Which statistical factor that was discussed in the video was new to you and your understanding?

. Which statistical factor that was discussed in the video was new to you and your understanding?

2. Was there an explanation of a statistical term that you knew something about, or heard about but now understand better? Tell us about that term and what you learned from the video.

3. What do you need to still know more about regarding study statistics? What would you like to understand or understand better?

Discuss your learning targets and how they connect to the identified Standards.

Reflecting on your Practice with Peers
1. Analyze your planning experience: After uploading your lesson and reviewing your peer’s feedback, write an
analysis of your planning experience.
2. Write a reflection on how you experienced the activity.
a. Summarize how you addressed the core teaching practice by providing specific examples from your lesson plan.
b. Discuss your learning targets and how they connect to the identified Standards. Support your explanation with specific examples/evidence of principles from developmental theory and/or research. (Use ECE 435 learning charts as well as other resources as support).
c. After summarizing peer feedback, describe what changes would you make to your instruction to better support EBLs’/ MLL s’ learning after receiving peer feedback. 250-500 words
Reflecting on your Practice with Peers (4 total @ 2.5 points each)
1. Analyze your planning experience: After uploading your lesson and reviewing your peer’s feedback, write an
analysis of your planning experience.
2. Write a reflection on how you experienced the activity.
a. Summarize how you addressed the core teaching practice by providing specific examples from your lesson plan.
b. Discuss your learning targets and how they connect to the identified Standards. Support your explanation with specific examples/evidence of principles from developmental theory and/or research. (Use ECE 435 learning charts as well as other resources as support).
c. After summarizing peer feedback, describe what changes would you make to your instruction to better support EBLs’/ MLL s’ learning after receiving peer feedback. 250-300 words
Reflecting on your Practice with Peers )
1. Analyze your planning experience: After uploading your lesson and reviewing your peer’s feedback, write an
analysis of your planning experience.
2. Write a reflection on how you experienced the activity.
a. Summarize how you addressed the core teaching practice by providing specific examples from your lesson plan.
b. Discuss your learning targets and how they connect to the identified Standards. Support your explanation with specific examples/evidence of principles from developmental theory and/or research. (Use ECE 435 learning charts as well as other resources as support).
c. After summarizing peer feedback, describe what changes would you make to your instruction to better support EBLs’/ MLL s’ learning after receiving peer feedback. 250-500 words
Reflecting on your Practice with Peers (4 total @ 2.5 points each)
1. Analyze your planning experience: After uploading your lesson and reviewing your peer’s feedback, write an
analysis of your planning experience.
2. Write a reflection on how you experienced the activity.
a. Summarize how you addressed the core teaching practice by providing specific examples from your lesson plan.
b. Discuss your learning targets and how they connect to the identified Standards. Support your explanation with specific examples/evidence of principles from developmental theory and/or research. (Use ECE 435 learning charts as well as other resources as support).
c. After summarizing peer feedback, describe what changes would you make to your instruction to better support EBLs’/ MLL s’ learning after receiving peer feedback. 250-500 words

Note This is my feedback.

here
Good Lesson. Some noticings:

Content Objective: Good

Language Objective: Good.

Core Practice 1: Developing Academic language

Pre-teaching/frontloading: First you should gain background knowledge on what students already know about the topic. Add turn and talks.

Mini-lesson: What questions will you ask as you are reading?

Make sure to add turn and talks for discussion.

Guided Practice: It might benefit students to watch you chart some of this information.

Independent work: You need to be a bit more specific here. Will the worksheet be labeled with vocabulary words?

Closure: Good question but I suggest you ask a more inferential question here since students already identfied the problem during guided practice and independent work. Good Lesson. Some noticings:

Content Objective: Good

Language Objective: Good.

Core Practice 1: Developing Academic language

Pre-teaching/frontloading: First you should gain background knowledge on what students already know about the topic. Add turn and talks.

Mini-lesson: What questions will you ask as you are reading?

Make sure to add turn and talks for discussion.

Guided Practice: It might benefit students to watch you chart some of this information.

Independent work: You need to be a bit more specific here. Will the worksheet be labeled with vocabulary words?

Closure: Good question but I suggest you ask a more inferential question here since students already identfied the problem during guided practice and independent work. Good Lesson. Some noticings:

Content Objective: Good

Language Objective: Good.

Core Practice 1: Developing Academic language

Pre-teaching/frontloading: First you should gain background knowledge on what students already know about the topic. Add turn and talks.

Mini-lesson: What questions will you ask as you are reading?

Make sure to add turn and talks for discussion.

Guided Practice: It might benefit students to watch you chart some of this information.

Independent work: You need to be a bit more specific here. Will the worksheet be labeled with vocabulary words?

Closure: Good question but I suggest you ask a more inferential question here since students already identfied the problem during guided practice and independent work. Good Lesson. Some noticings:

Content Objective: Good

Language Objective: Good.

Core Practice 1: Developing Academic language

Pre-teaching/frontloading: First you should gain background knowledge on what students already know about the topic. Add turn and talks.

Mini-lesson: What questions will you ask as you are reading?

Make sure to add turn and talks for discussion.

Guided Practice: It might benefit students to watch you chart some of this information.

Independent work: You need to be a bit more specific here. Will the worksheet be labeled with vocabulary words?

Closure: Good question, but I suggest you ask a more inferential question here since students already identified the problem during guided practice and independent work.
NOTE
I submitted my lesson plan. Please make my reflection about how I can implement the feedback I got

What does the Philosophy of Science tell us about the importance of the relationship between evidence and theory to Psychology.

essay question: What does the Philosophy of Science tell us about the importance of the relationship between evidence and theory to Psychology.

What are the assumptions
analysing the nature of the concept
unpack the foundation
use any of the aspects or approaches what we learned
do it philosophically

in the first couple of paragraphs say what you will talk about it and why
give a rationale
philosophically lead
philosophy upfront
what are the philosophical theories are important regarding the topic

Can choose any topic

Not expecting loads of psychological theory/evidence

Instead, unpick the nature of theory/theories and explore the foundations of these concepts

E.g. nature vs nurture – what do these terms possibly mean, how can these terms be examined sensibly in a scientific framework?

Question the assumptions/concepts?

Not what do we know, but how do we know it? How would we go about doing it?

Analyse the ways in which evidence can be developed

Either pros and cons of one philosophical approach, or compare two approaches
Provide a rationale in intro for why this topic was chosen
(personal tip: discuss what is the philosophical bedrock of the issue)

Write a research paper and examine the relationship between social media and prejudice.

Write a research paper and examine the relationship between social media and prejudice.

1. What key words did you use and why did you choose them? How easy or difficult was it to find posts using those key words? What are your thoughts about why it was easy or difficult to find the information?

2. Was it easy or difficult to determine the beliefs or attitudes of the individual posting? What cues did you use to determine those attitudes and beliefs?

3. Do you think the posters would say the same thing in the same way if they were having a face-to-face discussion on this topic? Does it matter? Why or why not?

4. Some individuals use their name and/or photo and others used a “handle” or a pseudonym with no photo or a photo of something other than themselves. How does this affect the tone or content of the post?

5. What message does the individual’s posting want the reader to come away believing about different social groups? What cues led you to determine the message?

6. What has been your overall experience with this assignment? How has it affected your attitudes of social media?