Best Writer

For this week, please do the following:
View the video from the link provided below. You must write this in APA 7 format, and you will need a cover page and a references page for at least 5 pages in total. In your paper, you will cover the following: What interview style is Carl Rogers using? How effective is it? What are the highlights of the interview? What do you think is being accomplished for the client?
Video link here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uRCD3anKsa0
For this week, please do the following:
View the video from the link provided below. You must write this in APA 7 format, and you will need a cover page and a references page for at least 5 pages in total. In your paper, you will cover the following: What interview style is Carl Rogers using? How effective is it? What are the highlights of the interview? What do you think is being accomplished for the client?
Video link here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uRCD3anKsa0
For this week, please do the following:
View the video from the link provided below. You must write this in APA 7 format, and you will need a cover page and a references page for at least 5 pages in total. In your paper, you will cover the following: What interview style is Carl Rogers using? How effective is it? What are the highlights of the interview? What do you think is being accomplished for the client?
Video link here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uRCD3anKsa0

***Note: Must be able to access and read the book “Money: How the Destruction of the Dollar Threatens the Global Economy—And What We Can Do About It” by Mr. Forbes.***

After reading the book “Money” by Mr. Forbes answer the following questions in sequence. Answer each of the questions noted in each section below. Each section should be approximately one page in length. Additionally, judge the importance of a sound money system and assess the value of Steve Forbes’s conclusion in using the gold standard.

Section 1: Chapter 1: How We Got Here

What are Forbes’s reasons for the housing bubble and how it related to the Federal Reserve Bank’s policies?
What does a weak dollar mean and what issues may come of it?
What one other concept or idea stood out to you in Chapter 1?
Section 2: Chapter 2: What Is Money

Why must money be stable?
What is Forbes’s prediction of Bitcoin?
This was noted at the end of the chapter: “Money measures wealth, but it does not create it.” What does this statement mean?
Section 3: Chapter 3: Money and Trade

What did Nixon do with the gold standard and what was the impact?
What is Forbes’s view of trade deficits? Are his viewpoints good or bad?
What one other concept or idea stood out to you in Chapter 3?
Section 4: Chapter 4: Money Versus Wealth; Chapter 5: Money and Morality

What happens when the supply of money is increased?
How can changes in monetary policy act as a system of communication?
How are money and trust tied together?
What one other concept or idea stood out to you in either Chapter 4 or 5?
Section 5: Chapter 6: The Gold Standard

What is the gold standard and how might it work in the US?
Why does Steve Forbes believe the gold standard should be brought back?
What is your overall conclusion of Steve Forbes’s view of money?

For your social justice program:

Explain the barriers to care in your selected population.
How do these barriers affect equity and inclusion in healthcare access, delivery and outcomes?
What effect to they have in your selected population?
How do you propose to improve the outcomes being affected by these barriers?

Please read the docs that I’ve attached below, They’ll give you a background and an idea of what exactly you’re writing about.

For this Assignment there is no need for an essay format. You may simply retype the question and answer each question with bullet points.

Replace the bracketed text below with your responses.

I have already chosen the historical topic, which is;
– Globalization
– Creating of the UN
– Act Prohibition the Importation of Slaves
– Founding of NATO

To be completed I need to:

1. Write a clear, relevant, and focused research question about your finalized topic.
[Insert text.]
2. Explain how another person’s beliefs, assumptions, and values may lead that person to create a different question than you.
[Insert text.]

3. Distinguish between primary and secondary sources.
[Insert text.]

4. Explain why it is important to consult a variety of sources when conducting historical research. Include specific details and examples.
[Insert text.]

5. Identify one secondary source that would help investigate your research question (include the title, author, and link to the source).
[Insert text.]

6. Choose a current event related to the subject of your historical research question and explain how they are connected.
[Insert text.]

*****Discussion Question 1*****

LAN Redundancy and Aggregation
Answer the following questions in full paragraph form as though you are responding to job interview questions.
Instructions:
* What role does STP play in the LAN environment?
* STP is enabled by default on Cisco Catalyst switches, but can you think of any scenario where STP could possibly be disabled without disastrous consequences?
* Do you think that disabling STP is ever a good idea? Why or why not?
Please be sure to validate your opinions and ideas with citations and references in APA format.

******RESPONSES******

VLANs and VTP
Please respond to a minimum of two peers.
Instructions:
1. Provide two additional examples of the role VLANs play in modern networks.
2. Provide at least one other way in which you agree with the original post.
3. Provide at least two questions that you would like to ask the original post’s author about their explanation of VTP.

Q1)
What role do VLANs play in modern networks and network design?
Irving (2021) stated that the VLAN in modern design segments a large network into smaller ones. This allows for compartmentalization if needed to restrict certain areas from being accessed by unauthorized personnel, it allows for additional preventative measures to be in place if other areas of the network are compromised, and it improves network efficiency.

Q2)
How can the VLAN Trunking Protocol (VTP) and VTP Pruning be used by network administrators or technicians in order to increase overall efficiency?

VLAN trunking protocol and VTP pruning can be used by network administrators or technicians in order to increase overall efficiency by, “VLAN Trunking Protocol (VTP) is used to communicate VLAN information between switches in the same VTP domain. VLAN Trunking Protocol (VTP) pruning is a feature in Cisco switches, which stops VLAN update information traffic from being sent down trunk links if the updates are not needed. If the VLAN traffic is needed later, VLAN Trunking Protocol (VTP) will dynamically add the VLAN back to the trunk link” (VLAN Trunking Protocol (VTP) Pruning, n.d.).

*****Discussion Question 2*****

Answer the following prompts in full paragraph form as though you are responding to job interview questions for a high-paying job that you really want. Include sufficient detail to demonstrate you have a solid understanding of the concepts and you can explain your thinking on a professional level.
* What accessibility services does Linux provide?
* What accessibility services are not available in Linux that may be needed by users?
* How do these accessibility services compare to accessibility services provided by Windows or macOS?

******RESPONSES******

Please respond to a minimum of two peers.
Respond as though you are the original interviewer and you have some follow-up questions for the original posts.
1. Provide at least two questions that you would like to ask the original authors and explain why you are asking those questions.
2. Explain at least one way that you agree with the original posts.
3. Explain at least one way that you would disagree with or add to the original posts.

Q1)
Why is it important to create a detailed plan before you deploy a Linux installation?

Creating a detailed plan is critical before deploying a Linux installation because it helps to ensure a successful outcome. A well-thought-out plan provides a roadmap for the installation process and helps to identify potential pitfalls before they become major problems. A detailed plan also helps to ensure that all necessary components are considered, including hardware and software requirements, network configuration, and security considerations. Additionally, a detailed plan helps to identify any necessary resources, including personnel and time, required for the installation process.

Q2)
Planning is a very significant step while performing Linux installation. This is because it helps in determining the actual goals of the process of installation. The plan helps in meeting the end results and needs. It also helps in measuring those results. While starting the process, it is important to have an overview of various methods and activities. It requires hard drive repartition, booting the media, creating partitions, creating swap space, etc. The best way to go about it is to take notes. This helps in documenting the entire process. The documentation helps when there is a need to turn back and look into the initial steps. It can be used to find errors and work out difficulties. Documentation also prevents the need to remember the details of steps.

How Error Prone Is Popular Reasoning?

This project provides an estimate of the frequency with which errors are made in reasoning about individuals, societies, and social processes.

ULOs:

Locate appropriate sources
Identify errors in reasoning
Communicate information professionally

Instructions:

Select issues from a daily newspaper. Locate the letters to the editor in each.
Read each letter to the editor, and circle all those that make assertions about individuals, societies, and social processes; that is, about the social world.
Identify examples of any of the four errors in reasoning in those letters. (Overgeneralization, Selective or Inaccurate Observation, Illogical Reasoning, & Resistance to Change) (Search through more newspaper issues, if necessary, until you find at least two examples of errors in reasoning about the social world.)

In the Discussion area:

Present your two “flawed” letters to the editor with an application to the four errors in reasoning.
Propose a solution to resolve the error.
Present a reference for both letters (e.g., Newspaper name and date)

It is important to consider how information is organized, information is shared, and how knowledge is accessed and shared by decision-makers throughout the organization.
In your write-up, ensure that you address how knowledge is gathered, stored, and disseminated for pertinent decision-makers throughout the firm.
For this Signature Assignment, you are asked to frame how a chief technology officer (CTO) might plan for and integrate a KM plan for an organization operating throughout the global marketplace. In your write-up, please discuss how knowledge is obtained, stored, updated, and shared with decision-makers. Address the benefits of a nimble and flat company, able to quickly structure to meet the demands of consumers and changes in the international environment.
Length: 12-15 pages (not including title and reference pages)
References: Include a minimum of 10 scholarly resources

This semester you will be creating an Advanced Service Plan, where you will practice the skills learned in this course. The assignment is divided in 4 modules where you will be submitting a specific part of your advanced service plan. Attached below, you will find a service plan example to help and guide you through the process of completing your own service plan. Please note that the example attached contains the complete service plan, however, for this module you are only required to submit the following part:

For this assignment, you will choose a family member or friend to be your practice “client” and implement some of the key processes of case management with them this semester.

Part 1: Conduct an intake interview with your client using the skills learned in class. Conduct informed consent procedures including confidentiality, do an assessment and look for client’s strengths.

For this assignment, you will create a Human Services organization (just for fun) and take a
made-up client through the process of case management in your organization from intake to
discharge. The Service Plan for your “client” is broken into three parts that build on each other.
Each part will be submitted one at a time. Part 1 is due first, then you will add part 2, then you
add part 3, then create a Service Plan presentation at the end of the semester that presents the
whole plan.
Part 1 (100 points): Create an organized document with the following information:
• Agency Name (Have fun with this and be creative.)
• Mission Statement of your Agency
• Population Served
• Eligibility Requirements
• Demographic information for your made-up client (name, age, address, phone number)
• Referral source and reason for referral
• Document how you conducted informed consent procedures including confidentiality
• Strengths Assessment
• Intake Summary
o Workers name, date of contact, date of summary
o Sources of information during the intake interview
o Presenting problem
o Summary of background and social history related to the problem
o Diagnostic summary statement (pinpoint the issue that needs to be addressed)
o Treatment recommendations (what services can your agency offer to help this
person?)
Rubric:
___/90 Thorough, Correctly Implemented, Clear and Organized
___/10 Spelling, Grammar and Visual Appeal of the Document
___/100 Grade for Part 1

In a Word document, share your lab experience and provide screenshots to demonstrate that you completed the lab.

1. INTRODUCTION

2. FORENSICS INVESTIGATIONS
2.1 Purpose and Objectives (Provide a brief overview of Digital Forensics)
2.2 Requirements (For example, to ensure that the evidence collected has not been tampered.)

3. DIGITAL FORENSICS
3.1 Forensics Analysis Methodology (Step 1) (List and describe the digital forensics analysis methodology and the phases of the digital forensics fundamentals and methodology.)
1. Preparation
2. Extraction
3. Identification
4. Analysis

3.2 Forensics Analysis Tools and Techniques (Step 2) (List and describe digital forensics analysis tools and techniques.)
1. Discuss the importance of using forensic tools to collect and analyze evidence.
2. Forensic Analysis Tools
3. Hash Analysis in Digital Forensics

3.3 Device Imaging Procedures (Step 3 and Lab Part2 Tasks 2 and 3) [insert and explain the key results of your workspace exercises]
1. The importance of Write Blocker
2. Describe the relevance to investigations of different devices which may be imaged such as, Disks, Files, Networks, Drives, and Mobile Phones
3. Discussion of creating a physical disk image, image loading and verification. (Answer here the disk imaging lab Task 2 and Task 3 questions from your lab to explain the aspects of disk imaging and analysis.)

3.4 Network Evidence Collection and Forensics Analysis (Step 3 and Lab Part 3)
1. Describe how Wireshark can be used to forensically identify potential suspicious network packets or indicators of compromise (IOC).
2. How would Wireshark be used to determine issues with email?
3. Answer here the Wireshark Part 3 questions from your lab to explain the aspects of analyzing traffic data.

3.5 Chain of Custody
1. What is the Chain of Custody and what steps does it include?
2. How do you ensure that the evidence you collected has not been tampered with (i.e., after collection)?
3. Why and how is this important to prove in court?

4. SUMMARY OF REFERENCES
[Provide your summary list of references using proper APA format. (Remember: You must also use in-line citations with proper APA format throughout the report.]

Argue on who wins the argument between Tucker Carlson and Dr. Ahmadu on the topic of FGC using the Modes of Persuasion. Usage of at least two logical fallacies is necessary. Write under the pretense that Dr. Ahmadu (she’s in favor of FGC) wins the argument

Interview below

https://www.rev.com/transcript-editor/shared/6jo_K6W7tOpkuFG19Hm2LKS-fRGik2nelnwuQ5TWY9SvJQpLRAz-6sBGRwzT0zsW4SdfNN_EtQyNXpz_iPWssV5kqgQ?loadFrom=DocumentHeaderDeepLink

if that doesn’t work here

Guide on Paragraphs below

https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/e/2PACX-1vTqEwx7Dv9UnbD3ErihQewqz9tZXvNWnnu-TcptT-63uZrh9_VAPLrtha5UoyNaXO9FPcxQCKMfqmwH/embed?start=false&loop=false&delayms=3000&slide=id.g720ed67a9d_2_0https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/e/2PACX-1vTqEwx7Dv9UnbD3ErihQewqz9tZXvNWnnu-TcptT-63uZrh9_VAPLrtha5UoyNaXO9FPcxQCKMfqmwH/embed?start=false&loop=false&delayms=3000&slide=id.g720ed67a9d_2_0

scoresheet below

https://docs.google.com/document/d/1TdfMIyL3DyrChC-DGEoGHgn8KgDK8mV0bNzwfOfIIs0/edit?usp=sharinghttps://docs.google.com/document/d/1TdfMIyL3DyrChC-DGEoGHgn8KgDK8mV0bNzwfOfIIs0/edit?usp=sharing

Logical Fallacy I used for a discussion post, can use parts in essay as well as for reference of writing style

One logical fallacy I will be incorporating into my essay is the double standard fallacy. The double standard fallacy is a type of logical fallacy where someone applies different standards or criteria to different situations, people, or groups, without any justified reason for the difference in treatment. This is often used to create an unfair advantage or disadvantage for a particular side of an argument, by setting up an inconsistent standard for evaluating evidence or arguments. Carlson lost the argument as he incorporated elements of the double standard fallacy. When the topic of male circumcision came up, Carlson would state how male circumcision was different from FGC, and how there was scientific research proving that male circumcision was okay and FGC isn’t, while also not providing any solid evidence as to why male circumcision is ok but FGC isn’t. Ahmadu states “There are a lot of men, right? Who have experienced circumcision who say that this is mutilation.” Carlson states there’s research that provides ‘profound medical advantages’ to male circumcision, but there is no research that shows there are advantages to female genital mutilation. As Dr. Ahmadu states, Carlson believes it is acceptable to perform an invasive procedure on boys, but not girls, implying that it’s abusing girls. This is an example of the double standard fallacy as it provides a different set of standards for girls and boys.One logical fallacy I will be incorporating into my essay is the double standard fallacy. The double standard fallacy is a type of logical fallacy where someone applies different standards or criteria to different situations, people, or groups, without any justified reason for the difference in treatment. This is often used to create an unfair advantage or disadvantage for a particular side of an argument, by setting up an inconsistent standard for evaluating evidence or arguments. Carlson lost the argument as he incorporated elements of the double standard fallacy. When the topic of male circumcision came up, Carlson would state how male circumcision was different from FGC, and how there was scientific research proving that male circumcision was okay and FGC isn’t, while also not providing any solid evidence as to why male circumcision is ok but FGC isn’t. Ahmadu states “There are a lot of men, right? Who have experienced circumcision who say that this is mutilation.” Carlson states there’s research that provides ‘profound medical advantages’ to male circumcision, but there is no research that shows there are advantages to female genital mutilation. As Dr. Ahmadu states, Carlson believes it is acceptable to perform an invasive procedure on boys, but not girls, implying that it’s abusing girls. This is an example of the double standard fallacy as it provides a different set of standards for girls and boys.One logical fallacy I will be incorporating into my essay is the double standard fallacy. The double standard fallacy is a type of logical fallacy where someone applies different standards or criteria to different situations, people, or groups, without any justified reason for the difference in treatment. This is often used to create an unfair advantage or disadvantage for a particular side of an argument, by setting up an inconsistent standard for evaluating evidence or arguments. Carlson lost the argument as he incorporated elements of the double standard fallacy. When the topic of male circumcision came up, Carlson would state how male circumcision was different from FGC, and how there was scientific research proving that male circumcision was okay and FGC isn’t, while also not providing any solid evidence as to why male circumcision is ok but FGC isn’t. Ahmadu states “There are a lot of men, right? Who have experienced circumcision who say that this is mutilation.” Carlson states there’s research that provides ‘profound medical advantages’ to male circumcision, but there is no research that shows there are advantages to female genital mutilation. As Dr. Ahmadu states, Carlson believes it is acceptable to perform an invasive procedure on boys, but not girls, implying that it’s abusing girls. This is an example of the double standard fallacy as it provides a different set of standards for girls and boys.One logical fallacy I will be incorporating into my essay is the double standard fallacy. The double standard fallacy is a type of logical fallacy where someone applies different standards or criteria to different situations, people, or groups, without any justified reason for the difference in treatment. This is often used to create an unfair advantage or disadvantage for a particular side of an argument, by setting up an inconsistent standard for evaluating evidence or arguments. Carlson lost the argument as he incorporated elements of the double standard fallacy. When the topic of male circumcision came up, Carlson would state how male circumcision was different from FGC, and how there was scientific research proving that male circumcision was okay and FGC isn’t, while also not providing any solid evidence as to why male circumcision is ok but FGC isn’t. Ahmadu states “There are a lot of men, right? Who have experienced circumcision who say that this is mutilation.” Carlson states there’s research that provides ‘profound medical advantages’ to male circumcision, but there is no research that shows there are advantages to female genital mutilation. As Dr. Ahmadu states, Carlson believes it is acceptable to perform an invasive procedure on boys, but not girls, implying that it’s abusing girls. This is an example of the double standard fallacy as it provides a different set of standards for girls and boys.

Second Logical Fallacy I used
The second logical fallacy I will be incorporating into my essay is the faulty emotional appeal logical fallacy. The faulty emotional appeal fallacy is when someone tries to persuade an audience by using emotions instead of logical reasoning. It’s considered as the opposite of a strong usage of Pathos. Carlson’s usage of faulty emotional appeal helped aid in his loss in the debate between him and Dr. Ahamadu in their argument on FGC. Carlson states “I think it’s so horrifying… that something like this is perpetrated on young girls.” Over the course of the argument he consistently uses this argument, while providing no real evidence behind these words. It was evident he had no real evidence to back up his thoughts, he had no sources or research to support his statements, and instead was trying to persuade the audience by appealing to their emotional sense of empathy and sympathy. This is shown in his vocabulary usage, instead of using facts and research to support his views and arguments, he relied on how “horrifying” he thought FGC was. Not to mention how at the start of their debate, Dr. Ahamdu had to correct Carlson, who mistook ‘female genital circumcision for ‘female genital mutilation,’ which Dr. Ahamdu does not support. Even after being corrected, Carlson still refers to FGC as FGM. Carlson fails to incorporate pathos into his argument, instead using faulty emotional appeal as his arguments were not strong and held no ground.The second logical fallacy I will be incorporating into my essay is the faulty emotional appeal logical fallacy. The faulty emotional appeal fallacy is when someone tries to persuade an audience by using emotions instead of logical reasoning. It’s considered as the opposite of a strong usage of Pathos. Carlson’s usage of faulty emotional appeal helped aid in his loss in the debate between him and Dr. Ahamadu in their argument on FGC. Carlson states “I think it’s so horrifying… that something like this is perpetrated on young girls.” Over the course of the argument he consistently uses this argument, while providing no real evidence behind these words. It was evident he had no real evidence to back up his thoughts, he had no sources or research to support his statements, and instead was trying to persuade the audience by appealing to their emotional sense of empathy and sympathy. This is shown in his vocabulary usage, instead of using facts and research to support his views and arguments, he relied on how “horrifying” he thought FGC was. Not to mention how at the start of their debate, Dr. Ahamdu had to correct Carlson, who mistook ‘female genital circumcision for ‘female genital mutilation,’ which Dr. Ahamdu does not support. Even after being corrected, Carlson still refers to FGC as FGM. Carlson fails to incorporate pathos into his argument, instead using faulty emotional appeal as his arguments were not strong and held no ground.The second logical fallacy I will be incorporating into my essay is the faulty emotional appeal logical fallacy. The faulty emotional appeal fallacy is when someone tries to persuade an audience by using emotions instead of logical reasoning. It’s considered as the opposite of a strong usage of Pathos. Carlson’s usage of faulty emotional appeal helped aid in his loss in the debate between him and Dr. Ahamadu in their argument on FGC. Carlson states “I think it’s so horrifying… that something like this is perpetrated on young girls.” Over the course of the argument he consistently uses this argument, while providing no real evidence behind these words. It was evident he had no real evidence to back up his thoughts, he had no sources or research to support his statements, and instead was trying to persuade the audience by appealing to their emotional sense of empathy and sympathy. This is shown in his vocabulary usage, instead of using facts and research to support his views and arguments, he relied on how “horrifying” he thought FGC was. Not to mention how at the start of their debate, Dr. Ahamdu had to correct Carlson, who mistook ‘female genital circumcision for ‘female genital mutilation,’ which Dr. Ahamdu does not support. Even after being corrected, Carlson still refers to FGC as FGM. Carlson fails to incorporate pathos into his argument, instead using faulty emotional appeal as his arguments were not strong and held no ground.The second logical fallacy I will be incorporating into my essay is the faulty emotional appeal logical fallacy. The faulty emotional appeal fallacy is when someone tries to persuade an audience by using emotions instead of logical reasoning. It’s considered as the opposite of a strong usage of Pathos. Carlson’s usage of faulty emotional appeal helped aid in his loss in the debate between him and Dr. Ahamadu in their argument on FGC. Carlson states “I think it’s so horrifying… that something like this is perpetrated on young girls.” Over the course of the argument he consistently uses this argument, while providing no real evidence behind these words. It was evident he had no real evidence to back up his thoughts, he had no sources or research to support his statements, and instead was trying to persuade the audience by appealing to their emotional sense of empathy and sympathy. This is shown in his vocabulary usage, instead of using facts and research to support his views and arguments, he relied on how “horrifying” he thought FGC was. Not to mention how at the start of their debate, Dr. Ahamdu had to correct Carlson, who mistook ‘female genital circumcision for ‘female genital mutilation,’ which Dr. Ahamdu does not support. Even after being corrected, Carlson still refers to FGC as FGM. Carlson fails to incorporate pathos into his argument, instead using faulty emotional appeal as his arguments were not strong and held no ground.

If any other information is necessary I can provide