Best Writer

Write Research Essay
Write a research paper about a topic of your choice. Tell me all about it.
Include an introductory paragraph with a hook and a thesis statement, or main idea, which should be supported by 3 supporting details. The following paragraphs should go into more detail about those 3 ideas. The closing paragraph should restate the thesis and wrap it up. Include a “Works Cited” page afterward. This does not count toward the page count.
Hook
Main Idea
3 supporting details
Closing Idea
Works Cited
MLA format
3-4 pages

For example,if your topic is Sparta. Your thesis can be about how it was a powerful city state in Greece. Then, you can talk about the military practices, the economic strengths, and the government structure.

If possible to submit rough draft and final draft

Write a 750-1,000 word review of a website about ADD or ADHD. You will write this review for the general public, so you might target a particular publication, such as a student or local newspaper or one of the national magazines. This will help you anticipate what your readers already know, what they value, and what criteria they accept as a basis of evaluation. Complete the following:1.Develop a set of criteria that the general public would see as acceptable for a website about diseases and disorders (like ADHD).2.Describe the website you have chosen, and then explain how it does (or does not) perform the criteria you established above.3.Use at least two scholarly sources outside of class texts to augment your understanding and perspective on these facts and elements. Use the GCU library for sources. Include this research in the paper in an appropriate scholarly mannerWrite a 750-1,000 word review of a website about ADD or ADHD. You will write this review for the general public, so you might target a particular publication, such as a student or local newspaper or one of the national magazines. This will help you anticipate what your readers already know, what they value, and what criteria they accept as a basis of evaluation. Complete the following:1.Develop a set of criteria that the general public would see as acceptable for a website about diseases and disorders (like ADHD).2.Describe the website you have chosen, and then explain how it does (or does not) perform the criteria you established above.3.Use at least two scholarly sources outside of class texts to augment your understanding and perspective on these facts and elements. Use the GCU library for sources. Include this research in the paper in an appropriate scholarly manner

OBJECTIVE

This assignment aims to increase the student’s awareness of the critical relationships between health, well-being and social environments such as families. Students will choose ONE of the suggested topic headings and prepare a short paper discussing the connections between the identified social determinant of health and family-related issues. Students will draw from a number of resources, including peer-reviewed journals, textbooks, newspaper articles, class discussions, and lecture notes to complete the assignment.
TOPIC HEADINGS
Choose one of the following
Early childhood experiences and poverty
Social exclusion and family experiences of recent immigrants to Canada
Issues of addiction (substance abuse/ smoking) and its effects on family relationships
Social support and chronic illness in the family
Work, stress, family life and caregiving

FIRST SECTION
Select a topic to research. (MY TOPIC IS SEXUAL ABUSE TRAUMA DURING CHILDHOOD) For your research, you must use Google Scholar, the GCU Library or another reputable site. Review the Topic 2 Resource for a description of what is considered a scholarly article.
Create a title page and a reference list with 10 references from the last 5 years. Include the permalink for each reference. Include the following types of references:

1.Book
2.Journal articles
3.Website
4.Dissertation/thesis from a database
5. Streaming video
6.Book chapter

PLEASE DO THE FIRST SECTION AND SECOND SECTION ON SEPERATE PAPERS

SECOND SECTION
Select three of the ten references from your Reference List assignment. Create an annotated bibliography for each of the three references.
Each annotation must have 150-200 words, making a total of 450-600 words for the entire assignment. Each annotation should have the following elements:
1.APA style reference of the article being annotated
2.A paraphrased summary of the article (See note on paraphrasing below.)
There are three main steps to paraphrasing: Identify the original idea(s) in the article, Identify general points regarding the idea(s), Summarize the general points of the article in your own word
3.An assessment of why it is a scholarly reference
4.A reflection on how it is applicable to your research

WRITING PROMPT: How does a specific cultural context influence one or two of the main character’s choices, behaviors, and opportunities. Be sure to first clarify the specific cultural context in question. Use specific dialogue and/or scenes that support your claim.

Some examples of strong cultural context forces are religion, gender roles, classism, stereotypes, patriarchy, racism, segregation, political views and so on. Select ONE theme and hone-in with in-depth analysis.

IMPORTANT: This essay is an argument analysis, not a summary. Your discussion is to convince me that specific (cultural) forces are driving the character’ actions or lack thereof.

REQUIRED: Integrate and cite at least 3 quotes from the book, There There to support your claim. Cite it, that means I want to see page numbers, line numbers, and good use of metacommentry when using quotes in your conversation.

To prepare, review Module: Cultural Context

Particulars:

Use 1st person (never 2nd)
5-6 paragraphs (word count varies – quality discussion over quantity of words).
MLA format/heading,12 font, Times New Roman, page numbers, and so on
Integrate a specific scene to support each claim made in each body paragraph. Cite that scene, so I can find it.
Include a Works Cited page as needed.
Edit grammar
800+ meaningful and cohesive words (sentences, paragraphs) 5 paragraphs minimum
Your thesis is a statement, your claim, and a hint at how you plan to support it.
Each body paragraph should discuss only one idea that supports your argument. Integrate one relevant quote or description of what transpired to support your point. Analyze.
If you add a quote, it must not be longer than 2 lines, less quote and more analysis is key and a sign of sophistication.

IMPORTANT: I am not looking for a summary of the play or unfolding of events. I am looking for your in-depth analysis, rationalizing why “things” turned out the way they did… how cultural context plays in the outcome of things.

Additional tips:

Essay structure: Introduction, body paragraphs, and conclusion. The conclusion is not a repeat of the thesis, rather it is a reflective discussion on what you discovered.

Quick tips:

THESIS should be located at end of introduction. UNDERLINE the thesis.

Each body paragraph topic sentence must be clear and specific, pointing to only one idea that supports the thesis, telling the reader what the entire paragraph is about.

Write an analytical essay in which you analyze and evaluate the techniques used in World War II Propaganda Posters
MAKE SURE YOU OPEN THE FILES!!!!

Ideas
My topic is clear and focused
I provide accurate, important details to support my main ideas
I anticipate the readers’ questions and provide answers in my work
Organization
I have an inviting introduction, well-constructed paragraphs, and a satisfying conclusion
My work is organized sequentially, logically, and effectively
I use effective transitions throughout my work that make my meaning clear and help readers move through the text
Voice
My content and ideas–and the way I express them–match the purpose and audience
I use natural, engaging language
When someone reads this text, it will be clear to them that I care about and understand the topic
Word Choice
My words are specific and correctly used so my readers will know exactly what I mean
All of my words and phrases are natural, effective, and appropriate; some of them are also memorable and powerful
Sentence Fluency
My sentences are put together well and in a way that enhances the meaning
I use a variety of sentence lengths and structures in my work
When I read my work out loud, it flows well and has rhythm
Conventions
I have reviewed my spelling, capitalization, and punctuation for correctness
My grammar, paragraphing, and usage are correct and help me define my style while also communicating clearly
Presentation
The formatting suits the purpose of the work
I use the appropriate amount of white space on the page
I use appropriate fonts, font size, titles, and heading
Ideas
My topic is clear and focused
I provide accurate, important details to support my main ideas
I anticipate the readers’ questions and provide answers in my work
Organization
I have an inviting introduction, well-constructed paragraphs, and a satisfying conclusion
My work is organized sequentially, logically, and effectively
I use effective transitions throughout my work that make my meaning clear and help readers move through the text
Voice
My content and ideas–and the way I express them–match the purpose and audience
I use natural, engaging language
When someone reads this text, it will be clear to them that I care about and understand the topic
Word Choice
My words are specific and correctly used so my readers will know exactly what I mean
All of my words and phrases are natural, effective, and appropriate; some of them are also memorable and powerful
Sentence Fluency
My sentences are put together well and in a way that enhances the meaning
I use a variety of sentence lengths and structures in my work
When I read my work out loud, it flows well and has rhythm
Conventions
I have reviewed my spelling, capitalization, and punctuation for correctness
My grammar, paragraphing, and usage are correct and help me define my style while also communicating clearly
Presentation
The formatting suits the purpose of the work
I use the appropriate amount of white space on the page
I use appropriate fonts, font size, titles, and heading
Ideas
My topic is clear and focused
I provide accurate, important details to support my main ideas
I anticipate the readers’ questions and provide answers in my work
Organization
I have an inviting introduction, well-constructed paragraphs, and a satisfying conclusion
My work is organized sequentially, logically, and effectively
I use effective transitions throughout my work that make my meaning clear and help readers move through the text
Voice
My content and ideas–and the way I express them–match the purpose and audience
I use natural, engaging language
When someone reads this text, it will be clear to them that I care about and understand the topic
Word Choice
My words are specific and correctly used so my readers will know exactly what I mean
All of my words and phrases are natural, effective, and appropriate; some of them are also memorable and powerful
Sentence Fluency
My sentences are put together well and in a way that enhances the meaning
I use a variety of sentence lengths and structures in my work
When I read my work out loud, it flows well and has rhythm
Conventions
I have reviewed my spelling, capitalization, and punctuation for correctness
My grammar, paragraphing, and usage are correct and help me define my style while also communicating clearly
Presentation
The formatting suits the purpose of the work
I use the appropriate amount of white space on the page
I use appropriate fonts, font size, titles, and heading
Ideas
My topic is clear and focused
I provide accurate, important details to support my main ideas
I anticipate the readers’ questions and provide answers in my work
Organization
I have an inviting introduction, well-constructed paragraphs, and a satisfying conclusion
My work is organized sequentially, logically, and effectively
I use effective transitions throughout my work that make my meaning clear and help readers move through the text
Voice
My content and ideas–and the way I express them–match the purpose and audience
I use natural, engaging language
When someone reads this text, it will be clear to them that I care about and understand the topic
Word Choice
My words are specific and correctly used so my readers will know exactly what I mean
All of my words and phrases are natural, effective, and appropriate; some of them are also memorable and powerful
Sentence Fluency
My sentences are put together well and in a way that enhances the meaning
I use a variety of sentence lengths and structures in my work
When I read my work out loud, it flows well and has rhythm
Conventions
I have reviewed my spelling, capitalization, and punctuation for correctness
My grammar, paragraphing, and usage are correct and help me define my style while also communicating clearly
Presentation
The formatting suits the purpose of the work
I use the appropriate amount of white space on the page
I use appropriate fonts, font size, titles, and heading

Knowledge Building – Week 9
Primate Behavior
We’ve now looked at some of the major groups of living primates. As we study primate behavior, it becomes clear that the complexity of this behavior has selected for increased neurological complexity, increased intelligence.

That intelligence allows for even more complex behavior.
To better understand this feedback loop and to understand how the social lives of primates has been shaped by evolution, we study primate behavior.
In this unit, we’ll look at the interaction of biology, ecology & behavior.
Primate Studies
Sometime between 7 and 8 million years ago, the lineage that would lead to humans split off from the lineage that would evolve into the modern apes.

It’s important to note that we did not evolve from gorillas or chimpanzees, but we do share a common ancestry.
We study modern primates, especially the great apes, to try to get a glimpse of what our hominid ancestors’ lifeways might have been like. We know it’s not an exact picture, but it’s as close as we can get.
We are also interested in learning about the great apes as species, as our closest relatives in the animal world, partly because we are in the process of wiping them out. All great apes are endangered, and may have only a few decades left in the wild before they are driven to extinction.
Humans are rapidly destroying the natural habitats of other primates. We currently have close to 7.6 billion humans on this planet. Some estimates suggest that by 2150 (less than 130 years from now), that number will reach 70 billion.
So we might have to get used to seeing non-human primates in zoos, unless we figure out how to resolve these issues.
Socioecology
Primatologists, people who study primates attempt to understand them in relation to their environmental context by studying Socioecology, looking at how environment and behavior interact. Primatologists look at variables such as:

availability of food and its distribution across the landscape;
availability of water;
the presence of predators, including humans;
Socioecology holds that primate social organization is determined by these variables. The size and composition of primate groups depends to a very large extent on the environment in which they live.

Sociobiology
Just as primatologists are interested in learning how primates interact and adapt to their environments, they are just as interested in learning about primate sociobiology – the study of the relationship between behavior and natural selection.

The basic assumption here is that certain behaviors have been selected for, because they increase reproductive success.
Sociobiological theory holds that behavior has evolved through natural selection in all primates, including humans.
As such, the way we primates behave on a daily basis can be understood as behavior that is effective in ensuring that we will pass on our genes.
In humans, like in apes, this means that we can come to something we think of as normal behavior – behavior that is more or less acceptable to those around us.
This is a dicey area in that sociobiologists suggest, to some extent, that certain genes contribute to behavior, and that only those individuals with those genes will reproduce.
Most animals, including mammals, and therefore humans, have behavioral patterns that are under strict genetic controls.
We cry as babies. We get jealous, angry, and sad or happy, and exhibit emotions that are manifested due to our biological nature. While culture can elaborate on our feelings and the elaboration of our responses, these emotions are very deep, and profoundly influenced by our biology.
But in most mammals, and even more so in primates, behavior is learned.
The idea is that some behavior is under genetic control, but some is learned.
Sociobiologists look at sexuality for clues to this. Humans, like other primates have a deep commitment to sexual behavior.
Culture teaches us appropriate sexual behavior, but the desire, the interest, the driving force to engage in sexual behavior is not learned; it is genetic.
The behavioral patterns that we use in pursuing our mates is learned. It is cultural. We understand that there are acceptable ways of acting on our arousal, and according to sociobiologists, this behavior that we will engage in has been selected for.
Quite simply, if we don’t behave appropriately, we will not find anyone willing to mate with us, and we therefore won’t be passing on our genes to the next generation.
The basic premise of sociobiology is that some behaviors are partly influenced by our genes, and that each of us will act to maximize our own reproductive success. We are not concerned about the species as a whole – we care about our own reproductive success, and we will plan accordingly.

Primate Social Behavior
When primatologists study Primate Social Behavior , they try to understand it in terms of Socioecology and Sociobiology.

To better understand how these mechanisms work in higher primates, primatologists are interested in studying primate social behavior, to understand how reproductive strategies are influenced by environment and behavior.
Dominance Hierarchies
Most primate societies, including humans, are organized into Dominance Hierarchies, which can be understood in terms of both socioecology & sociobiology.

Primate males tend to fall into rank or status. High status males have better access to resources and to females.
Primate females tend to fall into rank to a lesser extent.
Rank is like social status in that it can be changed. All primates can alter their rank to the extent to which they navigate complex social landscapes.
We can work to make money or to provide more for our children.
And most primates, human and non-human, have a good sense of what their status is. Status is apparent to any primate during youth and can significantly shape our adolescence and adulthood.
Status, and access to resources and mates, can be understood as reflecting our position in the dominance hierarchy.
Grooming
Grooming is another important aspect of primate social behavior.

Most primates like to groom each other. Most primates find it intensely pleasurable. We have been grooming each other for millions of years.
Humans, like most apes and monkeys, pay a lot of attention to their hair.
Grooming is pleasurable and hygienic, and the act of grooming another primate can be understood to reinforce social norms – grooming and being groomed are both parts of an elaborate social system of pleasing and being pleased, and as such, support and perpetuate dominance hierarchies, and can profoundly impact reproductive success.
Communication
Primates have intense communication skills.

All animals communicate – scents, sounds, and physical behavior.
Even though humans have language, we still utilize a number of communicative strategies shared by all primates.
Displays of virility – primates might flex muscles or accentuate posture. All primates, including humans, have elaborate mating dances.
Eye contact – primates can indicate interest or annoyance by varying their eye contact. All primates, including humans find prolonged eye contact threatening.
Our ability to communicate effectively with other primates will impact our position in dominance hierarchies, and can profoundly impact reproductive success.
Reproductive Strategies
If all of our social behavior goes well, it can lead to reproduction.

In most primates, sexual behavior is tied to the female’s reproductive cycle.
We want our DNA to be transmitted to the next generation. Primates, as well as other mammals, will go to great lengths to assure that.
Primates, like other mammals are deeply committed to sexuality.
Biologists categorize reproductive strategies in two general forms: K and r.

Some animals utilize the r strategy – producing large numbers of offspring but giving very little care in the hope that some of the young will survive. Fish, insects, and mice use this strategy.
Some animals, including primates, utilize the K strategy – producing few offspring but spending a lot of time taking care of those offspring.
Primates are helpless at birth and for some time afterwards.
Female primates want the best for their offspring. They will have few offspring and are heavily invested in their wellbeing.
Male primates have a somewhat different agenda. With much less investment in the offspring, male primates tend to strive for as many mates as possible.
n most primate species, males compete aggressively for females, as part of their reproductive strategy , looking for evidence of youth and fertility.
Females, in turn, look for the most desirable males, looking for evidence of status and stature.
In humans, culture intervenes, but many human males may still try for as many young mates as possible, and females may look for wealthier older men.
This is both genetic and learned. Human males and females are genetically coded to maximize their reproductive success, yet culture establishes normal behavior in which to strike a balance.
Humans are part of a biological continuum that includes all primates. We share behavioral traits with our primate relatives, and many of these behavioral traits are millions of years old, have been reinforced by natural selection and can be understood in terms of Socioecology and Sociobiology.

Our DNA and our environment influence our behavior as do culture and learning.
And much of primate behavior, including human behavior, can be understood by examining the ways in which biology, ecology, and behavior interact
USE TEXT TO COMPLETE ASSIGNMENT………..
Explorations: An Open Invitation to Biological Anthropology. Online book availble as well.

In your introduction, briefly summarize the debate about automation (include the authors’ names and article titles where appropriate). Define key terms such as “automation” or “AI” in your own words.

Answer the writing prompt clearly and directly in your thesis.

Include a counterargument in your essay.

Write 2-3 body paragraphs to support your thesis.

Use evidence from at least two articles (in the form of summary, paraphrase or quotation) to illustrate your points. Include paragraph numbers when citing from the articles. The articles are:

https://www.cnn.com/2019/08/24/politics/economy-us-workforce-automation/index.html
“The Robots are Coming for Your Job, Too” by Zachary Wolf

https://www.theatlantic.com/technology/archive/2019/01/automation-hotel-strike-ai-jobs/579433/
“The Quiet Ways Automation is Remaking Service Work” by Sidney Fussell

https://www.forbes.com/sites/forbestechcouncil/2018/12/28/let-the-robots-take-over-how-the-future-of-ai-will-create-more-jobs/?sh=2abc86a43c6d
“Let the Robots Take Over: How the Future of AI Will Create More Jobs” by Kenneth Coats

https://www.wired.com/story/robots-will-take-jobs-from-men-young-minorities/
“Robots Will Take Jobs from Men, the Young, and Minorities” by Tom Simonite

The articles are under 3/13/2023 and 3/8/2023 folders on Canvas.
Consider offering solutions in your conclusion paragraph.
Your essay has to be at least 800 words.
Use Microsoft word, Font 12 Arial or Times New Roman.
Use collocations and underline them. Check the Collocations folder on Canvas.

Suggestions
1. Before you start writing the essay, spend time (15-20 minutes) planning your points and examples.
2. Take your classmate’s feedback into consideration.
3. Read all model essays on Canvas before your start writing. My expectations are now higher from your first essay.

PLEASE MAKE SURE TO READ CAREFULLY AS THERE ARE MULTIPLE STEPS!
– there are FOUR attached readings to help with this assignment and also a website below

Break Up with the BRIC: Unpacking the Boston Regional Intelligence Center Budget

Assignment 1: Our readings this week identify some strategies and challenges for using intelligence-led policing (ILP) to fight crime. At the federal level, nearly every agency with federal law enforcement officers has some type of intelligence support. However, the ILP we discuss this week is focused on city & state law enforcement organizations.

Choose a city or state in the United States and select a position (do you believe it would be effective or not) and write a policy paper providing recommendations to implement ILP, or not to implement it ( or remove it), and explain why. Whichever choice you make, you will need to analyze both sides of the issues. Some people see great benefits in information sharing, and some people see huge problems with civil rights and civil liberties abuse. You are writing this for the Chief of Police in the town of your choosing. This is not a history paper. The Chief knows the history. Explain WHY you recommend or do not recommend using ILP.

Write a 2-page single-spaced policy paper, with your references on a third page. 12-pt, single-spaced, Times New Roman font.

Remember to research what existing intelligence analysis may or may not be already occurring. Many cities have something already in motion.

**Note** Any of you can contact law enforcement agencies and ask for an interview to discuss their thoughts on ILP and whether it is in use.

**************** USE BELOW FORMAT with Black Bolded Headers ******************
Name: Jane Smith

Subject (One sentence): Keep it short and to the point. This section frames the issue.

Problem Statement (one paragraph): Identify exactly what the problem is.

Issues & Analysis (1/2 -3/4 page): Identify TWO issues which must be addressed if ILP were to be implemented and write 1-2 paragraphs on each.

Insert a small title in front of each paragraph (e.g. Need to Hire Intelligence Analysts; Cross-train injured Police Officers; Cross-Train Crime Analysts; Civil Liberties Problems). Analyze whether it could or could not work.

Consider the decision-makers point of view. Is cost an option? Training? Civil rights and civil liberties? Legal challenges? Will the workforce push back? Do you need more people or funding? Can workers be cross-trained?

Recommendation (1/2-3/4 page): Based on the issues above, explain whether you do or do not recommend implementing ILP, and why. The above section is much more in the weeds about the two issues you select. In this section, you want to be more macro-level, or strategic, about your recommendation and the impact on the city.

References (these go on page 3): Use APA format to identify 5+ sources. Don’t forget your assigned readings.
*************************************
Note: First and foremost—read the assigned readings and then find a few more. No blogs, no Wikipedia… good sources. Check the Lasell Library, DHS documents, Center for Homeland Defense Studies, etc.

For this assignment, you will write an 800-1200 word Rhetorical Analysis based on the
reading, “The Disestablishment of Marriage” by Stephanie Coontz, which is available under the
“Readings” in the Paper 2/Rhetorical Analysis Module.
In a Rhetorical Analysis, your goal is to demonstrate how the various aspects of the
text work together to achieve the writer’s goal and to formulate a thesis statement that
indicates whether Coontz—because of her incorporation and usage of Rhetorical Situation
elements and Rhetorical Strategies—is successful at, in fact, arguing “The Disestablishment
of Marriage, as her title implies.
Hence, you will need to address all 9 of the following, as you (rhetorically analyze)
Coontz’s argument and include direct quotes/evidence from her article. You will focus on—
 The Rhetorical Situation, including
o the author
o the audience
o the occasion
o the purpose
o the persona
o the tone/stance of the article
 Rhetorical Strategies, including
o pathos
o logos
o ethos
Focus on HOW the article/rhetorical situation works, not simply WHAT it conveys; try
not to get distracted into arguing passionately a particular position or extolling the
beauty/creativity of the article. To complete the essay successfully, you will need to discuss
specific and concrete elements of the article—the way we will do over the next few class
meetings. (See the next page for prewriting ideas and invention work.)
No outside research (other than Coontz’s article itself) should be used for this
assignment. And, please adhere to these guidelines:
 Papers should be 800-1200 words and NOT 5 paragraphs.
 Papers need to have a thesis, which can be DIRECT or IMPLIED. Also, the thesis
can be revealed anywhere in the paper.
 Papers should begin with a descriptive title. (Note: paper titles should not be bolded,
italicized, put into quotation marks, or all capitalized.)
 Papers should be logically organized; transitions should be deftly utilized, too.
 Papers should reflect a solid command of grammar, mechanics, and spelling. (This
means thorough proofreading is essential!!)
I’m happy to assist, so please let me know if I can!!
Prewriting and Invention WorkFor this assignment, you will write an 800-1200 word Rhetorical Analysis based on the
reading, “The Disestablishment of Marriage” by Stephanie Coontz, which is available under the
“Readings” in the Paper 2/Rhetorical Analysis Module.
In a Rhetorical Analysis, your goal is to demonstrate how the various aspects of the
text work together to achieve the writer’s goal and to formulate a thesis statement that
indicates whether Coontz—because of her incorporation and usage of Rhetorical Situation
elements and Rhetorical Strategies—is successful at, in fact, arguing “The Disestablishment
of Marriage, as her title implies.
Hence, you will need to address all 9 of the following, as you (rhetorically analyze)
Coontz’s argument and include direct quotes/evidence from her article. You will focus on—
 The Rhetorical Situation, including
o the author
o the audience
o the occasion
o the purpose
o the persona
o the tone/stance of the article
 Rhetorical Strategies, including
o pathos
o logos
o ethos
Focus on HOW the article/rhetorical situation works, not simply WHAT it conveys; try
not to get distracted into arguing passionately a particular position or extolling the
beauty/creativity of the article. To complete the essay successfully, you will need to discuss
specific and concrete elements of the article—the way we will do over the next few class
meetings. (See the next page for prewriting ideas and invention work.)
No outside research (other than Coontz’s article itself) should be used for this
assignment. And, please adhere to these guidelines:
 Papers should be 800-1200 words and NOT 5 paragraphs.
 Papers need to have a thesis, which can be DIRECT or IMPLIED. Also, the thesis
can be revealed anywhere in the paper.
 Papers should begin with a descriptive title. (Note: paper titles should not be bolded,
italicized, put into quotation marks, or all capitalized.)
 Papers should be logically organized; transitions should be deftly utilized, too.
 Papers should reflect a solid command of grammar, mechanics, and spelling. (This
means thorough proofreading is essential!!)
I’m happy to assist, so please let me know if I can!!
Prewriting and Invention WorkFor this assignment, you will write an 800-1200 word Rhetorical Analysis based on the
reading, “The Disestablishment of Marriage” by Stephanie Coontz, which is available under the
“Readings” in the Paper 2/Rhetorical Analysis Module.
In a Rhetorical Analysis, your goal is to demonstrate how the various aspects of the
text work together to achieve the writer’s goal and to formulate a thesis statement that
indicates whether Coontz—because of her incorporation and usage of Rhetorical Situation
elements and Rhetorical Strategies—is successful at, in fact, arguing “The Disestablishment
of Marriage, as her title implies.
Hence, you will need to address all 9 of the following, as you (rhetorically analyze)
Coontz’s argument and include direct quotes/evidence from her article. You will focus on—
 The Rhetorical Situation, including
o the author
o the audience
o the occasion
o the purpose
o the persona
o the tone/stance of the article
 Rhetorical Strategies, including
o pathos
o logos
o ethos
Focus on HOW the article/rhetorical situation works, not simply WHAT it conveys; try
not to get distracted into arguing passionately a particular position or extolling the
beauty/creativity of the article. To complete the essay successfully, you will need to discuss
specific and concrete elements of the article—the way we will do over the next few class
meetings. (See the next page for prewriting ideas and invention work.)
No outside research (other than Coontz’s article itself) should be used for this
assignment. And, please adhere to these guidelines:
 Papers should be 800-1200 words and NOT 5 paragraphs.
 Papers need to have a thesis, which can be DIRECT or IMPLIED. Also, the thesis
can be revealed anywhere in the paper.
 Papers should begin with a descriptive title. (Note: paper titles should not be bolded,
italicized, put into quotation marks, or all capitalized.)
 Papers should be logically organized; transitions should be deftly utilized, too.
 Papers should reflect a solid command of grammar, mechanics, and spelling. (This
means thorough proofreading is essential!!)
I’m happy to assist, so please let me know if I can!!
Prewriting and Invention WorkFor this assignment, you will write an 800-1200 word Rhetorical Analysis based on the
reading, “The Disestablishment of Marriage” by Stephanie Coontz, which is available under the
“Readings” in the Paper 2/Rhetorical Analysis Module.
In a Rhetorical Analysis, your goal is to demonstrate how the various aspects of the
text work together to achieve the writer’s goal and to formulate a thesis statement that
indicates whether Coontz—because of her incorporation and usage of Rhetorical Situation
elements and Rhetorical Strategies—is successful at, in fact, arguing “The Disestablishment
of Marriage, as her title implies.
Hence, you will need to address all 9 of the following, as you (rhetorically analyze)
Coontz’s argument and include direct quotes/evidence from her article. You will focus on—
 The Rhetorical Situation, including
o the author
o the audience
o the occasion
o the purpose
o the persona
o the tone/stance of the article
 Rhetorical Strategies, including
o pathos
o logos
o ethos
Focus on HOW the article/rhetorical situation works, not simply WHAT it conveys; try
not to get distracted into arguing passionately a particular position or extolling the
beauty/creativity of the article. To complete the essay successfully, you will need to discuss
specific and concrete elements of the article—the way we will do over the next few class
meetings. (See the next page for prewriting ideas and invention work.)
No outside research (other than Coontz’s article itself) should be used for this
assignment. And, please adhere to these guidelines:
 Papers should be 800-1200 words and NOT 5 paragraphs.
 Papers need to have a thesis, which can be DIRECT or IMPLIED. Also, the thesis
can be revealed anywhere in the paper.
 Papers should begin with a descriptive title. (Note: paper titles should not be bolded,
italicized, put into quotation marks, or all capitalized.)
 Papers should be logically organized; transitions should be deftly utilized, too.
 Papers should reflect a solid command of grammar, mechanics, and spelling. (This
means thorough proofreading is essential!!)
I’m happy to assist, so please let me know if I can!!
Prewriting and Invention WorkFor this assignment, you will write an 800-1200 word Rhetorical Analysis based on the
reading, “The Disestablishment of Marriage” by Stephanie Coontz, which is available under the
“Readings” in the Paper 2/Rhetorical Analysis Module.
In a Rhetorical Analysis, your goal is to demonstrate how the various aspects of the
text work together to achieve the writer’s goal and to formulate a thesis statement that
indicates whether Coontz—because of her incorporation and usage of Rhetorical Situation
elements and Rhetorical Strategies—is successful at, in fact, arguing “The Disestablishment
of Marriage, as her title implies.
Hence, you will need to address all 9 of the following, as you (rhetorically analyze)
Coontz’s argument and include direct quotes/evidence from her article. You will focus on—
 The Rhetorical Situation, including
o the author
o the audience
o the occasion
o the purpose
o the persona
o the tone/stance of the article
 Rhetorical Strategies, including
o pathos
o logos
o ethos
Focus on HOW the article/rhetorical situation works, not simply WHAT it conveys; try
not to get distracted into arguing passionately a particular position or extolling the
beauty/creativity of the article. To complete the essay successfully, you will need to discuss
specific and concrete elements of the article—the way we will do over the next few class
meetings. (See the next page for prewriting ideas and invention work.)
No outside research (other than Coontz’s article itself) should be used for this
assignment. And, please adhere to these guidelines:
 Papers should be 800-1200 words and NOT 5 paragraphs.
 Papers need to have a thesis, which can be DIRECT or IMPLIED. Also, the thesis
can be revealed anywhere in the paper.
 Papers should begin with a descriptive title. (Note: paper titles should not be bolded,
italicized, put into quotation marks, or all capitalized.)
 Papers should be logically organized; transitions should be deftly utilized, too.
 Papers should reflect a solid command of grammar, mechanics, and spelling. (This
means thorough proofreading is essential!!)
I’m happy to assist, so please let me know if I can!!
Prewriting and Invention WorkFor this assignment, you will write an 800-1200 word Rhetorical Analysis based on the
reading, “The Disestablishment of Marriage” by Stephanie Coontz, which is available under the
“Readings” in the Paper 2/Rhetorical Analysis Module.
In a Rhetorical Analysis, your goal is to demonstrate how the various aspects of the
text work together to achieve the writer’s goal and to formulate a thesis statement that
indicates whether Coontz—because of her incorporation and usage of Rhetorical Situation
elements and Rhetorical Strategies—is successful at, in fact, arguing “The Disestablishment
of Marriage, as her title implies.
Hence, you will need to address all 9 of the following, as you (rhetorically analyze)
Coontz’s argument and include direct quotes/evidence from her article. You will focus on—
 The Rhetorical Situation, including
o the author
o the audience
o the occasion
o the purpose
o the persona
o the tone/stance of the article
 Rhetorical Strategies, including
o pathos
o logos
o ethos
Focus on HOW the article/rhetorical situation works, not simply WHAT it conveys; try
not to get distracted into arguing passionately a particular position or extolling the
beauty/creativity of the article. To complete the essay successfully, you will need to discuss
specific and concrete elements of the article—the way we will do over the next few class
meetings. (See the next page for prewriting ideas and invention work.)
No outside research (other than Coontz’s article itself) should be used for this
assignment. And, please adhere to these guidelines:
 Papers should be 800-1200 words and NOT 5 paragraphs.
 Papers need to have a thesis, which can be DIRECT or IMPLIED. Also, the thesis
can be revealed anywhere in the paper.
 Papers should begin with a descriptive title. (Note: paper titles should not be bolded,
italicized, put into quotation marks, or all capitalized.)
 Papers should be logically organized; transitions should be deftly utilized, too.
 Papers should reflect a solid command of grammar, mechanics, and spelling. (This
means thorough proofreading is essential!!)
I’m happy to assist, so please let me know if I can!!
Prewriting and Invention WorkFor this assignment, you will write an 800-1200 word Rhetorical Analysis based on the
reading, “The Disestablishment of Marriage” by Stephanie Coontz, which is available under the
“Readings” in the Paper 2/Rhetorical Analysis Module.
In a Rhetorical Analysis, your goal is to demonstrate how the various aspects of the
text work together to achieve the writer’s goal and to formulate a thesis statement that
indicates whether Coontz—because of her incorporation and usage of Rhetorical Situation
elements and Rhetorical Strategies—is successful at, in fact, arguing “The Disestablishment
of Marriage, as her title implies.
Hence, you will need to address all 9 of the following, as you (rhetorically analyze)
Coontz’s argument and include direct quotes/evidence from her article. You will focus on—
 The Rhetorical Situation, including
o the author
o the audience
o the occasion
o the purpose
o the persona
o the tone/stance of the article
 Rhetorical Strategies, including
o pathos
o logos
o ethos
Focus on HOW the article/rhetorical situation works, not simply WHAT it conveys; try
not to get distracted into arguing passionately a particular position or extolling the
beauty/creativity of the article. To complete the essay successfully, you will need to discuss
specific and concrete elements of the article—the way we will do over the next few class
meetings. (See the next page for prewriting ideas and invention work.)
No outside research (other than Coontz’s article itself) should be used for this
assignment. And, please adhere to these guidelines:
 Papers should be 800-1200 words and NOT 5 paragraphs.
 Papers need to have a thesis, which can be DIRECT or IMPLIED. Also, the thesis
can be revealed anywhere in the paper.
 Papers should begin with a descriptive title. (Note: paper titles should not be bolded,
italicized, put into quotation marks, or all capitalized.)
 Papers should be logically organized; transitions should be deftly utilized, too.
 Papers should reflect a solid command of grammar, mechanics, and spelling. (This
means thorough proofreading is essential!!)
I’m happy to assist, so please let me know if I can!!
Prewriting and Invention WorkFor this assignment, you will write an 800-1200 word Rhetorical Analysis based on the
reading, “The Disestablishment of Marriage” by Stephanie Coontz, which is available under the
“Readings” in the Paper 2/Rhetorical Analysis Module.
In a Rhetorical Analysis, your goal is to demonstrate how the various aspects of the
text work together to achieve the writer’s goal and to formulate a thesis statement that
indicates whether Coontz—because of her incorporation and usage of Rhetorical Situation
elements and Rhetorical Strategies—is successful at, in fact, arguing “The Disestablishment
of Marriage, as her title implies.
Hence, you will need to address all 9 of the following, as you (rhetorically analyze)
Coontz’s argument and include direct quotes/evidence from her article. You will focus on—
 The Rhetorical Situation, including
o the author
o the audience
o the occasion
o the purpose
o the persona
o the tone/stance of the article
 Rhetorical Strategies, including
o pathos
o logos
o ethos
Focus on HOW the article/rhetorical situation works, not simply WHAT it conveys; try
not to get distracted into arguing passionately a particular position or extolling the
beauty/creativity of the article. To complete the essay successfully, you will need to discuss
specific and concrete elements of the article—the way we will do over the next few class
meetings. (See the next page for prewriting ideas and invention work.)
No outside research (other than Coontz’s article itself) should be used for this
assignment. And, please adhere to these guidelines:
 Papers should be 800-1200 words and NOT 5 paragraphs.
 Papers need to have a thesis, which can be DIRECT or IMPLIED. Also, the thesis
can be revealed anywhere in the paper.
 Papers should begin with a descriptive title. (Note: paper titles should not be bolded,
italicized, put into quotation marks, or all capitalized.)
 Papers should be logically organized; transitions should be deftly utilized, too.
 Papers should reflect a solid command of grammar, mechanics, and spelling. (This
means thorough proofreading is essential!!)
I’m happy to assist, so please let me know if I can!!
Prewriting and Invention WorkFor this assignment, you will write an 800-1200 word Rhetorical Analysis based on the
reading, “The Disestablishment of Marriage” by Stephanie Coontz, which is available under the
“Readings” in the Paper 2/Rhetorical Analysis Module.
In a Rhetorical Analysis, your goal is to demonstrate how the various aspects of the
text work together to achieve the writer’s goal and to formulate a thesis statement that
indicates whether Coontz—because of her incorporation and usage of Rhetorical Situation
elements and Rhetorical Strategies—is successful at, in fact, arguing “The Disestablishment
of Marriage, as her title implies.
Hence, you will need to address all 9 of the following, as you (rhetorically analyze)
Coontz’s argument and include direct quotes/evidence from her article. You will focus on—
 The Rhetorical Situation, including
o the author
o the audience
o the occasion
o the purpose
o the persona
o the tone/stance of the article
 Rhetorical Strategies, including
o pathos
o logos
o ethos
Focus on HOW the article/rhetorical situation works, not simply WHAT it conveys; try
not to get distracted into arguing passionately a particular position or extolling the
beauty/creativity of the article. To complete the essay successfully, you will need to discuss
specific and concrete elements of the article—the way we will do over the next few class
meetings. (See the next page for prewriting ideas and invention work.)
No outside research (other than Coontz’s article itself) should be used for this
assignment. And, please adhere to these guidelines:
 Papers should be 800-1200 words and NOT 5 paragraphs.
 Papers need to have a thesis, which can be DIRECT or IMPLIED. Also, the thesis
can be revealed anywhere in the paper.
 Papers should begin with a descriptive title. (Note: paper titles should not be bolded,
italicized, put into quotation marks, or all capitalized.)
 Papers should be logically organized; transitions should be deftly utilized, too.
 Papers should reflect a solid command of grammar, mechanics, and spelling. (This
means thorough proofreading is essential!!)
I’m happy to assist, so please let me know if I can!!
Prewriting and Invention WorkFor this assignment, you will write an 800-1200 word Rhetorical Analysis based on the
reading, “The Disestablishment of Marriage” by Stephanie Coontz, which is available under the
“Readings” in the Paper 2/Rhetorical Analysis Module.
In a Rhetorical Analysis, your goal is to demonstrate how the various aspects of the
text work together to achieve the writer’s goal and to formulate a thesis statement that
indicates whether Coontz—because of her incorporation and usage of Rhetorical Situation
elements and Rhetorical Strategies—is successful at, in fact, arguing “The Disestablishment
of Marriage, as her title implies.
Hence, you will need to address all 9 of the following, as you (rhetorically analyze)
Coontz’s argument and include direct quotes/evidence from her article. You will focus on—
 The Rhetorical Situation, including
o the author
o the audience
o the occasion
o the purpose
o the persona
o the tone/stance of the article
 Rhetorical Strategies, including
o pathos
o logos
o ethos
Focus on HOW the article/rhetorical situation works, not simply WHAT it conveys; try
not to get distracted into arguing passionately a particular position or extolling the
beauty/creativity of the article. To complete the essay successfully, you will need to discuss
specific and concrete elements of the article—the way we will do over the next few class
meetings. (See the next page for prewriting ideas and invention work.)
No outside research (other than Coontz’s article itself) should be used for this
assignment. And, please adhere to these guidelines:
 Papers should be 800-1200 words and NOT 5 paragraphs.
 Papers need to have a thesis, which can be DIRECT or IMPLIED. Also, the thesis
can be revealed anywhere in the paper.
 Papers should begin with a descriptive title. (Note: paper titles should not be bolded,
italicized, put into quotation marks, or all capitalized.)
 Papers should be logically organized; transitions should be deftly utilized, too.
 Papers should reflect a solid command of grammar, mechanics, and spelling. (This
means thorough proofreading is essential!!)
I’m happy to assist, so please let me know if I can!!
Prewriting and Invention WorkFor this assignment, you will write an 800-1200 word Rhetorical Analysis based on the
reading, “The Disestablishment of Marriage” by Stephanie Coontz, which is available under the
“Readings” in the Paper 2/Rhetorical Analysis Module.
In a Rhetorical Analysis, your goal is to demonstrate how the various aspects of the
text work together to achieve the writer’s goal and to formulate a thesis statement that
indicates whether Coontz—because of her incorporation and usage of Rhetorical Situation
elements and Rhetorical Strategies—is successful at, in fact, arguing “The Disestablishment
of Marriage, as her title implies.
Hence, you will need to address all 9 of the following, as you (rhetorically analyze)
Coontz’s argument and include direct quotes/evidence from her article. You will focus on—
 The Rhetorical Situation, including
o the author
o the audience
o the occasion
o the purpose
o the persona
o the tone/stance of the article
 Rhetorical Strategies, including
o pathos
o logos
o ethos
Focus on HOW the article/rhetorical situation works, not simply WHAT it conveys; try
not to get distracted into arguing passionately a particular position or extolling the
beauty/creativity of the article. To complete the essay successfully, you will need to discuss
specific and concrete elements of the article—the way we will do over the next few class
meetings. (See the next page for prewriting ideas and invention work.)
No outside research (other than Coontz’s article itself) should be used for this
assignment. And, please adhere to these guidelines:
 Papers should be 800-1200 words and NOT 5 paragraphs.
 Papers need to have a thesis, which can be DIRECT or IMPLIED. Also, the thesis
can be revealed anywhere in the paper.
 Papers should begin with a descriptive title. (Note: paper titles should not be bolded,
italicized, put into quotation marks, or all capitalized.)
 Papers should be logically organized; transitions should be deftly utilized, too.
 Papers should reflect a solid command of grammar, mechanics, and spelling. (This
means thorough proofreading is essential!!)
I’m happy to assist, so please let me know if I can!!
Prewriting and Invention WorkFor this assignment, you will write an 800-1200 word Rhetorical Analysis based on the
reading, “The Disestablishment of Marriage” by Stephanie Coontz, which is available under the
“Readings” in the Paper 2/Rhetorical Analysis Module.
In a Rhetorical Analysis, your goal is to demonstrate how the various aspects of the
text work together to achieve the writer’s goal and to formulate a thesis statement that
indicates whether Coontz—because of her incorporation and usage of Rhetorical Situation
elements and Rhetorical Strategies—is successful at, in fact, arguing “The Disestablishment
of Marriage, as her title implies.
Hence, you will need to address all 9 of the following, as you (rhetorically analyze)
Coontz’s argument and include direct quotes/evidence from her article. You will focus on—
 The Rhetorical Situation, including
o the author
o the audience
o the occasion
o the purpose
o the persona
o the tone/stance of the article
 Rhetorical Strategies, including
o pathos
o logos
o ethos
Focus on HOW the article/rhetorical situation works, not simply WHAT it conveys; try
not to get distracted into arguing passionately a particular position or extolling the
beauty/creativity of the article. To complete the essay successfully, you will need to discuss
specific and concrete elements of the article—the way we will do over the next few class
meetings. (See the next page for prewriting ideas and invention work.)
No outside research (other than Coontz’s article itself) should be used for this
assignment. And, please adhere to these guidelines:
 Papers should be 800-1200 words and NOT 5 paragraphs.
 Papers need to have a thesis, which can be DIRECT or IMPLIED. Also, the thesis
can be revealed anywhere in the paper.
 Papers should begin with a descriptive title. (Note: paper titles should not be bolded,
italicized, put into quotation marks, or all capitalized.)
 Papers should be logically organized; transitions should be deftly utilized, too.
 Papers should reflect a solid command of grammar, mechanics, and spelling. (This
means thorough proofreading is essential!!)
I’m happy to assist, so please let me know if I can!!
Prewriting and Invention WorkFor this assignment, you will write an 800-1200 word Rhetorical Analysis based on the
reading, “The Disestablishment of Marriage” by Stephanie Coontz, which is available under the
“Readings” in the Paper 2/Rhetorical Analysis Module.
In a Rhetorical Analysis, your goal is to demonstrate how the various aspects of the
text work together to achieve the writer’s goal and to formulate a thesis statement that
indicates whether Coontz—because of her incorporation and usage of Rhetorical Situation
elements and Rhetorical Strategies—is successful at, in fact, arguing “The Disestablishment
of Marriage, as her title implies.
Hence, you will need to address all 9 of the following, as you (rhetorically analyze)
Coontz’s argument and include direct quotes/evidence from her article. You will focus on—
 The Rhetorical Situation, including
o the author
o the audience
o the occasion
o the purpose
o the persona
o the tone/stance of the article
 Rhetorical Strategies, including
o pathos
o logos
o ethos
Focus on HOW the article/rhetorical situation works, not simply WHAT it conveys; try
not to get distracted into arguing passionately a particular position or extolling the
beauty/creativity of the article. To complete the essay successfully, you will need to discuss
specific and concrete elements of the article—the way we will do over the next few class
meetings. (See the next page for prewriting ideas and invention work.)
No outside research (other than Coontz’s article itself) should be used for this
assignment. And, please adhere to these guidelines:
 Papers should be 800-1200 words and NOT 5 paragraphs.
 Papers need to have a thesis, which can be DIRECT or IMPLIED. Also, the thesis
can be revealed anywhere in the paper.
 Papers should begin with a descriptive title. (Note: paper titles should not be bolded,
italicized, put into quotation marks, or all capitalized.)
 Papers should be logically organized; transitions should be deftly utilized, too.
 Papers should reflect a solid command of grammar, mechanics, and spelling. (This
means thorough proofreading is essential!!)
I’m happy to assist, so please let me know if I can!!
Prewriting and Invention Work