Construct one deductive and one inductive argument using the correct argument indicator words as we have discussed in Chapter 5.
1. In your own words, explain why your examples are inductive and deductive, respectively (HINT: a good way to do this is by discussing each of the characteristics of these types of arguments listed in Chapter 5 of your textbook)
2. Discuss briefly the connection between the value of truth of the hypothesis (or premises) and the conclusion for each type of argument.
Best Writer
Describe a security threat impacting the United States that is fueled by contemporary globalization.
Describe a security threat impacting the United States that is fueled by contemporary globalization. Explain the role globalization plays in this security threat. Provide at least two probable solutions to address this security threat in today’s highly globalized world.
Explain what the following 3 quotes mean in terms of teaching students with literacy difficulties.
Explain what the following 3 quotes mean in terms of teaching students with literacy difficulties. The
explanation should indicate an understanding of the concepts underlying the quote as well as direct
connection to what this means for literacy instruction, particulary for students with literacy difficulties.
Terminology that MUST be defined within the answers for each quote are highlighted (in bold). The
paper can be divided up by the different quotations. I am going to list the textbook that these quotes
came from and this textbook must be used and I will also list some references for other sources that also
need to be referenced and used.
The textbook is: Multisensory Teaching of Basic Language Skills (4th ed.), 2018; Judith Birsh and Suzanne
Carreker
The 3 quotes were taken from the above mentioned textbook. I will try and download the textbook.
#1 Birsh and Carreker (2018) stated, “Chall explained that the reader who does not attain automaticity in
word recognition is said to be “glued” to the print (1983, p. 17)” (p. 341).
#2 “a test must be reliable to be valid” (Birsh & Carreker, 2018, p. 259).
#3 “Research has shown that phonological deficits separate good readers from poor ones, that deficits
do not go away on their own, and that they can be identified early (Dehaene, 2009; Shaywitz, 2003;
Wolf & Stoodley, 2008)” (Birsh & Carreker, 2018, p. 223).
References:
Stages of Reading Development by J.S. Chall (1983)
Reading in the Brain: The new science of how we read by S. Dehaene (2009)
Overcoming Dyslexia: A New and complete science-based program for reading problems at any
level; by S. E. Shaywitz (2003)
Proust and the Squid: The story and science of the reading brain by M. Wolf & C.J. Stoodley (2008)
Describe how each of dimensions of McDonaldization applies to your organization.
After reading about George Ritzer’s concept of the McDonaldization of society, think of another example (organization) besides the fast food industry where you believe this concept may be applied. Several good examples may be Amazon.com, Walmart, or General Motors.
First, in your own words, explain McDonaldization, including a discussion of the dimensions Ritzer outlines (efficiency, predictability, calculability/quantity, nonhuman technology, control). Please use your organization as an example. Describe how each of dimensions of McDonaldization applies to your organization. Also discuss what might be the advantages and disadvantages of each dimension for the organization
Provide some comments on the significance of McDonaldization for your example. Do you believe McDonaldization makes the organization you observed operate better or not? Why or why not? Define and describe the concept of the “irrationality of rationality” and describe whether or not this concept is seen in your selected organization. Why or why not?
Provide some concluding comments on the significance of McDonaldization in society. How might McDonaldization lead to Marx’s concept of alienation? Describe how the McDonaldization of society may lead to Weber’s concept of the “Iron Cage.” Do you see McDonaldization as a positive in our current society? Why or why not? Is McDonaldization in any way beneficial for your own social experiences?
Discuss how nurse leaders serve as advocates for their employees.
Discuss how nurse leaders serve as advocates for their employees. Describe how advocacy for employees affects patient care and outcomes.
Discuss about the chemical changes in human bodies in the process of aging.
Discuss about the chemical changes in human bodies in the process of aging.
Discuss the ethical guidelines that would need to be implemented when conducting translational research.
Discuss the ethical guidelines that would need to be implemented when conducting translational research. What are the ethical and legal considerations related to translating research into practice? Discuss what steps you would take as a member of a translational research team in order to establish ethical guidelines for conducting translational research
Explain how a research question relates to a specialization area in psychology and to a career vision.
For this assignment, you will write a literature review. Now that you have found resources related to your research question, the next step is to look further into how they relate to each other and shed light on your research question. Not only will you be writing literature reviews in some of your future courses at Capella, but these skills will also help you in your future career in whatever specialization you pursue. For example, as an addictions counselor, you might need to develop a treatment plan that is suited to a particular situation. You will need to turn to the literature to understand what is known and what is not about that situation. Using critical thinking skills, you can find themes and determine what course of action your treatment plan should take. Behavior analysts also rely on the literature to determine evidence-based practices when assessing, setting goals, and developing support plans for clients and students.
Complete the following in your assignment template:
Introduction
State your research question and explain how it relates to your specialization and professional interests.
Synthesis of Literature Into a Cohesive Review
In the preparation study in Week 5, you identified at least three key themes, or focuses of inquiry, that are relevant to your research question and present in each article. These themes may be based on:
Related aspects of research questions.
Related or differing conclusions.
Other factors or ideas the studies have in common.
Other points of contrast between the studies.
Use concise formulations of these themes as headings for the next sections of the paper. In these sections, compare and contrast your resources’ positions relative to each theme, and then synthesize your own position relative to the theme. Support your conclusions by citing your references.
Granello’s 2001 article, “Promoting Cognitive Complexity in Graduate Written Work: Using Bloom’s Taxonomy as a Pedagogical Tool to Improve Literature Reviews,” provides a framework and strategies to help you work through this part of your assignment.
Conclusion
Restate the conclusions you came to regarding the themes you explored with your research. Support your conclusions by citing your references. However, if you find that more research would be needed to decide a question, briefly outline ideas of how you could undertake that research.
Additional Requirements
Written communication: Should be free of errors that detract from the overall message.
APA formatting: References and citations should be formatted according to current APA style and format. Include a title page, abstract, and reference list.
Resources: Minimum of three scholarly resources. All references need to be cited in-text, according to current APA standards. Remember that citations are to support your thoughts, not take the place of them!
Length: 4–5 double-spaced pages, not including the title page or reference page.
Font and font size: Times New Roman, 12-point.
Competencies Measured
By successfully completing this assignment, you will demonstrate your proficiency in the following course competencies and scoring guide criteria:
Competency 1: Analyze the role of the practitioner-scholar model in guiding professional development.
Explain how a research question relates to a specialization area in psychology and to a career vision.
Competency 4: Apply critical thinking and effective decision making.
Identify themes that are relevant to a research question and present in each scholarly resource cited.
Use critical thinking tools to synthesize a cohesive review of literature concerning a research question in psychology.
Competency 5: Communicate in a manner that is scholarly, professional, and consistent with expectations for professionals in the field of psychology.
Apply the standard writing conventions for the discipline, including structure, voice, person, and tone.
Apply APA formatting to in-text citations and references.
Discuss the Plastic Pollution in California and the effects it does to poor people living in California.
Discuss the Plastic Pollution in California and the effects it does to poor people living in California.
Instruction is uploaded as PDF
Write a comparison-contrast essay discussing the differences between the two famous historical figures.
OPTION #2
Write a comparison-contrast essay
discussing the differences between the two famous historical figures.
Focus on specific similarities and differences. Feel free to use
specific examples from different spheres of influences, like music, film
or literature, but be sure that they are analogous. Some things you might want to think about:
What are the backgrounds of the individuals?
Where are they from?
Discuss their achievements and accolades.
What is the public perception of these people?
Objectives
Students will practice different types of invention strategies.
Students will appeal to the emotions of their audience in their own essays.
Students will write effective introductions.
Students will experiment with analytical skills.
Students will practice cause and effect and comparison.
Evaluation Criteria
The most important thing is that you fully use your analytical skills in using the appropriate rhetorical structure.
I will be looking to see how well you appeal to your audience and
how well you stress the logical and emotional aspects of your
association with the person/place. Also, I will be looking for the use
of opening and concluding strategies.
The style will be formal, and I want to see how well you can utilize the standards of American Edited English.
I will be looking to see how well you incorporate cause and effect and comparison into your essay.
I will focus on the quality of your introduction.
I am not looking for grammatical perfection, but the essay must
be readable and free of mechanical errors that distract your reader.
All these criteria will be considered in light of the Gordon Rule Rubric.