document. If you have questions about how to format the references, please refer to your copy of the APA Publication Manual, the UMGC writing resources provided within the course, or ask your instructor for assistance.
Submission
Create the Refelection Paper in the word processing software with which you are most familiar. When ready, submit your work for grading. Submit through your Assignment Folder/Dropbox. No submissions via email as an attachment!
Rubric
Rubric for Reflection Paper
CONTENT (8-points each)
1. All topics were discussed in clear detail
2. Assertions supported.
3. Ideas were interrelated coherently and logically
ORGANIZATION (16 Points)
An introduction previews main points of reflection, body of paper develops and elaborates main ideas, conclusion summarizes main points
WRITING MECHANICS and STYLE (5 points each)
4. Paper grammatically sound (proper sentence structure) and free of mechanical errors (e.g., misspellings, typos, etc.)
5. Citations and references in proper APA style
Points to be
Awarded
Behaviors Demonstrated
Exeptional
paper contains no errors in this area
Exceeds Expectations
paper contains limited errors in this area; however, the overall presentation of the material is readable and appropriate
Meets Expectations
paper contains limited errors in this area; however, the overall presentation of the material is difficult to read
Meets Some Expectations
paper contains a number of errors in this area; however, the overall presentation is acceptable
Minimal Expectations Met
paper contains a number of errors in this area, and the overall presentation is difficult to read
Not Done
paper contains numerous errors in this area, which detracts from the overall presentation
Links to review for reflection paper:
1. http://noba.to/qnw7g32t
2. http://saylordotorg.github.io/text_human-relations/s06-01-emotional-intelligence.html
3. http://ezproxy.umgc.edu/login?url=https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=nlebk&AN=1588512&site=eds-live&scope=site&profile=edsebook&ebv=EB&ppid=pp_97
4. http://ezproxy.umgc.edu/login?url=https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=nlebk&AN=1588512&site=eds-live&scope=site&profile=edsebook&ebv=EB&ppid=pp_112
5. https://www.proquest.com/docview/2219940647?accountid=14580
Last Completed Projects
| topic title | academic level | Writer | delivered |
|---|