Best Writer Title of assay “Do adult patients who use a manual toothbrush experience more gingival recession than those who use a sonic toothbrush?”
Words total around 1000 words
due 3/25/23
References should be in AMA format
The writer need to pick 4-5 peer reviewed scientific joirnal articles about this subject
I need good writers in scientific journals who knows the PICO method of reserearch
Form:
A dramatic monologue or epistolary persona poem (i.e., a poem in the form of a letter):
– written in free-verse (unmetered) lines of 10-12 syllables each, or as a prose poem
– between 15 and 25 lines in length
Theme:
Write a persona poem, in the voice of one of the following:
– an historical figure, a figure from art or mythology, or a character you invent
– an animal, plant, stone, tree, or other natural being
– an inanimate (mechanical/digital/artificial) object
Note that the implied addressee of the poem doesn’t need to be the reader! The persona might also be addressing another person, character, or thing. If the addressee is not the reader, specifying the actual addressee in the poem’s title is a good framing device.
Challenge:
Try to make your line and stanza lengths consistent. In other words:
– All your lines should be roughly the same number of syllables, even if they don’t follow a metrical stress pattern.
– If you use stanzas, all your stanzas should be the same length (couplets, tercets, quatrains, and so on).
– If you are writing this as a prose poem, make sure that your individual sentences have line integrity; this should not read like a “normal” piece of prose.
Suggestions:
– Try to choose a character whose voice has not been represented extensively in writing before now. That way, it will be up to you to invent the way this character speaks (rather than to copy the voice of this character as they appear in earlier texts).
– Make the character’s voice both believable and distinct from your own. This is likely to involve experimentation with diction, imagery, and pacing.
– Brainstorm about this character’s personality, views, and concerns before you start writing your poem. What is the size/scope of this character’s world? How much knowledge do they have, and what kind of knowledge is it? What do they desire? What do they loathe/fear/regret? What kind of response do they seek from their addressee?
– Remember that your persona’s speech should come out of an occasion—whether that be a specific event or a moment of insight, emotion, or change. Make sure that the poem suggests answers to the question, “Why is this persona speaking to us now?”
Assignment This week, you will perform scholarly research about a current event in Nursing. Here are some ideas:
Nursing compensation
Staffing ratios
Mandatory overtime
Patient and staff safety
Ethical dilemmas (euthanasia, genomics, etc.)
Find 2-3 scholarly, academic resources about the issue you have selected. Review your text to ensure the source meets the standard for academic writing.
In a document provide the following for EACH source:
Summarize the source you have found (1-2 paragraphs).
Critically analyze the article (3-4 paragraphs):
Is the article recent?
Is the information current?
Is the writing unbiased, or does it contain biased language? Use examples.
What is the strongest point in the article? Provide quote which supports your choice.
Where is the article the weakest? Provide a quote which supports your choice.
Your document should be in APA format:
12 pt, Times New Roman font, 1-inch margins, double spaced.
Sources are cited properly in the body of the analysis.
Sources have full APA citations at the end of the document.
Annotated Bibliography Samples in Purdue OWL
https://owl.purdue.edu/owl/general_writing/common_writing_assignments/annotated_bibliographies/annotated_bibliography_samples.html
Critically Analyzing Information Sources in Cornell University LibraryLinks to an external site.
https://guides.library.cornell.edu/critically_analyzing
Respond to the following in a minimum of 175 words:
Choose a recent (from the last few years) peer-reviewed research study on a topic of your choice from the University Library. Examine the study based on information learned in this week’s Rooney and Evans (2019) text readings and determine whether the study demonstrated compliance with the American Psychological Association (2017) Ethics Code Section 8 – Research and Publication standards specifically.
Support your response with specific (very brief) cited and referenced examples from the study. Even if you paraphrase, you need to cite in the body of the writing as well as fully reference. Your source must be a current (no more than 7 years old) peer reviewed journal article of an actual study.
References
American Psychological Association. (2017). Ethical principles of psychologists and code of conduct (2002, amended effective June 1, 2010, and January 1, 2017). https://apa.org/ethics/code/ethics-code-2017.pdf
Rooney, B. J., & Evans, A. N. (2019). Methods in psychological research (4th ed.). Sage Publications.Respond to the following in a minimum of 175 words:
Choose a recent (from the last few years) peer-reviewed research study on a topic of your choice from the University Library. Examine the study based on information learned in this week’s Rooney and Evans (2019) text readings and determine whether the study demonstrated compliance with the American Psychological Association (2017) Ethics Code Section 8 – Research and Publication standards specifically.
Support your response with specific (very brief) cited and referenced examples from the study. Even if you paraphrase, you need to cite in the body of the writing as well as fully reference. Your source must be a current (no more than 7 years old) peer reviewed journal article of an actual study.
References
American Psychological Association. (2017). Ethical principles of psychologists and code of conduct (2002, amended effective June 1, 2010, and January 1, 2017). https://apa.org/ethics/code/ethics-code-2017.pdf
Rooney, B. J., & Evans, A. N. (2019). Methods in psychological research (4th ed.). Sage Publications.Respond to the following in a minimum of 175 words:
Choose a recent (from the last few years) peer-reviewed research study on a topic of your choice from the University Library. Examine the study based on information learned in this week’s Rooney and Evans (2019) text readings and determine whether the study demonstrated compliance with the American Psychological Association (2017) Ethics Code Section 8 – Research and Publication standards specifically.
Support your response with specific (very brief) cited and referenced examples from the study. Even if you paraphrase, you need to cite in the body of the writing as well as fully reference. Your source must be a current (no more than 7 years old) peer reviewed journal article of an actual study.
References
American Psychological Association. (2017). Ethical principles of psychologists and code of conduct (2002, amended effective June 1, 2010, and January 1, 2017). https://apa.org/ethics/code/ethics-code-2017.pdf
Rooney, B. J., & Evans, A. N. (2019). Methods in psychological research (4th ed.). Sage Publications.Respond to the following in a minimum of 175 words:
Choose a recent (from the last few years) peer-reviewed research study on a topic of your choice from the University Library. Examine the study based on information learned in this week’s Rooney and Evans (2019) text readings and determine whether the study demonstrated compliance with the American Psychological Association (2017) Ethics Code Section 8 – Research and Publication standards specifically.
Support your response with specific (very brief) cited and referenced examples from the study. Even if you paraphrase, you need to cite in the body of the writing as well as fully reference. Your source must be a current (no more than 7 years old) peer reviewed journal article of an actual study.
References
American Psychological Association. (2017). Ethical principles of psychologists and code of conduct (2002, amended effective June 1, 2010, and January 1, 2017). https://apa.org/ethics/code/ethics-code-2017.pdf
Rooney, B. J., & Evans, A. N. (2019). Methods in psychological research (4th ed.). Sage Publications.
MIDTERM PROMPT: Production design is the art of creating a film’s aesthetic through its set—and as architects of a film’s setting, production designers work closely with the director and other key artisans to realize the overall look of a film (i.e. the “mise-en-scene”). More importantly, a film’s production design often contains implicit meanings that reinforce its key themes.
Please choose 2-3 feature length films from the first half of the course and write a formal analysis to explain how these filmmakers are critiquing sociopolitical issues such as class, race and gender through specific choices in the production design. You are welcome to analyze the symbolism of colors/color patters, costumes and props in addition to the locations and architecture of key buildings such as the Overlook Hotel (The Shining), the Armitage Home & the Sunken Place (Get Out), Richard Neutra’s Kaufmann House & Canyon View Estates (Don’t Worry Darling) and the Park & Kim Family Homes (Parasite).
For your analysis, please choose 2-3 feature length films from the list below:MIDTERM PROMPT: Production design is the art of creating a film’s aesthetic through its set—and as architects of a film’s setting, production designers work closely with the director and other key artisans to realize the overall look of a film (i.e. the “mise-en-scene”). More importantly, a film’s production design often contains implicit meanings that reinforce its key themes.
PLEASE USE GET OUT AND PARASITE
The Shining (Stanley Kubrick, USA, 1980)
Get Out (Jordan Peele, 2017, USA)
Don’t Worry Darling (Olivia Wilde, 2022, USA)
The Stepford Wives (Bryan Forbes, 1975, USA)
Parasite (Bong Joon-ho, South Korea, 2019)
NOTE: Please DO NOT analyze more than 3 of these films. If you analyze more than 3 of these films, I will deduct points from your essay grade.
To support your ideas and contextualize your arguments about these films, please choose at least TWO essays from the list below:
Greg Smith, “Real Horrorshow: The Juxtaposition of Subtext, Satire and Audience Implication in Stanley Kubrick’s The Shining” (pdf)
Anthony Carew, “American Horror: Genre and Post-Racial Myth in Get Out” (pdf)
JQ Adams, “Get Out: A Dystopian View of Neo-Slavery in the Fifth Wave” (pdf)
Sylvia Lavin, “Richard Neutra and the Psychology of the American Spectator” (pdf)
Jane Elliott, “Stepford U.S.A.: Second-Wave Feminism, Domestic Labor, and the Representation of National Time” (pdf)
Anna Krugovoy Silver, “The Cyborg Mystique: “The Stepford Wives” and Second Wave Feminism” (pdf)
Laurence Barber, “Killing The Host: Class and Complacency in Bong Joon-ho’s Parasite” (pdf)
“Inside the House From Bong Joon Ho’s Parasite” – Architectural Digest (pdf)
Anne Anlin Cheng, “The Shell Game: From “Get Out” to “Parasite” (pdf)NOTE: Please DO NOT analyze more than 3 of these films. If you analyze more than 3 of these films, I will deduct points from your essay grade.
here are the links to the essays you need in the essay
https://lareviewofbooks.org/article/shell-game-get-parasite/https://lareviewofbooks.org/article/shell-game-get-parasite/https://lareviewofbooks.org/article/shell-game-get-parasite/https://lareviewofbooks.org/article/shell-game-get-parasite/https://lareviewofbooks.org/article/shell-game-get-parasite/https://lareviewofbooks.org/article/shell-game-get-parasite/https://lareviewofbooks.org/article/shell-game-get-parasite/https://lareviewofbooks.org/article/shell-game-get-parasite/
https://www.architecturaldigest.com/story/bong-joon-ho-parasite-movie-set-design-interviewhttps://www.architecturaldigest.com/story/bong-joon-ho-parasite-movie-set-design-interviewhttps://www.architecturaldigest.com/story/bong-joon-ho-parasite-movie-set-design-interviewhttps://www.architecturaldigest.com/story/bong-joon-ho-parasite-movie-set-design-interviewhttps://www.architecturaldigest.com/story/bong-joon-ho-parasite-movie-set-design-interviewhttps://www.architecturaldigest.com/story/bong-joon-ho-parasite-movie-set-design-interviewhttps://www.architecturaldigest.com/story/bong-joon-ho-parasite-movie-set-design-interviewhttps://www.architecturaldigest.com/story/bong-joon-ho-parasite-movie-set-design-interview
https://go.gale.com/ps/i.do?id=GALE%7CA607580330&sid=googleScholar&v=2.1&it=r&linkaccess=abs&issn=03122654&p=AONE&sw=w&userGroupName=anon%7E4c1fc89https://go.gale.com/ps/i.do?id=GALE%7CA607580330&sid=googleScholar&v=2.1&it=r&linkaccess=abs&issn=03122654&p=AONE&sw=w&userGroupName=anon%7E4c1fc89https://go.gale.com/ps/i.do?id=GALE%7CA607580330&sid=googleScholar&v=2.1&it=r&linkaccess=abs&issn=03122654&p=AONE&sw=w&userGroupName=anon%7E4c1fc89https://go.gale.com/ps/i.do?id=GALE%7CA607580330&sid=googleScholar&v=2.1&it=r&linkaccess=abs&issn=03122654&p=AONE&sw=w&userGroupName=anon%7E4c1fc89https://go.gale.com/ps/i.do?id=GALE%7CA607580330&sid=googleScholar&v=2.1&it=r&linkaccess=abs&issn=03122654&p=AONE&sw=w&userGroupName=anon%7E4c1fc89https://go.gale.com/ps/i.do?id=GALE%7CA607580330&sid=googleScholar&v=2.1&it=r&linkaccess=abs&issn=03122654&p=AONE&sw=w&userGroupName=anon%7E4c1fc89https://go.gale.com/ps/i.do?id=GALE%7CA607580330&sid=googleScholar&v=2.1&it=r&linkaccess=abs&issn=03122654&p=AONE&sw=w&userGroupName=anon%7E4c1fc89https://go.gale.com/ps/i.do?id=GALE%7CA607580330&sid=googleScholar&v=2.1&it=r&linkaccess=abs&issn=03122654&p=AONE&sw=w&userGroupName=anon%7E4c1fc89
https://go.gale.com/ps/i.do?id=GALE%7CA594180949&sid=googleScholar&v=2.1&it=r&linkaccess=abs&issn=1449857X&p=AONE&sw=w&userGroupName=anon%7Eecf5612chttps://go.gale.com/ps/i.do?id=GALE%7CA594180949&sid=googleScholar&v=2.1&it=r&linkaccess=abs&issn=1449857X&p=AONE&sw=w&userGroupName=anon%7Eecf5612chttps://go.gale.com/ps/i.do?id=GALE%7CA594180949&sid=googleScholar&v=2.1&it=r&linkaccess=abs&issn=1449857X&p=AONE&sw=w&userGroupName=anon%7Eecf5612chttps://go.gale.com/ps/i.do?id=GALE%7CA594180949&sid=googleScholar&v=2.1&it=r&linkaccess=abs&issn=1449857X&p=AONE&sw=w&userGroupName=anon%7Eecf5612chttps://go.gale.com/ps/i.do?id=GALE%7CA594180949&sid=googleScholar&v=2.1&it=r&linkaccess=abs&issn=1449857X&p=AONE&sw=w&userGroupName=anon%7Eecf5612chttps://go.gale.com/ps/i.do?id=GALE%7CA594180949&sid=googleScholar&v=2.1&it=r&linkaccess=abs&issn=1449857X&p=AONE&sw=w&userGroupName=anon%7Eecf5612chttps://go.gale.com/ps/i.do?id=GALE%7CA594180949&sid=googleScholar&v=2.1&it=r&linkaccess=abs&issn=1449857X&p=AONE&sw=w&userGroupName=anon%7Eecf5612chttps://go.gale.com/ps/i.do?id=GALE%7CA594180949&sid=googleScholar&v=2.1&it=r&linkaccess=abs&issn=1449857X&p=AONE&sw=w&userGroupName=anon%7Eecf5612c
REQUIREMENTS & SOURCES:
You must analyze 2-3 films from the course (listed above). You may not analyze films that are not on the syllabus.
Your essay should be approximately 4-5 pages, typed, double-spaced, 12 pt font (with a minimum of 4 full pages in order to not receive a grade deduction).
Your essay should include a thesis statement. Your thesis should include a What (argument/topic), How (approach at analyzing your argument/topic) and Why (statement about the overall significance of your argument/topic).
You should incorporate at least 2 sources from the course syllabus in order to not receive a grade deduction.
You may cite points in the FS 101 Online Presentations, but these are NOT academic sources and they will NOT count as one of the two required course sources.
Outside academic sources as well as non-academic sources from the web, like blogs, wikipedia and movie reviews are NOT acceptable for this assignment even if cited correctly.
NOTE: I will only accept doc, docx and pdf formats. If you are working in pages, please export your midterm as a pdf.
ESSAY STRUCTURE:
THESIS: Please begin by writing a thesis statement that contains a WHAT, HOW, WHY (see FS 101 Online Presentation: Thesis Statement Workshop with Examples that is embedded below)
In your WHAT, you should introduce your argument about the overall significance of the production design in 2-3 films you will analyze.
In your HOW, you should briefly explain how these filmmakers critique sociopolitical issues in these films as well as introduce any key essays or concepts that you will use in your analysis. NOTE: You are also welcome to frame your HOW around one of the main points made by one of the authors of these essays or one of these filmmakers in an interview to explain how this relevant).
In your WHY, you should briefly explain what you will reveal by analyzing these 2-3 films (i.e. the overall significance of your comparative analysis).
BODY PARAGRAPHS: For your body paragraphs you should carefully and closely analyze specific scenes from these films and contextualize your ideas using film terminology and concepts that are addressed in the FS 101 presentations as well as the course essays/articles.
CONCLUSION: Your conclusion should briefly summarize/synthesize your main points to make the context of your argument clear.
SUGGESTIONS FOR GETTING STARTED:
Once you have selected your films, I also encourage you to revisit the FS 101 Online Presentations and identify which readings/essays/interviews from the course syllabus that you will use for your analysis. NO OUTSIDE SOURCES ARE ALLOWED.
Since you have already analyzed many of the films for this course in the Canvas discussions, I encourage you to incorporate points that you have already made in these discussions as a starting point.
You may “rework” or “revise” ideas and passages that you have already submitted for previous Canvas Discussions as long as you can synthesize these into a cohesive essay that analyzes two films.
Although you should not plagiarize any comments that other students have written, the Canvas discussions may be useful to expand the scope of your argument. In other words, you may NOT use other students’ ideas “verbatim” and this must be your own analysis.xplain how these filmmakers critique sociopolitical issues in these films as well as introduce any key essays or concepts that you will use in your analysis. NOTE: You are also welcome to frame your HOW around one of the main points made by one of the authors of these essays or one of these filmmakers in an interview to explain how this relevant).
In your WHY, you should briefly explain what you will reveal by analyzing these 2-3 films (i.e. the overall significance of your comparative analysis).
BODY PARAGRAPHS: For your body paragraphs you should carefully and closely analyze specific scenes from these films and contextualize your ideas using film terminology and concepts that are addressed in the FS 101 presentations as well as the course essays/articles.
CONCLUSION: Your conclusion should briefly summarize/synthesize your main points to make the context of your argument clear.
You should write a 8-10 page report (12-point, Times New Font, single-spacing) that summarizes the developments in cryptocurrencies, their relation to blockchains, and the cryptographic techniques that we discussed in the class. In particular, your report should answer the following questions.
What are cryptocurrencies? What are some examples of cryptocurrencies?
What is a blockchain? What is in the block of a blockchain? How are they linked?
When are the blocks added? Who adds the blocks—centralized server or distributed servers? Who maintains the blockchain?
Are these scalable? In other words, can the chains be as long as you wish them to be? What are the performance implications of having long chains?
How is consistency maintained among copies of blockchains?
Examples applications where blockchain technologies are being used.
Are these cryptocurrencies secure? In other words, what gives them the properties of reliability, tamper-proof, and uniqueness (avoid double counting)?
What has puzzle solving to do with cryptography? Why have they become popular in cryptocurrencies?
What cryptographic techniques that we discussed during the course are being employed in these technologies?
What are the advantages of cryptocurrencies over physical currencies or other digital currencies such as credit cards and debit cards?
Summary of your thoughts on cryptocurrencies—technologies used, advantages, and dangers.
Your report should be well organized into sections, starting with an introduction and ending with a conclusion and references. The references should be as per the IEEE (http://www.ijssst.info/info/IEEE-Citation-StyleGuide.pdfLinks to an external site.)
Short description: Critically explore the intersection of race, ethnicity, gender, socioeconomic status, sexual orientation, or other social factors that may facilitate and exacerbate challenges to achieving health equity in school-aged children or teens/adolescents.
topic: sexual orientation among African American Adolescent Young Women (explores sexual orientation, gender, and economic stability).
Paper Outline
DO NOT NEED Intro OR conclusion!!
base on the previous paper keep writing and come up with 3 solutions that address African American Adolescent Young Women’s social factors (orientation, gender, and economic stability)
• Solutions: Using peer-reviewed literature to discuss possible solutions to address all the challenges created by the intersection of social factors.
rubric:
solution: A realistic and relevant solution is suggested, related to the issue discussed in the paper
I need you to pick five European and/or African artworks (painting or sculpture), made between 1200 and 1600, to briefly discuss in writing. For each artwork, the main part of the discussion will be to choose one descriptive term/concept from the list below, and apply it to the artwork. Then you will explain specifically why you think the term/concept is a good fit for that artwork. You will also identify which period/style each artwork belongs to and briefly identify any traits you see in the artwork that relate to its period/style.
-This should be around 3 pages, double-spaced, assuming reasonable margins.
-Your project should use five different terms from the list, for five different artworks.
-You can write about any painting or sculpture found in the textbook I will provide for you (chapters 14 through 23). For African art, you would use the StokstadEarlyAfricanArt PDF
-You can also write about any painting or sculpture made between 1200 and 1600 that is found in the powerpoints, even if it is not in the textbook.
-DO NOT quote anything from any source!!! Summarize information from sources in your own words (and if you absolutely have to use a brief direct quote, make sure you cite the source and keep it to the bare minimum)
I will be providing the guidelines for the paper that has all the information, from the list of styles/periods to the description terms/concepts you need for the discussion. So please read all of that so you have a better idea what to do and what not to do. Also, providing the textbook link to a dropbox since the file is too big and the African art PDF so that you can pick the art you want to discuss.
https://www.dropbox.com/scl/fo/n19wx3tf7y53fdgrwbb0c/h?dl=0&rlkey=bka1unmr09ti2pla82c04zefq
Critical analyze and present your perspective on:
Recently, Silicon Valley Bank got into trouble, and so did other banks. Did it hurt the US Dollar or helped in its strength?
Investigate such scenarios around the globe and answer the issues and challenges that face companies who are buying from or selling to countries with currencies in a flux.
Your original post must be detailed and analytical of what you have understood from the chapter
Answer the following questions:
What are the current challenges of shipping products and how companies are paying higher prices for shipping goods to customers in such countries?
Base your answers on practical aspects, and not in an ideal world
It is important to share real information and experiences when answering the discussion posts
Do not copy from the textbook. Use your own personal language to show understanding of concepts
Ensure that your submission is supported by data, research, examples, and several news resources
Sanders, N. R. (2018). Supply Chain Analytics: Understanding the Business Context. Prospect Press. https://online.vitalsource.com/books/9781943153602
Select only one (1) of the following essay topics to complete: Question #1 or Question #2. Your essay should not be less than 500 words. However, there is no maximum word count. However, your essay must be at least 500 words for full points. Please give word count at the end of the essay. Be sure to include at least 3 citations and a Works Cited page. Follow example #29 “One Selection From an Anthology or a Collection” on page 184 of A Writer’s Reference.
Note: Your essay and works cited page entries must only come from the following articles from chapter 9 of Writing and Reading Across the Curriculum.
Question #1: “The Milgram Experiment” by McLeod
Question #2: “The Power of Situations” by Ross and Nisbett
There are no outside sources for this essay. Using outside sources will result in loss of points. Remember, this essay is over explanatory synthesis of the required materials.
Stay away from using first person pronouns (I, my). Stay away from second person pronouns (you) too. Instead, you will want to express your essay without saying phrases like:
“In my opinion”
“I think”
“I feel”
“When thinking about this topic, I”
Question #1:
Use information from “The Milgram Experiment” (252-258) in an explanatory synthesis.
The Milgram experiment has been conducted many times, and researchers have come to certain conclusions about why “ordinary people, simply doing their jobs, and without any particular hostility on their part, can become agents in a terrible destructive process.” Using this statement as a principle, discuss what came from these studies and suggest examples in our world today, close at home or far away, that suggest these conclusions are valid.
1.) Use explanatory synthesis to fully explain the Milgram Experiment. Remember, don’t bring in your own opinion, yet.
2.) After explaining the Milgram Experiment, discuss where this type of behavior may be found in our real world. This is an opportunity to compare the Milgram Experiment to something outside of the text. You may use any example as long as it is relevant to the same ideas presented in the Milgram Experiment.
Use at least 3 citations and include a Works Cited page that you should format following the model in your handbook on page 184, #29, “one selection from an anthology or collection”. You will have only one Works Cited entry. Essay should be at least 500 words.
Question #2:
Ross and Nisbett suggest that the “situational variable” may be the key predictor in how the person will behave in a given scenario. In a well-developed argument that draws on “The Power of Situations,” agree or disagree with Ross and Nisbett as you make the case that the key predictor of people’s behavior is either individual conscience, peer pressure, or situation.
Head your paper appropriately. You will need at least 3 citations and a Works Cited page. You will have only one Works Cited entry. Follow #29 on page 184 in A Writer’s Reference. Length should be approximately 500 words.Select only one (1) of the following essay topics to complete: Question #1 or Question #2. Your essay should not be less than 500 words. However, there is no maximum word count. However, your essay must be at least 500 words for full points. Please give word count at the end of the essay. Be sure to include at least 3 citations and a Works Cited page. Follow example #29 “One Selection From an Anthology or a Collection” on page 184 of A Writer’s Reference.
Note: Your essay and works cited page entries must only come from the following articles from chapter 9 of Writing and Reading Across the Curriculum.
Question #1: “The Milgram Experiment” by McLeod
Question #2: “The Power of Situations” by Ross and Nisbett
There are no outside sources for this essay. Using outside sources will result in loss of points. Remember, this essay is over explanatory synthesis of the required materials.
Stay away from using first person pronouns (I, my). Stay away from second person pronouns (you) too. Instead, you will want to express your essay without saying phrases like:
“In my opinion”
“I think”
“I feel”
“When thinking about this topic, I”
Question #1:
Use information from “The Milgram Experiment” (252-258) in an explanatory synthesis.
The Milgram experiment has been conducted many times, and researchers have come to certain conclusions about why “ordinary people, simply doing their jobs, and without any particular hostility on their part, can become agents in a terrible destructive process.” Using this statement as a principle, discuss what came from these studies and suggest examples in our world today, close at home or far away, that suggest these conclusions are valid.
1.) Use explanatory synthesis to fully explain the Milgram Experiment. Remember, don’t bring in your own opinion, yet.
2.) After explaining the Milgram Experiment, discuss where this type of behavior may be found in our real world. This is an opportunity to compare the Milgram Experiment to something outside of the text. You may use any example as long as it is relevant to the same ideas presented in the Milgram Experiment.
Use at least 3 citations and include a Works Cited page that you should format following the model in your handbook on page 184, #29, “one selection from an anthology or collection”. You will have only one Works Cited entry. Essay should be at least 500 words.
Question #2:
Ross and Nisbett suggest that the “situational variable” may be the key predictor in how the person will behave in a given scenario. In a well-developed argument that draws on “The Power of Situations,” agree or disagree with Ross and Nisbett as you make the case that the key predictor of people’s behavior is either individual conscience, peer pressure, or situation.
Head your paper appropriately. You will need at least 3 citations and a Works Cited page. You will have only one Works Cited entry. Follow #29 on page 184 in A Writer’s Reference. Length should be approximately 500 words.
Attached is the paper that need to be rewritten because I was only supposed to pick one topic.