Who is Jesus

First read the class notes for this week: Week 2 Christology Notes.

After reading the notes, please answer two of the following 3 questions (answers should be between 200-300 words long):

1. Whether you grew up in a religious environment or not, what do you remember your impression of Jesus being when you were young? What were you taught about Jesus? Were you taught he was God (a part of the Trinity)? Were you taught he was a myth? Or maybe a good, moral teacher? Explain how your were taught this.

2. In our notes, we looked at the evolution of the Christological title “Lord” through Israel’s Hebrew Scripture, the Septuagint (LXX), and the Christian New Testament. Even if you do not accept the claim of divinity for Jesus, do you find the argument that the Christian Church’s use of the title “Lord” indicates a belief in Jesus’ divinity plausible? Why / Why not?

3. In your opinion, what difference does the truth of the divinity of Jesus mean to the message of the Christian Church?

THE CLASS NOTES ARE ATTACHED IN A FILE.

Farm Labor Social Hierarchy

Paper #2 Topic:
From a global outlook, please compare two ancient civilizations on how has agriculture ancient civilizations used and managed their farm labor social hierarchy systems to promote economic growth. Did this social hierarchy system help or hinder the Agrarian process?
Examples of ancient civilizations: are Roman Empire, Greek Empire, Byzantine Empire, Medieval Europe, Muslim Empire & Medieval China.
Think about Hierarchy;
Serfdom vs free farmers, slaves vs serfdom or peasant farmer vs Landowner
Employment (farmers & soldiers, farmers & govt project).
Taxes on these types of farmers.
You will provide a minimum of three evidence data facts to prove your claim. Students must include in-text citations with a minimum of five references.

valuate the areas in which Ryanair possesses resources and capabilities that enable Ryanair to create a sustained competitive advantage?

Case study files attached: Ryan Air
Lecture slides to refer back to are attached: Session 3

Questions to answer:
1) Evaluate the areas in which Ryanair possesses resources and capabilities that enable Ryanair to create a sustained competitive advantage?
2) What are the implications of these resources and capabilities for Ryanair if it wanted to expand its global footprint?

NEED IN-TEXT CITATIONS FOR ALL ANSWERS
ANSWERS CAN ONLY BE TAKEN FROM THE CASE STUDY READING AND JOURNAL ARTICLES
ANSWERS TAKEN FROM THE CASE STUDY, PLEASE INDICATE THE NUMBER FOR THE IN-TEXT CITATION
Please read through the case study and lecture slides before answering the questions

Bariatric Surgery options

TOPIC: Bariatric surgery options AND criteria for surgery

A concise, thorough discussion of your chosen topic with citations and references of current literature. (Use current professional peer review journal articles, textbooks, or professional websites.

*** DO NOT USE consumer-based resources.

Provide appropriate headings.

Word count for initial post 500-700.

Provide your group members with an overview of the topic.

Briefing paper

Target Audience: Amitabh Akshay, CMO, Deepika Chopra

Topic: Assessing a sector’s competitive landscape and considering responses

The Topic is the executive team member’s challenge and your focus for the Briefing Paper
Do not respond to all of the priming questions (reading questions) in the Briefing Paper
Briefing Paper Structure:

Audience, date, and word count
Topic/challenge
Background
Analysis
Ethical cautions
Recommendation
References

Organ on a Chip

Around 80-85%% of the paper should be the body. Maybe even a bit more. So for every 10 pages, 1.5-2 pages are intro/conclusions, the rest is body. But, the body can contain a first section on Background, so the paper can contain a pretty substantial amount of historical development of the technology. In that case, the “Introduction” is really a summary of the why the topic is important and a brief synopsis of the body and conclusions. I have attached papers that can be used as sources for this paper as well.

Learnign about Qualitative Methods – Artificial Intelligence

Learnign about Qualitative Methods – Artificial Intelligence

To learn together about three different methods to collect qualitative data: Observations, Interviews, and Focus Groups.
To learn by teaching. This is a pedagogical tool that adds to your life skills in addition to knowledge on the subject matter,
To help each other cover the material by providing a helpful summary that everyone can understand.
To prepare you for next week’s activities.
To help you identify key elements to incorporate into your final project.

Pick one of the readings from the list below (there are eight readings. As a team, you don’t need to cover all of the readings; however, you NEED to cover the three topics: Observations, Interviews, and Focus Groups.)
Let your team members know in advance which reading you’ll be summarizing.
Post your summary on the discussion board
Your summary should
Start with a clear identification of the type of work, title, author, and main point in the present tense.

Example: In the feature chapter entitled “Field Research,” the author, Amy Blackstone, explains what field research is, how to use it, when to use it, and discusses its advantages and disadvantages.

Cover the reading’s most essential points and sections.

DO NOT include your own ideas, opinions, or interpretations in the summary.

Use “summarizing language.” Periodically remind your reader that this is a summary by using phrases such as the article claims, the author suggests, etc.

Include a complete bibliographic citation at the beginning of your summary. A full bibliographic citation includes, as a minimum, the title of the work, the author, the source.

Be no longer than 700 words.
Here is a guide on how to write summaries. https://www.llcc.edu/sites/default/files/2021-11/Writing%20a%20Summary.pdfLinks to an external site.

This is a group activity, but you will be graded individually based on the quality of your summary.

Readings

Interviews

Ch. 17 Interviews in Pickard, A., Childs, S., Lomas, E., McLeod, J., Shenton, A., & EBSCO Publishing. (2013). Research methods in information (Second ed.). http://ezproxy.uky.edu/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=nlebk&AN=1560617&site=ehost-live&scope=site&ebv=EB&ppid=pp_195Links to an external site.
Ch. 9 Interviews. Blackstone, A. (2012). Principles of Sociological Inquiry. Place of publication not identified: Saylor Foundation. https://saalck-uky.primo.exlibrisgroup.com/permalink/01SAA_UKY/ija67f/cdi_centerforopeneducation_opentextbooklibrary_OTLid0000139Links to an external site.
Ch. 8 Individual Interviews (pp 239-249) in Connaway, L., Radford, M., & EBSCO Publishing. (2017). Research methods in library and information scienceLinks to an external site. (Sixth ed., Library and information science text series). https://saalck-uky.primo.exlibrisgroup.com/permalink/01SAA_UKY/1e08o76/alma9941251877002636Links to an external site.
Observation

Ch. 19 Observation Download Observationin Pickard, A., Childs, S., Lomas, E., McLeod, J., Shenton, A., & EBSCO Publishing. (2013). Research methods in information (Second ed.). https://saalck-uky.primo.exlibrisgroup.com/permalink/01SAA_UKY/ija67f/cdi_askewsholts_vlebooks_9781783300235Links to an external site.
Ch. 9 Observation Download Observation(pp. 270-276) in Connaway, L., Radford, M., & EBSCO Publishing. (2017). Research methods in library and information science (Sixth ed., Library and information science text series) https://saalck-uky.primo.exlibrisgroup.com/permalink/01SAA_UKY/15remem/alma9941251877002636Links to an external site.
Focus Groups

Ch. 21 Focus Groups. in Pickard, A., Childs, S., Lomas, E., McLeod, J., Shenton, A., & EBSCO Publishing. (2013). Research methods in information (Second ed.). https://saalck-uky.primo.exlibrisgroup.com/permalink/01SAA_UKY/15remem/alma9941306381602636Links to an external site.
12.1 Focus Groups in Blackstone, A. (2012). Principles of Sociological Inquiry. Place of publication not identified: Saylor Foundation. https://saylordotorg.github.io/text_principles-of-sociological-inquiry-qualitative-and-quantitative-methods/s15-01-focus-groups.htmlLinks to an external site.
Ch. 8 Focus Group Interviews (pp. 249 – 258) in Connaway, L., Radford, M., & EBSCO Publishing. (2017). Research methods in library and information science (Sixth ed., Library and information science text series).https://saalck-uky.primo.exlibrisgroup.com/permalink/01SAA_UKY/ija67f/cdi_askewsholts_vlebooks_9781440834790Links to an external site.

Use collaboration techniques to correct written documents.

Deliverable 05 – English Composition
Competency

Use collaboration techniques to correct written documents.

Show your ability to analyze, correct, and revise the following rough draft, giving your input on the revision necessary to improve the quality of this essay. You will show successful completion of this deliverable by:

Providing feedback for corrections/alterations using the Comments feature in Word (Review tab).
Respond to the six questions at the end of the student rough draft linked above.
Use complete sentences in all of your responses.

Institutional Corrections and Community Corrections (week 4)

Exam Content

Criminal justice professionals are faced with ethical decisions every day, and the impact of these decisions can change a justice-served individual’s life for years to come. In this summative assessment, you explore the ethical dilemmas that occur when children commit violent crimes, as well as the impacts on rehabilitation and reintegration into society. The Supreme Court has made a number of rulings in recent years regarding the sentencing of juveniles. Reference the following articles to familiarize yourself with the topic of juvenile sentencing:

Juvenile Life Without Parole: An Overview from the Sentencing Project
https://www.sentencingproject.org/policy-brief/juvenile-life-without-parole-an-overview/https://www.sentencingproject.org/policy-brief/juvenile-life-without-parole-an-overview/

“Supreme Court Rules Against Juvenile Sentenced to Life Without Parole” from The Washington Post
https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/courts_law/supreme-court-life-without-parole/2021/04/22/6a633136-a371-11eb-a774-7b47ceb36ee8_story.htmlhttps://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/courts_law/supreme-court-life-without-parole/2021/04/22/6a633136-a371-11eb-a774-7b47ceb36ee8_story.html

Create a 15- to 18-slide Microsoft® PowerPoint® presentation to a federal- or state-level board about the ethical decision-making process as it applies to child offender cases that might appear in your system. Address the following in your presentation:

Analyze the complexity of the issues underlying the ethical dilemmas of juvenile sentencing.
Evaluate the rehabilitation and reintegration options that would be available in these situations.
Outline the decision-making that needs to occur when evaluating institutional or community-based corrections and rehabilitation for child offenders.
Describe the information that must be considered during the decision-making process.
Evaluate the possible long-term outcomes of both sides of the decision.
Recommend how the federal- or state-level board should handle these types of cases in the future.

Include detailed speaker notes.
Cite at least 2 sources to support your assignment.
Format your assignment according to APA guidelines.

Mind Map of Information Technologies

I need a mind map created
For this assignment, you will identify the process for decision-making regarding technology. You will also discuss the nursing role in identifying appropriate technology for practice.

This week you will create a mind map of information technologies and social media you would utilize in your role as a nurse. As well as the risks associated with each technology you selected the risks associated with each technology you selected