Best Writer

Unit VI Research Paper
Write a research paper about the single-trait genetic disorder you selected in Unit III Annotated Bibliography and include the
information listed below.
Include a thesis statement that clearly and concisely states the paper’s purpose.
Describe the single-trait genetic disorder you selected.
State whether it is a dominant or recessive disorder.
State whether it is sex-linked or autosomal recessive disorder.
State the genotype or possible genotypes of a person with the disorder.
Relate the genotype to phenotype of a person with the disorder and define phenotype.
Describe the symptoms, diagnosis, prognosis.
Discuss treatment options, including medicines/alternative treatments.
Describe incidence rate or statistics.
Describe what can be done to reduce the incidence rates.
Include a Punnett square of the parents that could produce offspring with the disorder.
Include the ratios of each genotype and phenotype produced by the cross.
Within your discussion of the above items, include definitions for the terms listed below:
single-trait genetic disorder,
dominant and recessive,
sex-linked trait and autosomal disorder,
genotype and phenotype, and
heterozygous and homozygous.
Include any other interesting facts.
Your research paper must be at least three full pages in length and include an introduction, a body with a review and
discussion of literature, and a conclusion. Please include an APA formatted title page. You are required to cite at least two
peer-reviewed references, and two of your own choosing, for a minimum of four references. You are encouraged to use the references from the Unit III Annotated Bibliography assignment,
but it is not a requirement. For more information on locating sources, view the following tutorial:
How to Find Peer-Reviewed Resources
Adhere to APA Style when constructing this assignment, including in-text citations and references for all sources that are
used.

Write 4 paragraphs to compare and contrast two countries. Nigeria and the United States of America. Compare and contrast Nigeria and United states of America

Here is the topic question required for the Essay:
In the first part of the Meno, Plato has Socrates argue that a definition of virtue is necessary if he and Meno are going to be able to claim to know anything about it. In the Nicomachean Ethics, Aristotle seems to follow the general procedure that Socrates outlines when, beginning in Chapter 7 of Book I, he seeks to provide an account of the “virtue” that is at stake in his claim that “the human good proves to be activity of the soul in accordance with virtue” (1098a18). Explain Aristotle’s understanding of virtue as it is developed here and later in the Ethics. How does it account for the human good? Is anything else besides virtue in this sense required in order for us to achieve happiness? Is it likely that Aristotle’s account would satisfy Socrates in the Meno? Why or why not? (Be sure to explain Socrates’ standard for an adequate definition as set out in the Meno.)

Here are the general guidelines and requirements of papers from the Professor:
You should take care that your writing is clear and says what you mean it to say fully and directly.
Make sure to address all parts of the question or prompt.
Papers should be reasonably close to the approximate word-count lengths in the assignments. Generally, if your paper is more than 10% over or under that approximate length, it is probably either underdeveloped or in need of some editing to condense it.
You should write for an audience who are generally acquainted with the texts you are discussing, with the aim of clarifying and deepening their understanding of those texts and their main ideas and/or of taking and defending your own position about the issues under discussion.
your goal will be to try to offer your own account of the ideas covered in these texts, explaining what those ideas are, their meaning, how they can be justified, what is important or significant about them and/or what you object to and think should be viewed otherwise. In all cases, you should provide reasons and evidence in support of your account or your assessment.
DO NOT write ‘book report’ style papers, where you spend a bunch of time giving basic background about the author or the texts in question. Make sure any background you do supply is directly relevant to the matters you are discussing, and is necessary to make them clear.
DO NOT write in a tone that ‘hypes’ the author or text under discussion. Your goal should be to provide a sober, critical assessment, not make things sound great.
On textual support. In the course of your paper, it is important that you establish that the views you are attributing to the authors you are discussing are what they actually hold.
There are two ways of doing this.
In cases where the view can be adequately represented in a summary or paraphrase form, you can provide a citation to the place where the author expresses the view you are attributing to them.
In cases where the view needs to be exhibited in the author’s own words, you should quote and provide a citation. Quoting can be necessary for a number for reasons, such as precision (which is a good reason to use someone’s exact language in many cases), or because the interpretation of an author’s position on a certain point is controversial and you want to establish exactly what they say in order to support a specific characterization of their view, or because the view needs some explanation, which should start with a careful discussion of their own language.
Some further points:
When quoting, be sure to provide enough context and explanation of the text you are quoting to ensure that its meaning is clear and the reader can understand how it supports or illustrates what you are saying. (Sometimes just quoting will be enough, but often it will not be).
Remember, even when you are simply summarizing key ideas found in the text in your own words, you must provide citation references to aid the reader in locating discussion of those ideas in the original.
Finally, make sure that you have something of your own to say about the texts you quote or refer to beyond simply stringing together quotations or paraphrases of their content. Tell the reader why and how these texts are important, interesting, or how they illustrate a point you want to make.
Some other notes about philosophical writing:
It is common in philosophy to use first person constructions like ‘I will argue that…’ or ‘I believe that…’. You should feel free to do so, especially since it will almost surely make your writing clearer.
Philosophical writing relies to a great extent on consistency of terminological usage. Rather than seeking synonyms to avoid using ‘common’ words, or trying to rephrase another author’s formulation in ‘your own’ terms, it is better to use the words that first come to mind when trying to say something and to stick with (or close to) other people’s precise formulations when discussing their claims, especially if you have reason to believe that the language in question contains technical vocabulary – i.e., terms around which the author is developing their concepts.
Obviously, when using other people’s language, you should enclose what you are using in quotation marks and provide clear references for where they first made that formulation. And references should also be supplied for paraphrases, even when you are not directly quoting.
Papers should be formatted according to the Chicago Manual of Style ‘notes and bibliography’ guidelines, with no title page or abstract. (For examples, see http://www.chicagomanualofstyle.org/tools_citationguide.html. )
All papers must include complete and correct bibliographic information for all sources cited or consulted. This will always be listed in the footnotes, and may also need to be listed in a separate bibliography at the end of the paper.
If all sources you consulted in preparation of the paper are directly referenced in the footnotes (either as a result of quotation or paraphrase and citation), then you do not need to include a separate bibliography.
If, on the other hand, you consulted sources you did not reference in the footnotes, you must include a separate bibliography.
Footnotes should be created using the ‘insert footnote’ function on your word processing software, not as running footers or manually.
Every modern word processing program can do this, and knowing how to use this function is an important part of university level writing competency. The ‘help’ menu on your word processing software is a good place to start if you’re unsure what to do.
Attached below are PDF documents of Nicomachean Ethics by Aristotle and Meno by Plato. Please use these documents as the sources in this paper.
Please write in size 12 font in Times New Roman.

Prompt
This book deals with themes related to race and experiences within the Civil Rights Movement. Describe and discuss Moody’s relationship with the movement.
How does her racial identity transform through the process of her teens and early twenties? What does her position and relationship with the movement itself towards the end of the memoir suggest about her personal experience?
Does she have the point of view you might expect, at the end? What does this tell us and how can we analyze some of these contradictions?

•What you need to do is to look at
how feminism was portrayed in the book The Secret History of Wonder Woman, (using
examples from the book), and then look at how it is seen today.
•To do this, you will need to make
a PowerPoint presentation, and use
pictures, art, poetry, prose, media, and other elements that portray feminism
then and now. Look at the people then who were involved in feminism,
their goals, their ideals, their methodology, and compare them to those of
today. You need to have at least 10 slides of material, not counting the
title page or work’s cited page. Make sure to cite your sources properly so you
don’t accidentally plagiarize! You can do this by using an end note, and
then providing the information on your works cited page.
•You will also need to answer the
following questions, either in a separate Word document, or within the PP
itself. Each answer needs to consist of at least 1 large paragraph of 8-10
sentences!
•1) Was Marston truly a
feminist? (Argue for or against,
and give specific examples!)
•2) If the ideas behind feminism
have changed over the last 100 years, how have they changed, and why? (If
they haven’t, discuss that as well).

Topic & Thesis
TOPIC: Identify a contemporary conspiracy theory and argue against it. “Contemporary” for our purposes means that the theory must have been hatched or reached the height of its popularity since 2005. For example, STUDENTS MAY NOT WRITE ABOUT: 9/11, Area 51, JFK, Illuminati, Chemtrails, Reptilian Elite, Autism/vaccine conspiracies, water fluoridation, Flat Earth Theory, Moon Landing Hoax, etc.
THESIS should strongly repudiate the conspiracy theory and the purported evidence offered by publications and individuals who have promoted it–via TV, websites, blogs, social media, and other platforms.
See the Sample Student Paper: “9/11 Truthers vs 9/11 Truth” (in Module 1) for a sense of appropriate essay sources, style, tone, format, and citation.
Research Requirements
At least two relevant quotes from Module authors must be integrated into the essay to provide a critical perspective on this theory:
(Kathryn Olmsted’s Real Enemies, https://www.google.com/books/edition/Real_Enemies/ldqRw1ZOCpoC?hl=en&gbpv=1&printsec=frontcover#v=onepage&q&f=false
Richard Hofstadter’s The Paranoid Style in American Politics https://harpers.org/archive/1964/11/the-paranoid-style-in-american-politics/
Zack Stanton, You’re Living in The Golden Age of Conspiracy Theories https://www.politico.com/news/magazine/2020/06/17/conspiracy-theories-pandemic-trump-2020-election-coronavirus-326530
and/or Ali Breland & Sinduja Rangarajan). Often, this is effectively referenced in the essay’s “frame” (title, abstract, introduction and conclusion).1
Five additional, authoritative, sources must be cited to provide background and context for your conspiracy theory, examine the known evidence, and support your arguments against it.
Source Guidance:
Sources may NOT include Wikipedia, a popular dictionary or encyclopedia, or any other general-knowledge outlet such as “Ask.com,” “About.com,” “How Stuff Works,” etc.
No more than one print book may be cited as a source.
Websites and periodicals (newspapers, magazines, blogs) offering in-depth coverage are another good place to start.
Sources may include fringe conspiracy sites to illustrate your theory and identify its promoters, but they should be balanced with reliable counter-arguments in the paper’s analysis.
Google Scholar can be a good search tool to weed out irrelevant and lightweight search results from the broader Internet.
Documentaries can be excellent or sketchy, depending on the expertise and agenda of its creators—scrutinize and verify any claims or images shared from one.
Abstract
An abstract of about 300 words is required on page one and counts towards the essay’s 2000-word minimum. An abstract is a summary of your major arguments and examples to help readers and other researchers quickly determine whether your sources and findings are relevant to their interests.
The abstract is written after the paper is completed. It does NOT replace the paper’s introductory paragraph. Consult this UNC Writing Center handout
(Links to an external site.)
for more information and suggestions on how to write an “informative” abstract.
Preparing & Submitting the Essay
Develop research questions before and during the research process.
Who are this theory’s Paranoid Spokespeople, and why are they pushing this conspiracy theory?
What is their expertise on or relationship to the subject, if any?
What is their evidence and why is it not to be believed?
How do any of the Module 1 writers shed light on this theory or its believers?
Review the Module One Overview on rhetoric and logical fallacies to help you take apart the arguments presented by proponents (optional).
Submit the paper using the last link in Module One. PDF format is best to retain all formatting.
Submitted essays will be automatically scored by Turnitin, software that scans for copied language from online and other sources and assigns a “Plagiarism Score.” Turnitin is not 100% reliable, but it is a helpful tool for you and me to see how closely you are paraphrasing from your sources (or whether you are neglecting to acknowledge them). Students are invited to “pre-submit” a near-final draft to check your Turnitin report and clean up citation before final submission (remember, the most recent version submitted is graded.
Format & Citation Checklist
12-point, professional font, like Times New Roman, Arial, Calibri, Georgia, etc.
1-inch margins on all four sides (warning: Microsoft Word defaults to 1.25” on the sides)
Lines are double-spaced, using one tab at the start of a new paragraph.
No extra line spacing goes between paragraphs, below titles and subtitles, or in-between items on the Works Cited page.
Attribute every quote and information from a source to its author as in-text citations.
Include a Works Cited page at the end, listing all sources that are cited in the paper, alphabetically.

Question: Why should the police be required to advise suspects of their Fifth Amendment rights when police are not required to advise people who consent to searches that they need not give consent? What is the difference? When does Miranda apply? Give examples. Support your position.

Explain the criminal justice process stages from arrest through final appeal. You may use a simple flow chart or you may choose another type of diagram. Then take three of the stages and explain them in detail. Be sure to cite your sources.

The Done Dead Literary Analysis Topics
Choose one topic from this list and write a literary analysis essay of 3—5 pages. You must use at least three direct quotes (however, the essay should be composed of LESS THAN 10% direct quotes) in the essay itself, and you should refer to the text with specific examples and references throughout the essay (end of sentence citation with page number). Your essay must have an introduction that contains a thesis statement, an essay map. Your introduction must also refer to the author and the title of the book. The focus of this essay is a comparison between subjects related to the short stories. You need to focus on at least three comparisons or contrasts.
You need a minimum of an introduction, three body paragraphs, and a conclusion. Remember that this is not a plot summary or a book report. You are focusing on specific aspects of the stories and exploring those particular ideas. DO NOT WRITE THIS LIKE A BOOK REPORT!!!! Your job is not to re-tell the story or to share your feelings about the book itself. You do not need to critique the book in this paper (so sentences like “This was a very interesting story” do not need to be included and will negatively impact your grade). Essays not written on one of the following topics will not be graded. At the top of your page with your heading list the number of the question you are answering. Do NOT use outside sources, only the novel as your source. Additionally, you must give credit for quotes, paraphrases, or ideas that come from the novel by using quote marks and end of sentence citations.
Value: 100 points
Other Guidelines:
1. No first or second person point-of-view (I, you, we, us, our, your, etc.) If you refer to the reader, say “the reader.”
2. Double space, 12 point font, Times New Roman, one inch margins all sides, left justified, page number and last name, and title are all required.
3. Give it a title.
4. Choose either the block or point by point organizational format for this essay.
5. Clear and interesting topic sentences, concluding sentences, transitions throughout.
6. Use proper quotation format. Integrate quotes smoothly into your writing, and cite all quotes with the page number from the book. Remember if you use dialog or a long block quote, you MUST follow those guidelines! See the MLA guide on the library website.
7. This essay should be a MINIMUM of 800 words (around three full pages).
8. Compare or contrast at least three points from the novel. Either compare by showing what is alike, OR contrast by showing what is different, but do not do both.
Topics (You MUST choose one of these):
1. Compare OR contrast how Billie and her Uncle Dee deal with the past.
2. Compare the challenges of Pria and Cliff’s meeting with how interracial couples are accepted or not accepted today (this will be from your own knowledge and the novel, and not outside sources).
3. Compare or contrast Dr. Melvin Hurley’s experience with Cliff’s experience with racism.
4. Compare OR contrast Jim McGhee and his son Harlen.
5. Compare OR contrast Lola with Billie.
6. Compare OR contrast the three male police officers involved with Cliff’s death scene. Comparisons must be based on criteria/similarities that are not “surface” characteristics.
7. Choose one theme shared by each of Billie’s family members and show how each of their stories communicates that common theme. You will compare them.
8. Comment on the role of female characters in the book. Choose three female characters and contrast the negative ways in which they deal with the past.
9. Compare OR contrast Pria (Billie’s mom) to her grandmother, Cliff’s mother. How did their worlds differ or how were they alike?
10. Compare or contrast Carlotta and Cliff. What are three ways they were alike or different?

Respond to ONE of the following sets of questions. Make sure to answer all questions within the set, referring to
the relevant readings and videos.

4. Traister argues that women’s anger has been both dismissed by men in power and used as a catalyst by women to
seek power for themselves. In some cases, this anger is turned toward the culture in order to confront and change
social norms; in others, it is turned toward electoral politics, and creates a kind of determination to run for office;
and in still others, it leads to a do-it-yourself (DIY)-approach to meeting basic needs, regardless of what’s
happening in the wider culture or political world. Citing the relevant course materials discuss the role of anger in
each type of these responses (cultural change, electoral politics, DIY services) and the venues in which they operate.
In what venues or situations is expressed anger more effective at achieving goals and in what cases is it more
effective not to express that anger? Is women’s anger different from men’s anger, politically? As a general matter,
has the role of anger in women’s political activity been under-discussed? Have the concerns of “angry women” been
dismissed?

The reading is below and the video I would like to use as a resource for this essay this is the link for the video below thank you so much.