Slavoj Zizek’s Talk “First as a Tragedy, Then as a Farce”

In one brief paragraph (75-100 words), apply the Toulmin method to Zizek’s talk. What is his claim? His support? His warrant?
In the second brief paragraph (75-100 words) explain how you might offer a Rogerian argument to Zizek’s talk. What compromises would or could you offer?
To know how to correctly write these short paragraphs there is a 10 minute long video on youtube and it is called “RSA Animation: First as a Tragedy, Then as a Farce” That’s where you will get Zizek’s ideas not off anywhere else

Last Completed Projects