Best Writer

1) Drawing on Ch. 11 (especially pp. 318-319), come up with a brief egalitarian argument in favor of air-ambulance legislation.

2) Drawing on Ch. 11 (especially pp. 318-319), come up with a brief libertarian argument against air-ambulance legislation. You may write about the arbitration provision in particular or about the legislation in general.

3) In your own view, should an individual whose quality health insurance covers a fraction of an air-ambulance bill be held responsible for the remainder of the bill? Why or why not? (You can assume for this question that the recent legislation has not yet been enacted.)

For this critical reflection select two articles from the Recommended Content in the Ambiguous Loss and Chronic Sorrow Module Overview (they are also listed on the syllabus). Read each article and then submit a two page essay for each answering the following questions.

1. Name the article and author(s) and use appropriate APA citations.

2. Why did you select this particular?

3. What were 3 takeaways from the article? What did you learn?

4. If you were to encounter a person in your role as a social worker how would this new knowledge help you to respond?

5. What if you encountered them personally rather than in your professional role, would your response be different? If so, how?

Submission: Please watch EACH of these videos and WRITE a short paragraph (100-150) about EACH of them in the PROPER SUBMISSION box!

Describe at least six techniques that can be used in career counseling. Please also discuss any multicultural issues that might apply to each. Please be sure to share at least 3 real-world examples in the field of counseling and human services to support your claims.

Describe how the push for a lead-free standard in electronic products (RoHS) increased social justice in the U.S. (minimum 500 words).

In this Legal Aspects of Evidence class we take a critical look at evidence and not only determine what is evidence, but how we legally use it to make arrest and prosecute cases in criminal court. The United States use the American Adversary system in criminal trials. Your task is to write a term paper that deals specifically with the adversary system and demonstrate your knowledge regarding the process and consider if the system is equity based.
In this term paper you should carefully review the chapters and reflect on the contents to assist you with the preparation of your term paper.
Your paper should be authentic and represent college level writing. Your paper is designed to critically reflect on and have scholarly research information that contributes to our American Adversary system. The paper should answer and/ or demonstrate your knowledge of the following information:
A comprehensive definition of the Adversary system here in the United States of America.
Scholarly research that compares our adversary system to other systems in other parts of the world.
The difference between the accusatorial and adversary system.
Do you believe the adversary system based on our accusatory process is fair to those on trial (explain your response).
Examine relevant, reliable and competent evidence and articulate how it plays a role in the adversarial system and give at least two examples.
Conclude your paper with giving an overview on the accusatorial process. Incorporate the rest of your studies from this text book and offer your critical reflection and thoughts regarding this accusatorial style.
The above bullets are offered as a pathway to assist you with the desired contents of your paper. The bullet points are not placed in a chronological format and it is up to you to formulate your paper in a college level format suitable of a term paper. Students are reminded that proper formatting using the APA formatting is required and all students are expected to submit papers which represent their authentic work. Copying and pasting will be closely monitored and must have legitimate citations to support the quote and/or copy and paste. Grammar is essential and all students are encourage to proof their papers several times before submitting the final draft.
Please use the chapters in your textbook as a reference and 6 additional outside sources are required to support your paper. Research shall be conducted through academic website searches. Contra Costa College Library has a great databases available to you as a student and I suggest you start there for your research as you navigate towards other academic journals and scholarly reviews. The citation style for this particular paper shall be completed in APA format.
(Your paper should be double spaced, 12 Font, Times New Roman, and 9-11 pages not counting title and bibliography pages).

BUSINESS CASES and WRITTEN MIDTERM CASE:
Analyze cases, these cases are available in Strategic Management Text. UBER will be used in a Written Exam.
case. The student assumes that he/she is a consultant with the goal of finding a course of action leading to the firm’s
long-term benefit – after making a thorough analysis of the firm’s situation in world markets. For the midterm case
analysis exam, students are only permitted to use the material in the case and perform their case analysis based on the
time frame presented in the case. Guidelines to the midterm case analysis will be provided by your professor.

Develop an introduction and short outline to “map” or plan your literary analysis.

Choose ONE character from The lottery- Shirley Jackson

For full points, your outline should have:
full introductory paragraph with the assertion that clearly answers the prompt: Who is the most compelling character? Why?
a minimum of TWO Main Points (I. & II.)
a minimum of 3 sub-points for each main point (A. B. C.), one of which should be textual evidence
use complete sentences that clearly support your claim
MLA format (set up the doc, use in-text citations in the outline, and add a Works Cited page)

While there are many ways this could be analyzed, here is one example of content (note: the labels and bold text are here to illustrate this model only- your paper will follow standard MLA):

Example: Poor Fortunato

With only two characters in the short story, “The Cask of Amontillado,” character development is everything. As a villain, Montresor’s narcissistic psychology is sufficiently profiled. However, of perhaps greater interest, is how Edgar Allan Poe achieves the necessary blurring of arrogance and innocence in the development of Fortunato.
I. Fortunato is compelling as a stereotypical, arrogant connoisseur.
A. Poe deliberately designs an annoying, prideful character who, much like the bells on his costume, immediately gets on the reader’s nerves.
B. Fortunato brags that “Luchesi cannot tell Amontillado from Sherry” (Poe 15) and in the process, chastises Montresor for even suggesting someone else.
C. Fortunato’s drunkenness and brash speech makes him unlikeable and allows the reader to initially want to see how far Montresor will actually go.
II. However, the reader cannot help but sympathize with Fortunato’s realization that he has been betrayed by someone he called “friend.”
A. Even with Fortunato’s arrogance and alleged insults, the premeditated deception and cruelty of the crime is not justified.
B. Poe curiously leaves out any detail of the “insult” in order to keep the reader initially unclear about which man has been most wronged, but the question of whether Fortunato is even aware of his alleged transgression is suddenly in the forefront.
C. Fortunato has been endeared with just enough innocence and naiveté to invoke empathy from the reader in the end.
D. “For the love of God, Montresor!” (Poe 19), he helplessly pleads for his life before being silenced forever by a man he excitedly shook hands with a short time before.
Works Cited
Poe, Edgar Allan. “The Cask of Amontillado.” Literature: A portable anthology, 4th edition. Edited by Janet Gardner, Beverly Lawn,
Jack Ridl, and Peter Schakel, 2017, pp. 14-20. Poor Fortunato

Task: The multiple-source essay asks you to synthesize the arguments of at least 10 sources ·Length: 2000-3000 words
·Format: APA ·Sources: a total of at least 10 sources, all of which should be from scholarly journals or credible trade journals. You should find your sources through library searches. If you cite sources from websites or popular journals, these sources should be in addition to the 10 sources you have cited from scholarly or trade journals.
·Topic: Please use the same topic that you used for writing assignments #1 and #2. It is recommended that you focus on or expand on the essay that you wrote for writing assignment #2. You will continue with the topic you have selected and will conduct additional searches in the library databases, hopefully, focusing on the topic more, and determining the 10 or more sources to use in this essay. Please note that this is a review of the literature on a topic. It is not a persuasive essay using sources to support a point. Rather it is an overview of the current research on a topic.
Integration of Sources: At least eight sources must be cited in the body of the essay. You may cite sources in your introduction to help you define terms, and you may cite sources in your conclusion to help you direct the reader to further inquiry. However, the body of the essay should synthesize at least 8 sources.

For this discussion, find ONE current article (August 2021 to current) on compensation and/or benefits (refer to your textbook for compensation and benefit topics – do not simply Google ‘Compensation and Benefits’). Summarize in your OWN words, the information from the article. If the article is lengthy, select the main points/concepts that interest you. Make sure to adhere to the word count. Place the link of the article under or at the end of your post. In the subject field, place a brief title.

Your post should be 75-85 words ONLY (no more no less).
Remember spelling, grammar, sentence flow can impact your grade.

Topic from Textbook: Designing Pay Levels, Mix, and Pay Structures