Write a research paper on ‘’How to poison the earth’’ is written by Linnea Saukko, and “Chronicles of Ice.” by Gretel, Ehrlich.

Write a research paper on ‘’How
to poison the earth’’ is written by Linnea Saukko, and
“Chronicles of Ice.” by Gretel, Ehrlich. Both authors make excellent point
about how to save and conserve the

planet of Earth. Both go about making points in two completely different ways
although

they do have a lot of similarities. Saukko uses a more sarcastic and ironic way
to prove her point, While

Ehrlich uses a more serious and detailed way to prove hers.

Both essays are directed toward to all people who love and care about Earth and
want

to see our planet be prosperous for many years to come and stay beautiful and to
be able to support life.

Ehrlich and Saukko are both worried about the effects of human activities on
the environmental and

what we can do to stop poisoning the Earth and save the glaciers. Both realize
the human action on the

environment and the effects they do have on Earth.

Saukko idea is completely theoretical, highly illegal, and almost impossible to

happen. Poisoning the earth can be difficult because the earth is always to
cleanse and renew itself. All

of the preparatory steps are listed in the first paragraph where she lists
examples of harmful substances,

nuclear power plants, pollution for rivers, groundwater that has been injected
with toxins, deep-well

injection involves drilling a hole, chlorophyl polyurethane, and pollutants
that jeopardize life in the

earth. Ehrlich her essay approaches to all reader through personal experience
her details and

descriptions make the essay informative attracting a specific reader. Both
essays are interesting, each

with distinct methods but overall informative while complimenting each other.
Saukko’s writing is

referred to as direct process analysis, but she also uses satire, which is very
effective when it comes to

keeping the reader interested. She uses phrases like preserving the earth can
be difficult because the

each is always trying to renew itself. Which is the first sentence of the
essay, to sarcastically express

her concern. The essay focuses mainly on toxins or poison and how they are
dangerous for life on

earth.

If we think about the right. God created the world for human, animals, plants,
and

etc…. to lives our life to the fullest and enjoy what a beautiful world
around. If she wants to poison the

earth. What happen to us? We all going to be dead; humans, animals, and
everything. We don’t have fresh

water to drink because of the toxins. We cannot do nothing. This is also lock
of completeness brings

about some confusion and many questions.

Overall Saukko’s talks about saving the environment in a more general matter,
where

as Ehrlich’s approaches the topic because of the actions and risk of the
environment problems,

like global warming, addressed in Saukko’s essay. Ehrlich’s essay talks about
her visit to the Prieto

Moreno glacier, by also using process analysis she is explaining the formation
of glaciers and how eighth

the help of human activities such as global warming, glaciers decline. She uses
personal experience to

express her concern on the effect of human activity on the environment. She is
very detailed and

descriptive which makes the essay informative, attracting readers who would be
specifically interested

in glaciers and what causing them to decline rather a general audience
interested in the overall effects

of other environmental issues as well.

Last Completed Projects