Best Writer

I’ve got this so far. I need more background on the bad things Columbus Did. And what indigenous people think about the change. How and why it should be changed. And how we move foward.
In 1492 Christopher Columbus sailed the ocean blue. We’ve heard this since we were in elementary school. The problem with elementary school is that a lot is left out of the history books. Rape, enslavement, genocide, land robbery, systemic torture, among other horrid things wouldn’t stop President Franklin to designate Columbus Day as a federal holiday in 1934. Do you see the issue here? Our nation doesn’t have Adolf Hitler Day, so why is Columbus Day a federal holiday? We have a holiday to celebrate a bad explorer, who discovered America by mistake, forced the native people into slavery, tortured and raped them; stole and forced them out of their homeland. Yeah, doesn’t sound like a good idea to me.
Columbus Day would first be celebrated in 1792 by Tammany Hall on the 300th anniversary of Columbus arrival in America. One hundred years later, President Benjamin Harrion would issue a proclamation in 1892, recommending the observance of the discovery of America. In 1934 President Franklin Roosevelt made Columbus Day a national holiday. Since then, Columbus Day has been commemorated with schools’ programs, community festivities, and parades. I don’t understand that concept. I think we can all agree Columbus was not a good man and we don’t need a federal holiday to celebrate him discovering the new land. He didn’t discover anything. The native people were living in what we now call America 14,000 years before Columbus was even born. In 1492 Christopher Columbus sailed the ocean blue. We’ve heard this since we were in elementary school. The problem with elementary school is that a lot is left out of the history books. Rape, enslavement, genocide, land robbery, systemic torture, among other horrid things wouldn’t stop President Franklin to designate Columbus Day as a federal holiday in 1934. Do you see the issue here? Our nation doesn’t have Adolf Hitler Day, so why is Columbus Day a federal holiday? We have a holiday to celebrate a bad explorer, who discovered America by mistake, forced the native people into slavery, tortured and raped them; stole and forced them out of their homeland. Yeah, doesn’t sound like a good idea to me.
Columbus Day would first be celebrated in 1792 by Tammany Hall on the 300th anniversary of Columbus arrival in America. One hundred years later, President Benjamin Harrion would issue a proclamation in 1892, recommending the observance of the discovery of America. In 1934 President Franklin Roosevelt made Columbus Day a national holiday. Since then, Columbus Day has been commemorated with schools’ programs, community festivities, and parades. I don’t understand that concept. I think we can all agree Columbus was not a good man and we don’t need a federal holiday to celebrate him discovering the new land. He didn’t discover anything. The native people were living in what we now call America 14,000 years before Columbus was even born.

Essay Writing SuggestionsEssay Writing Suggestions
These essay topics are built around weighty philosophical and scientific positions, followed by a handful of weighty questions. The questions are posed in such a way that you will need to think about them carefully, then take a stand on them, then explain your stand and defend it with your best well-reasoned arguments.
There isn’t a one-size-fits-all formula for writing philosophy essays. There is plenty of room for individual variation, and plenty of room for finding your voice. But please don’t be too creative: no plays, dialogues, stream-of-consciousness reports, or short stories. If you are having difficulty, or are new to writing philosophy essays, here are some suggestions you might wish to consider.
These essay topics are built around weighty philosophical and scientific positions, followed by a handful of weighty questions. The questions are posed in such a way that you will need to think about them carefully, then take a stand on them, then explain your stand and defend it with your best well-reasoned arguments.
There isn’t a one-size-fits-all formula for writing philosophy essays. There is plenty of room for individual variation, and plenty of room for finding your voice. But please don’t be too creative: no plays, dialogues, stream-of-consciousness reports, or short stories. If you are having difficulty, or are new to writing philosophy essays, here are some suggestions you might wish to consider.

One way to start out the essay is to combine careful exposition and analysis of the philosophical/scientific position or idea you are addressing, at least insofar as it is relevant to the main question/s. What exactly is so-and-so saying? Why is he/she saying it? What does he/she mean? Following that section will be your answer to the question/s. How much exposition and analysis? Consider making the exposition-analysis section about 40-50% of the paper. It should be focused only on that part of the philosophical/scientific position or idea that is relevant to the question at hand; there is no need to cover everything (e.g., all aspects of Sartre’s philosophy or all of Pinker’s popular science writings).
Make sure you read the entire text carefully, and that you understand it. It is an all-too-common occurrence for essays to stray miles away from the text they are addressing, to omit important parts of it, or to interpret the text in ways that are not plausible or supportable.
Of course, make sure your exposition is accurate and fair; steer clear of the strawman strategy; steer clear of absolutizing; steer clear of paraphrasing other peoples’ work (it’s boring – we want to hear your own thoughts); and don’t assume that a question that is rhetorically posed (e.g. “Who could possibly believe that?”) counts as an argument with any weight. It isn’t and it doesn’t.
One way to start out the essay is to combine careful exposition and analysis of the philosophical/scientific position or idea you are addressing, at least insofar as it is relevant to the main question/s. What exactly is so-and-so saying? Why is he/she saying it? What does he/she mean? Following that section will be your answer to the question/s. How much exposition and analysis? Consider making the exposition-analysis section about 40-50% of the paper. It should be focused only on that part of the philosophical/scientific position or idea that is relevant to the question at hand; there is no need to cover everything (e.g., all aspects of Sartre’s philosophy or all of Pinker’s popular science writings).
Make sure you read the entire text carefully, and that you understand it. It is an all-too-common occurrence for essays to stray miles away from the text they are addressing, to omit important parts of it, or to interpret the text in ways that are not plausible or supportable.
Of course, make sure your exposition is accurate and fair; steer clear of the strawman strategy; steer clear of absolutizing; steer clear of paraphrasing other peoples’ work (it’s boring – we want to hear your own thoughts); and don’t assume that a question that is rhetorically posed (e.g. “Who could possibly believe that?”) counts as an argument with any weight. It isn’t and it doesn’t.
The latter part of the essay – say 40-50% – consists of your answer/s to the main question/s, and the arguments you develop to support your answer/s. Consider this analogy. Liken your role to that of a criminal trial lawyer who must argue his/her case in front of a jury and a judge and a courthouse packed with friends and foe alike. You have to win them over. To do so, your argument has to be clear and easy to follow; it has to be streamlined rather than bulky (that is, limited to your 2 or 3 best arguments); it should anticipate objections and address them; it should steer clear of fancy rhetorical devices; it should avoid unnecessary detail and fluff; and it should play fair with the facts (or the text in question).
If you are not a fan of courtroom drama, here is another analogy. Try likening your role to that of a scientist who is presenting his/her new hypothesis to an audience of skeptical scientists at a conference. You have to outline your hypothesis, describe and justify the experiments you have devised to test the hypothesis, interpret and present the evidence, and then come to a conclusion. But your audience is not easily won over, and at each step you are met with questions like “what do you mean by x?” and “why would you do that?”; comments like “I don’t see why this is important,” or “so what?”; and objections like “ok, but your conclusions do not follow,” “there is a much simpler explanation,” “this is counter-intuitive,” and “but Prof. Big Shot’s findings undermine these findings.” As you write your paper, keep this unpleasant audience in mind.
As for citation style, both MLA and APA will work. Footnotes are ok, too, but not pages and pages of them.
Perhaps the most important thing is to keep in mind at all times that the jury and judge – or the scientific audience – who are listening to you are wondering “why should I believe this?” and “what exactly is he/she saying?” And keep in mind at all times one of the most common responses of the jury and judge, or skeptical scientists: “ok, but why?” This last question typically shows up when you make an important move in your argument and instead of defending it, you leave it hanging in mid-air, as if it is so obvious that it needs no further defense. Too many of these mid-air suspension moves and you won’t win your case or defend your hypothesis.
Naturally, a brief introduction in which you state your intentions and goals is helpful. But keep it brief, and avoid trivial statements such as “X was a great/important/pioneering/etc philosopher/scientist who lived and worked in Pigsty University.” A brief conclusion is helpful, consisting of a succinct retrospective. Even a brief prospective account of what is missing in your answer and what needs to be done next (if only you had the time and willpower) might also be helpful. Many scientific papers in respectable scientific journals end with one or two paragraphs on the shortcomings of the findings they have just presented.
Finally, it is entirely up to you whether or not to consult secondary sources. It is not a requirement that you go out and do research on these topics; indeed, you can rely on the text in question, the lectures, and your own thoughts. That is probably how a lot of philosophers (e.g. Sartre) and scientists (e.g. Darwin) intended it to be anyways: they were writing directly to you, the reader, one on one. On the other hand, you should feel free to consult secondary sources, if that’s what you want to do. If you do, however, beware: there are hundreds of books, thousands of journal articles, and hundreds of websites, all professing important insights into Sartre, Darwin, and the latest crop of human origins researchers (such as Henrich, Wrangham, Tomasello, Pinker, and Hrdy). Some are good and some are not; some will say X about Darwin, some will say the very opposite; some will be confusing and some will be clear as a bell. If you use these secondary sources, make sure you cite them in a bibliography.
The latter part of the essay – say 40-50% – consists of your answer/s to the main question/s, and the arguments you develop to support your answer/s. Consider this analogy. Liken your role to that of a criminal trial lawyer who must argue his/her case in front of a jury and a judge and a courthouse packed with friends and foe alike. You have to win them over. To do so, your argument has to be clear and easy to follow; it has to be streamlined rather than bulky (that is, limited to your 2 or 3 best arguments); it should anticipate objections and address them; it should steer clear of fancy rhetorical devices; it should avoid unnecessary detail and fluff; and it should play fair with the facts (or the text in question).
If you are not a fan of courtroom drama, here is another analogy. Try likening your role to that of a scientist who is presenting his/her new hypothesis to an audience of skeptical scientists at a conference. You have to outline your hypothesis, describe and justify the experiments you have devised to test the hypothesis, interpret and present the evidence, and then come to a conclusion. But your audience is not easily won over, and at each step you are met with questions like “what do you mean by x?” and “why would you do that?”; comments like “I don’t see why this is important,” or “so what?”; and objections like “ok, but your conclusions do not follow,” “there is a much simpler explanation,” “this is counter-intuitive,” and “but Prof. Big Shot’s findings undermine these findings.” As you write your paper, keep this unpleasant audience in mind.
As for citation style, both MLA and APA will work. Footnotes are ok, too, but not pages and pages of them.
Perhaps the most important thing is to keep in mind at all times that the jury and judge – or the scientific audience – who are listening to you are wondering “why should I believe this?” and “what exactly is he/she saying?” And keep in mind at all times one of the most common responses of the jury and judge, or skeptical scientists: “ok, but why?” This last question typically shows up when you make an important move in your argument and instead of defending it, you leave it hanging in mid-air, as if it is so obvious that it needs no further defense. Too many of these mid-air suspension moves and you won’t win your case or defend your hypothesis.
Naturally, a brief introduction in which you state your intentions and goals is helpful. But keep it brief, and avoid trivial statements such as “X was a great/important/pioneering/etc philosopher/scientist who lived and worked in Pigsty University.” A brief conclusion is helpful, consisting of a succinct retrospective. Even a brief prospective account of what is missing in your answer and what needs to be done next (if only you had the time and willpower) might also be helpful. Many scientific papers in respectable scientific journals end with one or two paragraphs on the shortcomings of the findings they have just presented.
Finally, it is entirely up to you whether or not to consult secondary sources. It is not a requirement that you go out and do research on these topics; indeed, you can rely on the text in question, the lectures, and your own thoughts. That is probably how a lot of philosophers (e.g. Sartre) and scientists (e.g. Darwin) intended it to be anyways: they were writing directly to you, the reader, one on one. On the other hand, you should feel free to consult secondary sources, if that’s what you want to do. If you do, however, beware: there are hundreds of books, thousands of journal articles, and hundreds of websites, all professing important insights into Sartre, Darwin, and the latest crop of human origins researchers (such as Henrich, Wrangham, Tomasello, Pinker, and Hrdy). Some are good and some are not; some will say X about Darwin, some will say the very opposite; some will be confusing and some will be clear as a bell. If you use these secondary sources, make sure you cite them in a bibliography.
One last bit of advice. Do a spell and grammar check before handing it in. Don’t spell soul as sole, Hume as Hum, or Sartre as Satire. One last bit of advice. Do a spell and grammar check before handing it in. Don’t spell soul as sole, Hume as Hum, or Sartre as Satire.

The first research paper due for this course should utilize one of the short stories presented in the first four modules. The student should select one of the following short stories to work with:

The Cask of Amontillado by Edgar Allan Poe
The Yellow Wallpaper by Charlotte Perkins Gilman
Recitatif by Toni Morrison
For this assignment please turn in your completed first research paper.

The research paper must be an argument-based paper. That argument should be centered on the literature and one of the schools of literary criticism presented earlier. The paper requires that the student create the thesis for the paper and use peer-reviewed sources found in the Ocean County College Library to support the thesis.

The required parameters of the papers are:

Required Elements: Topic sentence, thesis statement, title, academic peer-reviewed sources, and formal language.
Length: 1,500 words
Academic Style: Modern Language Association (MLA) Style
Required Sources: No less than 3 peer-reviewed secondary sources and a primary source; each source can be used up to 3 times
Paper Topic: The paper MUST be an analysis of the literature read in this course.
Paper History: The research paper submitted must be original work by the student-created for this course.
Tips for Drafting your Paper
Your research paper’s thesis statement is the most important task for you. The thesis should be created as earlier as possible as the rest of your paper revolves around it. The first task to complete is to draft a usable thesis.

For the paper, your thesis statement should be an argument that is based on one of the schools of literary criticism. A clear method for considering this is to think of the thesis as the result of combining the reading you find most interesting with the school of literary criticism that appeals to you. As you read the three short stories take notes on what in the story is interesting to you. This will help you find the thesis you want to work with quickly.

For example, suppose you find Montresor of Poe’s The Cask of Amontillado interesting because he murders without any remorse or feelings. This is the seed we need to write the paper. Think of it this way:

Interesting Reading + School of Literary Criticism = Thesis and topic

Montresor is a stone-cold killer + psychoanalytic criticism = and argument why Montresor is emotionless

A little research in this area might show you that killers with no feelings can suffer from schizophrenia. This becomes your thesis then:

Montresor suffers from schizophrenia.

With this thesis, we can then spend the paper proving our argument that Montresor has schizophrenia. Our argument is found by close reading and consideration of the elements in the literature that interest us most. Again, it is important that you work on the thesis for your paper as earlier as possible.

Submit the final polished draft of this paper as a .doc or .docx file.

Please separate questions and be mindful of the work count

Question 1
What kinds of interest inventories might you use in your counseling practice? Why? (175 words, 1 source)

Question 2
what sort of career counseling activities would you use with high school-aged clients? Why did you choose them? (75 words, 1 source)

Question 3
In Topic 4, you created a treatment plan for your client. Create a SOAP note that would go in the client’s chart following the visit. Post the SOAP note as a reply to this discussion thread. For follow-up discussion, evaluate at least two of your peers’ SOAP notes. Would you have documented anything differently? Why or why not? (175 words, 1 source)

Question 4:
In Topic 4, you created a treatment plan for your client. If your client were to attend a group therapy session, write a progress note for that client’s participation in that group. How is writing a group progress note different than an individual progress note? (175 words, 1 source)

Question 5:
For the weekly biblical inquiry this week, please identify a bible verse that sparks joy in your soul. Please offer a reflection for your peers to consider and ask a question at the end of the reflection for consideration. (75 words, 1 source)

Requirement
You are required to do the following:
(a) Set up a Microsoft Excel workbook for the tasks with a designated sheet for each of the
following: statement of comprehensive income, statement of financial position, horizontal
analyses, vertical analyses, ratio analyses, and charts you may consider inserting in your report
for illustration.
(b) Enter the financial statement figures and other relevant data in the designated sheets in the
workbook. Format the cells appropriately to give the sheets a great visual outlook.
(c) Perform horizontal analysis to indicate the annual changes in the values on the statement of
comprehensive income and the statement of financial position over the years you have been
assigned to work on. Format the cells appropriately to give the sheet a great visual outlook.
(d) Perform vertical analysis to indicate the significance of the values on the statement of
comprehensive income and the statement of financial position over the years you have been
assigned to work on. Format the cells appropriately to give the sheet a great visual outlook.
(e) Compute profitability ratios, liquidity ratios, solvency ratios, efficiency ratios, and market
value (or investment) ratios for the years you have been assigned to work on. Format the cells
appropriately to give the sheet a great visual outlook.
(f) Prepare charts to illustrate trends in selected ratios over the years (at least five of them). Format
the cells appropriately to give the sheet a great visual outlook. Requirement
(g) Write up a report on the financial statement analysis you have done (see the note below for
guidance on the contents and the structure of the report). Format the cells appropriately to give
the sheet a great visual outlook.

Structure of the report on the financial statement analysis
Your report should be structured in this format:
▪ Title page with an appropriate title for the report
▪ Executive summary
▪ Table of contents (use the heading styles command on the Home tab and the Insert Table
of Contents command on the References tab of Microsoft Word to insert a table of content
that you can update as you make changes to your report)
▪ Introduction
▪ Context analysis – company specifics, industry analysis, country analysis, and global
analysis
▪ Evaluation of financial performance with respect to profitability, liquidity, efficiency,
solvency, and market value presented in separate subsections. This part is expected to be a
thorough discussion.
▪ General conclusions
▪ Recommendations
▪ References
▪ Appendices – details of the relevant computations and any relevant secondary data
3. Formatting requirements
1. Font should be Times New Roman
2. Font size should be 12
3. Line spacing should be 1.15 points
4. Add space before a new paragraph
5. Tables and figures should be labelled appropriately
6. Insert page numbers at the bottom
7. Insert a cover page designed appropriately with a sense of engagement and the company
under review.

Refer back to the two news articles on the Department of Veteran’s Affairs and do a quick web search for additional information if necessary.

Consider and Address the following questions in an essay:

Who was General Shinseki?
What was the scandal or problem that occurred within the organization he was in charge of?
Identify three external actors or institutions that then put pressure (or were likely to put pressure) for change on the department? How did they do so? It is OK to think about institutions or actors not identified in the articles—but be clear in explaining why and how they might pressure the department.
Include two outside references other than class materials.

Format your essay in accordance with APA style guidelines. Provide a minimum of two references.

Class materials and readings should also be listed in the references if you use them in your writing.

Writing should be clear, well-organized, and contain minimal grammatical errors. 500 word minimum.

Check the articles in the screnshot attached.
Also the grading criteria

Bonus 30: Journey of Man Bonus Opportunity

View this video at the following link or Google “Journey of Man”. Total time is about 2 hours.

Use this link attached file a list of questions about the video.

USING YOUR OWN WORDS place the answers in the Submit box and post. Be sure to type just the question’s number and then your answer.USING YOUR OWN WORDS place the answers in the Submit box and post. Be sure to type just the question’s number and then your answer.

To prepare for this Discussion:
Analyze the following four World Heritage Sites listed in figure 9.1 in Chapter 9 of the course text for physical, chemical, and biological weathering. Use Table 9.1 on page 240 to assist you with your analysis.
Parthenon, Greece
Kilwa Kisiwani, Tanzania
Mesa Verde, U.S.A.
Machu Picchu, Per
Determine which site is at the greatest risk of weathering. Rank the locations 1 through 4 on their potential for weathering (with 1 being the highest risk).
Determine which one site is at greatest risk from mass wasting.

Post a paragraph with your ranking of the four locations, from the highest risk (1) to the lowest risk (4) from weathering, and explain why you have ranked them this way. Address the type of rock relevant to each location and the type(s) of weathering that impact this site. Then, in a second paragraph, explain the term mass wasting. State which site is most at risk for mass wasting and explain your rationale. If you believe none of the four sites are at risk, explain why.
Be sure to support your ideas by connecting them to the week’s Learning Resources, or something you have read, heard, seen, or experienced.

: Write a 1500-word essay dealing with an issue related to the course
material, with adequate coverage (or defence) of a contrary position. Your final product will be evaluated on its appraisal of the issue, its quality of argument, and the topic’s relevance to the subject matter
covered in the course. Your paper must interrogate the problem and prescribe potential solutions. The essay will be used as the basis for your participation in a final colloquium, in which you will participate in a panel discussion with other participants.

Using Charles Eisenstein’s Gift Economy Theory, How can the Canadian Economy thrive on sustainable Gift Economy? Is it at all feasible? Why and Why not? This must have 7 scholarly references and books.

Please refer to Angrist chapters 4 and 5 (p82-99; 165-181)
GOAL: To explore further extensions of ordinary least squares (the standard approach to multivariate regression analysis)
1) Choose one of the four following approaches:
Instrumental
Fixed Effects
Diff-in-Diff
Panel Data
2) Why is this approach used? What problem with data and/or the ordinary least squares (“OLS”, i.e. standard multivariate regression approach) does this approach attempt to correct?
3) Explain briefly how this approach is implemented.