Best Writer

Free and enslaved black Americans argued for their rights during the revolution. This writing assignment requires you to read and analyze primary sources from the revolutionary era.Free and enslaved black Americans argued for their rights during the revolution. this writing assignment requires you to read and analyze primary sources from the revolutionary era.

In your essay, you should:
Include all parts of the prompt listed below: introduction, summarize section, analyze section, synthesize section, and conclusion.
Use specific, cited, direct evidence (details, examples, and quotes) from the OpenStax textbook and the primary source documents to support your answers and bring out insightful interpretations.
Use correct spelling and grammar.
Meet the word count minimum of +1,000 words total. It is fine to exceed the word count.
Format:
Double-spaced, 12-point font, Times New Roman is my preference, but you won’t lose points if you use a different font or single space. Please be sure to include a word count. The paper should be at least 1000 words, or at least 4 pages.

Sources:
Please use your textbook and the primary sources Wheatley, Sarter, Sutton, and the freedom petitioners. Since all sources are provided, you should NOT do any outside research and you do NOT need include a bibliography or works cited at the end of your paper. Include quotes from the OpenStax and the primary sources throughout your assignment and use in-text parenthetical citations or footnotes to clarify which source the quote comes from. Since the ebook does not have page numbers, cite the textbook section where your found the quote (OpenStax, 7.2) and indicate which primary source document you are quoting (Wheatley).

PROMPT:
This prompt is broken down into different parts, but your assignment should be a cohesive essay separated into paragraphs. You should start with a brief introduction, then have a section that answers the questions in the summarize section, next analyze the articles, then synthesize the articles, then have a brief conclusion.

Introduction:
Introduce the topic of African Americans arguing for their rights during the Revolution Era. Be sure to include a thesis statement in your introduction.

Summarize section:
Describe the roles that free and enslaved African Americans played in the Revolutionary War. Include citations from the OpenStax textbook.

Analyze section:
After reading the primary source documents, analyze how each of the authors argued for their rights. Consider what strategies they used to form their positions and to make persuasive arguments.

Synthesize section:
Compare and contrast all 4 articles, explaining how they are similar and how they differ.

Conclusion

Sources needed for the essay:

“Petition of a Great Number of Negroes” to the Massachusetts House of Representatives (January 13, 1777). In Aptheker, ed., A Documentary History of the Negro People in the United States, voL 1, pp. 9-10. From the Massachusetts Historical Society, 5th series, vol. 3 (Boston, 1877). pp. 432ff.

Sutton, Belinda. “Petition to the Massachusetts General Court.” February 14, 1783 Sutton, Belinda. “Petition to the Massachusetts General Court.” February 14, 1783

https://rethinkingschools.org/books/rethinking-our-classrooms-volume-2/essay-on-slavery/https://rethinkingschools.org/books/rethinking-our-classrooms-volume-2/essay-on-slavery/https://rethinkingschools.org/books/rethinking-our-classrooms-volume-2/essay-on-slavery/https://rethinkingschools.org/books/rethinking-our-classrooms-volume-2/essay-on-slavery/https://rethinkingschools.org/books/rethinking-our-classrooms-volume-2/essay-on-slavery/

https://www.pbs.org/wgbh/aia/part2/2h19.htmlhttps://www.pbs.org/wgbh/aia/part2/2h19.htmlhttps://www.pbs.org/wgbh/aia/part2/2h19.html

Word limit: 500-600 words

PFT COVID-19 case study. Please write a 500–600-word case study which includes COVID-19 disease process and tracks impact of patient’s PFT results before and after the COVID-19 infection. Your case study must include all PFT nomenclature, literature and technical terms with in depth analysis.

Critical Elements

Exemplary

Greater, more than 80% – 100%

Proficient

More than 75%-80%

Not pass

Less than 75%

Disease pathway along with diagnosis which includes technical PFT related terminology and analysis

(30 points)

Provides in depth analysis that demonstrates complete understanding of multiple concepts, as they apply to the case study and explains technical terms and tests

Provides in-depth analysis that demonstrates complete understanding of most concepts and explains technical terms/tests

Does not include any of the main elements and requirements

Scholarly Research

(20 points)

Incorporates many scholarly resources effectively that reflect depth and breadth of the research. Bibliography: Please provide three or more scientific sources (APA format)

Incorporates some scholarly resources effectively that reflect depth and breadth of research. Bibliography: Please provide three or more scientific sources (APA format)

Does not incorporate scholarly resources that reflect depth and breadth of research

Critical Thinking

(30 points)

Draws insightful conclusions that are thoroughly defended with evidence and examples

Draws informed conclusions that are justified with evidence and relates to the case

Does not draw logical conclusion and lacks evidence and needs

Writing

(20 points)

No errors related to organization, grammar, spelling, and style and citations

Minor errors related to organization, grammar, spelling and style and citations

Major errors related to organization, grammar, spelling, and style and citations

watch the film and answer the following questions
Reserve 107″ TRUTH AND RECONCILIATION AT LAIRD, SASKATCHEWAN http://www.reserve107thefilm.com/Reserve 107″ TRUTH AND RECONCILIATION AT LAIRD, SASKATCHEWAN http://www.reserve107thefilm.com/Reserve 107″ TRUTH AND RECONCILIATION AT LAIRD, SASKATCHEWAN http://www.reserve107thefilm.com/Reserve 107″ TRUTH AND RECONCILIATION AT LAIRD, SASKATCHEWAN http://www.reserve107thefilm.com/Reserve 107″ TRUTH AND RECONCILIATION AT LAIRD, SASKATCHEWAN http://www.reserve107thefilm.com/

Historic Facts:
1. Where is Reserve 107?

2. What is the significance of Stony Knoll?

3. What First Nations group was allocated Reserve 107?

4. What year was the Treaty made and the Reserve created?

5. What reason was given for breaking the Treaty and taking the Reserve away from the Young Chippewayan Band? Who took it from them?

6. What year was the Treaty broken?

7. Why were Mennonites given the land?

8. In 1994, the Canadian government admits they illegally seized the land. Why do they still deny the Chippewayan people’s claim to the land?

People’s Opinions on the Historic Facts:

1. What is Chief George Kingfisher’s opinion of what the Canadian government’s role was in creating this wicked problem, and what should their role be now?

2. What is Ray Funk’s (the Mennonite farmer’s) opinion of what the Canadian government’s role was in creating this wicked problem, and what should their role be now?

3. What were the fears that different people expressed about the different communities meeting for the first time?

• Chippewayans:
• Mennonite farmers:
• Lutherans:
4. In 2006, the Stony Knoll Gathering and Memorandum Signing was held at Laird, Sask. What did they do at the first gathering?
5. What is the significance of a memorandum?
6. What comments did people make about how they felt after the gathering?
7. Do you think this was a good way to begin? Why? Is this how reconciliation looks?
8. Are there other ways you’ve experienced or witnessed reconciliation beginning?
9. What did the Chippewayans, Mennonites and Lutherans find they share in common?
10. What is a covenant? Why do you think that language was used? Is this a useful way to view Treatys and memorandums?
11. What is the grievance with? Who needs to redress this? How might this happen?
12. Comment on the relationship between the two men, Chief George Kingfisher and Ray Funk? Capture their thoughts on moving forward.

13. What cautionary remarks are made at the end of the film?

14. What are the steps towards transformation that we can learn from this example of reconciliation?

Choose one of the following four topics to explore in this discussion: bereavement, death, and dying; job loss; sexual harassment or sexual assault; marital discord or family conflict. What cultural identities might be relevant for this topic? How could you ask a question about culture if a client brought up this topic?

In the second paragraph, discuss empathy as a means of bridging a value difference or conflict as explored by Hook et al. (2017). Include your faith in this discussion. Do not use subheadings.

For this paper you will address the following subjects:

Identify the various ethical, legal, and safety considerations applicable to your topic of interest.
What are two major challenges that you see in protecting patient privacy regarding health care information, and specifically your chosen technology, in today’s health care climate?
The paper should include:

3 professional references,
be 3-4 pages long,
contain an introduction and conclusion,
in-text citations,
a cover page, and
a reference page
This paper must follow all proper APA formatting requirements.

What is a Lieder or Lied? How does it relate to Schubert and his son Elf-KIng? Please include the musical elements regarding this music, melody, rhythm, harmony, form, expression, text, performing forces. What is a Lieder or Lied? How does it relate to Schubert and his son Elf-KIng? Please include the musical elements regarding this music, melody, rhythm, harmony, form, expression, text, performing forces.

In order to complete you are required to have acces to this book: “Exploring Philosophy 7th edition, edited by Steven M. Cahn, Oxford University Press (OUP)” ISBN: 978-0190089580.

Read:
In Part 7: God
Michael Scriven: Faith and Reason, 303-307
William James: The Will to Believe, 342-354 (If you have the ebook this reading is in the section on Historical Sources)

Please do not plagiarize!

There are two different prompts and both need to have theeir own response of atleast 250 words. So this means the first prompt needs a response of 250 words, and the second prompt needs a response of 250 words (minimum of 500 total words) .

Do not use any quotes from the text and do not refer to the authors by their first names alone!
The first prompt: Read the debate over Pascal’s Wager between Pascal, Blackburn, and Zagzebski as it appears in our textbook. Where do you stand in this debate? Do you think that it is reasonable to believe in God without evidence, as James claims, or are you on the side of Scriven, who claims that it is never reasonable to base a belief in God on faith? Respond to the argument in the textbook that you disagree with.Remember, the authors are not merely expressing opinions, they are offering arguments that are intended to convince people to adopt their positions. So, present the arguments, not merely the positions. In this case, you have to present them in order because Blackburn is criticizing Pascal, and Zagzebski is criticizing Blackburn. Do not give your own opinions or arguments about the issues or the arguments Your views on both the issues and the arguments should be confined to the Discussions. Just explain the argument as it appears in the text.

The sceond prompt: Explain the argument between Scriven and James about whether it is reasonable to believe in God without evidence, basing your belief on faith. Do not include your own views on the subject or your reactions to the readings. They belong only in the Discussions. Remember the authors are not merely giving their opinions they are trying to solve a problem and convince their audience that they have the best solution.

Guidelines for the essay.

Writing Assignment: Common Sense
As tensions rose between American colonists and British officials in mid-1700s, debates arose on what colonists should do. One colonist, Thomas Paine, encapsulated the ideas of many colonists seeking independence from Britain in his work Common Sense, a pamphlet first published in January of 1776. It quickly became a bestseller and remains a classic work on American politics. After reading Common Sense, you will write a 3-4 page paper describing its contents and significance. In your paper, you will need to do the following:
What does Paine think about monarchy and hereditary rule? What does this mean for the American colonists?
What arguments does Paine make in support of American independence? Why can’t American colonists and the British solve their dispute peacefully?
What does Paine think the future of an independent American nation will look like? How will it governor? What advantages does it have going for it?
Formatting: Papers must be typed and double-spaced. The papers should be formatted with 1 inch margins on all sides and be written in a standard font, like Arial or Times New Roman, in size 12 font. Three full pages of text is required at a minimum. No cover page is required. An example will be available on Canvas.
Citations: Citations are required. When quoting or paraphrasing from, use parenthetical citations (Author, Page #). The author’s name is only needed for the first citation, subsequent citations will just require the page. A Works Cited page is not required, however if you use an edition other than the Gutenberg edition, then provide the edition used.
This essay is worth 30 points. 25 points are awarded for content (following the above guidelines). 5 points are awarded for grammar, punctuation, spelling, and structure (to ensure readability).

Pamphlet: https://www.gutenberg.org/cache/epub/147/pg147-images.html

Ethical writing about Company, Business, or Organization. The topic is picked and stated above. I will upload an instruction and grading scale. Please read it twice or even more because this professor is kinda picky.
– Have to have initial sources by 3/23 11:59 pm, at least 3, more is fine. 3 initial sources must be included and used in the final research (please see attach docs)
– Fine good sources and we should be good for the deadline (simply you can just write the paper, I can look up and copy them for seperate submission.
– The requirement is only 5 page but I put 6 just to have more for him for extra point. If you can get it to page 7, I’m very appreciated!
– Professor said he will update for the small steps, I will keep you updated
– Lastly, please write it in google docs or tranfer them to google docs because my MicroSoft Office is acting weird!

This is a criminal law word problem scenario report.
Referencing style : OSCOLA
The only area of law to look at is Murder – do not look at or mention any form of manslaughter.
I need this work to be done at a very high high standard.
Please include referencing and a bibliography.