Begin by considering the most relevant selection process you have knowledge of, or have experienced. This might include your current or previous position, a process you participated in that did not result in a job offer, or a selection process you oversee or have been exposed to (essentially any selection process of interest to you where have knowledge of the steps in this selection process). You should:

Begin by considering the most relevant selection process you have knowledge of, or have experienced. This might include your current or previous position, a process you participated in that did not result in a job offer, or a selection process you oversee or have been exposed to (essentially any selection process of interest to you where have knowledge of the steps in this selection process). You should:

List the components that are included in this specific selection process and briefly describe each component.
In your discussion of the components, briefly indicate what KSAOs you believe the component is attempting to measure.
Assume that you were asked by this organization to validate all relevant selection components. Discuss how you would validate each component (or the process as a whole, depending on your example).
Be sure to discuss the specific validation strategy for various components (content, construct, and criterion-related validation) and outline what steps you would take. In completing this requirement, we wish to be able to evaluate your understanding of validation and what is involved (on a general level).
In your discussion of validation, remember to acknowledge why validation evidence is important in selection.

Essay #2: Comparison/Contrast

Write an essay in which you compare and/or contrast (i.e., pointing out similarities and/or differences). Then make a recommendation, taking into consideration personal experiences and audience needs. Also, incorporate at least one quotation in your essay from an outside source, making sure to cite the source properly within your writing as well as on a Works Cited page at the end of your essay.

Business: Compare and/or contrast two restaurants in order to recommend one to your boss for a business dinner

Note: When writing a comparison/contrast essay, it’s easy to write an inadequate thesis that merely notes that the two things have similarities, differences, or both. Instead, your thesis must make a specific argument (i.e., express a specific opinion) about the two things you are comparing. In other words, explain why these two items are worth comparing and contrasting. Does the comparison/contrast show that the restaurants/vacation destinations/homes are both equal in quality? Or does the comparison/contrast perhaps display the benefits or shortcomings of one of the restaurants/vacation destinations/homes?

Requirements: Your essay must be 750-1000 words in length (not counting the Works Cited page), typed and double-spaced. Use Times New Roman font in 12-pt size. Format your paper according to MLA guidelines.

Assessment: Your grade will derive from your abilities to compare/contrast successfully your two subjects using a variety of specific details and examples, to argue a clear claim/thesis (your recommendation) through the comparison and/or contrast, and to organize your thoughts either by subject or by point to help your reader clearly
understand your argument.

Include my written introduction for the first paragraph:
If you’re looking for a restaurant to host a business dinner, two great options to consider are The Capital Grille and Del Frisco’s Double Eagle Steakhouse. Both of these upscale steakhouse chains offer a high-end dining experience with exceptional food and service. While they share many similarities, there are also some key differences between the two that may influence your decision. In this essay, I will compare and contrast The Capital Grille and Del Frisco’s Double Eagle Steakhouse in order to recommend one for your upcoming business dinner.

the role of family in child development

1. The project/ paper you will write about is focused on some aspect of lifespan development or issue related to it.
2.How is the issue related to development
What is its impact on the individual, society or family
3.Are there ramifications associated with the topic?

The Dreamers Movement for Immigration Reform

12-page research paper.

12 pages do not include the title page, table of contents, and references
Pages should be numbered
Double spaced
APA referencing and narrative style
WORD document, Calibri Regular 12 point font
This professor will read each page and he is very strict so please make this a quality paper. Thank you.

Viktor Frankl’s Man’s Search for Meaning – What advice would you give to college students looking to live a meaningful life?

ASSIGNMENT: In 1200 words, answer and defend your position on the following question: What advice would you give to college students looking to live a meaningful life?
Use evidence from Man’s Search for Meaning, Brown’s work, Esfahani Smith’s work, and at least one other credible source to support your thesis and reasons.

Writing Include a strong, arguable thesis in your introduction. Underline your thesis statement.
Support your position with reason and evidence.
Include at least four credible, scholarly sources in your Works Cited page and refer to each of these sources at least once in the essay. Man’s Search for Meaning must be one of your sources.
Present and refute at least one possible counterargument. How might someone argue against your thesis or one of your claims? Why is your argument still stronger?
Use the feedback on your previous essays to keep improving your work and grades. I do look back at the suggestions I’ve made previously to ensure that you’re not making the same mistakes again.
Refer back to these instructions and the English 1 essay rubric frequently to make sure you are meeting the expectations.

Grading Criteria
Remember: To pass (C) you must meet the minimum expectations, follow instructions, and write a satisfactory piece. Not meeting minimum word counts and/or not demonstrating an understanding of the topic/assignment will result in a failing grade (D or F). Grades of B and A demonstrate deeper engagement, attention to detail, and sophistication of thinking and writing.
This essay will be graded using the English 1 essay rubric, with special attention to
argumentation (e.g. ethos/pathos/logos, refutation, excellent evidence) and
language (e.g. grammar, punctuation, sentence structure) will also be considered in the grading.

Have a specific, argumentative thesis statement (underlined) that answers the question directly.
Use the paragraph structure. Add a clear topic sentence that explains one reason your thesis is true, provide 1-2 pieces of evidence, and explain how it all supports the claim/thesis.
Lead the reader through the argument. Related to the above point: you need to argue for/defend your thesis. Use those transitions signals to help the reader understand what you are arguing and why.
Refute at least one potential counterargument. You should refute an actual published argument: you might also consider, for example, how some researchers argue for paths to happiness. Do more research about what people think is the key to a meaningful life.
Cite sources correctly. If you are referring to more than one source by the same author, you need to format your in-text citations correctly so that the reader know which information comes from which source. See section 33 of A Pocket Style Manual for help.

Coaching and mentoring analysis and evaluation

Effective coaching and mentoring, during professional situations, change initiatives, etc. assists with sustaining performance improvements within an organization. Leaders and managers should be equipped with skills in how to coach and mentor others within their organization. Coaching is viewed by many people as being performance driven, designed to improve the professional’s on-the-job performance thereby improving the overall organization’s performance. Whereas, mentoring is designed to be development driven, looking not just at the professional’s current job function but beyond, taking a more holistic approach to career development. Using both skills can be beneficial for the employee/coachee and the overall organization.

Select a professional or personal project that needs to be worked on that includes a subordinate (someone you can coach and mentor). The exercise, evaluation and analysis needs to be different than the IDP Report that you are completing during the semester. Each analysis needs to be typed in 12-point times new roman font and 1” margins describing the student’s experience in a minimum of 5 pages, double spaced, that include the following areas.

Coaching and mentoring Role
Complete the Coaching Self-Assessment provided with the assignment. What skill area(s) are your strengths? What skills areas do you need to develop?
Coachee Skills Needed: Who is the individual and what is their position?
Identify and assess the core competencies needed by the individual you chose to coach and mentor for this assignment. Prioritize the capabilities that s/he needs to develop to perform successfully in their own current roles and identify opportunities/responsibilities/assignments that could help them develop those capabilities.
Coaching and Mentoring Exercise: Explain the project and the goals.
Describe two different sessions where you can coach and mentor the subordinate. (Note: Include the coaching and mentoring sessions dates- these need to occur during the semester and prior to the due date submission.) What specific things will you be coaching and mentoring the subordinate on during the two sessions?
How does this project support the overall organization strategies and goals? Be specific with providing at least two qualitative and/or quantitative goals.
How does the project align with the core competencies needed by the coachee provided in 1c?
What performance improvement tools and/or leadership skills (minimum of two) will be needed to support the project? How will they assist in increasing the organizational performance?
Reflection: Coach, Coachee and Process Outcomes
Coach:
How did you perform as a coach with respect to the areas identified in 1a? What specific behavior and actions did you exhibit during the coaching session to develop trust, motivating the coachee, increasing accountability and overall project performance? You can use the leadership skills (basic and advanced skills noted in the assignment and/or information from the textbook to support this area.
Did your coaching and mentoring inhibit or assist in/support developing the coachee’s thinking, problem solving, initiative and overall skillsets?
Were there areas that you still need to develop? If so, what is your plan to do so. If not, support your position.
Coachee:
Is the coachee more prepared/ready to complete the project and associated tasks based on the coaching and mentoring you provided? If so, explain the coachee’s increase in skills/competencies you observed (provide 2 qualitative and quantitative). If not, why not?
Explain how you could have coached better in this situation? What do you need to do different during the next coaching session?
C. Project Outcomes

What were the overall outcomes of the project?
Did you obtain the goals that were set forth in the beginning? Why or why not? If so, what specific goals did you achieve? If not, explain what you need to do to achieve the goals (more coaching and mentoring, coachee training, change goals, etc.).

Informative Speech Assignment

Purpose: The purpose of this speech is to share ideas and information with the audience by fully describing and explaining the complete subject that is your topic. Through this speech, you will have the opportunity to “teach” us something. Therefore, this speech should inform the audience on your topic as if it were generally unknown to them, while developing its significance to them specifically, as well as society generally, and at a depth that we will find truly educational.

Description: This speech should be 5-6 minutes in length and a comprehensive preparation outline, featuring 3-5 main points, is required at the beginning of your speech. There are penalties for going over or under the required time limits. This means you will need to practice your speech sufficiently to be sure of its length.

In addition, at least three to five references (listed in the “References” section and cited in APA) are required for this speech. All these sources must be verbally cited within the speech as supporting material for claims that are made or data that are offered. All sources cited must be credible. DO NOT USE WIKIPEDIA AS ONE OF THESE REFERENCES. You will lose points if you use Wikipedia as one of the sources.

You need to use of visual aid.

Evaluation: This speech is worth 100 points. The preparation outline is included in that total (attached in assignment outline). Please remember that we practice extemporaneous speaking, not manuscript presentation. Your speech will be graded on content, organization and delivery. The specific elements that will be graded are listed in the Informative Speech Evaluation Criteria (see below).

Remember, the purpose of this speech is to inform your audience on your topic, not to attempt to persuade them of what you believe. Be creative in choosing your topic and make sure that it really interests you. Purpose: The purpose of this speech is to share ideas and information with the audience by fully describing and explaining the complete subject that is your topic. Through this speech, you will have the opportunity to “teach” us something. Therefore, this speech should inform the audience on your topic as if it were generally unknown to them, while developing its significance to them specifically, as well as society generally, and at a depth that we will find truly educational.

Description: This speech should be 5-6 minutes in length and a comprehensive preparation outline, featuring 3-5 main points, is required at the beginning of your speech. There are penalties for going over or under the required time limits. This means you will need to practice your speech sufficiently to be sure of its length.

In addition, at least three to five references (listed in the “References” section and cited in APA) are required for this speech. All these sources must be verbally cited within the speech as supporting material for claims that are made or data that are offered. All sources cited must be credible. DO NOT USE WIKIPEDIA AS ONE OF THESE REFERENCES. You will lose points if you use Wikipedia as one of the sources.

You need to use of visual aid.

Evaluation: This speech is worth 100 points. The preparation outline is included in that total (attached in assignment outline). Please remember that we practice extemporaneous speaking, not manuscript presentation. Your speech will be graded on content, organization and delivery. The specific elements that will be graded are listed in the Informative Speech Evaluation Criteria (see below).

Remember, the purpose of this speech is to inform your audience on your topic, not to attempt to persuade them of what you believe. Be creative in choosing your topic and make sure that it really interests you. Purpose: The purpose of this speech is to share ideas and information with the audience by fully describing and explaining the complete subject that is your topic. Through this speech, you will have the opportunity to “teach” us something. Therefore, this speech should inform the audience on your topic as if it were generally unknown to them, while developing its significance to them specifically, as well as society generally, and at a depth that we will find truly educational.

Description: This speech should be 5-6 minutes in length and a comprehensive preparation outline, featuring 3-5 main points, is required at the beginning of your speech. There are penalties for going over or under the required time limits. This means you will need to practice your speech sufficiently to be sure of its length.

In addition, at least three to five references (listed in the “References” section and cited in APA) are required for this speech. All these sources must be verbally cited within the speech as supporting material for claims that are made or data that are offered. All sources cited must be credible. DO NOT USE WIKIPEDIA AS ONE OF THESE REFERENCES. You will lose points if you use Wikipedia as one of the sources.

You need to use of visual aid.

Evaluation: This speech is worth 100 points. The preparation outline is included in that total (attached in assignment outline). Please remember that we practice extemporaneous speaking, not manuscript presentation. Your speech will be graded on content, organization and delivery. The specific elements that will be graded are listed in the Informative Speech Evaluation Criteria (see below).

Remember, the purpose of this speech is to inform your audience on your topic, not to attempt to persuade them of what you believe. Be creative in choosing your topic and make sure that it really interests you. Purpose: The purpose of this speech is to share ideas and information with the audience by fully describing and explaining the complete subject that is your topic. Through this speech, you will have the opportunity to “teach” us something. Therefore, this speech should inform the audience on your topic as if it were generally unknown to them, while developing its significance to them specifically, as well as society generally, and at a depth that we will find truly educational.

Description: This speech should be 5-6 minutes in length and a comprehensive preparation outline, featuring 3-5 main points, is required at the beginning of your speech. There are penalties for going over or under the required time limits. This means you will need to practice your speech sufficiently to be sure of its length.

In addition, at least three to five references (listed in the “References” section and cited in APA) are required for this speech. All these sources must be verbally cited within the speech as supporting material for claims that are made or data that are offered. All sources cited must be credible. DO NOT USE WIKIPEDIA AS ONE OF THESE REFERENCES. You will lose points if you use Wikipedia as one of the sources.

You need to use of visual aid.

Evaluation: This speech is worth 100 points. The preparation outline is included in that total (attached in assignment outline). Please remember that we practice extemporaneous speaking, not manuscript presentation. Your speech will be graded on content, organization and delivery. The specific elements that will be graded are listed in the Informative Speech Evaluation Criteria (see below).

Remember, the purpose of this speech is to inform your audience on your topic, not to attempt to persuade them of what you believe. Be creative in choosing your topic and make sure that it really interests you. Purpose: The purpose of this speech is to share ideas and information with the audience by fully describing and explaining the complete subject that is your topic. Through this speech, you will have the opportunity to “teach” us something. Therefore, this speech should inform the audience on your topic as if it were generally unknown to them, while developing its significance to them specifically, as well as society generally, and at a depth that we will find truly educational.

Description: This speech should be 5-6 minutes in length and a comprehensive preparation outline, featuring 3-5 main points, is required at the beginning of your speech. There are penalties for going over or under the required time limits. This means you will need to practice your speech sufficiently to be sure of its length.

In addition, at least three to five references (listed in the “References” section and cited in APA) are required for this speech. All these sources must be verbally cited within the speech as supporting material for claims that are made or data that are offered. All sources cited must be credible. DO NOT USE WIKIPEDIA AS ONE OF THESE REFERENCES. You will lose points if you use Wikipedia as one of the sources.

You need to use of visual aid.

Evaluation: This speech is worth 100 points. The preparation outline is included in that total (attached in assignment outline). Please remember that we practice extemporaneous speaking, not manuscript presentation. Your speech will be graded on content, organization and delivery. The specific elements that will be graded are listed in the Informative Speech Evaluation Criteria (see below).

Remember, the purpose of this speech is to inform your audience on your topic, not to attempt to persuade them of what you believe. Be creative in choosing your topic and make sure that it really interests you. Purpose: The purpose of this speech is to share ideas and information with the audience by fully describing and explaining the complete subject that is your topic. Through this speech, you will have the opportunity to “teach” us something. Therefore, this speech should inform the audience on your topic as if it were generally unknown to them, while developing its significance to them specifically, as well as society generally, and at a depth that we will find truly educational.

Description: This speech should be 5-6 minutes in length and a comprehensive preparation outline, featuring 3-5 main points, is required at the beginning of your speech. There are penalties for going over or under the required time limits. This means you will need to practice your speech sufficiently to be sure of its length.

In addition, at least three to five references (listed in the “References” section and cited in APA) are required for this speech. All these sources must be verbally cited within the speech as supporting material for claims that are made or data that are offered. All sources cited must be credible. DO NOT USE WIKIPEDIA AS ONE OF THESE REFERENCES. You will lose points if you use Wikipedia as one of the sources.

You need to use of visual aid.

Evaluation: This speech is worth 100 points. The preparation outline is included in that total (attached in assignment outline). Please remember that we practice extemporaneous speaking, not manuscript presentation. Your speech will be graded on content, organization and delivery. The specific elements that will be graded are listed in the Informative Speech Evaluation Criteria (see below).

Remember, the purpose of this speech is to inform your audience on your topic, not to attempt to persuade them of what you believe. Be creative in choosing your topic and make sure that it really interests you. Purpose: The purpose of this speech is to share ideas and information with the audience by fully describing and explaining the complete subject that is your topic. Through this speech, you will have the opportunity to “teach” us something. Therefore, this speech should inform the audience on your topic as if it were generally unknown to them, while developing its significance to them specifically, as well as society generally, and at a depth that we will find truly educational.

Description: This speech should be 5-6 minutes in length and a comprehensive preparation outline, featuring 3-5 main points, is required at the beginning of your speech. There are penalties for going over or under the required time limits. This means you will need to practice your speech sufficiently to be sure of its length.

In addition, at least three to five references (listed in the “References” section and cited in APA) are required for this speech. All these sources must be verbally cited within the speech as supporting material for claims that are made or data that are offered. All sources cited must be credible. DO NOT USE WIKIPEDIA AS ONE OF THESE REFERENCES. You will lose points if you use Wikipedia as one of the sources.

You need to use of visual aid.

Evaluation: This speech is worth 100 points. The preparation outline is included in that total (attached in assignment outline). Please remember that we practice extemporaneous speaking, not manuscript presentation. Your speech will be graded on content, organization and delivery. The specific elements that will be graded are listed in the Informative Speech Evaluation Criteria (see below).

Remember, the purpose of this speech is to inform your audience on your topic, not to attempt to persuade them of what you believe. Be creative in choosing your topic and make sure that it really interests you. Purpose: The purpose of this speech is to share ideas and information with the audience by fully describing and explaining the complete subject that is your topic. Through this speech, you will have the opportunity to “teach” us something. Therefore, this speech should inform the audience on your topic as if it were generally unknown to them, while developing its significance to them specifically, as well as society generally, and at a depth that we will find truly educational.

Description: This speech should be 5-6 minutes in length and a comprehensive preparation outline, featuring 3-5 main points, is required at the beginning of your speech. There are penalties for going over or under the required time limits. This means you will need to practice your speech sufficiently to be sure of its length.

In addition, at least three to five references (listed in the “References” section and cited in APA) are required for this speech. All these sources must be verbally cited within the speech as supporting material for claims that are made or data that are offered. All sources cited must be credible. DO NOT USE WIKIPEDIA AS ONE OF THESE REFERENCES. You will lose points if you use Wikipedia as one of the sources.

You need to use of visual aid.

Evaluation: This speech is worth 100 points. The preparation outline is included in that total (attached in assignment outline). Please remember that we practice extemporaneous speaking, not manuscript presentation. Your speech will be graded on content, organization and delivery. The specific elements that will be graded are listed in the Informative Speech Evaluation Criteria (see below).

Remember, the purpose of this speech is to inform your audience on your topic, not to attempt to persuade them of what you believe. Be creative in choosing your topic and make sure that it really interests you. Purpose: The purpose of this speech is to share ideas and information with the audience by fully describing and explaining the complete subject that is your topic. Through this speech, you will have the opportunity to “teach” us something. Therefore, this speech should inform the audience on your topic as if it were generally unknown to them, while developing its significance to them specifically, as well as society generally, and at a depth that we will find truly educational.

Description: This speech should be 5-6 minutes in length and a comprehensive preparation outline, featuring 3-5 main points, is required at the beginning of your speech. There are penalties for going over or under the required time limits. This means you will need to practice your speech sufficiently to be sure of its length.

In addition, at least three to five references (listed in the “References” section and cited in APA) are required for this speech. All these sources must be verbally cited within the speech as supporting material for claims that are made or data that are offered. All sources cited must be credible. DO NOT USE WIKIPEDIA AS ONE OF THESE REFERENCES. You will lose points if you use Wikipedia as one of the sources.

You need to use of visual aid.

Evaluation: This speech is worth 100 points. The preparation outline is included in that total (attached in assignment outline). Please remember that we practice extemporaneous speaking, not manuscript presentation. Your speech will be graded on content, organization and delivery. The specific elements that will be graded are listed in the Informative Speech Evaluation Criteria (see below).

Remember, the purpose of this speech is to inform your audience on your topic, not to attempt to persuade them of what you believe. Be creative in choosing your topic and make sure that it really interests you. Purpose: The purpose of this speech is to share ideas and information with the audience by fully describing and explaining the complete subject that is your topic. Through this speech, you will have the opportunity to “teach” us something. Therefore, this speech should inform the audience on your topic as if it were generally unknown to them, while developing its significance to them specifically, as well as society generally, and at a depth that we will find truly educational.

Description: This speech should be 5-6 minutes in length and a comprehensive preparation outline, featuring 3-5 main points, is required at the beginning of your speech. There are penalties for going over or under the required time limits. This means you will need to practice your speech sufficiently to be sure of its length.

In addition, at least three to five references (listed in the “References” section and cited in APA) are required for this speech. All these sources must be verbally cited within the speech as supporting material for claims that are made or data that are offered. All sources cited must be credible. DO NOT USE WIKIPEDIA AS ONE OF THESE REFERENCES. You will lose points if you use Wikipedia as one of the sources.

You need to use of visual aid.

Evaluation: This speech is worth 100 points. The preparation outline is included in that total (attached in assignment outline). Please remember that we practice extemporaneous speaking, not manuscript presentation. Your speech will be graded on content, organization and delivery. The specific elements that will be graded are listed in the Informative Speech Evaluation Criteria (see below).

Remember, the purpose of this speech is to inform your audience on your topic, not to attempt to persuade them of what you believe. Be creative in choosing your topic and make sure that it really interests you. Purpose: The purpose of this speech is to share ideas and information with the audience by fully describing and explaining the complete subject that is your topic. Through this speech, you will have the opportunity to “teach” us something. Therefore, this speech should inform the audience on your topic as if it were generally unknown to them, while developing its significance to them specifically, as well as society generally, and at a depth that we will find truly educational.

Description: This speech should be 5-6 minutes in length and a comprehensive preparation outline, featuring 3-5 main points, is required at the beginning of your speech. There are penalties for going over or under the required time limits. This means you will need to practice your speech sufficiently to be sure of its length.

In addition, at least three to five references (listed in the “References” section and cited in APA) are required for this speech. All these sources must be verbally cited within the speech as supporting material for claims that are made or data that are offered. All sources cited must be credible. DO NOT USE WIKIPEDIA AS ONE OF THESE REFERENCES. You will lose points if you use Wikipedia as one of the sources.

You need to use of visual aid.

Evaluation: This speech is worth 100 points. The preparation outline is included in that total (attached in assignment outline). Please remember that we practice extemporaneous speaking, not manuscript presentation. Your speech will be graded on content, organization and delivery. The specific elements that will be graded are listed in the Informative Speech Evaluation Criteria (see below).

Remember, the purpose of this speech is to inform your audience on your topic, not to attempt to persuade them of what you believe. Be creative in choosing your topic and make sure that it really interests you.

We know that most problems which have resources to be allocated from many sources to multiple destinations can be solved using the maximum flow method. Examples may include airline scheduling or fairness in car sharing, etc. Can you explain why for them or find other example(s) to explain it so we can better understand how maximum flow method works in real world scenarios? (If you prefer, you may also choose other examples to illustrate other methods covered in this Distribution and Network Models Module.)Distribution and Network Models

Please follow the directions below. This is discussion post no need for a title page.

Distribution and Network Models
We know that most problems which have resources to be allocated from many sources to multiple destinations can be solved using the maximum flow method. Examples may include airline scheduling or fairness in car sharing, etc. Can you explain why for them or find other example(s) to explain it so we can better understand how maximum flow method works in real world scenarios? (If you prefer, you may also choose other examples to illustrate other methods covered in this Distribution and Network Models Module.)Distribution and Network Models
We know that most problems which have resources to be allocated from many sources to multiple destinations can be solved using the maximum flow method. Examples may include airline scheduling or fairness in car sharing, etc. Can you explain why for them or find other example(s) to explain it so we can better understand how maximum flow method works in real world scenarios? (If you prefer, you may also choose other examples to illustrate other methods covered in this Distribution and Network Models Module.)

APPLICATION OF ROLE THEORY TO A CASE STUDY, PART 1

This week, you will use role theory to apply to your chosen case study. In other words, your theoretical orientation—or lens—is role theory as you analyze the case study. Use the same case study you chose in Week 2. (Remember: You will be using this same case study throughout the entire course.)
Use the Analysis of a Theory Worksheet to help you dissect the theory. You do not need to submit this handout. It is a tool for you to use to dissect the theory, and then you can employ the information in the table to complete your Assignment.
Review and focus on the same case study that you used in Week 2.
Use the Analysis of a Theory Worksheet to help you dissect the theory.
Use bullet points when writing on each slide, meaning no long paragraphs of written text should be in the slides.
Keep in mind that the recording takes the place of fully written paragraphs, while the bullet points provide context and cues for the audience to follow along.
Your presentation should address the following:
Identify the presenting problem for the case study you selected. (Remember: The presenting problem has to be framed from the perspective of role theory. For example, the presenting problem can be framed within the context of role functioning.)
Identify all the relevant roles assumed by the client.
Analyze the social expectations and social and cultural norms revolving around the role, social position, and role scripts of one of the roles assumed by the client.
Explain the role and social position of the social worker in working with the client in the case study.
Describe how the role(s) and social position(s) assumed by the social worker will influence the relationship between the social worker and the client.
Identify three assessment questions that are guided by role theory that you will ask the client to better understand the problem.
Identify and describe two interventions that are aligned with the presenting problem and role theory.
Identify one advantage and one limitation in using role theory in understanding the case.
Submit also, as a separate document, your Week 4 Analysis of a Theory Worksheet.
Be sure to:
Identify and correctly reference the case study you have chosen.
Use literature to support your claims.
Use APA formatting and style.
Include a Reference List on the last slide.

Summary/Synthesis

Read over Chapter One (1 )Consumer Culture in our class Textbook, Signs of Life in the U.S.A., edited by Maasik and Solomon (2016). Follow the rubric provided on this module as well so as to receive 40 points for this assignment. Also, please look over the material found in Module/Week Two including viewing the PowerpPoint, (did you take the post-reading quiz on Chapter One), read all discussion boards, and look over the sample student summary/synthesis..

The purpose of this assignment is to as well as show you how to synthesize what you read and write that into formatted prose, what I call a summary/synthesis.

Please follow APA citation style.