Best Writer

Write a persuasive paper about a current issue that concerns you.there are numerous possibilities select a current issue in society, the news, your own community or elsewhere. Then compose a clear thesis that states your view on the issue .REMEMBER A GOOD ARGUMENT IS WELL AND LOGICALLY SUPPORTED WITH CONSIDERATION GIVEN TO OPPOSING VIEWPOINTS.

You only can use ppt and book to write this summary, do not allow to use other materials like Google or somethings. Student are required to write 200 words summary, 140 words response, 70 words conclusion double spaced review – 400 word requirement. All Summaries must follow APA writing guidelines.

Hi there, I’m Eugene.

I have attached a total of 7 files that are necessary for this assignment. I numbered them in the recommended order according to the “syallabus” file. The “0. Assignment Instructions” file contains the specific instructions for this assignment.

The “1. Reading Instructions” supplements the assignment instrctions. Now, the files Reading 1 to 3 as well as Supplement for Reading 1 will be the main sources for the assignment as indicated by the “number of sources,” but not all sources have to be used for the essay as I understand 300 page essay will not give enough room for addressing the whole 4 sources; one source, preferably the “2. Reading 1 …”, at minimum, should be used.

Also, I do not mind at all whether the pages go beyond 1 page or not – as long as it does not go over 300 words, I am happy.

A minor heads-up for the file “5. Supplement for Reading 1 …”: it is a word file that contains a link to a Youtube video.

Feel absolutely free to contact me for any clarification/additional info I may be able to ask my course instructor.

Discuss the connection between abuse and health problems such as bone and joint problems, digestive problems, depression and anxiety, chronic pain, hypertension, and cardiovascular disease.

Assignment: Assessing
and Treating Patients With Anxiety Disorders
Common symptoms of anxiety disorders include
chest pains, shortness of breath, and other physical symptoms that may be
mistaken for a heart attack or other physical ailment. These manifestations
often prompt patients to seek care from their primary care providers or
emergency departments. Once it is determined that there is no organic basis for
these symptoms, patients are typically referred to a psychiatric mental health
practitioner for anxiolytic therapy. For this Assignment, as you examine the
patient case study in this week’s Learning Resources, consider how you might
assess and treat patients presenting with anxiety disorders.
To prepare for this
Assignment:
Review this week’s Learning Resources, including the
Medication Resources indicated for this week.
Reflect on the psychopharmacologic treatments you might
recommend for the assessment and treatment of patients requiring
anxiolytic therapy.
The Assignment: 5
pages
Examine Case Study: A Middle-Aged
Caucasian Man With Anxiety. You will be asked to make three decisions
concerning the medication to prescribe to this patient. Be sure to consider
factors that might impact the patient’s pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic
processes.
At each decision point, you should evaluate all
options before selecting your decision and moving throughout the exercise.
Before you make your decision, make sure that you have researched each option
and that you evaluate the decision that you will select. Be sure to research
each option using the primary literature.
Introduction to the
case (1 page)
Briefly explain and summarize the case for this
Assignment. Be sure to include the specific patient factors that may
impact your decision making when prescribing medication for this patient.
Decision #1 (1 page)
Which decision did you select?
Why did you select this decision? Be specific and
support your response with clinically relevant and patient-specific
resources, including the primary literature.
Why did you not select the other two options provided
in the exercise? Be specific and support your response with clinically
relevant and patient-specific resources, including the primary literature.
What were you hoping to achieve by making this
decision? Support your response with evidence and references to the
Learning Resources (including the primary literature).
Explain how ethical considerations may impact your
treatment plan and communication with patients. Be specific and provide
examples.
Decision #2 (1 page)
Why did you select this decision? Be specific and
support your response with clinically relevant and patient-specific
resources, including the primary literature.
Why did you not select the other two options provided
in the exercise? Be specific and support your response with clinically
relevant and patient-specific resources, including the primary literature.
What were you hoping to achieve by making this
decision? Support your response with evidence and references to the
Learning Resources (including the primary literature).
Explain how ethical considerations may impact your
treatment plan and communication with patients. Be specific and provide
examples.
Decision #3 (1 page)
Why did you select this decision? Be specific and
support your response with clinically relevant and patient-specific
resources, including the primary literature.
Why did you not select the other two options provided
in the exercise? Be specific and support your response with clinically
relevant and patient-specific resources, including the primary literature.
What were you hoping to achieve by making this decision?
Support your response with evidence and references to the Learning
Resources (including the primary literature).
Explain how ethical considerations may impact your
treatment plan and communication with patients. Be specific and provide
examples.
Conclusion (1 page)
Summarize your recommendations on the treatment options
you selected for this patient. Be sure to justify your recommendations and
support your response with clinically relevant and patient-specific
resources, including the primary literature.
Note: Support your rationale with a minimum of five
academic resources. While you may use the course text to support your
rationale, it will not count toward the resource requirement. You should be
utilizing the primary and secondary literature.
Reminder : The College of
Nursing requires that all papers submitted include a title page, introduction,
summary, and references. The Sample Paper provided at the Walden Writing Center
provides an example of those required elements (available at https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/writingcenter/templates/general#s-lg-box-20293632).
All papers submitted must use this formatting.

Grading Rubric:
Introduction to the case (1 page)

Briefly explain and summarize the case for this
Assignment. Be sure to include the specific patient factors that may impact
your decision making when prescribing medication for this patient.
The response accurately, clearly, and fully summarizes in
detail the case for the Assignment.

The response accurately and clearly explains in
detail the specific patient factors that impact decision making when
prescribing medication for this patient.
Decision #1 (1–2 pages)

• Which decision did you select?
• Why did you select this decision? Be specific
and support your response with clinically relevant and patient-specific
resources, including the primary literature.
• Why did you not select the other two options
provided in the exercise? Be specific and support your response with clinically
relevant and patient-specific resources, including the primary literature.
• What were you hoping to achieve by making this
decision? Support your response with evidence and references to the Learning
Resources (including the primary literature).
• Explain how ethical considerations may impact
your treatment plan and communication with patients. Be specific and provide
examples.
The response accurately and clearly explains in detail the
decision selected.

The response accurately and clearly explains in
detail why the decision was selected, with specific clinically relevant
resources that fully support the decision selected.

The response accurately and clearly explains in
detail why the other two responses were not selected, with specific clinically
relevant resources that fully support the response.

The response accurately and clearly explains in
detail the outcome the student was hoping to achieve with the selected
decision, with specific clinically relevant resources that fully support the
response.

The response accurately and clearly explains in
detail how ethical considerations impact the treatment plan and communication
with patients.

Examples provided fully support the decisions and
responses provided.
Decision #2 (1–2 pages)

• Which decision did you select?
• Why did you select this decision? Be specific
and support your response with clinically relevant and patient-specific
resources, including the primary literature.
• Why did you not select the other two options
provided in the exercise? Be specific and support your response with clinically
relevant and patient-specific resources, including the primary literature.
• What were you hoping to achieve by making this
decision? Support your response with evidence and references to the Learning
Resources (including the primary literature).
• Explain how ethical considerations may impact
your treatment plan and communication with patients. Be specific and provide
examples.
The response accurately and clearly explains in detail the
decision selected.

The response accurately and clearly explains in
detail why the decision was selected, with specific clinically relevant
resources that fully support the decision selected.

The response accurately and clearly explains in
detail why the other two responses were not selected, with specific clinically
relevant resources that fully support the response.

The response accurately and clearly explains in
detail the outcome the student was hoping to achieve with the selected
decision, with specific clinically relevant resources that fully support the
response.

The response accurately and clearly explains in
detail how ethical considerations impact the treatment plan and communication
with patients.

Exam Decision #3 (1–2 pages)

• Which decision did you select?
• Why did you select this decision? Be specific
and support your response with clinically relevant and patient-specific
resources, including the primary literature.
• Why did you not select the other two options
provided in the exercise? Be specific and support your response with clinically
relevant and patient-specific resources, including the primary literature.
• What were you hoping to achieve by making this
decision? Support your response with evidence and references to the Learning
Resources (including the primary literature).
• Explain how ethical considerations may impact
your treatment plan and communication with patients. Be specific and provide
examples.
The response accurately and clearly explains in detail the
decision selected.

The response accurately and clearly explains in
detail why the decision was selected, with specific clinically relevant resources
that fully support the decision selected.

The response accurately and clearly explains in
detail why the other two responses were not selected, with specific clinically
relevant resources that fully support the response.

The response accurately and clearly explains in
detail the outcome the student was hoping to achieve with the selected
decision, with specific clinically relevant resources that fully support the
response.

The response accurately and clearly explains in
detail how ethical considerations impact the treatment plan and communication
with patients.

Examples provided fully support the decisions and
responses provided.
Conclusion (1 page)

• Summarize your recommendations on the treatment
options you selected for this patient. Be sure to justify your recommendations
and support your response with clinically relevant and patient-specific
resources, including the primary literature.
The response accurately and clearly summarizes in detail the
recommendations on the treatment options selected for this patient.

The response accurately and clearly explains a
justification for the recommendations provided, including clinically relevant
resources that fully support the recommendations provided.
Written Expression and Formatting – Paragraph
Development and Organization:
Paragraphs make clear points that support
well-developed ideas, flow logically, and demonstrate continuity of ideas.
Sentences are carefully focused—neither long and rambling nor short and lacking
substance. A clear and comprehensive purpose statement and introduction are
provided that delineate all required criteria.
Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow,
continuity, and clarity.

A clear and comprehensive purpose statement,
introduction, and conclusion are provided that delineate all required criteria.

Use at least five peer reviewed sources dated 5
years or less (2016 – 2021).
Click on the “tabs” in the case study attached
to revealed decision 1, 2, and 3.

Generalized Anxiety Disorder
Middle-Aged White Male With Anxiety
BACKGROUND INFORMATION
The client is a 46-year-old white male who works as a welder at a local steel fabrication factory. He presents today after being referred by his PCP after a trip to the emergency room in which he felt he was having a heart attack. He stated that he felt chest tightness, shortness of breath, and feeling of impending doom. He does have some mild hypertension (which is treated with low sodium diet) and is about 15 lbs. overweight. He had his tonsils removed when he was 8 years old, but his medical history since that time has been unremarkable. Myocardial infarction was ruled out in the ER and his EKG was normal. Remainder of physical exam was WNL.
He admits that he still has problems with tightness in the chest and episodes of shortness of breath- he now terms these “anxiety attacks.” He will also report occasional feelings of impending doom, and the need to “run” or “escape” from wherever he is at.
In your office, he confesses to occasional use of ETOH to combat worries about work. He admits to consuming about 3-4 beers/night. Although he is single, he is attempting to care for aging parents in his home. He reports that the management at his place of employment is harsh, and he fears for his job. You administer the HAM-A, which yields a score of 26.
Client has never been on any type of psychotropic medication.

MENTAL STATUS EXAM
The client is alert, oriented to person, place, time, and event. He is appropriately dressed. Speech is clear, coherent, and goal-directed. Client’s self-reported mood is “bleh” and he does endorse feeling “nervous”. Affect is somewhat blunted, but does brighten several times throughout the clinical interview. Affect broad. Client denies visual or auditory hallucinations, no overt delusional or paranoid thought processes readily apparent. Judgment is grossly intact, as is insight. He denies suicidal or homicidal ideation.
You administer the Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale (HAM-A) which yields a score of 26.
Diagnosis: Generalized anxiety disorder

RESOURCES
§ Hamilton, M. (1959). Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale. Psyctests, doi:10.1037/t02824-0

Decision Point One
Select what you should do:

Begin Zoloft 50 mg po daily
Begin Imipramine 25 mg po BID
Begin Buspirone 10 mg po BID

1. Read and take notes on the Week 2 Lesson:
Lesson 2: The Flapper and Depression: Dating, Family, Fashion, and Advertisements in the 1920s and 1930s
download
You will find the assignment within the slides. This is a different assignment from the Discussion Questions.
2.
Week 2 Discussion
This week’s discussion will focus on peoples’ experiences of dating, family, consumer culture, and the Great Depression in the 1920s and 1930s.
Assignment Objective
Students will analyze primary and secondary sources and synthesize them with lecture content to provide their own interpretation of the material.
Directions
You should complete the reading and lecture before answering this discussion prompt.

READ BOOK “Girls Like Us” by Rachel Lloyd

Reaction Essay Book Report
Your essay should be at least 4 to 5 pages (1000-1500 words) in length (typed, double spaced).
The essay should provide a description of your overall reaction to the book not simply be a
summary of the book’s content.
Examples of reaction discussion topics include:
 After reading the book did any of your views about sex trafficking of U.S. girls change?
 Were you shocked by the sex trafficking victims’ experiences and if so, what things
shocked you the most?
 Did you have any preconceived notions that changed? If yes, what were they and how
did they change? If not, explain more about this.
 In general, how did the reading make you feel?
 Do you have more/less understanding or empathy than you did before?
 Has this book challenged stereotypes or prejudices you have/had? Any realizations or
insights?
 Has reading this book changed the way you act or think? How did it challenge you, your
ideals, your philosophies, your concept of life or of the way you live?
 Is this the type of book you would have read on your own?
 Are you going to recommend this book to someone else?

PART 2 DISCUSSION BOARD:

After reading Girls Life Us by Rachel Lloyd and completing the Reaction Essay Book Report, think about and discuss how you would respond to the three myths listed below (in 300-400 words total).
Below are three of the most common myths regarding Domestic Minor Sex Trafficking in the United States. After reading this book and other materials from this course, how will you respond to others who believe these myths and mention them to you in the future?
The first misconception is that prostitution, even when involving minors, is a victimless crime and therefore, there is no harm associated with it.

Second, there is a popular misconception that minors freely choose prostitution and they retain power and control in the situation.

Another commonly held belief is that prostitution is a glamorous and exciting life which offers wealth or employment to the prostituted child.

Is charity a failure of the state? Discuss your answer in terms of the social contract between the individual and the state.

Purpose: application for the lab assistant of the psychology lab.
Focus: interest in the psychology of consciousness branch, highly interest to participate in the lab and research, this opportunity will be a great help for my future career
Length: 300-500 words
lab info: HOME | home (daviniafernandezespejo.com)
Background info: graduate from UCD, 2020, obtained a bachelor’s degree in psychology
Past experience: psychology lab assistant, attentional control uses both relational and optimal target representation to guide research program, UCD/Upcoming student of Master psychology program in 2021, University of Birmingham.
collect & analyze data: briefing participants confidentiality and guiding them through the whole research process
using python and r studios to build models to help analyze data, collecting and summarizing journals

One source needed is the lab info mentioned above.

You must have in text citations and a reference
section that abides by a particular reference style (APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, etc). The style does not
matter but choose one and stick with that one.
For the GSC 103 Written Assignment you will be required to write a 1000 word research paper on any of the topics
listed on the syllabus for this course (A list of topics can be found below).

As you research your topic, I would like you to consider the following questions:
1) What is the history that has led to our current understanding of the topic you are researching?
2) Who are the main players involved in this research?
-In other words, who were the scientists involved in the discovery / major advancements in the
history and evolution of the subject (if your topic has any)?
3) What are the major processes (physical and / or chemical) involved in your topic?
4) How does your topic affect our world, today?
-If you are researching a subject involved with deep time, how does it influence our thinking and
understanding of our place on this planet, today?
-If you choose energy and mineral resources, what are their environmental and economic
impacts?
You do not necessarily have to incorporate all of these questions into your writing, but I want them to be a
guide for you to use as you research your topic if you are in need of help. No requirement here.
When I grade these papers I will be looking for the following:
1) Organization—I want to see that you can present your ideas in a clear and organized way.
2) Detail—research (and really any) papers require a close eye to detail. I understand that we are not all
wordsmiths, but that doesn’t mean that we don’t have to properly take the time to read and check our
work. Sloppy papers reflect the intention of the writer, so just take some extra time to read and
appreciate your product.
3) Consistency—you must use citations to correctly reference your work. The particular format you choose
is not important, so long as it is consistent. If you have any questions regarding proper citation use,
please ask.
4) Time—although these papers are not long, I want to see that you took this project seriously and spent
the time to adequately research your writing. This goes beyond organization, detail, and consistency. I
want to see that time was taken to thoroughly and properly execute the research of your particular topic

Structure of the Earth
Plate Tectonics
Atoms, Crystals, Minerals, Rocks
Igneous rocks
Weathering and Soil
Sedimentary Rocks
Metamorphic Rocks
Volcanoes
Earthquakes
Crustal Deformation
Mass Wasting
Relative and Absolute Dating
Energy Resources
Mineral Resources
The Atmosphere
Streams and Floods
Groundwater
Ocean Currents
Tides and Coasts
Deserts
Ice Ages
Glacial Geology
Climate Chang